[논문][Retracted]Development and Evaluation of Self-Management Program for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Kim, Hyun Young; Kim, Su Hyun; Jung, Hyun Jung; Kim, Hwa Sun

doi:10.33851/jmis.2019.6.4.317

[Retracted]Development and Evaluation of Self-Management Program for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease 원문보기

The journal of multimedia information system, v.6 no.4, 2019년, pp.317 - 322

Kim, Hyun Young (Department of Nursing, Kyungwoon University) , Kim, Su Hyun (Collegy of Nursing, Kyungpook National University) , Jung, Hyun Jung (Depatment of Diagnostics, College of Korean Medicine, Daegu Haany University) , Kim, Hwa Sun (Elecmarvels)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The purpose of this study was to develop a self-management program for patients suffering from coronary artery disease (CAD), based on the self-determination theory and subsequently perform a heuristic evaluation by professionals and a quality assessment by users. The program consisted of 6 main menus and 20 submenus. Heuristic evaluation was conducted using eight principles, and as a result, a score of 1 was assigned by a professional for five principles: consistency and mapping, good ergonomics and minimalist design, flexibility and efficiency, anesthetics, and error management. Two professionals gave the principles of ease of input, screen readability, and glanceability a score of 1. In the quality assessment by the users, the system quality category had the highest score of 4.6 out of 5, and information quality had the lowest score of 3.87 out of 5. The overall average score was 4.08, which indicated the general satisfaction regarding the quality of the application. We have reflected on all the recommendations provided by the professionals based on their heuristic evaluation and incorporated them in the program.

주제어

표/그림 (6)

그림 Fig. 1. Relation between research Framework and program intervention.
표 Table 1. Components and details that reflect the three basic psychological desires of the CAD self-management program.
그림 Fig. 2. Main screen and Main menu.
그림 Fig. 3. Risk group identifications and health behavior achievement ratings using intelligent self-management tools.
표 Table 2. Hierarchical structure of CAD Self-Management Program main menus and submenus.
표 Table 3. Results of quality assessment by users.

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

This study was designed to develop a self-management program for patients with CAD and to evaluate the effectiveness of the application. A conceptual framework of the study was constructed based on the self-determination theory by Deci and Ryan (2002), as shown in Fig.

제안 방법

As a result of heuristic evaluation, a score of 1, which means that a usability problem exists but does not necessarily require repair, was given by an evaluator in each of the following five principles: consistency and mapping, ergonomics and minimalist design, flexibility and efficiency, aesthetics, and error management. Two evaluators gave the ease of input, screen readability, and glanceability principle a score of 1.
The heuristic evaluation used in this study includes the following eight principles: (1)visibility of system status, (2)match between system and the real world, (3)consistency and mapping, (4)good ergonomics and minimalist design, (5)ease of input, screen readability, and glanceability, (6)flexibility and efficiency, (7)aesthetics, and (8)error management. Each principle was evaluated based on the severity level on a five-point scale with a score of zero representing no issues with the principle and score closer to 4 representing the need for corrections.
The evaluators were as follows: two medical professionals with more than five years of experience, two professionals from the computer engineering field, one professional from the medical informatics field, and three professionals from the nursing field. The heuristic evaluation tool used in this study is a tool modified and supplemented for chronic patients by Jae-hee Jeon [14]. This tool is based on the ten heuristic principles developed by Nielson, which was then revised by Bertini et al.
The heuristic evaluation used in this study includes the following eight principles: (1)visibility of system status, (2)match between system and the real world, (3)consistency and mapping, (4)good ergonomics and minimalist design, (5)ease of input, screen readability, and glanceability, (6)flexibility and efficiency, (7)aesthetics, and (8)error management. Each principle was evaluated based on the severity level on a five-point scale with a score of zero representing no issues with the principle and score closer to 4 representing the need for corrections.
This tool is based on the ten heuristic principles developed by Nielson, which was then revised by Bertini et al. to combine Nielsen’s Severity Ranking Scale (SRS) with eight mobile heuristic evaluation principles, which were supplemented for mobile use.

대상 데이터

. In this study, a total of 8 professionals were selected for the evaluation.
The evaluators were as follows: two medical professionals with more than five years of experience, two professionals from the computer engineering field, one professional from the medical informatics field, and three professionals from the nursing field. The heuristic evaluation tool used in this study is a tool modified and supplemented for chronic patients by Jae-hee Jeon [14].
Surveys were performed to provide preliminary research regarding the disease-related knowledge and educational needs of CAD patients. These surveys were conducted on 58 CAD patients who visited the Internal Medicine Department of C Hospital in G City, Gyeongsangbuk-do from December 2016 to March 2017, and the survey results were taken into account when developing the program [13].

이론/모형

This study was designed to develop a self-management program for patients with CAD and to evaluate the effectiveness of the application. A conceptual framework of the study was constructed based on the self-determination theory by Deci and Ryan (2002), as shown in Fig. 1 [12].
The program was assessed by eight CAD patients using a quality evaluation tool based on the information systems success model [15], [16]. The program quality was measured using 24 questions based on a five-point scale.

참고문헌 (16)

H. R. Jeon and J.S. Park, "Survey of knowledge of cardiac rehabilitation and the level of educational need of patients with coronary artery disease," Clinical Nursing Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 434-441, 2007.
J. M. Black, Matassarin-Jacobs E. Medical-Surgical Nursing (5th ed.) Philadelpia: Saunders Co..
H. J. Yoon, M. H. Jeong, K. H. Kim, K. H. Park, D. S. Sim, H. W. park, et al., “Predictors of in-hospital complications and one-year clinical events in patients with acute myocardial infarction,” The Korean Journal of Medicine, vol. 77, no. 6, pp.723-733, 2009.
10.1007/s10916-007-9120-x R. P. Konstance, E. L. Eisenstein, K. J. Anstrom, L. K. Shaw, R. M. Califf, R. A. Harrington, D. B. Matchar, K. A. Schulman, and D. F. Kong, "Outcomes of second revascularization procedures after stent implantation," Journal of Medical System, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 177-86, 2008. 10.1007/s10916-007-9120-x 18461821

상세보기
R. B. Haynes, D. L. Sackett. Compliance in health care: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1979
H. S. Jeong, “Disease-related knowledge level and compliance of health behavior in patient myocardial infarction according to the atherosclerotic risk factors,” The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Adult Nursing, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 529-538, 2001.
10.1136/hrt.2004.045559 L. Jackson, J. Leclerx, Y. Erskine, W. Linden, “Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: A review of referral and adherence predictors,” Heart, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 10-14, 2004. 10.1136/hrt.2004.045559 15604322 PMC1768637

상세보기
10.1016/j.pec.2007.12.005 B. G. Sol, Y. van der Graaf, J. J. van der Bijl, B. M. Goessens, and F. L. Visseren, "The role of self-efficacy in vascular risk factor management: a randomized controlled trial," Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 71. no. 2, pp. 191-7, 2008. 10.1016/j.pec.2007.12.005 18242934

상세보기
10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9 S. Yusuf, S, Hawken, S. Ounpuu, T, Dans, A. Avezum, F. Lanas, et al., “Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case-control study,” Lancet, vol. 364, no. 9438, pp. 937-952, 2004. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9

상세보기
I. S. Yang, D. H. Choi, YH. Kang, “The awareness of cardiovascular risk factors and Its correlates in patient with coronary artery disease,” Journal of Korean Academic Society of Adult Nursing, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 499-508, 2010.
E. K. Lee, Y. J. Son, “Gender differences in cardiac knowledge and symptoms recognition in patients with acute coronary syndromes,” Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 166-174, 2010.
E. L. Deci, R. M. Ryan, Handbook of self-determination research, Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2002.
H. Y. Kim, “The Knowledge level and educational nees of patients with coronary artery disease,” Social Science Research, vol. 28, pp. 1-13, 2018.
J. H. Jeon, “Development and Evaluation of Smartphone Application for Self-Care Performance of Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B,” [dissertation]. Seoul:Chung-Ang University, 2015.
10.1287/isre.3.1.60 W. H. DeLone, E. R. McLean, “Information System Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable, Information Systems Research, vol.3, no.1, pp.60-95, 1992. 10.1287/isre.3.1.60

상세보기
10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 W.H. DeLone, E.R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year”, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol.19, no.4, pp.9-30, 2003. 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

상세보기

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증