[논문]흡수역량이 기술혁신역량 및 기술사업화 역량과 경영성과에 미치는 영향

김영기; 박성택

doi:10.15207/jkcs.2018.9.12.217

흡수역량이 기술혁신역량 및 기술사업화 역량과 경영성과에 미치는 영향
Effects of Absorptive Capacity on Technology Innovation and Commercialization Capacities and Management Performance 원문보기

한국융합학회논문지 = Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, v.9 no.12, 2018년, pp.217 - 225

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구는 흡수역량이 기술혁신역량과 기술사업화역량과 경영성과에 미치는 영향요인을 파악한 연구이다. 본 연구에서는 선행연구를 통해 흡수역량을 탐색적 흡수역량과 활용적 흡수역량으로 구분하고 이를 독립변수 설정하고 기술혁신역량, 기술사업화 역량에 미치는 영향에 대한 분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과, 흡수역량은 기술혁신역량과 기술사업화역량에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 기술혁신역량과 기술사업화역량도 경영성과에 긍정적인 영향을 치미는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 흡수역량이 기업의 혁신에 영향을 미치는 중요 변인임을 확인하였으며, 기업은 본 연구결과를 통해 흡수능력의 중요성을 인식하고 기술혁신전략 수립시에 가이드라인으로 활용이 가능할 것으로 보인다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

This study analyzes the effects of the absorptive capacity on the technology innovation and commercialization capacities and the management performance. Based on previous studies, the absorptive capacity is sub-classified into the exploratory absorptive capacity and the exploitative absorptive capacity, which are set as independent variables, to analyze their effects on the technology innovation and commercialization capacities. In short, the absorptive capacity has positive effects on the technology innovation and commercialization capacities. In addition, the technology innovation capacity and the technology commercialization capacity have positive effects on the management performance. The findings confirm that the absorptive capacity is an important factor impacting on the corporate innovation, and suggest that businesses should recognize the importance of the absorptive capacity as a guideline for developing their strategies for technological innovation.

주제어

표/그림 (7)

그림 Fig. 1. Research Model
표 Table 1. Operationalization of Variables
표 Table 2. Discriminant Validity Analysis
그림 Fig. 2. Result of Hypotheses Testing
표 Table 3. Correlation between Latent Variable
표 Table 4. Hypotheses Testing
표 Table 5. Result of mediated pathway

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

This empirical study concerns the effects of the absorptive capacity on the technology innovation and technology commercialization capacity. Based on the literature, this study designs the model, includes Korean manufacturers as subjects, performs an online questionnaire survey and analyzes the results.

가설 설정

Fourth, the technology innovation capacity and technology commercialization capacity have partial mediating effects.

제안 방법

This empirical study concerns the effects of the absorptive capacity on the technology innovation and technology commercialization capacity. Based on the literature, this study designs the model, includes Korean manufacturers as subjects, performs an online questionnaire survey and analyzes the results.
Hence, this study analyzes the effects of the absorptive capacity on the technology innovation capacity and technology commercialization capacity, and the effects of the technology innovation capacity and technology commercialization capacity on the management performance in Korean manufacturers.
Hence, this study sets up the absorptive capacity directly related to the technology innovation capacity and the technology commercialization capacity as the independent variable, and adopts the management performance as the dependent variable for statistical hypothesis testing. [Figure 1] shows the model for this study.
The findings give the following implications. The differentiated scholarly implication of this study includes sub-classifying the absorptive capacity into exploratory absorptive capacity and exploitative absorptive capacity to analyze the causality relevant to the factors influencing the technology innovation capacity and the technology commercialization capacity.

대상 데이터

This study analyzes the data from 127 out of 130 copies collected with an online questionnaire survey conducted for August, 2018, with 3 copies excluded for insincere responses. Males (n=94, 74%) outnumber females (n=33, 26%).

이론/모형

This study forms the hypotheses based on Cohen et al. (2002) and Chesbrough (2003) emphasizing the exploitation of external knowledge with the innovative capacity, and Cohen & Levinthal (1990) and Phene et al. (2006) stressing the significant effects of the organizational capacity to absorb external knowledge on the organizational capacity for innovation.

성능/효과

First, the exploratory absorptive capacity and exploitative absorptive capacity have positive effects on the technology innovation capacity and technology commercialization capacity. The capacity to acquire external knowledge and to exploit it is very important to business organizations.
Second, the technology innovation capacity and technology commercialization capacity have positive effects on the management performance. As the factors significantly impacting on the management performance by the medium of technology innovation capacity and technology commercialization capacity, businesses need to develop measures to enhance their capacity for innovation and commercialization.
Third, the technology innovation capacity has positive effects on the technology commercialization capacity. As the technology innovation capacity influences the technology commercialization capacity including developing new products, businesses should make efforts to raise their innovation capacity.

후속연구

Still, in that this study is limited to surveying some Korean manufacturers, the findings are hard to generalize. Also, given this study involves no more than two subcategories of the absorptive capacity, further studies need to deal with more specific subcategories of the absorptive capacity, and increase the sample size by including the subjects from other industries.

참고문헌 (39)

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review, 27(2), 185-203.

상세보기
Metcalfe, S. (1995). The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, 446.
Choi, S. M., Park, S. T., & Kim, Y. K. (2017). A Study on effects of Exploration and Exploitation on Patent Activities and Innovation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 10(8), 2735-2742.

상세보기
Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Armara. N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003. Technovation, 26(5/6), 644-664.

상세보기
Todtling, F., & Kaufmann, A. (2001). The role of the region for innovation activities of SMEs. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(3), 203-215.

상세보기
Lin, B. W., & Chen, J. S. (2005). Corporate technology portfolios and R&D performance measures: a study of technology intensive firms. R&D Management, 35(2), 157-170.

상세보기
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. In Strategic Learning in a Knowledge economy 39-67..
Liao, Y., Su, Z., Chen, Y., Kan, Y., Duan, H., Qiu, Y., & Wang, R. (2003). TD-DFT study on electronic spectrum property for bis (8-hydroxyquinoline) beryllium and its derivatives. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 24(3), 477-480.

상세보기
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of management review, 31(4), 833-863.

상세보기
Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of management review, 32(3), 774-786.

상세보기
Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of management studies, 46(8), 1315-1338.

상세보기
Westphal, L. E., Kim, L. & Dahlman, C. J. (1985). Reflections on the Republic of Korea's acquisition of technological capability in N. Rosenberg and C. Frischtak (2eds.), International Technology Tra
Yam, C. M., Guan, J. C., Pun, K. F. & Tang, P. Y. (2004). An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese firms: Some Empirical Findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 33(8), 1123-1140.

상세보기
Nevens, T.M., Summe, G.L., & Uttal, B. (1990). Commercializing Technology: What the Best Companies Do. Havard Business Review, 1990, 154-163.
Camison, C. & Lopez, A. V. (2010). An examination of the relationship between manufacturing flexibility and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(8), 853-878.

상세보기
Chen, C., & Huang, J. (2007) How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management: the social interaction perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 27(2), 104-118.

상세보기
Chen, C. J. (2009). Technology Commercialization, Incubator and Venture Capital, and New Venture Performance. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 93-103.

상세보기
Mansfield, E. (1972). Contribution of R&D to economic growth in the United States. Science, 175(4021), 477-486.

상세보기
Acha, V. (2000). The role of technological capabilities in determining performance: the case of the upstream petroleum industry. The DRUID conference of industrial dynamics, Hillerdpd.
Sterlacchini, A. (1999). Do innovative activities matter to small firms in non-R&D-intensive industries? An application to export performance. Research Policy, 28(8), 819-832.

상세보기
Robinson, W. T. (1990). Product innovation and start-up business market share performance. Management Science, 36(10), 1279-1289.

상세보기
Fombrun, C.J., & Wally, S. (1989). Structuring small firms for rapid growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(2), 107-122.

상세보기
Covin, J. G., & Covin, T. (1990). Competitive aggressiveness, environmental context, and small firm performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 35-50.

상세보기
Chandler, G. N., & Hanks, S. H. (1994). Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance. Journal of business venturing, 9(4), 331-349.

상세보기
Cockburn, I. M., & Henderson, R. M. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157-182.

상세보기
Cohen, W. M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research policy, 31(8-9), 1349-1367.

상세보기
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Marsh, L. (2006). Breakthrough innovations in the US biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 369-388.

상세보기
Jantunen, A. (2005). Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 336-349.

상세보기
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of product innovation management, 19(2), 110-132.

상세보기
Booz, Allen, & Hamilton. (1982). New product management for the 1980's. NewYork: Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc.
Kim, S. K., Lee, B. G., & Oh, K. S. (2009). The effect of R&D and technology commercialization capabilities on the innovation performance of Korean it SMEs: The case of direct and indirect recipients of public R&D funding. In Management of Engineering & Technology, 2009. PICMET 2009. Portland International Conference on (1531-1541). IEEE.
Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
Nunnally, J. C. (1987). Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Thompson, R., Barclay, D. W., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration. Technology Studies: Special Issue on Research Methodology, 12(2), 284-324.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

상세보기
Barclay, D., Higgins, C. & Thomson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Causal Modeling, Personal Computer Adoption and Useasan Illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309.
Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237-246.

상세보기
Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling, OH University of Arkon Press, Akron.

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증