[국내논문]호흡동조전산화단층촬영과 콘빔전산화단층촬영의 팬텀 영상 체적비교 Comparison of Volumes between Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images using Dynamic Phantom원문보기
목 적 : Computerized imaging reference systems 동적팬텀을이용한 cone-beamcomputed tomography(CBCT) 영상과 four-dimensionalcomputed tomography(4DCT) 영상의 체적을 비교분석 하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 동적팬텀 내에 직경 1, 2, 3 cm 노드를 각각 삽입하고, CT simulator와 TruebeamSTx X-ray Imaging system을 이용하여 4DCT 영상과 CBCT 영상을 얻었다. 4DCT 영상은 maximum intensity projection(MIP), minimum intensity projection(MinIP), 그리고 average intensity projection(AVG)영상으로 재구성 하고 노드의 체적은 Eclipse system의 CT ranger tool로 CT number를 설정하여 측정하였다. 결 과 : CBCT를 기준으로 노드1, 2, 3 cm의 체적을 비교하였을 때 4DCT의 MIP는 0.54~2.33, 5.16~8.06, 9.03~20.11 ml, MinIP는 0.00~1.48, 0.00~8.47, 1.42~24.85 ml, AVG는 0.00~1.17, 0.00~2.19, 0.04~3.35 ml의 차이를 보였다. 결 론 : 노드의 체적을 비교한 결과 CBCT 영상은 4DCT의 AVG 영상과 유사한 것으로 확인되었다.
목 적 : Computerized imaging reference systems 동적팬텀을이용한 cone-beamcomputed tomography(CBCT) 영상과 four-dimensionalcomputed tomography(4DCT) 영상의 체적을 비교분석 하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 동적팬텀 내에 직경 1, 2, 3 cm 노드를 각각 삽입하고, CT simulator와 TruebeamSTx X-ray Imaging system을 이용하여 4DCT 영상과 CBCT 영상을 얻었다. 4DCT 영상은 maximum intensity projection(MIP), minimum intensity projection(MinIP), 그리고 average intensity projection(AVG)영상으로 재구성 하고 노드의 체적은 Eclipse system의 CT ranger tool로 CT number를 설정하여 측정하였다. 결 과 : CBCT를 기준으로 노드1, 2, 3 cm의 체적을 비교하였을 때 4DCT의 MIP는 0.54~2.33, 5.16~8.06, 9.03~20.11 ml, MinIP는 0.00~1.48, 0.00~8.47, 1.42~24.85 ml, AVG는 0.00~1.17, 0.00~2.19, 0.04~3.35 ml의 차이를 보였다. 결 론 : 노드의 체적을 비교한 결과 CBCT 영상은 4DCT의 AVG 영상과 유사한 것으로 확인되었다.
Purpose : The aim of this study was to compare the differences between the volumes acquired with four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)images with a reconstruction image-filtering algorithm and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with dynamic phantom. Materials and Methods : The 4DCT im...
Purpose : The aim of this study was to compare the differences between the volumes acquired with four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)images with a reconstruction image-filtering algorithm and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with dynamic phantom. Materials and Methods : The 4DCT images were obtained from the computerized imaging reference systems (CIRS) phantom using a computed tomography (CT) simulator. We analyzed the volumes for maximum intensity projection (MIP), minimum intensity projection (MinIP) and average intensity projection (AVG) of the images obtained with the 4DCT scanner against those acquired from CBCT images with CT ranger tools. Results : Difference in volume for node of 1, 2 and 3 cm between CBCT and 4DCT was 0.54~2.33, 5.16~8.06, 9.03~20.11 ml in MIP, respectively, 0.00~1.48, 0.00~8.47, 1.42~24.85 ml in MinIP, respectively and 0.00~1.17, 0.00~2.19, 0.04~3.35 ml in AVG, respectively. Conclusion : After a comparative analysis of the volumes for each nodal size, it was apparent that the CBCT images were similar to the AVG images acquired using 4DCT.
Purpose : The aim of this study was to compare the differences between the volumes acquired with four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)images with a reconstruction image-filtering algorithm and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with dynamic phantom. Materials and Methods : The 4DCT images were obtained from the computerized imaging reference systems (CIRS) phantom using a computed tomography (CT) simulator. We analyzed the volumes for maximum intensity projection (MIP), minimum intensity projection (MinIP) and average intensity projection (AVG) of the images obtained with the 4DCT scanner against those acquired from CBCT images with CT ranger tools. Results : Difference in volume for node of 1, 2 and 3 cm between CBCT and 4DCT was 0.54~2.33, 5.16~8.06, 9.03~20.11 ml in MIP, respectively, 0.00~1.48, 0.00~8.47, 1.42~24.85 ml in MinIP, respectively and 0.00~1.17, 0.00~2.19, 0.04~3.35 ml in AVG, respectively. Conclusion : After a comparative analysis of the volumes for each nodal size, it was apparent that the CBCT images were similar to the AVG images acquired using 4DCT.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
제안 방법
In this study, we compared volumes of each images acquired from the reconstruction image-filtering algorithm of 4DCT and CBCT with the dynamic phantom system.
0, Varian, Palo Alto, USA) system. We analyzed with the CT ranger tool and used comparative measuring the volumes by doing auto contouring after establishing the region of interest (ROI) on node and changing the number of ranges into in order of 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400 and 1500 (Fig. 3).
After comparing the volumes in both stationary and moving states, we found that the volumes increased as the range widened. We compared both states for the values of MIP, MinIP, AVG and CBCT with the change in the range of values and we were able to confirm that the AVG volumes were similar to those on CBCT.
There was a limitation about CIRS phantom with problems such as variations in breathing pattern, period and the amplitude of the respiratory cycle in this study. However, in this study with CIRS phantom, CBCT images were similar to AVG images of 4DCT.
이론/모형
We reconstructed the images with the following parameters: maximum intensity projection (MIP), minimum intensity projection (MinIP) and average intensity projection (AVG) images. The image-filtering algorithm of the CT simulator and the extracted Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine files (DICOM) were used to accomplish this task (Fig. 1).
We analyzed the images by using the values of MIP, MinIP and AVG, which were derived from the image-filtering algorithm of the CT simulator. The volumes were acquired from the CBCT images using the Eclipse CT ranger tool (Version 11.
We compared the volumes acquired from the 4DCT and CBCT images in the moving state, using the reconstruction image-filtering algorithm. In range 800, the volumes for a nodal size of 1 cm were 1.
참고문헌 (16)
Underberg RW, Lagerwaard FJ, Cuijpers JP, Slotman BJ, vanSornsendeKoste JR, Senan S: Four-dimensional CT scans for treatment planning in stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer. Int J RadiatOncolBiol Phys. 2004;60:1283-1290
Keall PJ, Mageras GS, Balter JM, et al.: The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology. Report of AAPM Task Group 76. Med Phys 2006;33:3874-3900
Vedam SS, Keall PJ, Kini VR, Mostafavi H, Shukla HP, Mohan R: Acquiring a four-dimensional computed tomography data set using an external respiratory signal. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:45-62
Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, Wong JW,Martinez AA: Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. Int J RadiatOncolBiol Phys. 2002;53:1337-1349
Lagerwaard FJ, Van Sornsen de Koste JR, Nijssen- Visser MR, et al.: Multiple "Slow"CT Scans for Incorporating Lung Tumor Mobility in Radiotherapy Planning. Int J RadiatOncolBiol Phys. 2001;51:932-937
Godfrey D, Yin F, Wang Z, Yoo S, Oldham M, Willett C: Rapid low-dose 3D image-guided treatment verification of sites prone to respiratory motion using breath-hold on-board digital tomosynthesis (DTS). Med Phys 2006;33:2268
Wang Z, Yin F, Marks L, Wu Q, Yoo S, Willett C: Intra- and Inter-breath-hold Position Variations for OBI Guided Amplitude Gating Treatment with Breath Hold. Med Phys 2006;33:2040
Yin F, Marks L, Wang Z, et al.: A technique for conebeam CT guided stereotactic body radiation therapy. Med Phys 2006;33:2063
Wang Z, Wu QJ, Marks LB, Larrier N, Yin FF: Conebeam CT localization of internal target volumes for stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung lesions. Int J RadiatOncolBiol Phys. 2007;69:1618-1624
Li H, Zhu XR, Zhang L, et al.: Comparison of 2D radiographic images and 3D cone beam computed tomography for positioning head-and-neck radiotherapy patients. Int J RadiatOncolBiol Phys. 2008;71:916-925
Heinzerling JH, Anderson JF, Papiez L, et al.: Four-Dimensional computed tomography scan analysis of tumor and organ motion at varying level of abdominal compression during stereotaxic treatment of lung and liver. Int J RadiatOncolBiol Phys. 2008;70:1571-1578
Wunderink W, Romero AM, Osorio EM, Boer HC, Levendag PC, Heijmen BJ: Target coverage in imageguided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumors. Int J RadiatOncolBiol Phys. 2007;68:282-290
Matney J, Vedam S,Dong L, et al.: Is average CT a good estimate of mid-ventilation position of surrounding normal structures for proton therapy treatment planning of lung tumors?. Phys Med Biol. 2009;36:2710
이 논문을 인용한 문헌
저자의 다른 논문 :
활용도 분석정보
상세보기
다운로드
내보내기
활용도 Top5 논문
해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다. 더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.