최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기방사선기술과학 = Journal of radiological science and technology, v.41 no.4, 2018년, pp.351 - 360
김호성 (신한대학교 방사선학과) , 김태형 (강원대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과) , 김상현 (신한대학교 방사선학과)
In recent years, demand for examination of bone mineral density (BMD) is increasing in Korea according aging society. Therefore, it is required to develop an efficient management program that can increase the safety and reliability of Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) that can be applied to the...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
골밀도 검사는 무엇인가? | 따라서 골다공증의 진단에 필요한 골밀도 검사의 수요도 매년 증가 추세를 보이고 있다. 골밀도(bone mineral density; BMD) 검사는 골다공증의 진단과 골절을 예측하기 위한 검사로 골밀도의 정량적인 방사선학적 검사법이다[2,3]. | |
한국인 여성의 골다공증 유병률의 현황은 어떤가? | 4%, 골감소증의 유병률은 47.9%, 여성에서는 10세 단위로 연령이 증가할 때마다 골다공증이 2배씩 증가하여 70세 이상 여성은 68.5%가 골다공증 환자이며, 골다공증 골절 발생률이 2008년 이후 2013년까지 매년 4%씩 증가하는 것으로 보고하고 있다[1]. 따라서 골다공증의 진단에 필요한 골밀도 검사의 수요도 매년 증가 추세를 보이고 있다. | |
국내에서는 골밀도에 대해 서로 다른 기관에서 검사한 자료끼리 비교가 불가능한 이유는? | 장비 측면에서는 국내의 골밀도 장비의 허가시험은 외국과 동일한 규격으로 진행되지만 일본에서처럼 규격에 맞는 팬텀으로 성능평가를 하지 못한다. 그 이유는 DXA 성능에 대한 가이드라인이 없기 때문이다. 이런 이유로 제조사마다의 기준이 다르기 때문에 측정하는 시설마다 골밀도 값의 차이가 발생할 수밖에 없다. 따라서 서로 다른 기관에서 검사한 자료는 서로 비교가 불가하다. |
Daily Medi, October 22, 2017. http://www.dailymedi.com/detail.php?number823533
Kanis JA. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1994; 4: 368-381
Bouxsein ML, Seeman E. Quantifying the material and structural determinants of bone strength. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2009; 23: 741-753
Lenchik L, Leib ES, Hamdy RC, et al. Executive summary International Society for Clinical Densitometry position development conference Denver, Colorado July 20-22, 2001. J Clin Densitom. 2002;5:S1-S3.
Lewiecki EM, Watts NB, McClung MR, et al. Official positions of the international society for clinical densitometry. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2004; 89(8): 3651-3655
Lewiecki EM, Lane NE. Common mistakes in the clinical use of bone mineral density testing. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008; 4: 667-674
Lewiecki EM, Binkley N, Petak SM. DXA quality matters. J Clin Densitom. 2006; 9:388-392
Watts NB. Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporos Int. 2004; 15: 847-854
Messina C, Bandirali M, Sconfienza LM, et al. Prevalence and type of errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Eur Radiol. 2015; 25: 1504-1511
Fenton JJ, Robbins JA, Amarnath AL, Franks P. Osteoporosis overtreatment in a regional health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176: 391-393
Lee YH, Lee IJ, Yong HJ. The Study on Bone Mineral Density Measurement Error in Accordance with Change in Region Of Interest (ROI) by Utilizing Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Journal of Radiological Technology and Science 2012;35(1):1-7
Faulkner KG. Clinical use of bone densitometry. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J, editors. Osteoporosis, Two-Volume Set. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001 chapter 59.
The Writing Group for the International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference. Technical standardization for dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom. 2004; 7:27-36.
Khan AA, Colquhoun A, Hanley DA, et al. Standards and guidelines for technologists performing central dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 2007; 10:189-195.
Bonnick SL, Lewis LA. Bone Densitometry for Technologists. New York, London: Springer 2013.
Pearson D, Cawte SA. Long-term quality control of DXA: a comparison of Shewhart rules and Cusum charts. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7:338-343.
Bonnick SL. Bone Densitometry in Clinical Practice: Application and Interpretation. New York, NY: Humana 2010.
Damilakis J, Adams JE, Guglielmi G, Link TM. Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis. Eur Radiol. 2010;20: 2707-2714.
Guglielmi G, Diano D, Ponti F, Bazzocchi A. Quality assurance in bone densitometry. Current Radiology Reports. 2014; 2(2): 1-6.
Leslie WD, Moayyeri A. Minimum sample size requirements for bone density precision assessment produce inconsistency in clinical monitoring. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1673-80.
International Society for Clinical Densitometry: 2017 ISCD Official Positions. http://www.iscd.org/ official-positions/2017-iscd-official-positionsadult/. Accessed 2017. The new official positions of the ISCD as updated in 2017 about phantom scanning, precision assessment and cross-calibration of DXA machines.
Donnelly LF, Dickerson JM, Goodfriend MA, Muething SE. Improving patient safety: effects of a safety program on performance and culture in a department of radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193: 165-171
Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Vrahoriti H, Kontakis G, Varveris H, Gourtsoyiannis N. Embryo/fetus radiation dose and risk from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13:716-22.
Masud T, Langley S, Wiltshire P, Doyle DV, Spector TD. Effect of spinal osteophytosis on bone mineral density measurements in vertebral osteoporosis. BMJ. 1993;307:172-173.
Svendsen OL, Hassager C, Skodt T, Christiansen C. Impact of soft tissue on in vivo accuracy of bone mineral measurements in the spine, hip and forearm: a human cadaveric study. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:868-873
Phillipov G, Seaborn CJ, Phillips PJ. Reproducibility of DXA: potential impact on serial measurements and misclassification of osteoporosis, Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:49-54.
Faulkner KG. Clinical use of bone densitometry. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J, editors. Osteoporosis, Two-Volume Set. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001 chapter 59.
Shepherd JA, Lu Y, Wilson K, et al. Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom. 2006;9:31?36.
Larkin A, Sheahan N, O'Connor U, Gray L, Dowling A, Vano E, Torbica P, Salat D, Schreiner A, Neofotistou V, et al. QA/acceptance testing of DEXA X-ray systems used in bone mineral densitometry. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008;129:279-83.
Blake GM, Naeem M, Boutros M. Comparison of effective dose to children and adults from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations. Bone. 2006;38:935-42.
Boudousq V, Kotzki PO, Dinten JM, Barrau C, Robert-Coutant C, Thomas E, et al. Total Dose incurred by patients and staff from BMD measurement using a new 2D digital bone densitometer, Osteoporos. Int. May 2003: 263-269.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Council Directive 97/43/ EURATOM on Health Protection of Individuals against the Dangers of Ionising Radiation in relation to Medical Exposure. Official Journal of the European Communities, Luxembourg 1996.
EU 2000; Publication 118: Referral Guidelines.
EU 1998; Research Guidelines, Publication 99.
Huda W, Morin RL. Patient doses in bone mineral densitometry, Br. J. Radiol. May 1996;69:422-425.
Lewiecki EM, Binkley N, Morgan SL, et al. Best practices for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement and reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance. J Clin Densitom 2016; 19: 127-140.
Kim HS, Research on the Bone Mineral Densitometer Quality Control and the Precision Test of Radio- Technologists by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at Metropolitan Area Hospital. Journal of Radiation Industry. 2017;11(4): 283-289
Watts NB. Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:847-854.
Jergas M, Genant HK. Current methods and recent advances in the diagnosis of Osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36:1649-62.
Johnston CC, Slemenda CW, Melton LJ. Clinical use of bone densitometry. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1105-9.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.