다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
정보처리학회지 = Korea information processing society review, v.23 no.5, 2016년, pp.85 - 96
정영임 (한국과학기술정보연구원) , 최선희 (한국과학기술정보연구원) , 장덕현 (부산대학교)
초록이 없습니다.
| 핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
|---|---|---|
| SNIP은 어떻게 고안되었는가? | SNIP은 Leiden 대학의 Henk Moed에 의해 개발된 평가지표로 학문분야별 상대적 지표를 나타낸다. 주제분야의 인용패턴을 고려하고, 논문이 해당 주제 분야에 영향을 미치는 속도, 주제분야 학술지의 커버리지를 고려하며, 편집자의 조작이 지수에 영향을 미치지 못하도록 고안되었다. 서로 다른 분야의 학술지를 비교하는데 강점이 있으며, 동일 분야의 학술지는 IF와 거의 동일한 값을 산출한다는 특징이 있다[11]. | |
| SERUM 프로젝트의 목적은? | · SERUM 프로젝트: 전세계적인 도서관들 사이의 협력 네트워크 구축을 통해 전자자원의 이용기록을 통합하고, 개별 기관의 이용 기록을 타 기관이나 전체 기록과 비교할 수 있게 하며, 적절한 이용 지표와 저널 순위를 산출 하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 총 다운로드 횟수(DT), 저널 이용 지수(JUF), 즉시 다운로드 횟수(DI), 다운로드 반감기(DHL)의 4가지 지표를 저널별로 산출하며, 이를 논문, 리뷰논문, 학술대회 발표논문, 레터, 노트 및 기타의 5가지 유형별로 구분하여 제공한다[22]. | |
| 저널 Impact Factor의 장점은? | 저널 Impact Factor(IF)는 인용에 기반한 지표로 계산이 용이하며 이해하기 쉬워 널리 알려져 있다. 도서관에서 저널 구독을 위한 의사 결정, 원문(full-text) 데이터베이스의 선정과 평가에 사용하기도 하고, 편집자나 출판사가 저널의 학술적 영향력을 측정하기 위해 사용하는 등 상당한 권위를 가진 지표이다. |
Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data in Horizon 2020, European Commission Directorate- General for Research & Innovation, 2016
Be Open to Open Science: Stakeholders Should Prepare for the Future, not Cling to the Past, LIBER, 2016. Available at: http://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/B e-Open-to-Open-Science.pdf
Be Open to Open Science - Libraries Call on All Stakeholders to Play a Constructive Role, IFLA, 2016, Available at: http://www.ifla.org/node/10516
Be Open to Open Science : Stakeholders Should Prepare for the Future, not Cling to the Past EBLIDA,2016. Available at: http://www.eblida.org/news/be-open-to-open-scien ce.html
오픈 사이언스로 대중과 과학을 연결하다., 김승환, 2016. Available at: http://blog.naver.co m/nststory2014/220607120400
Measuring the societal impact of open science, 2:AM Altmetrics and open science, Holmberg, K., 2015. Available at: http://altmetricsconference.com/2am-altmetrics-and-o pen-science/
Nisonger, Thomas E. 2004. "The benefits and drawbacks of impact factor for journal collection management in libraries." The Serials Librarian. 47(1-2): 57-75.
Glanzel, Wolfgang, and Moed, Henk F. 2002. "Journal impact measures in bibliometric research." Scientometrics 53(2): 171-193.
DORA: http://www.ascb.org/dora/
Hirsch, J. E. 2005. "An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46): 16569-16572.
Moed, Henk F. 2010. "Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals." Journal of Informetrics 4(3): 265-277.
Waltman, Ludo, et al. 2013. "Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator." Journal of informetrics 7(2): 272-285.
Guerrero Bote, Vicente P., Borja Gonzalez-Pereira, and Felix de Moya-Anegon. 2009. "The SJR indicator: A new indicator of journals' scientific prestige." ArXiv.
Moed, H. F. 2005. "Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10): 1088-1097.
Schloegl, C., & Gorraiz, J. 2010. "Comparison of citation and usage indicators: the case of oncology journals." Scientometrics, 82(3): 567-580.
Brody, T., Harnad, S., & Carr, L. 2006. "Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8): 1060-1072.
McDonald, J. D. 2007. "Understanding journal usage: A statistical analysis of citation and use." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1): 39-50.
Duy, J., & Vaughan, L. 2006. "Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(5): 512-517.
Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegon, F. (2014). "Relationship between Downloads and Citation and the influence of language." Scientometrics, 101(2): 1043-1065.
CoUNTER: Code of Practice on Journal Usage Factor. https://www.projectcounter.org/
Bollen, J., & Sompel, H. V. D. 2008. "Usage impact factor: the effects of sample characteristics on usagebased impact metrics." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology, 59(1): 136-149.
Schloegl, C., & Gorraiz, J. 2010. "Comparison of citation and usage indicators: the case of oncology journals." Scientometrics, 82(3): 567-580.
Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. 2010. "Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web." First Monday, 15(7).inger 2010;
Galligan and Dyas-Correia 2013
Bornmann, L. 2014. "Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics." Scientometrics, 103(3): 1123-1144.
Wouters, P., & Costas, R. 2012. "Users, Narcissism and Control: Tracking the Impact of Scholarly Publications in the 21st Century." Utrecht, Netherlands: SURF Foundation. research-acumen.eu/wp-content/uploads/Users-narcissism-and-control.
Piwowar, H. 2013. "Introduction altmetrics: What, why and where?." Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4): 8-9.
Hammarfelt, B. 2014. "Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities." Scientometrics, 101(2): 1419-1430.
Mohammadi, E., & Thelwall, M. 2014. "Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8): 1627-1638.
조재인. 2015. "Altmetrics 를 통한 연구의 영향력 평가에 관한 연구." 한국도서관.정보학회지, 46(1): 65-81.
Gumpenberger, C., Glanzel, W. & Gorraiz, 2016. "The ecstasy and the agony of the altmetric score", Scientometrics,108(2):977-982 doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1991-5
Shuai, X., Pepe, A., & Bollen., J. 2012. "How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: Article downloads Twitter mentions, and citations." Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.2461v1.
Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. 2014. "How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of 'alternative metrics' in scientific publications." Scientometrics, 101(2): 1491-1513.
Bornmann, L. 2014. "Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics." Scientometrics, 103(3): 1123-1144.
David Walters, Institutional services and altmetrics as drivers for a cultural transition to open scholarship, 2:AM Altmetrics and open science, 2015. Available at: http://altmetricsconference.com/2am-altmetr ics-and-open-science/
Council of the European Union, The transition towards an Open Science system - Council conclusions (adopted on 27/05/2016), Available at: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/ doc/document/ST-9526-2016-INIT/en/pdf 2016
European Commission, Next-generation altmetrics: responsible metrics and evaluation for open science, Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/p df/call_for_evidence_next_generation_altmetr ics.pdf#viewfit&pagemodenone, 2016.
Altmetric.com: http://www.altmetric.com/
ImpactStory.org: http://www.impactstory.org/
Plum X Metrics: http://plumanalytics.com/
PLoS의 ALM(Article-Level-Metrics): http://arti cle-level-metrics.plos.org/
Youngim Jung, Metadata Schema ver. 1.0 of Korea DOI Center, The 3rd Asian Science Editors' Conference and Workshop 2016,
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.