$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Korea's STEM Research Analysis Based on Publications in the Web of Science, 1968-2012 원문보기

Journal of information science theory and practice : JISTaP, v.2 no.1, 2014년, pp.35 - 47  

Kim, Byungkyu (Information Service Center, Institute of Science and Technology Information) ,  So, Minho (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ,  Choi, Seon-Heui (Information Service Center, Institute of Science and Technology Information)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Korean researchers' scientific outputs are increasing rapidly with the growth of both Korea's economy and industry size. This is the time to analyze the scientific output (STEM area) of Korea over the last 40 years. For this analysis, this study used the SCIE database of Web of Science (WoS), which ...

주제어

#Bibliometrics   #STEM research   #Web of Science   #Korea  

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

제안 방법

  • The objective of the research is first, analysis of citation and subject categories and second, analysis of co-authorship. For this, the collected data was pre-processed to add subject classifications on journals using Leydesdorff and WoS subject categories.
  • However, we focus more on analysis to find out characteristics by subject and co-authorship. Specifically, the objectives of this study are (1) analysis of Korean scholarly publications by citation and subject using the WoS SCIE database, and (2) analysis of co-authorship between Korea and other countries using the WoS SCIE database.
  • The last analysis of this study is the investigation for the ratio of co-authorship with other countries by discipline (14 subject categories). The major disciplines that show a high ratio with other countries are Physics (38%), Environment Sciences (38%), Ecology (49%), and Geoscience (55%).
  • This study analyzes only those journal publications which researchers consider to be the most representative and trustworthy for analyzing Korean researchers’ scientific output in STEM using bibliometric methods during the last 40 years.
  • This study focuses on Korean scholarly publications that are indexed by WoS SCIE and uses all types of documents (articles, editorial materials, letters, news items, corrections, notes, and reviews). Other journals’ publications are not considered.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Abrizah, A., & Wee, M.-C. (2011). Malaysia's Computer Science research productivity based on publications in the WoS, 2000-2010. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1), 109-124. 

  2. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? - A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80. 

    상세보기 crossref

  3. Choi, H.-N., Kim, B.-K., Jung, Y.-I. & Choi, S.-H. (2013). Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 7(1), 1-33. 

    상세보기 crossref

  4. Cho, H.-Y. (2010). A comparative study on researchers' language preference for citing documents in different subject fields. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for Library and Information Science, 21(1), 212-221. 

  5. Choi, S.-H., Kim, B.-K., Kang, M.-Y., You, B.-J., Lee, J., & Park, J.-W. (2011). A study of citing patterns of Korean scientists on Korean journals. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 28(2), 97-115. 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  6. Choi, S.-H., & Kim, B.-K. (2013). Study on automatic subject classification of Korean Journals using citation index databases. International Conference on Convergence Content 2013, Japan. 

  7. Choi, S.-K. (1996). Comparative study on citation analysis in the field of mechanical engineering in Korea and Japan. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 13(2), 121-142. 

  8. Fu, H.-Z., & Ho, Y.-S. (2013). Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980-2011. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 210-222. 

    상세보기 crossref

  9. Fukui, T., & Rahman, M. (2002). Contribution of research in basic and clinical sciences in Japan. Internal Medicine, 41(8), 626-628. 

    상세보기 crossref

  10. Kim, B.-K., Kang, M.-Y., Choi, S.-H., Kim, S.-Y., You, B.-J. & Shin, J.-D. (2011). Citing behavior of Korean scientists on foreign journals in KSCD. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 28(2), 117-133. 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  11. Kim, M.-J. (2001). A bibliometric analysis of physics publications in Korea 1994-1998. Scientometrics, 50, 503-521. 

    상세보기 crossref

  12. Kim, M.-J. (2005). Korean science and international collaboration, 1995-2000. Scientometrics, 63(2), 321-339. 

    상세보기 crossref

  13. Kim, W.-J., Noh, K.-R., Park, M.-S. & Choi, H.-K. (2011). 2010 SCI analysis research of Korean researchers. KISTI Knowledge Report, 16. 

  14. Kim, W.-J. (2012). A study on the factors influencing citation speed and citation frequency of scientific articles using bibliometric analysis in South Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(4), 285-306. 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  15. King, C., & Pendlebury, D.A. (2013). Web of Knowledge research fronts 2013: 100 top-ranked specialties in the sciences and social sciences. Thomson Reuters. 

  16. Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contribution of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometric, 63(3), 617-630. 

    상세보기 crossref

  17. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362. 

    상세보기 crossref

  18. National Science & Technology Commission (2011). SCI Analysis Research. 

  19. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105-2125. 

    상세보기 crossref

  20. Marshakova-Shaikevich, I. (2006). Scientific collaboration of new 10 EU countries in the field of social sciences. Information Processing and Management, 42(6), 1592-1598. 

    상세보기 crossref

  21. Thomson Reuters (2008). A guide to evaluating research performance with citation data. 

  22. Van Leeuwen, T. N., Costas, R., Calero-Medina, C., & Visser, M. S. (2013). The role of editorial material in bibliometric research performance assessments. Scientometrics, 95(2), 817-828. 

    상세보기 crossref

  23. Yang, K.-D., & Lee, J.-W. (2012). Comparative analysis of citation indexes in Korea. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on WIS (pp. 756-762), Seoul: KISTI. 

  24. Zhang, H., & Zhang, Y. (1997). Scientometric study on research performance in China. Information Processing and Management, 33(1), 81-89. 

    상세보기 crossref

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로