$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

열 개념에 대한 흥미와 학생이 인식하는 과제난이도 수준이 과학상태호기심 유발에 미치는 영향
The Effects of Interest in Thermal Concepts and the Perceived Task Difficulty on Science State Curiosity 원문보기

초등과학교육 = Journal of Korean elementary science education, v.40 no.2, 2021년, pp.175 - 190  

강지훈 (달산초등학교) ,  김지나 (부산대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구의 목적은 열 개념에 대한 흥미와 학생이 인식하는 과제난이도 수준이 과학상태호기심 유발에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 알아보는 것이다. 이를 위해 초등학교 5~6학년 410명을 대상으로 열 개념 과제의 내용에 대한 흥미와 과제를 해결하면서 학생이 인식하는 과제난이도 및 과학상태호기심을 측정하였다. 과학상태호기심 유발에 영향을 미칠 것으로 예상되는 학생의 과학호기심 수준을 공변량으로 하여 2(흥미 낮음 vs 흥미 높음)×2(난이도 쉬움 vs 난이도 어려움) ANCOVA를 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 과제의 내용에 대한 흥미가 높은 학생이 과학상태호기심도 높게 유발되었다. 한편, 학생이 인식하는 과제난이도에 따라 유발되는 과학상태호기심 수준은 차이가 없었다. 그리고 과제의 내용에 대한 흥미가 낮은 학생은 과제를 쉽다고 인식할 경우 과학상태호기심이 높게 유발되었으나, 흥미가 높은 학생은 과제를 어렵다고 인식할 경우 과학상태호기심이 높게 유발되었다. 본 연구는 해당 과제의 내용에 대한 흥미가 과학상태호기심 유발에 영향을 주며, 과제난이도 수준에 따라 흥미가 과학상태호기심 유발에 미치는 영향이 달라진다는 것을 실증적으로 검증하였다는 점에서 의미가 있다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of this study was to find out how interest in thermal concepts and the perceived difficulty affect the stimulation of science state curiosity. To achieve this purpose, 410 elementary school students in 5th to 6th grade were asked to measure interest in the content of the thermal concept ...

주제어

#과학상태호기심   #과학호기심   #흥미   #학생이 인식한 과제난이도   #상호작용 효과  

표/그림 (11)

참고문헌 (65)

  1. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545-561. 

    상세보기

  2. Anderson, R. C., Shirey, L., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1987). Interestingness of children's reading material. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Conative and affective process analyses (Vol. 3, pp. 287-299). Lawrence Erlbaum. 

  3. Arkes, H. R. (1979). Competence and the over justification effect. Motivation and Emotion, 3(2), 143-150. 

    상세보기

  4. Arnone, M. P., Small, R. V., Chauncey, S. A., & McKenna, H. P. (2011). Curiosity, interest and engagement in technology-pervasive learning environments: A new research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 181-198. 

    상세보기

  5. Ayres, P. (2006). Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 389-400. 

    상세보기

  6. Bathgate, M. E., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. (2014). Children's motivation toward science across contexts, manner of interaction, and topic. Science Education, 98(2), 189-215. 

  7. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. McGraw-Hill. 

  8. Boyle, G. J. (1979). Delimitation of state-trait curiosity in relation to state anxiety and learning task performance. Australian Journal of Education, 23(1), 70-82. 

    상세보기

  9. Boyle, G. J. (1983). Critical review of state-trait curiosity test development. Motivation and Emotion, 7(4), 377-397. 

    상세보기

  10. Brindley, J. (1987). Factors affecting task difficulty. In D. Nunan, (Ed.), Guidelines for the development of curriculum resource (pp. 45-56). National Curriculum Resource Centre. 

  11. Clifford, M. M. (1972). Effects of competition as a motivational technique in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 123-137. 

    상세보기

  12. DeLeeuw, P. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 223-234. 

    상세보기

  13. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Riverside Press. 

  14. Gardner, P. L., & Tamir, P. (1989). Interest in biology. part I: A multidimensional construct. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(5), 409-423. 

    상세보기

  15. Grossnickle, E. M. (2016). Disentangling curiosity: Dimensionality, definitions, and distinctions from interest in educational contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 23-60. 

    상세보기

  16. Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D., & Ranganath, C. (2014). State of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit. Neuron, 84(2), 486-496. 

  17. Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2011). Principles of physics: Extended 9th ed. John Wiley & Sons. 

  18. Haussler, P. (1987). Measuring students' interest in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 9(1), 19-92. 

  19. Henderson, B., & Moore, S. G. (1979). Measuring exploratory behavior in young children: A factor-analytic study. Developmental Psychology, 15(2), 113-119. 

    상세보기

  20. Henderson, B., Charlesworth, W. R., & Gamradt, J. (1982). Children's exploratory behavior in a novel field setting. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3(2), 93-99. 

    상세보기

  21. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549-571. 

    상세보기

  22. Hom, Jr. H. L., & Maxwell, F. R. (1983). The impact of task difficulty expectations on intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 7(1), 19-24. 

    상세보기

  23. Honeyfield, J. (1993). Responding to task difficulty. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification: Theory and practice (pp. 127-138). Regional Language Center. 

  24. Im, S., & Pak, S. J. (2000). An analysis of multi-dimension of students' interest in learning physics. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(4), 491-504. 

  25. Jung, M., & Eom, H. (2011). Understanding and Interpretation of interaction effects in multi-factor ANOVA designs. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 13(2), 1-15. 

  26. Kang, J., & Kim, J. (2020). Analysis of the relationship between familiarity, feeling of knowing, state curiosity, and state anxiety of elementary school students in the thermal task contexts. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 39(3), 433-448. 

  27. Kang, J. (2021). Characteristics and learning effects of elementary school students' state curiosity and state anxiety in science learning. Ph. D. thesis, Pusan National University. 

  28. Kang, J., Yoo, P., & Kim, J. (2020). The development of instruments for the measuring science state curiosity and anxiety in science learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(5), 485-502. 

  29. Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T.-Y., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20(8), 963-973. 

    상세보기

  30. Kashdan, T. B., Gallagher, M. W., Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Breen, W. E., Terhar, D., & Steger, M. F. (2009). The curiosity and exploration inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 987-998. 

    상세보기

  31. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 

  32. Kim, H. J., & Im, S. (2012). An analysis of elementary school students' interest about learning science in informal science education environment. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 125-134. 

  33. Kim, H. J., Lee, J. W., & Im, S. (2013). An analysis of students' interest in high school 'science' in view of the 2009 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 17-29. 

  34. Kim, M. K. (2008). Causal relationships among students' attitude, interest, conceptual understanding, and school achievement in secondary physics. Ph. D. thesis, Seoul National University. 

  35. Kim, S. (1996). The role of interest in text comprehension. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 8(2), 273-301. 

  36. Ko, H. K., & Lee, H. S. (2007). Factors of predicting difficulty of mathematics test items in college scholastic ability test. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 10(1), 113-127. 

  37. Koballa, T. R. Jr., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science education. In S. K. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook for research in science education (pp. 75-102). Erlbaum. 

  38. Lavonen, J., Juuti, K., Uitto, A., Meisalo, V., & Byman, R. (2005). Attractiveness of science education in the Finnish comprehensive school. In A. Manninen, K. Miettinen & K. Kiviniemi (Eds.), Research findings on young people's perceptions of technology and science education. Mirror results and good practice. Technology Industries of Finland. 

  39. Lee, K. H., & Ko, H. K. (2010). A study on cases of difficulty variables in high school mathematics items. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 13(2), 323-343. 

  40. Lee, S. H., Lee, B. J., & Son, H. C. (2007). Estimating the regression equations for predicting item difficulty of mathematics in the college scholastic ability test. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A: The Mathematical Education, 46(4), 407-421. 

  41. Li, W., Lee, A., & Solmon, M. (2007). The role of perceptions of task difficulty in relation to self-perceptions of ability, intrinsic value, attainment value, and performance. European Physical Education Review, 3(3), 301-318. 

  42. Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 75-86. 

    상세보기

  43. Litman, J. A., Hutchins, T. L., & Russon, R. K. (2005). Epistemic curiosity, feeling of knowing, and exploratory behavior. Cognition and Emotion, 19(4), 559-582. 

  44. Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75-98. 

    상세보기

  45. Lynch, R., Patten, J. V., & Hennessy, J. (2013). The impact of task difficulty and performance scores on student engagement and progression. Educational Research, 55(3), 291-303. 

  46. McGillivray, S., Murayama, K., & Castel, A. D. (2015). Thirst for knowledge: The effects of curiosity and interest on memory in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 30(4), 835-841. 

    상세보기

  47. Naylor, F. D. (1981). A state-trait curiosity inventory. Australian Psychologist, 16(2), 172-183. 

    상세보기

  48. Park, J. S. (2008). The emotional effects of interest-type and deprivation-type of epistemic curiosity: The perfect mediating role of actual self. Master's thesis, Korea University. 

  49. Park, M. H. (2004). A study of variables related to item difficulty in college scholastic ability test. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 14(1), 71-88. 

  50. Park, T., Eoh, H., Kim, C., & Yun, M. (2000). Relationship between task difficulty and EEG pattern in choice reaction tasks. 대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집, 321-325. 

  51. Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1991). Toward a logic of meanings. Erlbaurn. 

  52. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27-57. 

    상세보기

  53. Ryu, J. (2009). The effects of learner expertise and task difficulty on cognitive load factors and performance. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 15(4), 1-19. 

  54. Scasserra, D. (2008). The influence of perceived task difficulty on task performance. Master's thesis, Rowan University. 

  55. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 299-323. 

  56. Seong, T. (2019). An easy statistical analysis: From descriptive statistics to structural equation model (3rd Ed.) [알기 쉬운 통계분석(3판)]. Hakjisa. 

  57. Shin, D. D., & Kim, S. (2019). Homo curious: Curious of interest? Educational Psychology Review, 31(5), 853-874. 

  58. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-62. 

    상세보기

  59. Spielberger, C. D., Barker, L., Russell, S., Silva de Crane, R., Westberry, L., Knight, J., & Marks, E. (1979). Preliminary manual for the State-Trait Personality Inventory (STPI). University of South Florida. 

  60. Van Velsor, E., & McCauley, C. D. (2004). Our view of leadership development. In C. D. McCauley, & E. Van Velsor (Eds.), The center for creative leadership: Handbook of leadership development (pp. 1-22). Jossey-Bass. 

  61. Vygotsky, L. A. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. 

  62. Weible, J. F., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2016). Science curiosity in learning environments: Developing an attitudinal scale for research in schools, homes, museums, and the community. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1235-1255. 

    상세보기

  63. Won, H., Son, J. H., & An, H. E. (2012). A study on the mismatch of level of difficulty between teachers and learners in Korean achievement test. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 22(3), 1-23. 

  64. Yang, M. (2008). The effects of task difficulty on learners' attention to meaning and form during focus-on-form instruction. Foreign Languages Education, 15(3), 27-52. 

  65. Yoo, J. E. (2013). Misunderstandings and mis-applications on ANCOVA in educational studies. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 13(6), 27-49. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로