$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Safety-II and Resilience Engineering in a Nutshell: An Introductory Guide to Their Concepts and Methods 원문보기

Safety and health at work : SH@W, v.12 no.1, 2021년, pp.10 - 19  

Ham, Dong-Han (Department of Industrial Engineering, Chonnam National University)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Background: Traditional safety concept, which is called Safety-I, and its relevant methods and models have much contributed toward enhancing the safety of industrial systems. However, they have proved insufficient to be applied to complex socio-technical systems. As an alternative, Safety-II and res...

주제어

#FRAM   #Resilience   #Resilience engineering   #Safety-I   #Safety-II  

참고문헌 (65)

  1. 1 Dekker S. Field guide to human error investigations 2002 Ashgate Aldershot (UK) 

  2. 2 Leveson N. Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety 2011 The MIT Press Cambridge 

  3. 3 Yoon Y.S. Ham D.-H. Yoon W.C. A？new approach to analyzing human-related accidents by combined use of HFACS and activity theory-based method Cognition, Technology & Work 19 2017 759 783 

  4. 4 Yoon Y.S. Ham D.-H. Yoon W.C. Application of activity theory to analysis of human-related accidents: method and case studies Reliability Eng System Safety 150 2016 22 34 

  5. 5 Hollnagel E. Leonhardt J. Licu T. Shorrock S. From Safety-I to Safety-II: a white paper 2013 EUROCONTROL Brussels (Belgium) 

  6. 6 Hollnagel E. Safety-I and Safety-II: the past and future of safety management 2014 Ashgate Farnham (UK) 

  7. 7 Hollnagel E. Resilience engineering: a new understanding of safety J？Ergonomics Society of Korea 35 2016 185 191 

  8. 8 Leonhardt J. Hollnagel E. Macchi L. Kirwan B. A？white paper on resilience engineering for ATM 2009 EUROCONTROL Brussels (Belgium) 

  9. 9 Hollnagel E. Understanding accidents-from root causes to performance variability Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th human factors and power plants 2002 1 6 

  10. 10 Underwood P. Waterson P. Systematic accident analysis: examining the gap between research and practice Accident Analysis Prevention 55 2013 154 164 23542136 

  11. 11 Underwood P. Waterson P. Systems thinking, the Swiss cheese model and accident analysis: a comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg train derailment using the ATSB, Accimap and STAMP models Accident Analysis Prevention 68 2014 75 94 23973170 

    상세보기

  12. 12 Wiegmann D.A. Shappell S.A. A？human error approach to aviation accident analysis: the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System 2003 Ashgate Farnham (UK) 

  13. 13 Reinach S. Viale A. Application of a human error framework to conduct train accident/incident investigations Accident Analysis Prevention 38 2006 396 406 16310153 

    상세보기

  14. 14 Sujan M.A. Huang H. Braithwaite J. Learning from incidents in health care: critique from a safety-II perspective Safety Science 99 2017 115 121 

    상세보기

  15. 15 Patterson M. Deutsch E. Safety-I, Safety-II and resilience engineering Current Problems Pediatric Adolescent Health Care 45 2015 382 389 

  16. 16 Ferjencik M. An integrated approach to the analysis of incident causes Safety Science 49 2011 886 905 

    상세보기

  17. 17 Svendung I. Rasmussen J. Graphic representation of accident scenarios: mapping system structure and the causation of accidents Safety Science 40 2002 397 417 

    상세보기

  18. 18 Perrow C. Normal accidents-living with high risk technologies 1999 Princeton University Press Princeton 

  19. 19 Patriarca R. Bergstrom J. Di Gravio G. Costantino F. Resilience engineering: current status of the research and future challenges Safety Science 102 2018 79 100 

    상세보기

  20. 20 Dekker S. Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance Journal of Safety Research 33 2002 371 385 12404999 

    상세보기

  21. 21 Hollnagel E. Woods D.D. Leveson N. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts 2006 Ashgate Aldershot (UK) 

  22. 22 Hollnagel E. Paries J. Woods D.D. Wreathall J. Resilience engineering in practice: a guidebook 2011 Ashgate Farnham (UK) 

  23. 23 Shorrock S. What Safety-II isn’t 2016 Available from: http://humanisticsystems.com/2014/06/08/what-safety-ii-isnt/ 

  24. 24 Ham D.-H. Park J. Use of a big data analysis technique for extracting HRA data from event investigation reports based on the Safety-II concept Reliability Engineering System Safety 194 2020 106232 

    상세보기

  25. 25 Hollnagel E. Macleod F. The imperfections of accident analysis Loss Prevention Bulletin 270 2019 2 6 

  26. 26 Havinga J. Dekker S. Rae A. Everyday work investigations for safety Theoretical Issues Ergonomics Science 19 2017 213 228 

  27. 27 de Carvalho P.V. Righi A.W. Huber G.J. Lemos C. Jatoba A. Gomes J.O. Reflections on work as done (WAD) and work as imagined (WAI) in an emergency response organizations: a study on firefighters training exercises Applied Ergonomics 68 2018 28 41 29409645 

  28. 28 Woltjer R. Pinska-Chauvin E. Laursen T. Josefsson B. Towards understanding work-as-done in air traffic management safety assessment and design Reliability Engineering System Safety 141 2015 115 130 

    상세보기

  29. 29 Wachs P. Saurin T.A. Righi A.W. Wears R.L. Resilience skills as emergent phenomena: a study of emergency departments in Brazil and the United States Applied Ergonomics 56 2016 227 237 26972019 

    상세보기

  30. 30 Wachs P. Saurin T.A. Modelling interactions between procedures and resilience skills Applied Ergonomics 68 2018 328 337 29409652 

    상세보기

  31. 31 Hollnagel E. The ETTO principle: efficiency-thoroughness trade-off 2009 Ashgate Farnham (UK) 

  32. 32 Xiao T. Sanderson P. Clayton S. Venkatesh B. The ETTO principle and organizational strategies: a field study of ICU bed and staff management Cognition, Technology & Work 12 2010 143 152 

  33. 33 Salmon P.M. Stanton N.A. Lenne M. Jenkins D.P. Rafferty L.A. Walker G.H. Human factors methods and accident analysis: practical guidance and case study applications 2011 Ashgate Farnham (UK) 

  34. 34 Salmon P.M. Cornelissen M. Trotter M.J. Systems-based accident analysis methods: a comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP Safety Science 50 2012 1158 1170 

    상세보기

  35. 35 Hulme A. Stanton N.A. Walker G.H. Waterson P. Salmon P.M. What do applications of systems thinking accident analysis methods tell us about accident causation? A systematic review of applications between 1990 and 2018 Safety Science 117 2019 164 183 

    상세보기

  36. 36 Lundberg J. Rollenhagen C. Hollnagel E. What you find is not always what you fix-how other aspects than causes of accidents decide recommendations for remedial actions Accident Analysis and Prevention 42 2010 2132 2139 20728672 

    상세보기

  37. 37 Hollnagel E. FRAM: the functional resonance analysis method 2012 Ashgate Farnham (UK) 

  38. 38 Hollnagel E. Hounsgaard J. Colligan L. FRAM-the Functional Resonance Analysis Method-a handbook for the practical use of the method 2014 Center for Quality 

  39. 39 Anderson J.E. Ross A. Back J. Duncan M. Snell P. Walsh K. Jaye P. Implementing resilience engineering for healthcare quality improvement using the CARE model: a feasibility study protocol Pilot Feasibility Studies 2 2016 61 27965876 

  40. 40 Hollnagel E. Safety-II in practice: developing the resilience potentials 2018 Routledge London (UK) 

  41. 41 Patriarca R. Gravio G.D. Costantino F. Falegnami A. Bilotta F. An analytic framework to assess organizational resilience Safety and Health at Work 9 2018 265 276 30370158 

    원문보기 상세보기

  42. 42 Shirali G. Shekari M. Angali K.A. Assessing reliability and validity of an instrument for measuring resilience safety culture in sociotechnical systems Safety Health Work 9 2018 296 307 

  43. 43 Lundberg J. Johansson B. Systemic resilience model Reliability Engineering System Safety 141 2015 22 32 

    상세보기

  44. 44 Hoffman R.R. Hancock P.A. Measuring resilience Human Factors 59 2017 564 581 28134573 

    상세보기

  45. 45 Arpansa Regulatory guide: holistic safety 2017 Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency 

  46. 46 Arpansa Regulatory guide: holistic safety-sample questions 2017 Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency 

  47. 47 Raben D.C. Viskum B. Mikkelsen K.L. Hounsgaard J. Bogh S.B. Hollnagel E. Application of a non-linear model to understand healthcare processes: using the functional resonance analysis method on a case study of the early detection of sepsis Reliability Engineering and System Safety 177 2018 1 11 

    상세보기

  48. 48 Hollnagel E. Pruchnicki S. Woljter R. Etcher S. Analysis of Comair flight 5191 with the functional resonance accident model Proceedings of the 8th international symposium of the Australian aviation psychology association 2008 

  49. 49 Rosa L.V. Haddad A.N. de Carvalho P. Assessing risk in sustainable construction using the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) Cognition, Technology & Work 17 2015 559 573 

    상세보기

  50. 50 Patriarca R. Di Gravio G. Costantino F. Tronci M. The functional resonance analysis method for a systemic risk based environmental auditing in a sinter plant: a semi-quantitative approach Environmental Impact Assessment Rev 63 2017 72 86 

  51. 51 Patriarca R. Bergstrom J. Di Gravio G. Costantino F. Defining the functional resonance analysis space: combining abstraction hierarchy and FRAM Reliability Engineering System Safety 165 2018 34 46 

  52. 52 Clay-Williams R. Hounsgaard J. Hollnagel E. Where the rubber meets the road: using FRAM to align work-as-imagined with work-as-done when implementing clinical guidelines Implementation Science 10 2015 125 26319404 

    상세보기

  53. 53 Raben D.C. Both S.B. Viskum B. Mikkelsen K.L. Hollnagel E. Learn from what goes right: a demonstration of a new systematic method for identification of leading indicators in healthcare Reliability Engineering System Safety 169 2018 187 198 

    상세보기

  54. 54 Aguilera M. da Fronseca B. Ferris T. Vidal M. de Carvalho P. Modelling performance variabilities in oil spill response to improve system resilience J？Loss Prevension Process Industries 41 2016 18 30 

  55. 55 Hounsgaard J. Patient safety in everyday work: learning from thigs that go right 2016 University of Southern Denmakr 

  56. 56 Herrera I.A. Woltjer R. Comparing a multi-linear (STEP) and systemic (FRAM) method for accident analysis Reliability Engineering System Safety 95 2010 1269 1275 

    상세보기

  57. 57 de Carvalho P. The use of Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) in a mid-air collision to understand some characteristics of the air traffic management system resilience Reliability Engineering System Safety 96 2011 1482 1498 

    상세보기

  58. 58 Woltjer R. Resilience assessment based on models of functional resonance Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on resilience engineering 2008 

  59. 59 Tian J. Wu J. Yang Q. Zhao T. FRAMA: a safety assessment approach based on Functional Resonance Analysis Method Safety Science 85 2016 41 52 

    상세보기

  60. 60 Furniss D. Curzon P. Blandford A. Using FRAM beyond safety: a case study to explore how sociotechnical systems can flourish or stall Theoretical Issues Ergonomics Science 17 2016 507 532 

  61. 61 Patriarca R. Di Gravio G. Costantino F. A？Monte Carlo evolution of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM0 to assess performance variability in complex systems Safety Science 91 2017 49 60 

  62. 62 Pereira A. Introduction to the use of FRAM on the effectiveness assessment of a radiopharmaceutical dispatches process Proceedings of 2013 international nuclear atlantic conference 2013 

  63. 63 Praetorius G. Hollnagel E. Dahlman J. Modelling vessel traffic service to understand resilience in everyday operations Reliability Engineering System Safety 141 2015 10 21 

    상세보기

  64. 64 de Vries L. Work as Done? Understanding the practice of sociotechnical work in the maritime domain J？Cognitive Engineering Decision Making 11 2017 270 295 

  65. 65 Patriarca R. Di Gravio G. Woltjer R. Costantino F. Praetorius G. Ferreira P. Hollnagel E. Framing the FRAM: a literature review on the functional resonance analysis method Safety Science 129 2020 104827 

    상세보기
LOADING...

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로