이 연구에서는 철근콘크리트 기둥의 휨 연성에 대한 보조 띠철근으로서 ACI 318-14에서 제시하는 크로스타이의 대체로서 V-타이 보조 띠철근의 효율성을 평가하였다. 작용 축하중비를 주요 변수로 일정 축하중과 반복 횡하중을 받는 기둥에서 파괴모드 및 횡하중-횡변위 관계를 측정하였다. 기둥의 최대 휨 내력 이후, 크로스타이의 $90^{\circ}$ 갈고리가 서서히 열리면서 주철근의 조기 좌굴 및 코어 콘크리트의 심각한 손상을 동반한 반면, V-타이의 뽑힘 현상은 기둥의 파괴 시까지 나타나지 않았다. 최대 내력의 80% 시점에서 V-타이 기둥의 일손상 지수 값은 크로스타이 기둥에 비해 축력비가 0.25, 0.4 및 0.55일 때 각각 2.4배, 2.3배 및 5.2배 높았다. 즉, 기둥의 휨 연성에 대한 기존 크로스타이 대비 V-타이의 효율성은 축력비가 높을수록 현저하였다.
이 연구에서는 철근콘크리트 기둥의 휨 연성에 대한 보조 띠철근으로서 ACI 318-14에서 제시하는 크로스타이의 대체로서 V-타이 보조 띠철근의 효율성을 평가하였다. 작용 축하중비를 주요 변수로 일정 축하중과 반복 횡하중을 받는 기둥에서 파괴모드 및 횡하중-횡변위 관계를 측정하였다. 기둥의 최대 휨 내력 이후, 크로스타이의 $90^{\circ}$ 갈고리가 서서히 열리면서 주철근의 조기 좌굴 및 코어 콘크리트의 심각한 손상을 동반한 반면, V-타이의 뽑힘 현상은 기둥의 파괴 시까지 나타나지 않았다. 최대 내력의 80% 시점에서 V-타이 기둥의 일손상 지수 값은 크로스타이 기둥에 비해 축력비가 0.25, 0.4 및 0.55일 때 각각 2.4배, 2.3배 및 5.2배 높았다. 즉, 기둥의 휨 연성에 대한 기존 크로스타이 대비 V-타이의 효율성은 축력비가 높을수록 현저하였다.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of V-shaped ties as an alternative to the supplementary crossties specified in ACI 318-14 on the flexural ductility of reinforced concrete columns. From column specimens tested under constant axial loads and reversed cyclic lateral loads, the mode of failure an...
This study evaluated the effectiveness of V-shaped ties as an alternative to the supplementary crossties specified in ACI 318-14 on the flexural ductility of reinforced concrete columns. From column specimens tested under constant axial loads and reversed cyclic lateral loads, the mode of failure and lateral load-lateral displacement relationship were measured according to the variation of the applied axial load levels. After the columns reached the peak lateral load capacity, the $90^{\circ}$ hooks of the crossties gradually opened, which eventually caused premature buckling of the longitudinal reinforcement and severe crushing of the core concrete, whereas no V-ties were extracted from the core concrete until the column failure. As a result, the cumulative work damage indicators up to 80% of the peak lateral load for V-tie columns under the axial load level of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.55 was as much as 2.4, 2.3, and 5.2 times higher, respectively, than those of the companion crosstie columns. The superiority of the V-ties to the conventional crossties in enhancing the flexural ductility of columns became more prominent as the axial load level increases.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of V-shaped ties as an alternative to the supplementary crossties specified in ACI 318-14 on the flexural ductility of reinforced concrete columns. From column specimens tested under constant axial loads and reversed cyclic lateral loads, the mode of failure and lateral load-lateral displacement relationship were measured according to the variation of the applied axial load levels. After the columns reached the peak lateral load capacity, the $90^{\circ}$ hooks of the crossties gradually opened, which eventually caused premature buckling of the longitudinal reinforcement and severe crushing of the core concrete, whereas no V-ties were extracted from the core concrete until the column failure. As a result, the cumulative work damage indicators up to 80% of the peak lateral load for V-tie columns under the axial load level of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.55 was as much as 2.4, 2.3, and 5.2 times higher, respectively, than those of the companion crosstie columns. The superiority of the V-ties to the conventional crossties in enhancing the flexural ductility of columns became more prominent as the axial load level increases.
Kim, J. K., Han, B. S., and Shin, S. W., "Ductility Capacity of Ultra-High Strength R/C Tied Columns Considering the Axial Load Ratio and Configuration of Transverse Reinforcement", Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2009, p. 503.
ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-14) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, 2014, p. 519.
Yang, K. H., Lee, Y. H., Kwak, N. H., and Chung, H. S., "A Study on the Effectiveness of Hook Type of Crossties in the Flexural Behavior of Confined Concrete Columns", Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol. 15, No. 9, 1999, pp. 63-70.
Lukkunaprasit, P. and Sittipunt, C., "Ductility Enhancement of Moderately Confined Concrete Tied Columns with Hook-Clips", ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 100, No. 4, 2003, pp. 422-429.
Yang, K. H. and Kim, W. W., "Axial Compression Performance of RC Short Columns with Supplementary V-Shaped Ties", ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 113, No. 6, 2016, pp. 1347-1356.
ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete(ACI 318M-14) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, 2014, p. 503.
Kwak, M. K. and Yang, K. H., "Simplified Moment-Curvature Relationship Model of Reinforced Concrete Columns Considering Confinement Effect", Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2016, pp. 279-288.
FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA, Washington, 2000.
Yang, K. H., "Flexural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns Using Wire Ropes as Lateral Reinforcement", Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 64, No. 3, 2012, pp. 269-281.
Watson, S. and Park, R., "Simulated Seismic Load Tests on Reinforced Concrete Columns", Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol .120, No. 6, 1994, pp. 1825-1849.
Sheikh, S. A. and Khoury, S. S., "A Performance-Based Approach for the Design of Confining Steel in Tied Columns", ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 94, No. 4, 1997, pp. 421-432.
MacGregor, J. G., Reinforced Concrete Mechanics and Design, 2011, pp. 576-589.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.