[논문]기업혁신요인이 기업혁신성과에 미치는 영향 연구 : 혁신촉진요인(High, Low 수준)과 혁신저해요인(High, Low 수준)의 집단별 차이 분석

지용빈; 서영욱

doi:10.5762/kais.2021.22.4.441

기업혁신요인이 기업혁신성과에 미치는 영향 연구 : 혁신촉진요인(High, Low 수준)과 혁신저해요인(High, Low 수준)의 집단별 차이 분석
A Study on The Impact of Enterprise Innovation Factors on Enterprise Innovation Performance: Analysis of The Differences between Innovation Acceleration Factors(High, Low Level) and Innovation Hindrance Factors(High, Low Level) by Groups 원문보기

한국산학기술학회논문지 = Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, v.22 no.4, 2021년, pp.441 - 456

지용빈 (대전대학교 일반대학원 융합컨설팅학과) , 서영욱 (대전대학교 일반대학원 융합컨설팅학과)

초록
AI-Helper

기업은 지속적인 성장과 경쟁우위 확보를 위해 기술개발 관련 적극적인 혁신 활동을 하고 있다. 이러한 기업혁신활동이 기업혁신성과에 미치는 요인은 여러 가지가 있지만, 기업의 이러한 혁신 활동이 항상 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것은 아니다. 이에 본 연구에서는 기업혁신요인 중 혁신촉진요인과 혁신저해요인을 중심으로 혁신성과에 미치는 효과를 분석하였다. 연구모형은 2016년 기술혁신조사(STEPI)에 응답한 2,081개 국내 제조기업을 분석하였고, 신뢰도, 타당성 및 로지스틱 회귀분석을 위해 SPSS 25.0이 사용되었다. 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 혁신 활동은 제품혁신성과와 공정혁신성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치며, 정부지원은 반대의 결과를 나타냈다. 둘째, 기술 협력은 혁신촉진 및 저해요인과 상관없이 제품혁신성과에 긍정적인 영향을 나타냈다. 셋째, 혁신 활동은 혁신촉진 및 저해요인과 상관없이 공정혁신성과에 긍정적인 영향을 나타냈다. 본 연구는 기술적 혁신에 한정된 기존 선행연구들과는 달리 혁신촉진요인과 혁신저해요인에 대한 기업들의 태도를 구분하여 그에 따라 집단별로 혁신 성과가 어떻게 달라지는지를 중심으로 수행하였기 때문에 혁신의 실패와 위험부담을 낮출 수 있는 기업혁신전략을 수립하는데 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Enterprise is focused on R&D innovative activities in order to achieve sustainable growth & secure competitive advantage. There are many factors that influence enterprise innovation performance, but enterprise innovation activities do not always have a positive effect. Therefore, this study analyzed the effects of on innovation performance, focusing on innovation acceleration factors and innovation hindrance factors. The research model analyzed 2,081 national manufacturing enterprises that responded to the 2016 Korean Innovation Survey (STEPI). SPSS 25.0 was used to perform reliability, feasibility, and logistic regression analysis. The results are as follows. First, innovation activities have positive effects on enterprise product and process innovation performance. On the other hand, government support had the opposite results. Second, the collaboration of technology showed a positive effect on product innovation performance, independent of innovation acceleration and hindrance factors. Third, innovation activities showed a positive effect on process innovation performance, regardless of the innovation acceleration and hindrance factors. Unlike prior studies limited to technological innovation, this study analyzed the attitudes of enterprises toward innovation acceleration and hindrance factors. This study is expected to contribute to establishing a strategy for reducing the failure and risk of innovation due to its findings on how innovation performance varies by groups.

주제어

표/그림 (10)

그림 Fig. 1. Research model
표 Table 1. Group classification of innovation acceleration factors and innovation hindrance factors
표 Table 2. Detailed measurement items for enterprise innovation factors
표 Table 3. Detailed measurement items for enterprise innovation performance
표 Table 4. Detailed measurement items for innovation acceleration factors and innovation hindrance factors
표 Table 5. Pearson correlation coefficient between variables
표 Table 6. Analysis result of the measurement model
표 Table 7. The results of assessment of discriminant validity
표 Table 8. The results of logistic regression analysis : Overall sample
표 Table 9. Summary of statistical hypothesis testing

참고문헌 (53)

Evangelista, "Innovation in the Service Sector Results from the Italian Statistical Survey", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.58, No.3, pp.51, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(98)00025-0

상세보기
M. A. Schilling, Strategic management of technological innovation, p.366, McGraw-Hill Publishers, 2008, pp.25-30
K. H. Bong, J. M. Park, "A Study on Technological Innovation and Employment Performance from the Perspective of Process : Focused on Small and Medium Sized Enterprises", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol.21, No.4, pp.1508-1535, 2018.
S. Roper, J. Du, J. H. Love, "Modelling the innovation value chain", Research Policy, Vol.37, No.6-7, pp.961, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.005

상세보기
N. Amara, P. D'Este, R. Landry, D. Doloreux, "Impacts of obstacles on innovation patterns in KIBS firms", Journal of Business Research, Vol.69, No.10, pp.4065, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.045

상세보기
P. Cohen, Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity, p.422, A Bradford Book Publishers, 1995, pp.127-128
J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, Innovation: A Guide to the Literature, p.26, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0001
I. March-Chorda, A. Gunasekaran, B. Lloria-Aramburo, "Product development process in Spanish SMEs: an empirical research", Technovation, Vol.22, No.5, pp.301-312, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00021-9

상세보기
F. Galia, D. Legros, "Complementarities Between Obstacles to Innovation: Evidence from France", Research Policy, Vol.33, No.8, pp.1185-1199, 2004. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.06.004

상세보기
G. Battisti, P. Stoneman, "How Innovative are UK Firms? Evidence from the Fourth UK Community Innovation Survey on Synergies between Technological and Organizational Innovations", British Journal of Management, Vol.21, No.1, pp.187, 2010. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00629.x

상세보기
D. H. Kim, "A Typology of Enterprise Innovation based on a Meta-model", Industrial Development Institute Kyungsung University, Vol.33, No.1, pp.117-152, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22793/indinn.2017.33.1.005
K. W. Cho, S. W. Kim, Y. R. Cho, H. J. Kang, S. A. Sohn "2017 Guidelines of the Korean Innovation Survey - Recent Developments and Applications -", Science & Technology Policy Institute, pp.1-245, 2017.
J. S. Kim, J. W. Kang, "An Exploratory Study of Innovation Types and their Importances under the 4th Industrial Revolution - Focusing on the Analysis of Delphi Results -", National Future Technology Management Institute Chungbuk University, Vol.4, No.2, pp.1-26, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33443/tm.2019.4.2.1
K. S. Kim, "Causal Links from Innovative Activities to Financial Performance in Korean Manufacturing Firms: Mediating Effects of Innovative and Operational Performance", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol.17, No.1, pp.146-173, 2014. UCI: G704-001043.2014.17.1.007
S. J. Kim, S. J. Yong, "A Study on Determinant Factors of the Joint Technology Development Project Performance between SMEs and Universities", Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.19, No.1, pp.145-176, 2011. UCI: G704-001004.2011.19.1.005
L. Li, F. Jiang, Y. Pei, N. Jiang, "Entrepreneurial orientation and strategic alliance success: The contingency role of relational factors", Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.72, pp.46, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.011

상세보기
D. W. Ryu, D. H. Lee, J. H. Park, "The effects of alliance management capability on alliance performance in R&D SMEs: Moderating effect of competitive strength", Institute of Social Sciences, Vol.25, No.1, pp.276-296, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46415/jss.2018.03.25.1.276

상세보기
C. Y. Lee, B. K. Kim, "The Success Factors on Private-Public Technology Collaboration of SMEs", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol.22, No.3, pp.416-445, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2019.06.22.3.416

원문보기 상세보기
S. W. Kim, STEPI Insight, Science & Technology Policy Institute, Korea, pp.1-26.
H. J. Chang, "An Analysis on the Effect of Government Supports for the R&D of SMEs: Focused on Technical, Economic, and Social Outcomes", Korea Society Policy Association, Vol.26, No.4, pp.195-218, 2016. UCI: G704-000388.2016.26.4.002
I. Busom, J. A. Velez-Ospina, "Innovation, Public Support, and Productivity in Colombia. A Cross-industry Comparison", World Development, Vol.99, No.C, pp.75-94, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.005

상세보기
S. Y. Kang, S. M. Park, "A Relationship between Innovation Capability and Performance: Differences in Firm Development Stages", Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, Vol.13, No.2, pp.91-100, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.13.2.201804.91

원문보기 상세보기
K. Blind, "The influence of regulations on innovation: A quantitative assessment for OECD countries", Research Policy, Vol.41, No.2, pp.391-400, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.008

상세보기
S. Breschi, F. Malerba, L. Orsenigo, "Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation", The Economic Journal, Vol.110, No.463, pp.388-410, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00530

상세보기
L. C. Levin, A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson, S. G. Winter, "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol.1987, No.3, pp.783-831, 1987. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2534454

상세보기
E. P. Gallie, D. Legros, "French firms' strategies for protecting their intellectual property", Research Policy, Vol.41, No.4, pp.780-794, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.008

상세보기
W. Kim, S. Y. Chung, "An Effect of Appropriability on R&D Collaboration and Product Innovation Performance: Focusing on the Moderated Mediation of Government R&D Support", Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.25, No.1, pp.1-34, 2017. UCI: G704-001004.2017.25.1.002

원문보기 상세보기
H. C. Kim, "The Study on the Factors Affecting the Choice of Open Innovation strategy : Focused on Internal Competence and Appropriability", Korean Journal of Business Administration, Vol.31, No.9, pp.1705-1722, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18032/kaaba.2018.31.9.1705

상세보기
Coad, A. G. Pellegrino, M. Savona, "Barriers to innovation and firm productivity", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.25, No.3, pp.321-334, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1076193

상세보기
K. N. Lee, H. J. Jang, S. O. Choi, "Determinants and Complementarities of the Obstacles to Technological Innovation from Korea", The Korea Association for Policy Studies, Vol.20, No.4, pp.109-130, 2016. UCI: G704-000863.2016.20.4.006
H. P. Choi, J. H. Lee, "An Analysis of the Factors that Influence the Choice of R&D Collaboration :Evidence from Korean Manufacturing Companies", Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.18, No.1, pp.153-175, 2010. UCI: G704-001004.2010.18.1.009
D. H. Kim, J. K. Kim, "The Effects of R&D Capability and Market Orientation on Product Innovation Performance : The Moderating Role of Technological Innovation Orientation", Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems, Vol.22, No.4, pp.79-95, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2017.22.4.079

원문보기 상세보기
J. H. Lim, B. K. Kim, "The Effects of Entrepreneurship Orientation and Absorptive Capacity on Corporate Performance : Focusing on Mediating Effects of Product Innovation Performance", Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.21, No.4, pp.1536-1576, 2018.
J. Papinniemi, "Creating a model of process innovation for reengineering of business and manufacturing", International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.60-61, pp.95-101, 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00146-7

상세보기
T. Reichstein, A. Salter, "Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms", Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.15, No.4, pp.653-682, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl014

상세보기
G. Dosi "Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation", Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.26, No.3, pp.1120-1171, 1988. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2726526

상세보기
A. Afuah, Business models : a strategic management approach, p.415, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2004, pp.62-65
K. Pavitt, "Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory", Research Policy, Vol.13, No.6, pp.343-373, 1984. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0

상세보기
H. Kim, N. J. Kim, "The Effect of Innovation Success Factors and Innovation Capabilities on Performance in Manufacturing Firm", Journal of the Korean Production and Operations Management Society, Vol.20, No.3, pp.99-125, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21131/kopoms.20.3.200909.99
Damanfour, W. M. Evan, "Organizational Innovation and performance : The Problem of 'Organizational Lag'", Journal of Management Studies, Vol.29, No.3, pp.392-402, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117449
J. E. Song, Y. J. Kim, "The Impact of Technological Collaboration, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation Strategy on Innovation Output in Small- and Medium-sized Firms", Korea Internet e-Commerce Association, Vol.17, No.1, pp.93-116, 2017. UCI: G704-001762.2017.17.1.008

상세보기
V. Hippel, The Sources of Innovation, p.232, New York Oxford University Press, 1988, pp.102-107.
T. K. Sung, J. S. Kim, "Determinants of Firm's Innovation Performance: Evidence from Jeonbukbased Firms in Korea", Korean Journal of Business Administration, Vol.22, No.4, pp.2017-2036, 2009. UCI: G704-000789.2009.22.4.022
E. Y. Kim, "A Study on the Determinants of Technological Innovation in the Korean Manufacturing Firms -Focusing on Technological Regime-", Korean Industrial Economic Association, Vol.22, No.4, pp.2017-2036, 2009. UCI: G704-001438.2011.24.3.028
K. A. Kim, "The Impact of Supporting Policies in Innovation of Cultural Industry", The Korean Governance Review, Vol.21, No.1, pp.415-432, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2014.21.1.018

상세보기
T. H. Park, K. H. Park, "Effect of IT Manufacturing Firms' Technological Innovation Factors -Focused on Cooperative relation and Governmental support-", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol.10, No.9, pp.39-45, 2012. UCI: G704-002010.2012.10.9.007

원문보기 상세보기
S. Y. Lee, S. H. Suh, "Factors Influencing the Performance of Interfirm R&D Cooperation Supported by the Government", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol.14, No.3, pp.664-688, 2011. UCI: G704-001043.2011.14.3.003
A. Leiponen, J. Byma, "If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies'", Research Policy, Vol.38, No.9, pp.1478-1488, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.003

상세보기
R. Veugelers, B. Cassiman, "Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms'", Research Policy, Vol.28, No.1, pp.63-80, 1999. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00106-1

상세보기
J. Beldwin, Z. Lin, "Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers", Research Policy, Vol.31, No.1, pp.1-18, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00110-X

상세보기
S. Y. Kang, S. M. Park, J. T. Hwang, "The Impact of Different Types of Innovation on the Survival of Service Firms", Industrial Development Institute Kyungsung University, Vol.32, No.4, pp.211-242, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22793/indinn.2016.32.4.009
J. F. Hair, R. E. Andercon, R. L. Tatham, B. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis 6th Edition, p.928, Prentice Hall, 2006, pp.321-327.
Y. S. Choi, K. W. Kim, "What Explains Firm's Innovativeness in Korean Manufacturing? : Global Activity and Knowledge Sources", KDI Journal of Economic Policy, Vol.35, No.2, pp.41-70, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23895/kdijep.2013.35.2.41

원문보기 상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format