$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] Analysis of PMIS Users Satisfaction and Loyalty Using Structural Equation Model 원문보기

Architectural research, v.23 no.1, 2021년, pp.1 - 10  

Kim, Min-Cheol (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ,  Lee, Hyung-Il (NH Investment & Securities) ,  Cho, Sang-Ho (Tomoon Architects & Engineering) ,  Kim, Ju-Hyung (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Project management information systems (PMIS) have been implemented to support cooperation among the participants of construction projects. Unlike other information systems used by members from an organization with similar culture and business environment, the PMIS are members from one-off fragmente...

Keyword

표/그림 (11)

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

  • This study aimed to verify the system factors capable of enhancing User Satisfaction and loyalty. This enabled us to establish the following individual characteristics affecting PMIS users that warranted analysis: System Quality, Information Quality, Service Quality, users’ IT application ability, and their Extrinsic Motivation.

가설 설정

  • H1 : The System Quality of PMIS will have a significant positive effect on User Satisfaction.
  • H2 : The quality of information provided by PMIS will have a significant positive effect on User Satisfaction.
  • H3 : The Service Quality of PMIS will have a significant positive effect on User Satisfaction.
  • H4 : Users’ ability to use IT applications will have a significant positive effect on User Satisfaction.
  • H5 : Users’ Extrinsic Motivation will have a significant positive effect on User Satisfaction.
  • H6 : The System Quality of PMIS will have a significant positive effect on User Loyalty.
  • H7 : The quality of information provided by PMIS will have a significant positive effect on User Loyalty.
  • H8 : The Service Quality of PMIS will have significant positive effect on User Loyalty.
  • H9 : Users’ ability to use IT applications will have a significant positive effect on User Loyalty.
  • H10 : Users’ Extrinsic Motivation will have a significant positive effect on User Loyalty.
  • H11 : User Satisfaction with the PMIS will have a significant positive effect on User Loyalty.
  • H1 : The direct effect of the path from System Quality to User Satisfaction is 0.44; thus, it is positively significant (p<0.01).
  • H2 : The direct effect of the path from Information Quality to User Satisfaction is 0.44; thus, it is positively significant (p<0.01).
  • H3 : The direct effect of the path from Service Quality to User Satisfaction is 0.22; thus, it is positively significant (p<0.01).
  • H4 : The direct effect of the path from users’ IT application ability to User Satisfaction is insignificant.
  • H5 : The direct effect of the path from Extrinsic Motivation to User Satisfaction is insignificant.
  • H6 : The direct effect of the path from System Quality to User Loyalty is 0.52; thus, it is positively significant (p<0.01).
  • H7 : The direct effect of the path from Information Quality to User Loyalty is insignificant.
  • H8 : The direct effect of the path from Service Quality to User Loyalty is insignificant.
  • H9 : The direct effect of the path from users’ IT application ability to User Loyalty is 0.77; thus, it is positively significant (p<0.05).
  • H10 : The direct effect of the path from Extrinsic Motivation to User Loyalty is 0.49; thus, it is positively signifi-cant (p<0.01). H11 : The direct effect of the path from User Satisfaction to User Loyalty is 0.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Afsar, B., Rehman, Z. U., Qureshi, J.A., & Shahjehan, A. (2010). "Determinants of customer loyalty in the banking sector: The case of Pakistan." African Journal of Business Management, 4(6): 1040-1047. 

  2. Bai, B., Law, R., & Wen, I. (2008). "The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intentions: Evidence from Chinese online visitors." International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27: 391-402. 

  3. Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. (1983). "Selected determinants of consumer satisfaction and complaint reports." Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1): 21-28. 

  4. Beerli, A., Martin, J. D., & Quintana, A. (2002). "A model of customer loyalty in the retail banking market." European Journal of Marketing, 38(1/2): 253-275. 

  5. Caniels, M. C., & Bakens, R. J. (2012). "The effects of Project Management Information systems on decision making in a multi project environment." International Journal of Project Management, 30: 162-175. 

  6. Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1997). "Information, systems and information systems: Making sense of the field." 

  7. Chung, B. Y., Skibniewski, M. J., Lucas Jr, H. C., & Kwak, Y. H. (2008). "Analyzing enterprise resource planning system implementation success factors in the engineering-construction industry." Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 22(4): 373-83. 

  8. Chung, B. Y., Skibniewski, M. J., & Kwak Y. H. (2009). "Developing ERP systems success model for the construction industry." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(3): 207-17. 

  9. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). "Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test." MIS Quarterly, 19(2): 189-211. 

  10. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). "Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable." Information Systems Research, 3(1): 60-95. 

  11. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). "The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update." Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4): 9-30. 

  12. Deng, Z., Lu, Y., Wei, K. K., & Zhang, J. (2010). "Understanding customer satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical study of mobile instant messages in China", International Journal of Information Management, 30: 289-300. 

  13. Ein-Dor, Segev. & Steinfeld (1981). "Organizational context and the success of management information systems." Management Science, 24(10): 1064-1077. 

  14. Garrity, E. J., Glassberg, B., Kim, Y. J., Sanders, G. L., & Shin, S. K. (2005). "An experimental investigation of web-based information systems success in the context of electronic commerce." Decision Support Systems, 39(3): 485-503. 

  15. Goodman, J. (1989). "The nature of customer satisfaction." Quality Progress, 22(2): 37-40. 

  16. Huitt, W. (2001). "Motivation to learn: An overview." Educational Psychology Interactive. 

  17. Igbaria, M., & Nachman, S. A. (1990). "Correlates of User Satisfaction with end user computing." Information and Management, 19(2): 73-82. 

  18. Jang, H. (2010). "Analysis of pedestrian-streetscape image in commercial district using Structural Equation Model." Department of Transportation Engineering Graduate School, Myongji University. 

  19. Kim, Y. (2012). "The Structural Equation Model validation of social anxiety, empathy, social skills, anger-expressive form, interpersonal relationships satisfaction affecting the euphoria of college students." Department of Education Graduate School, Yeungnam University. 

  20. Lawrence, M., & Low, G. (1993). "Exploring individual User Satisfaction within user-led development." MIS Quarterly, 17(2): 195-2. 

  21. Lee, S. K., & Yu, J. H. (2012). "Success model of project management information system in constr uc tion." Automation in Construction, 25: 82-93. 

  22. Lee, S. K., & Yu, J. H. (2011). "Critical Success Factors for Project Management Information System in Construction." Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, 1: 25-30 

  23. Li, E. Y. (1997). "Perceived importance of information system success factors: A meta analysis of group differences." Information and Management, 32: 15-28. 

  24. Lucas(1982). The Impact of Office Automation on the Organization: Some Implications for Research and Practice," Communications of the ACM, 25(11): 838-847. 

  25. Meyers, B. L., Kappelrnan, L. A., & Prybutok, V. R. (1997). "A comprehensive model for assessing the quality and productivity of the information systems function: Toward a theory for information systems assessment." Information Resources Management Journal: 6-26. 

  26. Nelson, D. L. (1990). "Individual adjustment to information-driven technologies: A critical review." MIS Quarterly, 14(1): 79-100. 

  27. Oliver, R. L. (1980). "A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions." Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4): 460-469. 

  28. Oliver, R. L, & Linda, G. (1981). "Effect of satisfaction and its antecedents on consumer preference and intention." Advances in Consumer Research, 8(1): 88-93. 

  29. Petter, S., Delone, W., & Mclean, E. R. (2013). "Information systems success: The quest for the independent variables." Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4): 6-61. 

  30. Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., & Kavan, C. B. (1995). "Service Quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness." MIS Quarterly, 19(2): 173-188. 

  31. Raymond, L., & Bergeron, F. (2008). "Project management information systems: An empirical study of their impact on project managers and project success." International Journal of Project Management, 26(2): 213-21. 

  32. Santhanam, R., & Hartono, E. (2003). "Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance." MIS Quarterly, 27(1): 125-153. 

  33. Shin, G. K., & Sohn, S. J. (2011). "The impact of innovation propensity and IT application ability on the adoption of the home trading system." Korean Journal of Accounting Research, 16(1): 207-226. 

  34. Williams, L. J., Vandenberg, R. J., & Edwards, J. R. (2009). "Structural Equations Modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis." The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1): 543-604. 

  35. Woolfolk, A. (2012). Educational Psychology, Allyn and Bacon. 

  36. Yalowitz, S. S. (2002). "Personality and motivation in visitor satisfaction." Visitor Studies Today, 5(1): 14-17. 

  37. Yang, Y. C., Park, C. J., Kim, J. H., & Kim, J. J. (2007). "Management of daily progress in a construction project of multiple apartment buildings." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133: 242-253. 

활용도 분석정보

상세보기
다운로드
내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로