최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기Safety and health at work : SH@W, v.12 no.1, 2021년, pp.10 - 19
Ham, Dong-Han (Department of Industrial Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Background: Traditional safety concept, which is called Safety-I, and its relevant methods and models have much contributed toward enhancing the safety of industrial systems. However, they have proved insufficient to be applied to complex socio-technical systems. As an alternative, Safety-II and res...
1 Dekker S. Field guide to human error investigations 2002 Ashgate Aldershot (UK)
2 Leveson N. Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety 2011 The MIT Press Cambridge
3 Yoon Y.S. Ham D.-H. Yoon W.C. A?new approach to analyzing human-related accidents by combined use of HFACS and activity theory-based method Cognition, Technology & Work 19 2017 759 783
4 Yoon Y.S. Ham D.-H. Yoon W.C. Application of activity theory to analysis of human-related accidents: method and case studies Reliability Eng System Safety 150 2016 22 34
5 Hollnagel E. Leonhardt J. Licu T. Shorrock S. From Safety-I to Safety-II: a white paper 2013 EUROCONTROL Brussels (Belgium)
6 Hollnagel E. Safety-I and Safety-II: the past and future of safety management 2014 Ashgate Farnham (UK)
7 Hollnagel E. Resilience engineering: a new understanding of safety J?Ergonomics Society of Korea 35 2016 185 191
8 Leonhardt J. Hollnagel E. Macchi L. Kirwan B. A?white paper on resilience engineering for ATM 2009 EUROCONTROL Brussels (Belgium)
9 Hollnagel E. Understanding accidents-from root causes to performance variability Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th human factors and power plants 2002 1 6
10 Underwood P. Waterson P. Systematic accident analysis: examining the gap between research and practice Accident Analysis Prevention 55 2013 154 164 23542136
11 Underwood P. Waterson P. Systems thinking, the Swiss cheese model and accident analysis: a comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg train derailment using the ATSB, Accimap and STAMP models Accident Analysis Prevention 68 2014 75 94 23973170
12 Wiegmann D.A. Shappell S.A. A?human error approach to aviation accident analysis: the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System 2003 Ashgate Farnham (UK)
13 Reinach S. Viale A. Application of a human error framework to conduct train accident/incident investigations Accident Analysis Prevention 38 2006 396 406 16310153
14 Sujan M.A. Huang H. Braithwaite J. Learning from incidents in health care: critique from a safety-II perspective Safety Science 99 2017 115 121
15 Patterson M. Deutsch E. Safety-I, Safety-II and resilience engineering Current Problems Pediatric Adolescent Health Care 45 2015 382 389
16 Ferjencik M. An integrated approach to the analysis of incident causes Safety Science 49 2011 886 905
17 Svendung I. Rasmussen J. Graphic representation of accident scenarios: mapping system structure and the causation of accidents Safety Science 40 2002 397 417
18 Perrow C. Normal accidents-living with high risk technologies 1999 Princeton University Press Princeton
19 Patriarca R. Bergstrom J. Di Gravio G. Costantino F. Resilience engineering: current status of the research and future challenges Safety Science 102 2018 79 100
20 Dekker S. Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance Journal of Safety Research 33 2002 371 385 12404999
21 Hollnagel E. Woods D.D. Leveson N. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts 2006 Ashgate Aldershot (UK)
22 Hollnagel E. Paries J. Woods D.D. Wreathall J. Resilience engineering in practice: a guidebook 2011 Ashgate Farnham (UK)
23 Shorrock S. What Safety-II isn’t 2016 Available from: http://humanisticsystems.com/2014/06/08/what-safety-ii-isnt/
24 Ham D.-H. Park J. Use of a big data analysis technique for extracting HRA data from event investigation reports based on the Safety-II concept Reliability Engineering System Safety 194 2020 106232
25 Hollnagel E. Macleod F. The imperfections of accident analysis Loss Prevention Bulletin 270 2019 2 6
26 Havinga J. Dekker S. Rae A. Everyday work investigations for safety Theoretical Issues Ergonomics Science 19 2017 213 228
27 de Carvalho P.V. Righi A.W. Huber G.J. Lemos C. Jatoba A. Gomes J.O. Reflections on work as done (WAD) and work as imagined (WAI) in an emergency response organizations: a study on firefighters training exercises Applied Ergonomics 68 2018 28 41 29409645
28 Woltjer R. Pinska-Chauvin E. Laursen T. Josefsson B. Towards understanding work-as-done in air traffic management safety assessment and design Reliability Engineering System Safety 141 2015 115 130
29 Wachs P. Saurin T.A. Righi A.W. Wears R.L. Resilience skills as emergent phenomena: a study of emergency departments in Brazil and the United States Applied Ergonomics 56 2016 227 237 26972019
30 Wachs P. Saurin T.A. Modelling interactions between procedures and resilience skills Applied Ergonomics 68 2018 328 337 29409652
31 Hollnagel E. The ETTO principle: efficiency-thoroughness trade-off 2009 Ashgate Farnham (UK)
32 Xiao T. Sanderson P. Clayton S. Venkatesh B. The ETTO principle and organizational strategies: a field study of ICU bed and staff management Cognition, Technology & Work 12 2010 143 152
33 Salmon P.M. Stanton N.A. Lenne M. Jenkins D.P. Rafferty L.A. Walker G.H. Human factors methods and accident analysis: practical guidance and case study applications 2011 Ashgate Farnham (UK)
34 Salmon P.M. Cornelissen M. Trotter M.J. Systems-based accident analysis methods: a comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP Safety Science 50 2012 1158 1170
35 Hulme A. Stanton N.A. Walker G.H. Waterson P. Salmon P.M. What do applications of systems thinking accident analysis methods tell us about accident causation? A systematic review of applications between 1990 and 2018 Safety Science 117 2019 164 183
36 Lundberg J. Rollenhagen C. Hollnagel E. What you find is not always what you fix-how other aspects than causes of accidents decide recommendations for remedial actions Accident Analysis and Prevention 42 2010 2132 2139 20728672
37 Hollnagel E. FRAM: the functional resonance analysis method 2012 Ashgate Farnham (UK)
38 Hollnagel E. Hounsgaard J. Colligan L. FRAM-the Functional Resonance Analysis Method-a handbook for the practical use of the method 2014 Center for Quality
39 Anderson J.E. Ross A. Back J. Duncan M. Snell P. Walsh K. Jaye P. Implementing resilience engineering for healthcare quality improvement using the CARE model: a feasibility study protocol Pilot Feasibility Studies 2 2016 61 27965876
40 Hollnagel E. Safety-II in practice: developing the resilience potentials 2018 Routledge London (UK)
42 Shirali G. Shekari M. Angali K.A. Assessing reliability and validity of an instrument for measuring resilience safety culture in sociotechnical systems Safety Health Work 9 2018 296 307
43 Lundberg J. Johansson B. Systemic resilience model Reliability Engineering System Safety 141 2015 22 32
44 Hoffman R.R. Hancock P.A. Measuring resilience Human Factors 59 2017 564 581 28134573
45 Arpansa Regulatory guide: holistic safety 2017 Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency
46 Arpansa Regulatory guide: holistic safety-sample questions 2017 Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency
47 Raben D.C. Viskum B. Mikkelsen K.L. Hounsgaard J. Bogh S.B. Hollnagel E. Application of a non-linear model to understand healthcare processes: using the functional resonance analysis method on a case study of the early detection of sepsis Reliability Engineering and System Safety 177 2018 1 11
48 Hollnagel E. Pruchnicki S. Woljter R. Etcher S. Analysis of Comair flight 5191 with the functional resonance accident model Proceedings of the 8th international symposium of the Australian aviation psychology association 2008
49 Rosa L.V. Haddad A.N. de Carvalho P. Assessing risk in sustainable construction using the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) Cognition, Technology & Work 17 2015 559 573
50 Patriarca R. Di Gravio G. Costantino F. Tronci M. The functional resonance analysis method for a systemic risk based environmental auditing in a sinter plant: a semi-quantitative approach Environmental Impact Assessment Rev 63 2017 72 86
51 Patriarca R. Bergstrom J. Di Gravio G. Costantino F. Defining the functional resonance analysis space: combining abstraction hierarchy and FRAM Reliability Engineering System Safety 165 2018 34 46
52 Clay-Williams R. Hounsgaard J. Hollnagel E. Where the rubber meets the road: using FRAM to align work-as-imagined with work-as-done when implementing clinical guidelines Implementation Science 10 2015 125 26319404
53 Raben D.C. Both S.B. Viskum B. Mikkelsen K.L. Hollnagel E. Learn from what goes right: a demonstration of a new systematic method for identification of leading indicators in healthcare Reliability Engineering System Safety 169 2018 187 198
54 Aguilera M. da Fronseca B. Ferris T. Vidal M. de Carvalho P. Modelling performance variabilities in oil spill response to improve system resilience J?Loss Prevension Process Industries 41 2016 18 30
55 Hounsgaard J. Patient safety in everyday work: learning from thigs that go right 2016 University of Southern Denmakr
56 Herrera I.A. Woltjer R. Comparing a multi-linear (STEP) and systemic (FRAM) method for accident analysis Reliability Engineering System Safety 95 2010 1269 1275
57 de Carvalho P. The use of Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) in a mid-air collision to understand some characteristics of the air traffic management system resilience Reliability Engineering System Safety 96 2011 1482 1498
58 Woltjer R. Resilience assessment based on models of functional resonance Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on resilience engineering 2008
59 Tian J. Wu J. Yang Q. Zhao T. FRAMA: a safety assessment approach based on Functional Resonance Analysis Method Safety Science 85 2016 41 52
60 Furniss D. Curzon P. Blandford A. Using FRAM beyond safety: a case study to explore how sociotechnical systems can flourish or stall Theoretical Issues Ergonomics Science 17 2016 507 532
61 Patriarca R. Di Gravio G. Costantino F. A?Monte Carlo evolution of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM0 to assess performance variability in complex systems Safety Science 91 2017 49 60
62 Pereira A. Introduction to the use of FRAM on the effectiveness assessment of a radiopharmaceutical dispatches process Proceedings of 2013 international nuclear atlantic conference 2013
63 Praetorius G. Hollnagel E. Dahlman J. Modelling vessel traffic service to understand resilience in everyday operations Reliability Engineering System Safety 141 2015 10 21
64 de Vries L. Work as Done? Understanding the practice of sociotechnical work in the maritime domain J?Cognitive Engineering Decision Making 11 2017 270 295
65 Patriarca R. Di Gravio G. Woltjer R. Costantino F. Praetorius G. Ferreira P. Hollnagel E. Framing the FRAM: a literature review on the functional resonance analysis method Safety Science 129 2020 104827
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.