$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Absolute Radiometric Calibration for KOMPSAT-3 AEISS and Cross Calibration Using Landsat-8 OLI 원문보기

한국측량학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, v.35 no.4, 2017년, pp.291 - 302  

Ahn, Hoyong (Dept. of Spatial Information Engineering, Pukyoung National University) ,  Shin, Dongyoon (Road Policy Research Center, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements) ,  Lee, Sungu (Ground System Development Team, Korea Aerospace Research Institute) ,  Choi, Chuluong (Dept. of Spatial Information Engineering, Pukyoung National University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Radiometric calibration is a prerequisite to quantitative remote sensing, and its accuracy has a direct impact on the reliability and accuracy of the quantitative application of remotely sensed data. This paper presents absolute radiometric calibration of the KOMPSAT-3 (KOrea Multi Purpose SATellite...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

제안 방법

  • 1. Absolute radiometric calibration was performed using a reflectance-based method on a target field imaged by KOMPSAT-3 coincident with ground-based surface and atmospheric measurement.
  • In this study, we obtained the EO-1 Hyperion image for the same days as the KOMPSAT-3 and Landsat-8 overpasses for the SBAF at the Libya-4 PICS. EO-1 Hyperion sensor images were used to derive the SBAF to compensate for the differences in the RSR between the sensors.
  • 8m spatial resolution). It will operate at an altitude of 685 km in a sun-synchronous orbit for 4 years and monitor the Korean peninsula using a payload capable of sub-meter class resolution. The mission objectives of the KOMPSAT-3 are to provide continuous satellite Earth observation after KOMPSAT-1 and KOMPSAT-2 and to meet the nation's needs for high-resolution EO (Electro-Optical) images required for GIS (Geographical Information Systems) and other environmental, agricultural and oceanographic monitoring applications.
  • However, we need to analyze the nonlinearity generated by the determination of the calibration coefficient and to reduce the uncertainty of the calibration coefficient. The accuracy of the ground measurements will be improved by using sun photometer and sky radiometer measurements in the next field campaign.
  • , 2010). The purpose of this study was to produce radiometric calibration coefficients that allow calibration of KOMPSAT-3 (KOrea Multi Purpose SATellite-3) DN (Digital Number) to values with physical units. Conversion to the sensor spectral radiance and TOA (Top Of Atmosphere) reflectance is a fundamental step during comparison of products from different sensors.

대상 데이터

  • The NASA EO-1 satellite was launched on November 21, 2001. During 1 year, it did validation and assessment mission.

데이터처리

  • Absolute radiometric calibration coefficient was calculated for each spectral band for KOMPSAT-3 AEISS using a RSR corresponding to predicted TOA radiances and images DN of KOMPSAT-3. The absolute radiometric calibration curves are shown in Fig.
  • For the cross calibration, the calibration coefficient was calculated by comparing the at sensor spectral radiance for the same location calculated using the Landsat-8 calibration parameters in the metadata and the DN of KOMPSAT-3 for the ROI (Regions Of Interest). Each ROI for cross calibration was selected to be homogenous, with a size of about 9 ×9 km.
  • We performed absolute radiometric calibration using vicarious method for the KOMPSAT-3 sensor following a field campaign in Goheung, South Korea, in 2014. The radiometric calibration coefficient was determined to explain the relationship between the DN and sensor radiance through absolute radiometric calibration of the KOMPSAT-3 AEISS. We also described a cross calibration approach based on the Libya-4 PICS that used near simultaneous collections from the two sensors during an underfly.

이론/모형

  • To calculate the total radiance at the sensor (LS) quantitatively, radiative transfer models are used, which predict the path radiance in a certain region on a specific date and remove its effect. At the sensor radiance used for reflectance based vicarious calibration was calculated using MODTRAN radiative transfer code.
  • However, LTAN (Local Time on Ascending Node) of KOMPSAT-3 and LANDSAT-8 has approximately 3 hours of difference according to the orbit of a satellite, and this makes a difference of the solar zenith angles when acquire images. In order to solve these issues to apply cross calibration, the cosine correction was to be applied to KOMPSAT-3 images according to the zenith angle suggested by Teillet et al. (2001).
  • In this study, cross calibration was conducted using the KOMPSAT-3 AEISS with reference to the Landsat-8, which performs radiometric calibration by an onboard calibrator (Amanollahi et al., 2013). For cross calibration, we used sameday (3 hours different) Landsat-8 and KOMSAT-3 overpass time at the Libya-4 PICS (Pseudo Invariant Calibration Sites) on August 6, 2013, June 3, 2013, April 3, 2014 and September 10, 2014 (Fig.
  • Therefore, a rural model was used by the MODTRAN (MODerate resolution TRANsmission algorithm) (Schläpfer and Nieke, 2005) an aerosol model.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Amanollahi, J., Tzanis, C., Abdullah, A.M., Ramli, M.F., and Pirasteh, S. (2013), Development of the models to estimate particulate matter from thermal infrared band of Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 1245-1254. 

  2. Belward, A.S. and Valenzuela, C.R. (1991), Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System for Resource Management in Developing Countries, Kluwer Academic, Netherlands. 

  3. Chander, G., Mishra, N., Helder, D.L., Aaron, D., Angal, A., Choi, T., Xiong, X., and Doelling, D. (2013), Applications of spectral band adjustment factors (SBAF) for cross calibration, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 1267-1281. 

  4. Chander, G., Mishra, N., Helder, D.L., Aaron, D., Choi, T., Angal, A., and Xiong, X. (2010), Use of EO-1 Hyperion data to calculate spectral band adjustment factors (SBAF) between the L7 ETM+ and Terra MODIS sensors, Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IEEE, 25-30 July, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 1667-1670. 

  5. Dinguirard, M. and Slater, P.N. (1999), Calibration of spacemultispectral imaging sensors: A review, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 194-205. 

  6. Folkman, M.A., Pearlman J., Liao B.L., and Jarecke P.J. (2001), EO-1/Hyperion hyperspectral imager design, development, characterization, and calibration, Proceedings of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of the Land and Atmosphere, SPIE, 9-12 October, Sendai, Japan, pp. 40-51. 

  7. Fontenla, J.M., Harder, J., Livingston, W., Snow, M., and Woods, T. (2011), High-resolution solar spectral irradiance from extreme ultraviolet to far infrared, Journal of Geophysical Reasearch: Atmospheres, Vol. 116, No. D20. 

  8. Irons, J.R., Dwyer, J.L., and Barsi, J.A. (2012), The next Landsat satellite: The Landsat Data Continuity Mission, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 122, pp. 11-21. 

  9. Jin, C.G. and Lee, S.G (2014), Cross calibration for KOMPSAT2 MSC images using EO-1 Hyperion, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Remote Sensing, ISRS, 16-18 April, Busan, Korea, unpaginated CD-ROM. 

  10. Kim J.S., Jin, C.G., Choi, C.U., and Ahn. H.Y. (2015), Radiometric characterization and validation for the KOMPSAT-3 sensor, Remote Sensing Letters, Vol. 6, No. 7, pp. 529-538. 

  11. Lee, S.G., Jin, C.G., Choi, C.U., Lim, H.S., Kim, Y.S., and Kim, J.S. (2012), Absolute radiometric calibration of the KOMPSAT2 multispectral camera using a reflectancebased method and empirical comparison with IKONOS and QuickBird images, Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 063594-063594. 

  12. Mishra, N., Haque, M.O., Leigh, L., Aaron, D., Helder, D.L., and Markham, B.L. (2014), Radiometric cross calibration of Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Landsat7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+), Remote Sensing, Vol. 6, No. 12, pp. 12619-12638. 

  13. Morakot K., Chaichat, M., and Panatda K. (2013), The effect of extraterrestrial solar model and spectral differences on cross calibration, Proceedings of the 34th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, 20-24 October, Bali, Indonesia, unpaginated CD-ROM. 

  14. Pagnutti, M., Ryan, R.E., Kelly, M., Holekamp, K., Zanoni, V., Thome, K., and Schiller, S. (2003), Radiometric characterization of IKONOS multispectral imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 53-68. 

  15. Richter, R. and Schlapfer, D. (2011), Atmospheric/ Topographic Correction for Satellite Imagery, DLR Report, German Aerospace Center, D-82234, Wessling, Germany, DLR-IB 565-02/11. 

  16. Schlapfer, D. and Nieke, J. (2005), Operational simulation of at sensor radiance sensitivity using the MODO/ MODTRAN4 environment, Proceedings of the 4th EARSeL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy, 27-30 April, Warsaw, Poland, pp. 611-619. 

  17. Teillet, P.M., Barker, J.L., Markham, B.L., Irish, R.R., Fedosejevs, G., and Storey, J.C. (2001), Radiometric crosscalibration of the Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-5 TM sensors based on tandem data sets, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 39-54. 

  18. Teillet, P.M., Fedosejevs, G., Gauthier, R., O'Neill, N., Thome, K.J., Biggar, S.F., Ripley, H., and Meygret, A. (2001), A generalized approach to the vicarious calibration of multiple Earth observation sensors using hyperspectral data, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 304-327. 

  19. Teillet, P.M., Slater, P.N., Ding, Y., Santer, R.P., Jackson, R.D., and Moran, M.S. (1990), Three methods for the absolute calibration of the NOAA AVHRR sensors inflight, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 105-120. 

  20. Thome, K.J. (2001), Absolute radiometric calibration of Landsat7 ETM+ using the reflectance-based method, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 27-38. 

  21. Ungar, S., Middleton, E., Ong, L., and Campbell, P. (2009), EO-1 Hyperion onboard performance over eight years: Hyperion calibration, Proceedings of 6th European Association of Remote Sensing Laboratories, EARSeL, 16-19 March, Tel Aviv, Israel, pp. 1-6. 

  22. Yang, X.J. and Lo, C.P. (2000), Relative radiometric normalization performance for change detection from multi-date satellite images, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 66, No. 8, pp. 967-980. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

LOADING...

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로