최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기정보시스템연구 = The Journal of information systems, v.24 no.4, 2015년, pp.83 - 97
이웅규 (대구대학교 경영학과) , 박진훈 (대구대학교 경영학과)
Purpose: Traditionally, information technology acceptance have been considered one of the most important research issues. However non-acceptance, which was main objective of acceptance theories, have not been included in main research area by communities of information systems. This study is to iden...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
비수용이란 무엇인가? | 이와 같이 다양한 연구가 진행되었음에도 불구하고 정보기술을 수용하지 않는 현상 즉, 비수용(non-acceptance)을 설명하려는 시도는 정보기술 수용에 관한 연구에 비해 아직까지 상대적으로 적은 편이다. 사실 정보기술 수용이론의 개발의 중요한 배경 가운데 하나는 주어진 정보기술을 수용하지 않는 현상에 대한 문제인식에서부터 출발한다. | |
기술수용모형은 논란이 있음에도 불구하고 아직까지 어떠한 연구모형으로 간주되고 있는가? | , 1989), 혁신확산이론(innovation diffusion theory) (Moore and Benbasat, 1991), 이성적행동이론(theory of reasoned action, 이하 TRA) (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975)또는 계획된행동이론(theory of planned behavior, 이하 TPB) (Taylor and Todd, 1995) 등이 그 대표적인 예다. 특히 TAM의 경우에는 여러 가지 논란이 있음에도 불구하고 아직까지도 새로운 환경이나 새로운 정보기술 수용을 설명하는 중요한 연구모형으로 간주되고 있다. | |
비수용이 빈도나 정도를 측정하기 쉽지 않은 이유는 무엇인가? | 가령 기존 연구에서 대부분 수용의 정도로 채택되고 있는 사용 의도는 계량적 접근이 가능한 구간척도(interval scale)에 의해 측정되고 있다. 하지만 비수용은 일종의 상태(state of being)이기 때문에 빈도나 정도를 측정하기 쉽지 않다. 그렇기 때문에 비수용은 단순히 분류만 가능한 명목척도(nominal scale)에 의존할 수밖에 없다. |
이웅규, "비사용의 연구 주제와 연구 방법론," 정보시스템연구, 제24권, 제3호, 2015, pp. 155-169.
Abraham, C., Boudreau, M. C., Junglas, I., and Watson, R., "Enriching our theoretical repertoire: the role of evolutionary psychology in technology acceptance," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 22, 2013, pp. 56-75.
Bhattacherjee, A., and Hikmet, N., "Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 16, NO. 4, 2007, pp. 725-737.
Bhattacherjee, A., and Park, S. C., "Why end-users move to the cloud: a migration-theoretic analysis," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2014, pp. 357-372.
Benbasat, I., and Barki, H., "Quo vadis TAM?" Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2007, pp. 211-218.
Bazerman, M. H., and Moore, D. A., Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, 2008, John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Birks, D. F., Fernandez, W., Levina, N., and Nasirin, S., "Grounded theory method in information systems research: its nature, diversity and opportunities.," European Journal of Information systems, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2013, pp. 1-8.
Cenfetelli, R. T., "Inhibitors and enablers as dual factor concepts in technology usage," Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 11, 2004, pp. 472-493.
Cenfetelli, R. T., and Schwarz, A., "Identifying and testing the inhibitors of technology usage intentions," Information Systems Research, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2011, pp. 808-823.
Charmaz, K., Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis (Introducing Qualitative methods series), 2014, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Davis, F. D., "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1989, pp. 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R., "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models," Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, 1989, pp. 982-1003.
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, 1975.
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach, Taylor & Francis, 2011.
Hirscheim, R., "Introduction to the special issue on 'Quo vadis TAM-Issues and reflections on technology acceptance research," Journal of the Association of Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2007, pp. 203-205.
Joshi, K., "A model of users' perspective on change: the case of information systems technology implementation", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1991, 229-242.
Kahneman, D., A "perspective on judgement and choice: mapping bounded rationality," American Psychologist, Vol. 58, No. 9, 2003, pp. 697-720.
Kim, H. W., and Kankanhali, A., "Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2009, pp. 567-582.
Klein, S., & Myers, M., "A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems," MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 1999, 67-93.
Lapointe, L., & Rivard, S., "A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2005, 461-491.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., and Larsen, K. R. T., "The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future," Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 50, 2003, 752-780.
Lee, E. J., Kwon, K. N., and Schumann, D. W., "Segmenting the non-adopter category in the diffusion of internet banking," International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2005, pp. 414-437.
Markus, M. L., "Power, politics, and MIS implementation," Communication of the ACM, Vol. 26, No. 6, 1983, pp. 430-444.
Marakas, G. M., & Hornik, S., "Passive resistance misuse: overt support and covert recalcitrance in IS implementation", European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1996, pp. 208-219.
Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I., "Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology behavior," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1991, pp. 192-222.
Nelson, K., M, Nadkarni, S., Narayanan, V. K., and Ghods, M., "Understanding software operations support expertise: A revealed causal mapping approach," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2000, pp. 475-507.
Ozdemir, S., and Trott, P., "Exploring the adoption of a service innovation: A study of Internet banking adopters and non-adopters," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Vol. 13, NO. 4, 2009, pp. 284-299.
Polites, G. L., and Karahanna, E., "Shackled to the status quo: the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2012, pp. 21-42.
Silva, L., "Post-positivist review of technology acceptance model," Journal of the Association of Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2007, pp. 255-266.
Stanovich, K. E., and West, R. F., "Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate," Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 23, 2000, pp. 645-665.
Strauss, A. L., and Corbin, J., Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (2nd ed.), 1998, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A., "Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models," Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1995, pp. 144-176.
Urquhart, C., "Theory in social psychology: seeing the forest and the trees," Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2001, pp. 193-200.
Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., and Myers, M, D., "Putting the 'theory' back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems," Information Systems Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2010, pp. 357-381.
Venkatesh, V., and Bala, H., "Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions," Decision Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2008, pp. 273-315.
Venkatesh, V., and Brown, S., "A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges," MIS Quarterly , Vol. 25, No. 1, 2001, pp. 71-102.
Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D., "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies," Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2000, pp. 186-204.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.