$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

유산영향평가의 개념과 특성에 관한 연구 - 이코모스 유산영향평가 지침서와 사례 보고서를 중심으로 -
A Study on the Concept and Characteristics of Heritage Impact Assessments for Cultural World Heritage Properties - Focused on ICOMOS Guidance on Heritage Impact Assessments and Case Reports -

대한건축학회논문집 = Journal of the architectural institute of korea, v.36 no.8, 2020년, pp.61 - 72  

김충호 (서울시립대 도시공학과) ,  이경아 (한국전통문화대 전통건축학과) ,  김동민 (서울시립대 도시공학과)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study aims to identify the concept and characteristics of Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) in order to introduce and implement HIA in Korea. For this, the 2011 ICOMOS guidance on HIA and case reports were analyzed through the methods of document analysis and case study. As a result, the study ...

주제어

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Ahn, H.K., & Lim, D.J. (2009). A Comparative Case Study of the Reduction of administrative Burdens and its Implications to Korea - Focused on Dutch and British Cases. Korean Association For Policy Science, 13(1), 97-122. 

  2. Ana, P.R., & Ron, V.O. (2012). Guidance on heritage impact assessments - Learning from its application on World Heritage site management. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2(2), 104-114. 

  3. Bae, E.H. (2001). Environmental Change, Institutional change and Policy Change - the New Institutionalism. Korean Institute of Public Affairs, 39(2), 103-139. 

  4. Choi, S.H., Jung, J.H., & Jung, S.W. (2016). Concept and Procedures of Qualitative Content Analysis. Korean Association for Qualitative Inquiry, 2(1), 127-155. 

  5. Chun, S.Y., Ko, J.W., Park, D.S., & Chun, S.K. (2012). An Analysis of School Funding System in England. Korean Civil Law Association, 21(3), 197-215. 

  6. Chung, C.M., & Ko, S.H. (1999). A Study on the Estabilishment of District Planning System in Urban Planning. Journal of Korean-International Society of Community Development, 24(1), 87-104. 

  7. Cultural Heritage Administration (2019a). A Study on the Basis of World Heritage Management. 

  8. Cultural Heritage Administration (2019b). Guidance on Heritage Impact Assessments for Cultural World Heritage Properties. 

  9. Federal Chancellery of the Republic of Austria (2019). Heritage Impcat Assessment 'Heumarkt Neu' Construction Project and Development of the World Heritage Property 'Historic Centre of Vienna'. 

  10. Jo, E.G. (2015). A Study on World Heritage conservation policies through the case of the Dresden Elbe Valley. National Research Institute of Cultural Properties, 48(2), 96-109. 

  11. Jung, J.J. (2010). A Study on the Change of the Measures for Fiscal Dividend Implementation - Application of Integrated System Approach. Institute of Governmental Studies, 16(1), 117-154. 

  12. Kang, K.H., & Kim, J.D. (2010). A Preliminary Study on Demostic Embracement and Development Plan regarding UNESCO World Heritage Programme. MUN HWA JAE - Annual Review in Cultural Heritage Studies, 43(1), 56-85. 

  13. Kim, H.S. (2016). Institutionalist Approach to the Korean Question. THE INSTITUTE FOR FAR EASTERN STUDIES, 32(2), 1-32. 

  14. Kim, M.K., Roh, M.S., Kim, I.S., & Jun, H. J. (2012). A Study on the Applicability of GBT(Green BIM Template) for BIM-based Green Building Certification System - Focused on CASBEE in Japan. Society of Design Convergence, 11(4), 31-44. 

  15. Kim, T.E. (2015). Critical Review of Historical Institutionalism Research Trend. Korean Public Administration Review, 49(4), 57-96. 

  16. Kim, Y.C., & Jung, S.W. (2015). Documents Analysis as Qualitative Research Method. Education Research Institute, 21(6), 253-285. 

  17. Korean National Commission for UNESCO. March 16, 2020 from http://www.unesco.or.kr 

  18. Lee, J.Y., & Lee, J.H. (1999). Comparative Analysis of EIA System. The Korean Association For Public Administration, 33(3), 145-160. 

  19. Patrick R.P., Peter G., & Frank, V. (2019). Improving heritage impact assessment - an analytical critique of the ICOMOS guidelines. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HERITAGE STUDIES, 25(4), 333-347. 

  20. Studio Thompson (2015). Heritage Impact Assessment - Proposed Development Near to the World Heritage Property of Old Town of Galle and its Fortifications. 

  21. Studio Thompson (2014). Heritage Impact Assessment - Proposed Development in the Buffer Zone of the World Heritage Property of Villa Adriana. 

  22. Suh, W.S. (2011). A Study on the Introduction of Climate Change Risk Disclosure. Korea Business Law Association, 25(3), 253-295. 

  23. Sung, Y.K. (2010). An analysis on perspectives and concepts of global education in curriculum document - with reference to national curriculum in the UK. Research Institute of Education Korea University, (37), 23-40. 

  24. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. June 15, 2020 from http://whc.unesco.org 

  25. Weon, S.Y. (2008). A Study on Introduction and Issues of Building Agreement. The Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 10(4), 123-130. 

  26. World Heritage Committee (2018a). Adoption of retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value. World Heritage 42COM, 17-18. 

  27. World Heritage Committee (2018b). State of conservation of the properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger. World Heritage 42COM, 91. 

  28. World Heritage Committee (2019). State of conservation of the properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger. World Heritage 43COM, 81-84. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로