$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

판정행렬을 기반한 일체형 PET-MRI의 폐암 진단 유용성 평가
Evaluation of Usefulness for Diagnosis of Lung Cancer on Integrated PET-MRI Using Decision Matrix 원문보기

방사선기술과학 = Journal of radiological science and technology, v.44 no.6, 2021년, pp.635 - 643  

김정수 (동남보건대학교 방사선과) ,  양현진 (동남보건대학교 방사선과) ,  김유미 (동남보건대학교 방사선과) ,  권형진 (서울대학교병원 핵의학과) ,  박찬록 (전주대학교 방사선학과)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The results of empirical researches on the diagnosis of lung cancer are insufficient, so it is limited to objectively judge the clinical possibility and utilization according to the accuracy of diagnosis. Thus, this study retrospectively analyzed the lung cancer diagnostic performance of PET-MRI (Po...

주제어

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Korea Central Cancer Registry. Annual report of cancer statistics in Korea in 2018; 2021. 

  2. Park JY, Jang SH. Epidemiology of Lung Cancer in Korea: Recent trends. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. 2016;79(2):58-69. 

  3. Papadopoulos A, Guida F, LeffondrL K, CLnLe S, Cyr D, Schmaus A, et al. Heavy smoking and lung cancer: Are women at higher risk? Result of the ICARE study. Brt J Cancer. 2014;110:1385-91. 

  4. McLean AEB, Barnes DJ, Troy LK. Diagnosing lung cancer: The complexities of obtaining a tissue diagnosis in the era of minimally invasive and personalised medicine. J Clin Med. 2018;7(7):163. 

  5. RiihimLki M, Hemminki A, Fallah M, Thomsen H, Sundquist K, Sundquist J, et al. Metastatic sites and survival in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2014;86(1):78-84. 

  6. Conti M, Bendriem B. The new opportunities for high time resolution clinical TOF PET. Clin Trans Img. 2019;7(2):139-47. 

  7. Erdi YE. Limits of tumor detectability in nuclear medicine and PET. Mol Img Radionucl Ther. 2012;21(1):23-8. 

  8. Qu X, Huang X, Yan W, Wu L, Dai K. A meta-analysis of 18FDG-PET-CT, 18FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(5):1007-15. 

  9. Lee SJ, Seo HJ, Cheon GJ, Kim JH, Kim EE, Kang KW, et al. Usefulness of integrated PET/MRI in head and neck cancer: A preliminary study. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;48(2):98-105. 

  10. Khiewvan B, Torigian DA, Emamzadehfard S, Paydary K, Salavati A, Houshmand S, et al. Update of the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI in the management of patients with cervical cancer. Hell J Nucl Med. 2016;19(3):254-68. 

  11. Ehman EC, Johnson GB, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Cha S, Leynes AP, Larson PEZ, et al. PET/MRI: Where might it replace PET/CT? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46(5):1247-62. 

  12. Kwon HW, Becker AK, Goo JM, Cheon GJ. FDG Whole-Body PET/MRI in Oncology: A systematic review. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;51(1):22-31. 

  13. Delso G, Ziegler S. PET/MRI system design. Eur J Nucl Med and Mol Imaging. 2009;36:86-92. 

  14. Jung JH, Choi Y, Im KC. PET/MRI: Technical challenges and recent advances. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;50(1):3-12. 

  15. Loeffelbein DJ, Souvatzoglou M, Wankerl V, Martinez-MLller A, Dinges J, Schwaiger M, et al. PET-MRI fusion in head and neck oncology: Current status and implications for hybrid PET/MRI. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(2):473-83. 

  16. Nensa F, Beiderwellen K, Heusch P, Wetter A. Clinical applications of PET/MRI: current status and future perspectives. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014; 20(5):438-47. 

  17. Duan XY, Wang W, Li M, Li Y, Guo YM. Predictive significance of standardized uptake value parameters of FDG-PET in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015;48(3):267-72. 

  18. BLsing KA, SchLnberg SO, Brade J, Wasser K. Impact of blood glucose, diabetes, insulin, and obesity on standardized uptake values in tumors and healthy organs on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Nucl Med Biol. 2013;40:206-13. 

  19. Malladi A, Viner M, Jackson T, Mercier G, Subramaniam RM. PET/CT mediastinal and liver FDG uptake: Effects of biological and procedural factors. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013;57:169-75. 

  20. Kim MY. Relationship between pSUV of 18F-FDG PET/CT and pathological diagnosis in breast cancer. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2013:36(4);305-11. 

  21. Martinez-Moller A, Souvatzoglou M. Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET-MRI. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:520-6. 

  22. Catana C, Van der Kouwe A, Benner T, Michel CJ. Toward implementing an MRI-based PET attenuation-correction method for neurologic studies on the MR-PET brain prototype. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1431-8. 

  23. Soongsathitanon S, Masa-Ah P, Tuntawiroon M. A new standardized uptake values (SUV) calculation based on pixel intensity values. Math Comput Simul. 2012;6:26-33. 

  24. Franklin WA, Aisner DL, Davies KD. Pathology, biomarkers, and molecular diagnostics. In: Niederhuber JE, Armitage JO, Kastan MB, Doroshow JH, Tepper JE (eds) Abeloff's Clinical Oncology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2020:Chap 15. 

  25. Jain S, Pincus MR, Bluth MH, McPherson RA, Bowne WB, Lee P. Diagnosis and management of cancer using serologic and other body fluid markers. In: McPherson RA, Pincus MR (eds) Henry's Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods. 23rd ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2017:Chap 74. 

  26. Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: A simulation study. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(9):1519-27. 

  27. Kim JE, Kim JS, Choi NG, Han JB. Evaluation of the liver cancer diagnosis function of PET-MRI based on decision matrix analysis. J Kor Cont Asc. 2017;17(11):50-9. 

  28. Kang GW, Kim SE, Lee DS, Jeong JK. Koh's nuclear medicine. Kor Med. 2008;(3):8-20. 

  29. Hutton BF, Erlandsson K, Thielemans K. Advances in clinical molecular imaging instrumentation. Clin Transl Imaging. 2018;6:31-5. 

  30. Cangemi V, Volpino P, Drudi FM, D'Andrea N, Cangemi R, Piat G. Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic chest CT scanning. Impact on lung cancer management. Int Surg. 1996;81(1):77-82. 

  31. Ambrosini V, Nicolini S, Caroli P, Nanni C, Massaro A, Cristina Marzola M, et al. PET/CT imaging in different types of lung cancer: An overview. Eur J Radiol. 2021;81(5):988-1001. 

  32. Silvestri GA, Gonzalez AV, Jantz MA, Margolis ML, Gould MK, Tanoue LT, et al. Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer. Chest J. 2013;143(5): 211-50. 

  33. Collins LG, Haines C, Perkel R, Enck RE. Lung cancer: Diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75(1):56-63. 

  34. Rivera MP, Detterbeck F, Mehta AC. Diagnosis of lung cancer* The guidelines. Chest. 2003;123:129-36. 

  35. Shin GS, Dong GR. The difference of standardized uptake valueon PET-CT according to change of CT parameters. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2007;30(4):373-9. 

  36. Pournazari K, Jahangiri P, Mehdizadeh Seraj S, Khosravi M, Arani L, Torigian D, et al. PET/MRI applications in lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(Supplement 1):1157. 

  37. Mayerhoefer ME, Prosch H, Beer L, Tamandl D, Beyer T, Hoeller C, et al. PET/MRI versus PET/CT in oncology: A prospective single-center study of 330 examinations focusing on implications for patient management and cost considerations. Eur J Nucl and Mol Img. 2020;47:51-60. 

  38. Hartenbach M, Hartenbach S, Bechtloff W, Danz B, Kraft K, Klemenz B, et al. Combined PET/MRI improves diagnostic accuracy in patients with prostate cancer: A prospective diagnostic trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(12):3244-53. 

  39. Grunnet M, Sorensen JB. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2012;76(2):138-43. 

  40. Hsu WH, Huang CS, Hsu HS, Huang WJ, Lee HC, Huang BS, et al. Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level is a prognostic factor in women with early non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(2):419-24. 

  41. Matsuoka K, Sumitomo S, Nakashima N, Nakajima D, Misaki N. Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen and CYFRA21-1 in patients with pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32(3):435-9. 

  42. Okada M, Nishio W, Sakamoto T, Uchino K, Yuki T, Nakagawa A, et al. Effect of histologic type and smoking status on interpretation of serum carcinoembryonic antigen value in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(3):1004-9. 

  43. Okada M, Nishio W, Sakamoto T, Uchino K, Yuki T, Nakagawa A, et al. Prognostic significance of perioperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen in non-small cell lung cancer: Analysis of 1,000 consecutive resections for clinical stage I disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(1):216-21. 

  44. Vickers AJ. Decision analysis for the evaluation of diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. Am Stat. 2008;62(4):314-20. 

  45. Killeen PR. Beyond statistical inference: A decision theory for science. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006;13(4):549-62. 

  46. Kubota K, Matsuzawa T, Fujiwara T, Ito M, Hatazawa J, Ishiwata K, et al. Differential diagnosis of lung tumor with positron emission tomography: A prospective study. J Nucl Med. 1990:31(12);1927-32. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로