최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기Journal of dental rehabilitation and applied science = 구강회복응용과학지, v.32 no.4, 2016년, pp.263 - 273
이영훈 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) , 고경호 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) , 허윤혁 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) , 박찬진 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) , 조리라 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
In the implant prosthetic procedure, the soft tissue reaction was varied with the material and surface treatment of the abutment. It may be the cause of the peri-implantitis, and hence it can affect the long-term prognosis of the implant prosthesis. Titania and zirconia abutment presented superior b...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
임플란트 주위 연조직은 치아 주위 치주 조직에 비해 어떤 점이 취약한가? | 임플란트 주위 연조직은 치아주위 치주조직에 비해 박테리아의 축적에 상대적으로 취약할 뿐 아니라, 기계적인 과부하, 보철적인 요인 등에 의해서도 영향을 받게 된다. 연조직 부착의 질을 결정하는 지대주의 표면 요인인 표면의 화학적 특성과 표면에너지 및 표면형태(topography) 등도 생체적합성에 영향을 준다. | |
임플란트 지대주의 재료 중 지르코니아의 장점은 무엇인가? | 티타늄 산화막에 의한 보호작용으로 부식에 높은 저항성을 가져 체내에서 안정적으로 사용할 수 있다. 지르코니아는 티타늄보다 우수한 생체친화성을 가지며 생체불활성 소재로 체내에서 독성이나 염증반응을 일으키지 않으며 부식이나 변색에 대한 저항성이 매우 높다. 이러한 지르코니아를 이용한 지대주는 재료 자체의 안정성뿐만 아니라 자연치아와 유사한 색상으로 기존의 금속 지대주를 사용했을 때 발생될 수 있는 치은주위 변색을 막을 수 있어 심미적으로 많은 장점을 지닌다.2 | |
임플란트 주위염이란 무엇인가? | 임플란트 주위염은 감염과 그로 인한 염증반응으로 발생한 임플란트 주위 골소실로 정의한다. 15 임플란트 주위 염에 관여하는 박테리아 종은 자연치의 치주염에 관여하는 박테리아 종과 유사하다고 알려져 있다. |
Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971-3.
Nakamura K, Kanno T, Milleding P, Ortengren U. Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:299-309.
Nothdurft FP, Fontana D, Ruppenthal S, May A, Aktas C, Mehraein Y, Lipp P, Kaestner L. Differential behavior of fibroblasts and epithelial cells on structured implant abutment materials: a comparison of materials and surface topographies. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:1237-49.
Tomasi C, Tessarolo F, Caola I, Wennstrom J, Nollo G, Berglundh T. Morphogenesis of peri-implant mucosa revisited: an experimental study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:997-1003.
Buser D, Weber HP, Donath K, Fiorellini JP, Paquette DW, Williams RC. Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs. J Periodontol 1992;63:225-35.
Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:81-90.
Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz PO, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:721-7.
Abrahamsson I, Cardaropoli G. Peri-implant hard and soft tissue integration to dental implants made of titanium and gold. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:269-74.
Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:635-41.
van Brakel R, Meijer GJ, Verhoeven JW, Jansen J, de Putter C, Cune MS. Soft tissue response to zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo within-subject comparison. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:995-1001.
Nothdurft FP, Fontana D, Ruppenthal S, May A, Aktas C, Mehraein Y, Lipp P, Kaestner L. Differential behavior of fibroblasts and epithelial cells on structured implant abutment materials: a comparison of materials and surface topographies. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:1237-49.
Kim YS, Ko Y, Kye SB, Yang SM. Human gingival fibroblast (HGF-1) attachment and proliferation on several abutment materials with various colors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:969-75.
Rutkunas V, Bukelskiene V, Sabaliauskas V, Balciunas E, Malinauskas M, Baltriukiene D. Assessment of human gingival fibroblast interaction with dental implant abutment materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2015;26:169.
Lindhe J, Meyle J; Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology. Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35:282-5.
Agerbaek MR, Lang NP, Persson GR. Comparisons of bacterial patterns present at implant and tooth sites in subjects on supportive periodontal therapy. I. Impact of clinical variables, gender and smoking. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:18-24.
Subramani K, Jung RE, Molenberg A, Hammerle CH. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:616-26.
Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004;75:292-6.
van Brakel R, Cune MS, van Winkelhoff AJ, de Putter C, Verhoeven JW, van der Reijden W. Early bacterial colonization and soft tissue health around zirconia and titanium abutments: an in vivo study in man. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:571-7.
Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-69.
Salihoglu U, Boynuegri D, Engin D, Duman AN, Gokalp P, Balos K. Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconium oxide and titanium alloys: an in vivo human study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:101-7.
de Avila ED, Avila-Campos MJ, Vergani CE, Spolidorio DM, Mollo Fde A Jr. Structural and quantitative analysis of a mature anaerobic biofilm on different implant abutment surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:428-36.
Yamane K, Ayukawa Y, Takeshita T, Furuhashi A, Yamashita Y, Koyano K. Bacterial adhesion affinities of various implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:1310-5.
Kim HY, Yeo IS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Kim DJ, Han JS. Initial in vitro bacterial adhesion on dental restorative materials. Int J Artif Organs 2012;35:773-79.
Kim ML, Jeong CM, Jeon YC, Byon E, Jeong Y, Cho LR. The effects of Mg-ion implantation and sandblasting on Porphyromonas gingivalis attachment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:245-52.
Kang SN, Jeong CM, Jeon YC, Byon ES, Jeong YS, Cho LR. Effects of Mg-ion and Ca-ion Implantations on P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum Adhesion. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2014;11:39-46.
Sawase T, Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Albrektsson T, Baba K. Chemical and topographical surface analysis of five different implant abutments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:44-50.
Guida L, Oliva A, Basile MA, Giordano M, Nastri L, Annunziata M. Human gingival fibroblst functions are stimulated by oxidized nano-structured titanium surfaces. J Dent 2013;41:900-7.
Pecora GE, Ceccarelli R, Bonelli M, Alexander H, Ricci JL. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants. Implant Dent 2009;18:57-66.
Nevins M, Kim DM, Jun SH, Guze K, Schupbach P, Nevins ML. Histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to laser microgrooved abutments: a canine study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:245-55.
Li P, Tong Z, Huo L, Yang F, Su W. Antibacterial and biological properties of biofunctionalized nanocomposites on titanium for implant application. J Biomater Appl 2016 ;31:205-14.
Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histomertric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2001;72:1372-83.
Alves CC, Munoz F, Cantalapiedra A, Ramos I, Neves M, Blanco J. Marginal bone and soft tissue behavior following platform switching abutment connection/disconnection-a dog model study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:983-91.
Iglhaut G, Becker K, Golubovic V, Schliephake H, Mihatovic I. The impact of dis-/reconnection of laser microgrooved and machined implant abutments on soft-and hard-tissue healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:391-7.
Farronato D, Santoro G, Canullo L, Botticelli D, Maiorana C, Lang NP. Establishment of the epithelial attachment and connective tissue adaptation to implants installed under the concept of "platform switching": a histologic study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:90-4.
Huh JB, Rheu GB, Kim YS, Jeong CM, Lee JY, Shin SW. Influence of Implant transmucosal design on early peri-implant tissue responses in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:962-8.
Kim S, Oh KC, Han DH, Heo SJ, Ryu IC, Kwon JH, Han CH. Influence of transmucosal designs of three one-piece implant systems on early tissue responses: a histometric study in beagle dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:309-14.
Iglhaut G, Schwarz F, Winter RR, Mihatovic I, Stimmelmayr M, Schliephake H. Epithelial attachment and downgrowth on dental implant abutments-a comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:324-31.
Canullo L, Micarelli C, Lembo-Fazio L, Iannello G, Clementini M. Microscopical and microbiologic characterization of customized titanium abutments after different cleaning procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:328-36.
Canullo L, Penarrocha D, Clementini M, Iannello G, Micarelli C. Impact of plasma of argon cleaning treatment on implant abutments in patients with a history of periodontal disease and thin biotype: radiographic results at 24-month follow-up of a RCT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:8-14.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.