$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

The role of openness in open collaboration: A focus on open-source software development projects 원문보기

ETRI journal, v.42 no.2, 2020년, pp.196 - 204  

Lee, Saerom (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University) ,  Baek, Hyunmi (School of Media and Communication, Korea University) ,  Oh, Sehwan (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Open-source software development projects are well suited for exploring new ideas and acquiring knowledge from developers outside of the project. In this paper, we examine the impact of external developers on innovation in open-source software development from the perspective of organizational learn...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

  • Open-source software development (OSSD) is an example of open collaboration. In this paper, we investigate the factors affecting the performance of open collaborations with an emphasis on OSSD projects. With developments in OSSD platform environments, developers are easily able to create the software involved in the collaboration.
  • This study has empirical applications. The results of this study contribute to the development of government policies regarding the most effective ratio of internal to external developers on a project. The results show that an organization can control the internal developer participation based on the extent to which the external developers participate.
  • Moreover, we clarified the roles of exploration and exploitation by considering the mutuality of software. This paper contributes to the field of knowledge creation by empirically analyzing the effects of exploration on innovation.

가설 설정

  • Hypothesis 2 Exploration has a stronger effect on the performance of projects whose focus is exploitation than it does on the performance of projects that depend heavily on the work of outside developers.
  • Hypothesis 3 As the number of releases increases, the effect of exploration on the project performance decreases.
  • Mockus and others [42] stated that it is important to fix critical bugs so that the core project developers can manage the release of the software to prevent unexpected changes when it is released. We therefore hypothesize that the role of exploration decreases after releasing the software.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (48)

  1. S. L. Brown and K. M. Eisenhardt, The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations, Administrative Sci. Quarterly 42 (1997), no. 1, 1-34. 

  2. F. T. Rothaermel and D. L. Deeds, Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development, Strategic Manag. J. 25 (2004), no. 3, 201-221. 

  3. S. S. Levine and M. J. Prietula, Open collaboration for innovation: Principles and performance, Organization Sci. 25 (2013), no. 5, 1414-1433. 

  4. S. Chengalur-Smith and A. Sidorova, Survival of open-source projects: A population ecology perspective, in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Syst., Seattle, WA, USA, 2003, 782-787. 

  5. A. Lima, L. Rossi, and M. Musolesi, Coding together at scale: GitHub as a collaborative social network, in Proc. AAAI Int. Conf. Weblogs Social Media, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 2014, pp. 31-40. 

  6. S. R. Lee, H. M. Baek and J. J. Jahng, Governance strategies for open collaboration: Focusing on resource allocation in open source software development organizations, Int. J. Inf. Manag. 37 (2017), no. 5, 431-437. 

  7. M. Markus. The governance of free/open source software project: Monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? J. Manag. Governance 11 (2007), no. 2, 151-163. 

  8. W. Scacchi and C. Jensen, Governance in open source software development projects: Towards a model for network-centric edge organizations, DTIC Document, 2008. 

  9. J. Hahn, J. Y. Moon, and C. Zhang, Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: Impact of prior collaboration ties, Inf. Syst. R. 19 (2008), no. 3, 369-391. 

  10. Z. L. He and P. K. Wong, Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis, Org. Sci. 15 (2004), no. 4, 481-494. 

  11. J. G. March, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Org. Sci. 2 (1991), no. 1, 71-87. 

  12. L. Dabbish et al., Social coding in GitHub: Transparency and collaboration in an open software repository, in Proc. ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA, USA, Feb. 2012, pp. 1277-1286. 

  13. B. Perens, The open source definition. Open sources: Voices from the open source revolution, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, CA, USA, 1, 1999, pp. 171-188. 

  14. G. Gousios and D. Spinellis, GHTorrent: GitHub's data from a firehose, in Proc. IEEE Working Conf. Mining Softw. Repositories, Zurich, Switzerland, June 2012, pp. 12-21. 

  15. A. Kieser, N. Beck, R. Tainio, Rules and organizational learning: The behavioral theory approach, Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (M. Dierkes, A. Antal, J. Child and I. Nonaka, eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, 2001. 

  16. B. Levitt and J. G. March, Organizational learning, Annu. Rev. Soc. 14 (1988), no. 1, 319-338. 

  17. N. Argyres, Capabilities, technological diversification and sivisionalization, Strategic Manag. J. 17 (1996), no. 5, 395-410. 

  18. G. Ahuja and C. M. Lampert, Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions, Strategic Manag. J. 22 (2001), 521-543. 

  19. M. J. Benner and M. Tushman, Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries, Administrative Sci. Quarterly 47 (2002), no. 4, 676-707. 

  20. G. Dowell and A. Swaminathan, Entry timing, exploration, and firm survival in the early US bicycle industry, Strategic Manag. J. 27, (2006), no. 12, 1159-1182. 

  21. R. Katila and G. Ahuja, Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction, Academy Manag. J. 45 (2002), no. 6, 1183-1194. 

  22. A. Nerkar, Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge, Manag. Sci. 49 (2003), no. 2, 211-229. 

  23. L. Rosenkopf and A. Nerkar, Beyond local search: Boundary spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry, Strategic Manag. J. 22 (2001), no. 4, 287-306. 

  24. R. Belderbos et al., Technological activities and their impact on the financial performance of the firm: Exploitation and exploration within and between firms, J. Product Innovation Manag. 27 (2010), no. 6, 869-882. 

  25. S. Jayanthi and K. K. Sinha, Innovation implementation in high technology manufacturing: A chaos-theoretic empirical analysis, J. Operat. Manag. 16 (1998), no. 4, 471-494. 

  26. A. Nerkar and P. W. Roberts, Technological and Product market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry, Strategic Manag. J. 25 (2004), no. 8-9, 779-799. 

  27. B. Van Looy, T. Martens, and K. Debackere, Organizing for continuous innovation: On the sustainability of ambidextrous organizations, Creativity Innovation Manag. 14 (2005), no. 3, 208-221. 

  28. A. Phene, K. F. Lindquist, and L. Marsh, Breakthrough innovations in the US biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin, Strategic Manag. J. 27 (2006), no. 4, 369-388. 

  29. J. S. Sidhu, H. R. Commandeur, and H. W. Volberda, The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation, Org. Sci. 18 (2007), no. 1, 20-38. 

  30. F. Perretti and G. Negro, Mixing genres and matching people: A study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood, J. Organizational Behavior. 28 (2007), no. 5, 563-586. 

  31. J. A. Chatman, Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit, Academy Manag. Rev. 14 (1989), no. 3, 333-349. 

  32. M. Osterloh and S. Rota, Open source software development - Just another case of collective invention? Res Policy 36 (2007), no. 2, 157-171. 

  33. F. Rullani and L. Frederiksen, Individual interaction and innovation capabilities: Exploration and exploitation in open source software communities, in Proc. DRUID Summer Conf. Opening Innovation: Strategy, Organization Technol., London, UK, June 2010, pp. 1-52. 

  34. J. Howison and K. Crowston, Collaboration through open superposition: A theory of the open source way, MIS Quarterly 38 (2014), no. 1, 29-50. 

  35. G. B. Voss and Z. G. Voss, Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: Implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains, Org. Sci. 24 (2013), no. 5, 1459-1477. 

  36. V. Gilsing and B. Nooteboom, Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: the case of pharmaceutical biotechnology, Res. Policy 35 (2006), no. 1, 1-23. 

  37. M. L. Tushman and C. A. O'Reilly III, Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, California Manag. Rev. 38 (1996), no. 4, 8-29. 

  38. D. A. Levinthal and J. G. March, The myopia of learning, Strategic Manag. J. 14 (1993), no. S2, 95-112. 

  39. A. E. Eiben and C. A. Schippers, On evolutionary exploration and exploitation, Fundamenta Informaticae 35 (1998), 35-50. 

  40. O. Baysal and A. J. Malton, Correlating social interactions to release history during software evolution, in Proc. Int. Workshop Mining Softw. Repositories, Mineapolis, MN, USA, May 2007, pp. 1-8. 

  41. Q. Tu, Evolution in open source software: A case study, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Soft. Maintenance, San Jose, CA, USA, Oct. 2000, pp. 131-142. 

  42. A. Mockus, R. T. Fielding, and J. Herbsleb, A case study of open source software development: The Apache server, in Proc. Int. Conf. Soft. Eng., Limerick, Ireland, June 2000, pp. 263-272. 

  43. G. Ahuja and C. Morris Lampert, Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions, Strategic Manag. J. 22 (2001), no. 6-7, 521-543. 

  44. K. Crowston, H. Annabi, and J. Howison, Defining open source software project success, in Proc. Intern. Conf. Inf. Syst., Seattle, WA, USA, Dec. 2003, pp. 1-14. 

  45. H. Baek and S. Oh, Identifying the network characteristics of contributors that affect performance in open collaboration: Focusing on the GitHub open source, J. Soc. e-Business Studies 20 (2015), no. 1, 23-43. 

  46. V. Dhar and E. A. Chang, Does chatter matter? The impact of user- generated content on music sales, J. Interactive Marketing 51 (2009), no. 4, 300-307. 

  47. W. Duan, B. Gu, and A. Whinston, The dynamic of online word-ofmouth and product sales: And empirical investigation of the movie industry, J. Retailing 84 (2008), no. 2, 233-242. 

  48. R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny, The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 51 (1986), no. 6, 1173-1182. 

LOADING...

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로