최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.40 no.1, 2020년, pp.77 - 87
백종호 (한국교육과정평가원)
Scientific inquiry has emphasized its importance in various aspects of science learning and has been performed according to various methods and purposes. Among the various aspects of science learning, it is emphasized to develop core competencies with science, such as scientific thinking. Therefore,...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
과학 탐구는 어떻게 운영되었는가? | 과학 탐구는 과학에 대한 다양한 학습의 차원에서 그 중요성이 강조되고, 다양한 방법과 목적에 따라 운영되었다. 과학 학습에 대한 다양한 측면 중 과학적 사고력과 같은 과학과의 중요 역량 함양이 강조되고 있다. | |
과학 학습에서 강조되는 함양은? | 과학 탐구는 과학에 대한 다양한 학습의 차원에서 그 중요성이 강조되고, 다양한 방법과 목적에 따라 운영되었다. 과학 학습에 대한 다양한 측면 중 과학적 사고력과 같은 과학과의 중요 역량 함양이 강조되고 있다. 따라서 과학적 추론이 적절하게 일어날 수 있도록 안내할 필요가 있다. | |
과학 탐구는 학생들에게 어떤 기대효과가 있는가? | 과학 탐구의 중요성은 과학 교육에서 빠질 수 없는 논의 중 하나이다. 탐구는 여전히 학생들의 학습을 위해 다양한 방식으로 활용되고 있고, 학생들로 하여금 성장을 가져올 것이라는 기대를 받고 있기 때문이다. 탐구가 이야기하는 이른바 ‘과학 하기’가 과학자들에게서는 과학 지식의 형성 및 발전과 연관이 있다면, 학습자들에게는 개인의 인지적 발달 및 과학 관련 역량 증진에 초점을 두고 있다(NRC, 2000;Deboer, 2006). |
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-219.
DeBoer, G. E. (2006). Historical perspective on inquiry teaching in schools. In L. Flick & N. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Nature of Science: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education (pp. 17-35). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509-515.
Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 860-877.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
Jeong, J. I., & Jang, N. H. (2018), Comparative analysis of the description of osmosis in Korean and American high school chemistry textbooks. Teacher Education Research, 57(4), 539-548.
Jeong, J.-S. (2006). Role of hypothesizing abduction in high school students' generation of hypotheses about root-pressure. The Korean Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 405-414.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85.
Joung, Y. J., & Song, J. (2006). The features of the hypotheses generated by pre-service elementary teachers using the form of Peirce's abduction. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(2), 126-140.
Kind, P. M., Kind, V., Hofstein, A., & Wilson, J. (2011). Peer argumentation in the school science laboratory-Exploring effects of task features. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2527-2558.
Kim, H., Kin, Y., Kim, D., & Wee, S. M. (2018). The case study of strategies for abductive reasoning in the process of solving earth science inquiry questions for middle school students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(15), 799-820.
Kim, Y., & Kim. Y. (2008). Newton's scientific problem finding and abductive reasoning in his discovery of the light and color theory. Sae Mulli, 53(3), 162-170.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar. S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by designTM into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547.
LaBanca, F. (2008). Impact of problem finding on the quality of authentic open inquiry science research projects. Doctoral Thesis. Western Connecticut State University. UMI Number: 3411366.
Lawson, A. E. (2000). How do humans acquire knowledge? and what does that imply about the nature of knowledge? Science & Education, 9, 577-598.
Lipton, P. (2004) Inference to the Best Explanation (2nd ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Maeng, S. H., Park, M., Lee, J. A., & Kim, C. J. (2007). A case study of middle school students' abductive inference during a geological field excursion. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(9), 818-831.
Ministry of Education(MOE) (2015). 2015 revised science curriculum. Ministry of Education 2015-74 [issue 9].
National Research Council(NRC) (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Noh, T., Yun, J., Kang, H., & Kang, S. (2006). A comparison of scientists' and students' responses to discrepant event and alternative hypothesis in the conceptual change processes from the phlogiston theory to the oxygen theory. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(7), 798-804.
Park, J. (2000). Analysis of students' processes of generating scientific explanatory hypothesis-Focused on the definition and the characteristics of scientific hypothesis -. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(4), 667-679.
Runco, M. A. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Ablex Pub. Corp.
Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. (2000). Towards a taxonomy of problems used in problem-based learning curricula. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 11(2/3), 57-72.
Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. Brandwein (Eds.), The Teaching of Science (pp. 1-104). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schwartz, R. S., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Authentic scientific inquiry as context for teaching nature of science. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science. Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education (pp. 331-355). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Tolentino, L., Birchfield, D., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., JohnsonGlenberg, M., Kelliher, A., & Martinez, C. (2009). Teaching and learning in the mixed-reality science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 501-517.
VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995-1015.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625-636.
Yoon, H. G., & Pak, S. J. (2000). The change of middle school students' motivation for investigation through the extended science investigations. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(1), 137-154.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.