$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

전문연구자의 학문배경에 따른 인용행태에 관한 연구
A Study on the Citation Behavior by Academic Background of Researchers 원문보기

정보관리학회지 = Journal of the Korean society for information management, v.33 no.1 = no.99, 2016년, pp.247 - 268  

오유진 (Chonbuk National University. Department of Library & Information Science) ,  오효정 (Chonbuk National University. Graduate School of Archives and Records Management) ,  김종혁 (Chonbuk National University. Department of English Literature) ,  김용 (Chonbuk National University. Department of Library & Information Science)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

연구주제와 관련된 다양한 자료들 중에서 특정 문헌이 참고문헌으로 선택되어 이용되는 인용과정은 오랫동안 많은 과학자들의 다양한 관점에 따라 연구되어 왔지만 아직까지 인용행태의 본질과 복잡성은 명확히 밝혀지지 않았다. 특히 한국의 경우 인용행태 연구에 있어 서지학적 요인에 대한 통계적 분석 연구방법이 주로 이용되었는데, 이 방법은 인용의 역동적이며 복잡한 인지적 측면을 밝히는데 한계가 있었다. 이에 본 연구는 설문조사를 통해 인용동기와 서지학적 요인에 대한 인용자들의 인식을 직접 알아보고, 응답결과를 인용자 특성에 따라 비교해 보았다. 문헌분석을 통해 22가지 인용동기와 21가지 서지요인을 추출하여 5점 Likert 척도문항을 구성한 뒤, 설문지를 이메일에 첨부하여 배포, 총 354부의 유효표본을 확보하였다. SPSS 22.0을 이용하여 빈도분석, 독립표본 t검정, 일원분산분석을 실시한 결과, 가장 중요하게 고려되는 인용동기는 '주장에 대한 증거제공'이었으며 '사회적 친분관계', '자기인용' 등은 영향력이 거의 없는 것으로 나타났다. 서지요인의 경우, 학술지의 명성이 인용선택에 가장 영향력이 크다고 인지되었으며 페이지수, 저자수, 저자성별의 영향력은 거의 없었다. 또한 전공분야, 연구활동경력에 따라 이러한 인식에 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 연구결과를 통해 선행연구를 실증하고, 인용빈도에 영향력이 크다고 가정되어온 요인들이 의도된 것인지를 확인할 수 있었으며, 전문도서관이나 학술데이터베이스의 검색지점 설정에 제언할 수 있었다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Although it has been a long subject of study why researchers prefer some cited documents to others, the existing relative researches have had a variety of perspectives on the nature and complexity of the citation behavior and not provided a complete answer to this question. In particular, Korea rese...

주제어

참고문헌 (65)

  1. Abt, H. A. (1993). Institutional productivities. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 105, 794-798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/133232 

  2. Ahmed, T., Johnson, B., Oppenheim, C., & Peck, C. (2004). Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited: Part II., The 1953 Watson and Crick article on the structure of DNA. Scientometrics, 61(2), 147-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630290504 

  3. Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: a network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 829-846. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2657504 

  4. Baird, L. M., & Oppenheim, C. (1994). Do citations matter? Journal of Information Science, 20(1), 2-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555159402000102 

  5. Beaver, D. B. (2004). Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics, 60(3), 399-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000034382.85360.cd 

  6. Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: an investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402 

  7. Brooks, T. A. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 34-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630370106 

  8. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150 

  9. Burrell, Q. L. (2003). Predicting future citation behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 372-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10207 

  10. Camacho-Minano, M., & Nunez-Nickel, M. (2009). The multilayered nature of reference selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 754-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21018 

  11. Cano, V. (1989). Citation behavior: classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(4), 284-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198907)40:4 3.0.co;2-z 

  12. Choi, Seon-Heui, Kim, Byung-Kyu, Kang, MuYeong, You, Beom-Jong, Lee, Jongwook, & Park, Jae-Won (2011). A study of citing patterns of Korean scientists on Korean journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(2), 97-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2011.28.2.097 

  13. Chubin, D. E., & Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4), 423-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500403 

  14. Cole, S. (1975). The growth of scientific knowledge: Theories of deviance as a case study. In L. A. Coser(Ed.), The idea of social structure: Papers in honor of Robert K. Merton (pp. 175-220). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 

  15. Cronin, B. (1981). Agreement and divergence on referencing practice. Journal of Information Science, 3(1), 27-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555158100300104 

  16. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham. 

  17. Cullars, J. (1990). Citation characteristics of Italian and Spanish literary monographs. Library Quarterly, 60(1), 337-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/602265 

  18. Frost, C. O. (1989). The literature of online public access catalogs. 1980-85: An analysis of citation patterns. Library Resources and Technical Services, 33(4), 344-357. 

  19. Garfield, E. (1965). Can citation indexing be automated? In M. E. Stevens, V. E. Giuliano, & L. B. Heilprin (Eds.), Statistical association methods for mechanized documentation (pp. 189-192). National Bureau of Standards. 

  20. Garfield, E. (1996). When to cite. Library Quarterly, 66(4), 449-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/602912 

  21. Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 113-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277700700112 

  22. Han, J., & Kwon, S. (2008). Preliminary study on bibliometric citation analysis of the oceanographic journals. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 229-234. 

  23. Hanney, S., Frame, I., Grant, J., Green, P., & Buxton, M. J. (2005). From bench to bedside: Tracing the payback forwards from basic or early clinical research - a preliminary exercise and proposals for a future study. Uxbridge: The Health Economics Research Group. Brunel University. 

  24. Harwood, N. (2009). Citers' use of citees' names: Findings from a qualitative interview-based study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 1007-1011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20789 

  25. Haslam, N., Ban, L., Kaufmann, L., Loughnan, S., Peters, K., Whelan, J., & Wilson., S. (2008). What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics, 76(1), 169-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1892-8 

  26. Hooten, P. A. (1991). Frequency and functional use of cited documents in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(6), 397-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199107)42:6 3.0.co;2-n 

  27. Hurt, C. D. (1985). Methodological citation differences in science, technology and social sciences literature. Library and Information Science Research, 7(4), 345-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(87)90033-1 

  28. Kaplan, N. (1965). The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16(3), 179-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090160305 

  29. Kim, Byung-kyu, Kim, Tae-jung, Kang, Mu-yeong, & You, Beom-jong (2011). A study on adding index terms for improving the retrieval efficiency of the STI database. The Korea Contents Society, 9(1), 293-294. 

  30. Kim, Byung-Kyu, Kang, MuYeong, Choi, Seon-Heui, Kim, Soon-Young, You, Beom-Jong, & Shin, Jae-Do (2011). Citing behavior of Korean scientists on foreign journals in KSCD. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(2), 117-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2011.28.2.117 

  31. Kim, S. (2003). A study on citation analysis of design science literature. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 233-244. 

  32. Kim, Wan-Jong (2012). A study on the factors influencing citation speed and citation frequency of scientific articles using bibliometric analysis in South Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(4), 285-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2012.46.4.285 

  33. Klamer, A., & van Dalen, H. P. (2002). Attention and the art of scientific publishing. Journal of Economic Methodology, 9(3), 289-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350178022000015104 

  34. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 

  35. Lawani, S. M. (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, 9(1), 13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02016604 

  36. Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20(1), 28-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.010 

  37. Liu, M. (1993a). A study of citing motivation of Chinese scientists. Journal of Information Science, 19(1), 13-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555159301900103 

  38. Liu, M. (1993b). Progress in documentation - the complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 370-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb026920 

  39. Macroberts, M. H., & Macroberts, B. R. (1986). Quantitative measures of communication in science: a study of the formal level. Social Studies of Science, 16(1), 151-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631286016001008 

  40. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press. 

  41. Moed, H. F., & Garfield, E. (2004). In basic science the percentage of 'authoritative' references decreases as bibliographies become shorter. Scientometrics, 60(3), 295-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000034375.39385.84 

  42. Moed, H. F., & Vriens, M. (1989). Possible inaccuracies occurring in citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 15(2), 95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/102831538901500205 

  43. Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citation. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500106 

  44. Nam, Young-Joon, Seo, Hyun-Jung, & Kim, Gyu-Hwan (2011). Citing behaviors of researchers in Korea civil engineering. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 201-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2011.28.4.201 

  45. Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 609-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410120 

  46. Peters, H. P. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1994). On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 39-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199401)45:1 3.0.co;2-q 

  47. Prabha, C. G. (1983). Some aspects of citation behavior: A pilot study in business administration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(3), 202-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630340305 

  48. Rabow, H. (2005). The discovery of discoveries: Exploring the dissemination of major findings in the life sciences. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 322-326. 

  49. Rousseau, R. (2000). Are multi-authored articles cited more than single-authored ones? Are collaborations with authors from other countries more cited than collaborations with in the country? A case study. In F. Havemann, R. Wagner-Dobler, & H. Krestschmer, (Eds.), Collaboration in Science and in Technology: Proceedings of the Second Berlin Workshop on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 173-176. 

  50. Shadish, W. R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Sengupta, S. K. (1995). Author judgments about works they cite - three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25(3), 477-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631295025003003 

  51. Sievert, M. E., & Haughawout, M. (1989). An editor's influence on citation patterns: A case study of Elementary School Journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 334-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198909)40:5 3.0.co;2-s 

  52. Snyder, H. W., & Bonzi, S. (1991). Motivations for citation: a comparison of self citation and citation to others. Scientometrics, 21(2), 245-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02017571 

  53. Snyder, H., & Bonzi, S. (1998). Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989). Journal of Information Science, 24(6), 431-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551984232414 

  54. Soper, M. E. (1976). Characteristics and use of personal collections. Library Quarterly, 46(4), 397-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/620584 

  55. Stewart, J. A. (1983). Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles. Social Forces, 62(1), 166-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2578354 

  56. Sweetland, J. H. (1989). Errors in bibliographic citations: A continuing problem. Library Quarterly, 59(4), 291-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/602160 

  57. van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. E. (2005). Demographers and their journals: Who remains uncited after ten years? Population and Development Review, 30, 489-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00025.x 

  58. Vinkler, P. (1987). A quasi-quantitative citation mode. Scientometrics, 12(1-2), 47-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02016689 

  59. Wang, P., & White, M. D. (1996). A qualitative study of scholars' citation behavior. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 33, 255-61. 

  60. Wang, P., & White, M. D. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: contributions, criteria and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly, 67(2), 122-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/629929 

  61. Wang, P., & White, M. D. (1999). A cognitive model of document use during a research project: Study II. Decisions at the reading and citing stages. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 98-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1999)50:2 3.0.co;2-l 

  62. White, H. D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 89-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.89 

  63. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099 

  64. Yeon, S. (2007). Characteristics of public administration journals by citation analysis. Korean Public Management Review, 21(3), 113-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009539979002100404 

  65. Zuckerman, H. (1987). Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence. Scientometrics, 12(5-6), 329-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02016675 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

BRONZE

출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로