최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기생태와 환경 = Korean journal of ecology and environment, v.46 no.2, 2013년, pp.145 - 153
정연숙 (강원대학교 생명과학과) , 이경은 (강원대학교 생명과학과)
It is a global trend that the water management policy is shifting from a water quality-oriented assessment to the aquatic ecosystem-based assessment. The majority of aquatic ecosystem assessment systems were developed solely based on physicochemical factors (e.g., water quality and bed structure) an...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
우리나라 호수생태계는 생물 수용에 왜 좋지 않은가? | 우리나라도 수체를 수생태계로 바라 보는 인식으로 바뀌고 있다. 우리나라 호수생태계는 수자원 공급용으로 축조된 저수지가 대부분이어서 생물을 수용할 물리적 입지가 부적절한 곳이 많다. 뿐만 아니라 물리적 훼손 등 인위적 교란이 증가하여 수질이 좋음에도 불구하고 생물상의 건강성은 낮은 곳이 많다. | |
선진적인 물 관리 정책은 어떻게 바뀌어가는 추세인가? | 사람을 위한 물 공급 측면에서 수질이 매우 중요했을 뿐만 아니라 수체를 생태계로 이해하기보다 물공급원으로 인식해왔기 때문이다. 그러나 선진적인 물 관리 정책은 수질평가 중심에서 수생태계 건강성 평가로 전환되는 추세이다. 미국이나 유럽에서는 수질정책의 기본적인 개념으로 수체의 건강성을 제시하며(Davis and Simon, 1995), 수질기준의 정책 목표 내에 생물 요인들과 관련된 기준을 두고 있다(Kim, 2009). | |
호수 생태계 평가를 위해 다변수법의 적용에 한계점이 있음에도 왜 사용하는가? | 다변수법의 적용은 시간과 비용이 많이 소요되고 변수 간의 상관성 등의 한계점이 있다. 그러나 현재 단일 변수로 쓸 만한 지표가 개발되어 있지 않으며 다변수법은 다면평가와 데이터 축적의 장점이 크다. 다변수법을 세 단계, 즉 평가지표의 선정, 점수화, 평가지수의 결정과 검증단계로 나누어 검토하였다. |
Andreas, B.K. and R.W. Lichvar. 1995. Floristic index for establishing assessment standards: a case study for Northern Ohio. Technical Report WRP-DE-8, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS., USA.
Andreas, B.K., J.J. Mack and J.S. McCormac. 2004. Floristic Quality Assessment Index (FQAI) for vascular plants and mosses for the State of Ohio. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, Wetland Ecology Group, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for Use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water; Washington, D.C., USA.
Brooks, R.P., D.H. Wardrop and J.A. Bishop. 2004. Assessing wetland condition on a watershed basis in the Mid-Atlantic region using synoptic land cover maps. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 94: 9-22.
Calislie, B.K., A.L. Hicks, J.P. Smith, S.R. Garcia and B.G. Largay. 1999. Plants and aquatic invertebrates as indicators of wetland biological integrity in Waquoit Bay watershed, Cape Code. Environmental Cape Code 2: 30-60.
Cardoso, A.C., A.G. Solimini and G. Premazzi. 2005. Report on harmonisation of freshwater biological methods. European Commission.
Cho, Y.-H. 1997. A study on evaluation method of stream naturalness for ecological restoration of stream corridors. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 25(2): 73-81.
Choung, Y., W.T. Lee, K.-H. Cho, K.Y. Joo, B.M. Min, J.-O. Hyun and K.S. Lee. 2012. Categorizing vascular plant species occurring in wetland ecosystems of the Korean Peninsula. Center for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Chuncheon, Korea.
Elifritz, B.F. and M.S. Fennessy. 2005. A comparison of natural and constructed wetlands using the floristic quality assessment index. Annual report. Olentangy River wetland Research Park.
Fennessy, M.S., M. Gray, R.D. Lopez and J. Mack. 1998. An ecological assessment of wetlands using reference sites. Final Report to U.S. EPA, State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ferreira, M.T., P.M. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, F.C. Aguiar and A. Albuquerque. 2005. Assessing biotic integrity Iberian rivers: Development of a multimetric plant index. Ecological Indicators 5: 137-149.
Gernes, M.C. and J.C. Helgen. 1999. Indexes of biotic integrity (IBI) for wetlands: vegetation and invertebrate IMI'. Final Report to U.S. EPA, Assistance number CD995525-01. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul, USA.
Gernes, M.C. and J.C. Helgen. 2002. Indexes of biological integrity (IBI) for large depressional wetlands in Minnesota. Report to U.S. EPA, Assistance number CD-995525-01. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. St. Paul, USA.
Hatzenbeler, G.R., J.M. Kampa, M.J. Jennings and E.E. Emmons. 2004. A comparison of fish and aquatic plant assemblages to assess ecological health of small Wisconsin lakes. Lake and Reservoir Management 20(3): 211-218.
Herman, K.D., L.A. Masters, M.R. Penskar, A.A. Reznicek, G.S. Wilhelm and W.M. Brodowicz. 1997. Floristic quality assessment: development and application in the State of Michigan (USA). Natural Areas Journal 17(3): 265-279.
Herman, K.D., L.A. Masters, M.R. Penskar, A.A. Reznicek, G.S. Wilhelm, W.W. Brodovich and K.P. Gardiner. 2001. Floristic quality assessment with wetland categories and examples of computer applications for the State of Michigan-Revised (2nd). Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife, Natural Heritage Program.
Indiana Department of Natural Resources. 2007. Tier II Aquatic vegetation survey protocol.
Karr, J.R. and D.R. Dudley. 1981. Ecological perspectives on water quality goals. Environmental Management 5: 55-68.
Karr, J.R. and W.E. Chu. 1999. Restoring life in running waters: better biological monitoring. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
Karr, J.R., K.D. Fausch, P.L. Angermeier, P.R. Yant and I.J. Schlosser. 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey. Special Publification 5, Urbana, USA.
Kim, B. 2009. Evaluation of ecological integrity in lake ecosystem (2nd). Center for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Chuncheon, Korea.
Kim, D.-C. and I.-S. Park. 1999. A study on the evaluation criteria of stream naturalness for ecological environment restoration of stream corridors. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 17(3): 123-134.
Ladd, D.M. 1993. Coefficients of conservatism for Missouri vascular flora. The Nature Conservancy. St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Lopez, R.D. and M.S. Fennessy. 2002. Testing the floristic quality assessment index as an indicator of wetland condition. Ecological Application 12: 487-497.
Mack, J.J. 2001a. Vegetation index of biotic integrity (VIBI) for wetlands: ecoregional, hydrogeomorphic, and plant community comparisons with preliminary wetland aquatic life use designations. Final Report to U.S. EPA Grant No. CD985875-01. Vol. 1.
Mack, J.J. 2001b. Ohio rapid assessment method for wetlands. Manual for using version 5.0. Ohio EPA Technical Wetland/2001-1-1. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, 401 Wetland Ecology Unit.
Mack, J.J. 2007. Developing a wetland IBI with statewide application after multiple testing iterations. Ecological Indicators 7: 864-881.
Mack, J.J., M. Micacchion, L.D. Augusta and G.R. Sablak. 2000. Vegetation indices of biotic integrity (VIBI) for wetlands and calibration of the Ohio rapid assessment method for wetlands (ver. 5). Final Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Wetland Ecology Unit.
Miller, S.J., D.H. Wardrop, W.M. Mahaney and R.P. Brooks. 2006. A plant-based index of biological integrity (IBI) for headwater wetland in central Pennsylvania. Ecological Indicators 6: 290-312.
National Institute of Environmental Research. 2010. Summary report of the survey and health assessment for the aquatic ecosystems. National Institute of Environmental Research.
Nichols, S.A. 1998. Floristic quality assessment of Wisconsin lake plant communities with example applications. Journal of Lake and Reservoir Management 15: 133-141.
Nichols, S., S. Weber and B. Shaw. 2000. A proposed aquatic plant community biotic index for Wisconsin lakes. Environmental Management 26(5): 491-502.
Northern Great Plains Floristic Quality Assessment Panel. 2001. Floristic quality assessment for plant communities of North Dakota, South Dakota (excluding the B lack Hills), and adjacent grasslands. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research, Jamestown, North Dakota, USA. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/2001/fqa/.
Oldham, M.J., W.D. Bakowsky and D.A. Sutherland. 1995. Floristic quality assessment system for southern Ontario. Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario, USA.
Penning, W.E., M. Mjelde, B. Dudley, S. Hellsten, J. Hanganu, A. Kolada, M. Van den Berg, S. Poikane, G. Phillips, N. Willby and F. Ecke. 2008. Classifying aquatic macrophytes as indicators of eutrophication in European lakes. Aquatic Ecology 42: 237-251.
Rankin, E.T. 1989. The qualitative habitat evaluation index (QHEI): rationale, methods, and application. Ecological Assessment Section, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, USA.
Rothrock, P.E., T.P. Simon and P.M. Stewart. 2008. Development, calibration, and validation of a littoral zone plant index of biotic integrity (PIBI) for lacustrine wetlands. Ecological Indicators 8: 79-88.
Seo, A. 2012. Classififying wetland plant species as indicators of eutrophication in lakes of Korea. Mater thesis. Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea.
Simon, T.P., P.M. Stewart and P.E. Rothrock. 2001. Development of multimetric indices of biotic integrity for riverine and palustrine wetland plant communities along Southern Lake Michigan. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 4: 293-309.
Swink, F. and G. Wilhelm. 1979. Plants of the Chicago region. Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, USA.
Swink, F. and G. Wilhelm. 1994. Plants of the Chicago region. 4th edition. Indiana Academy of Sciences, Indianapolis, USA.
Taft, J.B., G.S. Wilhelm, D.M. Ladd and L.A. Masters. 1997. Floristic quality assessment for vegetation in Illinois, a method for assessing vegetation integrity. Erigenia 15: 3-95.
U.S. EPA. 1998. Lake and reservoir bioassessment and biocriteria. Technical Guidance Document EPA 841-B-98-007.
U.S. EPA. 2002. Methods for evaluating wetland condition: Developing metrics and indexes of biological integrity. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-822-R-02-016.
Wilcox, D.A., J.E. Meeker, P.L. Hudson, B.J. Armitage, M. Glen Black and D.G. Uzarski. 2002. Hydrologic variability and the application of index of biotic integrity metrics to wetlands: a great lakes evaluation. Wetlands 22(3): 588-615.
Wilhelm, G. and D. Ladd. 1988. Natural areas assessment in the Chicago region. Transactions of the 53rd North American Wildlife & Natural Resources Conference. p. 361-375.
Wilhelm, G.S. and L.A. Masters. 1995. Floristic quality assessment in the Chicago region and application computer programs. Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois.
Wisconsin Floristic Quality Assessment. 2002. http://www.botany.wisc.edu/wisflora/WFQA.html.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.