최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기정보관리학회지 = Journal of the Korean society for information management, v.32 no.4 = no.98, 2015년, pp.249 - 272
유소영 (한남대학교 문헌정보학과) , 이재윤 (명지대학교 문헌정보학과) , 정은경 (이화여자대학교 문헌정보학과) , 이보람 (이화여자대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과)
Inappropriate applications of bibliometric approach and misinterpretation on the analysis in research evaluation have been found and recognized nationally and internationally as the use of the approach has been rapidly adopted in various sectors in research evaluation systems and research funding ag...
고영만, 조수련, 박지영 (2013). 학술지의 피인용횟수 순위를 적용한 tapered h-지수의 변형지표 "Kor-hT"에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 30(4), 111-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.111 Ko, Young Man, Cho, Soo-Ryun, & Park, Ji Young (2013). A study on the "Kor-hT", a modified tapered h-index, by applying the ranking according to the number of citations of journals in evaluating Korean journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 111-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.111
김판준 (2011). 연구 성과평가와 연구정보서비스의 연계를 위한 기초 연구: 과학기술 분야 연구개발사업을 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 28(4), 243-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.243 Kim, Pan Jun (2011). A study on framework for linkage of research performance evaluation and research information service. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 243-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.243
김판준, 이재윤 (2010). 학술지 영향력 측정을 위한 h-지수의 응용에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(1), 269-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.269 Kim, Pan-Jun, & Lee, Jae Yun (2010). A study on journal impact measurement with Hirsch-type indices. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(1), 269-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.269
설혜심 (2011). 학문의 분화와 통섭. 학림, 32, 91-124. Seol, Hyesim (2011). Differentiation and consilience of disciplines. Hak-Lim, 32, 91-124.
이재윤 (2011b). 인용 네트워크 분석에 근거한 문헌 인용 지수 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 45(2), 119-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.2.119 Lee, Jae Yun (2011b). A study on document citation indicators based on citation network analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 45(2), 119-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.2.119
이종욱, 양기덕 (2011). 교수연구업적 평가법의 계량적 분석: 국내 문헌정보학과 교수연구업적을 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 28(4), 119-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.119 Lee, Jongwook, & Yang, Kiduk (2011). A bibliometric analysis of faculty research performance assessment methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 119-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.119
조은성, 송재도 (2011). 국내외 마케팅 학술지의 영향력: Kor-Factor와 Impact Factor의 문제점을 중심으로. 마케팅관리연구, 16(2), 53-82. Cho, Eun Seong, & Song, Jae Do (2011). The influence of Korean and international marketing journals: Focused on the problems of Kor-Factor and Impact Factor. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 16(2), 53-82.
중앙일보 대학평가. [2015.11.10]. Retrieved from http://univ.joongang.co.kr/ Joongangilbo University Rank. [2015.11.10]. Retrieved from http://univ.joongang.co.kr/
한국정보과학회 (2013). 컴퓨터 분야 성과지표 개선(안). 한국정보과학회. Retrieved from http://an.kaist.ac.kr/-sbmoon/tmp/kiisereport.pdf KIISE (2013). Improvement plan of research performance measures in computer science. KIISE. Retrieved from http://an.kaist.ac.kr/-sbmoon/tmp/kiisereport.pdf
Astrom, F., & Hansson, J. (2013). How implementation of bibliometric practice affects the role of academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 45(4), 316-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000612456867
Ball, R., & Tunger, D. (2006). Bibliometric analysis: A new business area for information professionals in libraries? Scientometrics, 66(3), 561-577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0041-0
Butler-Adam, J. (2013). DORA: The San Francisco declaration on research assessment. South African Journal of Science, 109(7/8), 1-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/sajs.2013/a0032
Cagan, R. (2013). The San Francisco declaration on research assessment. Disease Models & Mechanisms, 6(4), 869-870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.012955
Garfield, E. (2009). From information retrieval to scientometrics-is the dog still wagging its tail. Keynote Address at WIS & COLLNET. Retrieved from http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/dalianchina2009.html
Grant Steen, R. (2013). Journal impact factor: Baby and bathwater discarded? European Science Editing, 39(3), 64-65.
Hagen, N. T. (2008). Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: Source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis. PLoS ONE, 3(12), e4021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004021
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429-431. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/bibliometrics-the-leiden-manifesto-for-research-metrics-1.17351
Hoppeler, H. (2013). The San Francisco declaration on research assessment. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 216(Pt 12), 2163-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.090779
IEEE (2013). Appropriate use of bibliometric indicators for the assessment of journals, research proposals, and individuals. Retrieved from https://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/ieee_bibliometric_statement_sept_2013.pdf
King, J. (1987). A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 13(5), 261-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555158701300501
Jimenez-Contreras, E., Lopez-Cozar, E. D., Ruiz-Perez, R., & Fernandez, V. M. (2002). Impactfactor rewards affect Spanish research, Nature, 417 (27 June 2002), 898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/417898b
Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2012). Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(9), 1901-1902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22641
Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 256-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002
Pourquie, O. (2013). The San Francisco declaration on research assessment. Development (Cambridge, England), 140(13), 2643-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.099234
Pendlebury, D. A. (2009). The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 57(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00005-009-0008-y
Pendlebury, D. A. (2010). Using bibliometrics in evaluating research. Retrieved from https://services.anu.edu.au/files/system/Pendlebury_White_Paper.pdf
Pugh, E. N., & Gordon, S. E. (2013). Embracing the principles of the san francisco declaration of research assessment: Robert Balaban's editorial. The Journal of General Physiology, 142(3), 175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201311077
Schekman, R., & Patterson, M. (2013). Reforming research assessment. eLife, 2(2), e00855. http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00855
Schubert, A. (2009). Using the h-index for assessing single publications. Scientometrics, 78(3), 559-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2208-3
Servaes, J. (2014). On impact factors and research assessment. At the start of volume 31 of telematics and informatics. Telematics and Informatics, 31(1), 1-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.09.005
Thomson Reuters (2008). Using bibliometrics: A guide to evaluating research performance with citation data. Retrieved from http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/325133_thomson.pdf
Way, M., & Ahmad, S. A. (2013). The San Francisco declaration on research assessment. Journal of Cell Science, 126(Pt 9), 1903-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.134460
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.