질의응답

참고문헌 (61)

1. 강미정(2007). C. S. 퍼스의 기호학 연구 : 신미술사의 철학을 위하여. 미출판 박사학위논문, 서울대학교, 서울. 

2. 권용주, 정진수, 박윤복, 강민정(2003). 선언적 과학 지식의 생성 과정에 대한 과학철학적 연구: 귀납적, 귀추적, 연역적 과정을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 23(3), 215-228. 

   원문보기 상세보기

3. 김성도(1997). 기호와 추론 : 퍼스의 가추법을 중심으로. 기호학연구, 3(1), 351-379. 

4. 김성도(1998). 가추법의 화용론적 함의. 담화와 인지, 5(2), 23-40. 

   상세보기

5. 김선희, 이종희(2002). 수학적 추론으로서의 가추법. 수학교육학연구, 12(2), 275-290. 

   원문보기 상세보기

6. 김선희(2004). 수학적 지식 점유에 관한 기호학적 고찰. 미출판 박사학위논문, 이화여자대학교, 서울. 

7. 김선희, 김기연(2004). 수학적 모델링 과정에 포함된 추론의 유형 및 역할 분석. 학교수학, 6(3), 283-299. 

   원문보기 상세보기

8. 김원경, 문소영, 변지영(2006). 수학교사의 확률과 통계에 대한 지식과 신념. 수학교육, 45(4), 381-406. 

9. 김정섭, 박수홍(2002). 지식 창출을 위한 논리로서 가추법과 교수설계 적용을 위한 탐색. 교육공학연구, 18(4), 139-165. 

10. 남주현(2007). 초.중등 통계교육을 위한 통계적 방법론에 대한 연구. 미출판 박사학위논문, 이화여자대학교, 서울. 

11. 양은경, 신재홍(2014). 개방형 기하 문제에서 학생의 드래깅 활동을 통해 나타난 수학적 추론 분석. 수학교육학연구, 24(1), 1-27. 

    원문보기 상세보기

12. 신보미, 이경화(2006). 컴퓨터 시뮬레이션을 통한 통계적 확률 지도에 대한 연구. 수학교육학연구, 16(2), 139-156. 

    원문보기 상세보기

13. 이병덕(2008). 논리적 추론과 증명. 서울: 이제이북스. 

14. 이영하, 이은호(2010). 통계적 추론에서의 표집분포 개념 지도를 위한 시뮬레이션 소프트웨어 설계 및 구현. 학교수학, 12(3), 273-299. 

    원문보기 상세보기

15. 이영하, 강민정(2013). 교과서 문제해결에 포함된 가추의 유형: 중학교 2학년과 3학년 수학 교과서를 중심으로. 수학교육학연구, 23(3), 335-351. 

    원문보기 상세보기

16. 이정연, 우정호(2009). 조건부확률 개념의 교수학적 분석과 이해 분석. 수학교육학연구, 19(2), 233-256. 

    원문보기 상세보기

17. 전영삼(1990). 피셔의 우도와 카르납의 확증도. 철학연구, 14(1), 87-119. 

18. 정용재, 송진웅(2006). Peirce의 귀추법에 관한 이론적 고찰을 통한 과학교육적 함의 탐색. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(6), 703-722. 

    원문보기 상세보기

19. Bakker, A. (2004). Design research in statistics education on symbolizing and computer tools. Freudenthal Institute. 

20. Ben-Zvi, D., & Arcavi, A. (2001). Junior high school students' construction of global views of data and data representations. Educational studies in mathematics, 45, 35-65. 

    상세보기

21. Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2004). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking: Goals, definitions, and challenges. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 3-16). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

22. Chinn, C., & Anderson, R. (1998). The Structure of Discussions inteded to Promote Reasoning. The Teachers College Record, 100(2), 315-368. 

23. Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2004). Principles of instructional design for supporting the development of students' statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 375-395). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

24. delMas, R. C. (2004). A comparison of mathematical and statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 79-95). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

25. Dinov, I. D., Christou, N., & Gould, R. (2009). Law of large numbers: The theory, applications and technology-based education. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(1), n1. www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v17n1/dinov.html 

26. Eco, U. (1983). Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction. In U. Eco & T. Sebeok (Eds.), The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce (pp. 198-220). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. 

27. Eco, U. (2009). 기호학과 언어 철학. (김성도 번역.). 파주: 열린책들. (원본출판 1984) 

28. Ernest, P. (2005). Agency and creativity in the semiotics of learning mathematics. In M. H. G. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign - Grounding mathematics education (pp. 23-34). New York: Springer. 

29. Furtak, E. M., Hardy, I., Beinbrech, C., Shavelson, R. J., & Shemwell, J. T. (2010). A framework for analyzing evidence-based reasoning in science classroom discourse. Educational Assessment, 15(3-4), 175-196. 

    상세보기

30. GAISE (2005a). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A curriculum framework for PreK-12 statistics education. The American Statistical Association (ASA). Retrieved December 4, 2006, from http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/GAISEPreK-12.htm 

31. GAISE (2005b). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) college report. The American Statistical Association (ASA). Retrieved December 4, 2006, from http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/GAISECollege.htm 

32. Garfield, J. (2002). The Challenge of Developing Statistical Reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3). www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n3/garfield.html 

33. Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Creating statistical reasoning environments. J. Garfield & D. Ben-Zvi. (Eds.), Developing Students Statistical Reasoning: Connecting Research and Teaching Practice (pp. 45-63). New York: Springer. 

34. Groth, R. E., & Bergner, J. A. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptual and procedural knowledge of mean, median, and mode. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1), 37-63. 

    상세보기

35. Harradine, A., Batanero, C., & Rossman, A. (2011). Students and teachers' knowledge of sampling and inference. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics-challenges for teaching and teacher education (pp. 235-246). New York: Springer. 

36. Hoffmann, M, H. G. (2005). Signs as means of discovery. In M. H. G. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign: Grounding mathematics education (pp. 45-56). New York: Springer. 

37. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). " Doing the lesson" or" doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792. 

    상세보기

38. Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 

39. Leavy, A. M. (2006). Using data comparison to support a focus on distribution: Examining preservice teacher's understandings of distribution when engaged in statistical inquiry. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 89-114. 

40. Maloney, J., & Simon, S. (2006). Mapping children's discussions of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1817-1841. 

    상세보기

41. Mason, J. (1996). Abduction at the heart of mathematical being. In E. Gray (Ed.), Thinking about mathematics & Music of the spheres: Papers presented for the inaugural lecture of Professor David Tall (pp. 34-40). Coventry: Mathematics Education Research Centre. 

42. Meyer, M. (2010). Abduction-A logical view for investigating and initiating processes of discovering mathematical coherences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 185-205. 

    상세보기

43. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for schools mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. 

44. Nguyen-Danh (2011). The role of abduction in realizing geometric invariants. In A. Mendez-Vilas (Ed.), Education in a technological world: communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts (pp. 539-547). Badajoz, Spain: FORMATEX. 

45. Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 23-41. 

    상세보기

46. Pedemonte, B., & Reid, D. (2011). The role of abduction in proving processes. Educational studies in mathematics, 76(3), 281-303. 

    상세보기

47. Peirce, C. S. (1931-1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols VII-VIII. B. Arthur (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

48. Peirce, C. S. (1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols I-VI. C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

49. Petty, M. E. (2001). A case study of the abductive reasoning processes of pre-service elementary education students in a role playing setting concerning a mock senate hearing on global climate change. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Information and Learning Company. 

50. Pratt, D. (2005). How do teachers foster students' understanding of probability? In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring Probability in School: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 171-189). NY: Springer. 

51. Reading, C., & Reid, J. (2006). An emerging hierarchy of reasoning about distribution: From a variation perspective. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 46-68. 

52. Rymes, B. (2009). Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. 

53. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 

54. Stohl, H. (2005). Probability in teacher education and development. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 345-366). NY: Springer. 

55. Stohl. H., & Tarr. J. E. (2002). Developing notions of inference using probability simulation tools. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 319-337. 

    상세보기

56. Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press. 

57. Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher's role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516-551. 

    상세보기

58. Weber, K., Maher, C., Powell, A., & Lee, H. S. (2008). Learning opportunities from group discussions: Warrants become the objects of debate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 247-261. 

    상세보기

59. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 

60. Yackel, E. (2001). Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In: M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol 1 (pp. 9-24). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute. 

61. Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher's role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423-440. 

    상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

이윤경 (2) 조정수 (32)

활용도 Top5 논문

더보기

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.