$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 예비교사의 TPACK 평가틀 개발과 TPACK 발달 저해 요인 분석
Development of Pre-Service Teachers' TPACK Evaluation Framework and Analysis of Hindrance Factors of TPACK Development 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.41 no.4, 2021년, pp.325 - 338  

최경식 (한국교원대학교) ,  백성혜 (한국교원대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

이 연구는 한 교사 양성대학에서 40명의 예비교사를 대상으로 TPACK 발달을 위한 15주 교육프로그램을 개발하고, 예비교사의 TPACK의 실천적 역량을 평가하기 위한 TPACK 발달 평가틀을 개발하였다. 개발된 TPACK(Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) 발달 평가틀은 TPK(Technological Pedagogical Knowledge), TCK(Technological Content Knowledge), TPACK이 각각 0단계부터 4단계까지 5단계로 구성되었다. 이를 토대로 예비교사의 TPK, TCK, TPACK 수준을 평가한 결과, 대부분의 예비교사의 TPK, TCK, TPACK 수준은 일치하였으나, 일부 예비교사의 경우 TPK와 TCK가 일치하지 않았다. 이때 TPACK 수준은 TPK와 TCK 가운데 낮은 수준을 따르는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 TPACK 수준이 낮은 예비교사가 갖고 있는 TPACK 발달 저해요인을 조사한 결과, 학생의 자율적 학습 능력에 대한 불신, 학생의 상호작용 역량에 대한 불신, 학교 현장의 현실적 제약에 대한 인식 등이 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과를 토대로 실천적인 TPACK 발달을 위해서는 예비교사에게 균형잡힌 TPK와 TCK의 발달을 돕고, 예비교사가 갖고 있는 TPACK 발달 저해요인을 제거하는 교육 프로그램을 제공할 필요가 있다고 주장하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

In this study, we developed a 15-week educational program for TPACK(Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) development of 40 pre-service teachers in a university for teacher training. We also developed a TPACK evaluation framework to evaluate the practical competency of TPACK of pre-service te...

주제어

표/그림 (10)

참고문헌 (107)

  1. Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281-300. 

  2. Allsopp, M., Hohlfeld, T. & Kemker, K. (2007). The technology integration matrix: The development of field-test of an Internet based multimedia assessment tool for the implementation of instructional technology in the classroom. Proceeding of Florida Educational Research Association 2007 Conference: Tampa, FL. 

  3. Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., & Hollingsworth, T. D. (2020). How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet, 395(10228), 931-934. 

  4. Angeli, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher education method course through technology: Effects on preservice teachers' technology competency. Computers & Education, 45(4), 383-398. 

  5. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice teachers as ICT designers: An instructional design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292-302. 

  6. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154-168. 

  7. Archambault, L. (2016). Exploring the Use of Qualitative Methods to Examine TPACK. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators (2nd ed.). Routledge. 

  8. Archambault, L., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656-1662. 

  9. Baxter J. A., & Lederman N. G. (1999) Assessment and Measurement of Pedagogical Content Knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds) Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 6 (pp. 147-161). Springer. 

  10. Booker, S. (2017). The evolution of pre-service teachers TPACK after completing an undergraduate technology integration course [Doctoral dissertation, Kennesaw State University]. 

  11. Borg, M. (2004). The apprenticeship of observation. ELT Journal, 58(3), 274-276. 

  12. Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2009). Strategies for preparing preservice social studies teachers to effectively integrate technology: Models and practices. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 46-59. 

  13. Chai, C. S. (2010). The relationships among Singaporean preservice teachers' ICT competencies, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs on the espoused use of ICT. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 387-400. 

  14. Chai, C. S., Hong, H.-Y., & Teo, T. K. G. (2009). Singaporean and Taiwanese pre-service teachers' beliefs and their attitude towards ICT use: A comparative study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 117-128. 

  15. Chai, C. S., & Koh, J. H. L. (2017). Changing teachers' TPACK and design beliefs through the Scaffolded TPACK Lesson Design Model (STLDM). Learning: Research and Practice, 3(2), 114-129. 

  16. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). A review of the quantitative measures of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators. Routledge. 

  17. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C.-C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193. 

  18. Choi, E.-S., Lee, Y.-J., & Paik, S.-H. (2017). The Effects of Programming-Based Lessons on Science Teachers' Perceptions Related to TPACK. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 693-703. 

  19. Choi, K., & Paik, S.-H. (2020a). The difference of measurement results between the questionnaire and performance assessment of Pre-service teacher's TPACK competency. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(4), 437-449. 

  20. Choi, K., & Paik, S.-H. (2020b). The effect of lessons considering the TPACK development stage on the self-efficacy and development level of pre-service teachers. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(22), 1371-1391. 

  21. Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (2018). Practical intelligence and tacit knowledge: An ecological view of expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Cambridge handbooks in psychology. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 770-792). Cambridge University Press. 

  22. Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Thacker, I. (2021). A Comparison of Perceived and Observed Learning From Professional Development: Relationships Among Self-Reports, Direct Assessments, and Teacher Characteristics. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(2), 138-151. 

  23. Cox, S. M. (2008). A Conceptual Analysis of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge [Doctoral dissertation]. Brigham Young University. 

  24. Cox, S. M., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in Practice: Using an Elaborated Model of the TPACK Framework to Analyze and Depict Teacher Knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60-69. 

  25. Crompton, H. (2015). Pre-service Teachers' Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Beliefs on the Use of Technology in the K-12 Mathematics Classroom: A Review of the Literature. In C. Angeli & N. Valanides (Eds.), Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (pp. 239-250). Springer US. 

  26. Curaoglu, O., Bu, L., Dickey, L., Kim, H. & Cakir, R. (2010). A Case Study of Investigating Preservice Mathematics Teachers' Initial Use of the Next-Generation TI-Nspire Graphing Calculators with Regard to TPACK. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3803-3810). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 

  27. Demetriou, C., Ozer, B. U., & Essau, C. A. (2014). Self-report questionnaires. The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology, 1-6. 

  28. Deng, F., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C.-C., & Lee, M.-H. (2014). The relationships among Chinese practicing teachers' epistemic beliefs, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs about the use of ICT. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 245-256. 

  29. Duke, N. K., & Mallette, M. H. (2011). Literacy research methodologies. Guilford Press. 

  30. Dunning, D. (2011). Chapter five: The Dunning-Kruger Effect: On Being Ignorant of One's Own Ignorance. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol 44, pp. 247-296). Academic Press. 

  31. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. 

  32. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. 

  33. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. 

  34. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Teachers' beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st-century teaching and learning. International Handbook of Research on Teacher Beliefs, 403. 

  35. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson Education. 

  36. Gilbert, J. K., & Justi, R. (2016). Modelling-based Teaching in Science Education (Vol. 9). Springer International Publishing. 

  37. Glazer, E. M., Hannafin, M. J., Polly, D., & Rich, P. (2009). Factors and interactions influencing technology integration during situated professional development in an elementary school. Computers in the Schools, 26(1), 21-39. 

  38. Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953-1960. 

  39. Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Smith, N. B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates' technology integration decisions: TPACK decision making. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 530-546. 

  40. Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79. 

  41. Graham, C., Cox, S. & Velasquez, A. (2009). Teaching and Measuring TPACK Development in Two Preservice Teacher Preparation Programs. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4081-4086). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 

  42. Harris, J. B., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. J. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3833-3840). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 

  43. Harris, J. B., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. J. (2012). Testing an Instrument Using Structured Interviews to Assess Experienced Teachers' TPACK. In C. Maddux & D. Gibbons (Eds.), Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2012 (pp. 15-22). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. 

  44. Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers' curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229. 

  45. Hazzan, O. (2002). Prospective high school mathematics teachers' attitudes toward integrating computers in their future teaching. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 35(2), 213-225. 

  46. Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499-1509. 

  47. Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., Blunk, M., Goffney, I. M., & Rowan, B. (2007). Validating the ecological assumption: The relationship of measure scores to classroom teaching and student learning. Measurement, 5(2-3), 107-118. 

  48. Hofer, M. J. & Harris, J. B. (2012). TPACK Research with Inservice Teachers: Where's the TCK?. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4704-4709). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 

  49. Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful Learning with Technology: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Higher Ed. 

  50. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154. 

  51. Jacobson, M. J., So, H.-J., Teo, T., Lee, J., Pathak, S., & Lossman, H. (2010). Epistemology and learning: Impact on pedagogical practices and technology use in Singapore schools. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1694-1706. 

  52. Jang, S.-J., & Tsai, M.-F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327-338. 

  53. Jen, T.-H., Yeh, Y.-F., Hsu, Y.-S., Wu, H.-K., & Chen, K.-M. (2016). Science teachers' TPACK-Practical: Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach. Computers & Education, 95, 45-62. 

  54. Judson, E. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 581-597. 

  55. Jung, J., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2020). Course-level modeling of preservice teacher learning of technology integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 555-571. 

  56. Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 200-222. 

  57. Kang, S., & Jang, M. (2016). On secondary mathematics teachers' technology integration self-efficacy. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. A: The Mathematical Education, 55(4), 523-538. 

  58. Kaplon-Schilis, A., & Lyublinskaya, I. (2020). Analysis of Relationship Between Five Domains of TPACK Framework: TK, PK, CK Math, CK Science, and TPACK of Pre-service Special Education Teachers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 25-43. 

  59. Kereluik, K., Casperson, G. & Akcaoglu, M. (2010). Coding Pre-Service Teacher Lesson Plans for TPACK. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3889-3891). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 

  60. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., & Peruski, L. (2004). With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-55. 

  61. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740-762. 

  62. Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S., & Mishra, P. (2012). How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. In R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes & M. L. Niess (Eds.), Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches (pp. 16-31). IGI Global. 

  63. Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric for assessing teachers' lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6). 

  64. Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2015). Towards a Web 2.0 TPACK lesson design framework: Applications of a Web 2.0 TPACK survey of Singapore preservice teachers. In T. B. Lin, V. Chen, & C. S. Chai (Eds.), New media and learning in the 21st century (pp. 161-180). Springer. 

  65. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121. 

  66. Landry, G. A. (2010). Creating and validating an instrument to measure middle school mathematics teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Tennessee. 

  67. Lee, Y., Ryu, J., & Han, K.-S. (2020). Direction of Post-Corona Era Education Seen through Media Articles: The Role of "Creativity Education" in Crisis. The Journal of Creativity Education, 20(4), 65-85. 

  68. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. University of Chicago Press. 

  69. LoTi(2011). LoTi Digital-Age Framework. Retrieved from http://ts.prn.bc.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2012/01/LoTi_Framework_Sniff_Test.pdf. 

  70. Lyublinskaya, I., & Tournaki, N. (2012). The effects of teacher content authoring on TPACK and on student achievement in algebra: Research on instruction with the TI-Nspire handheld In R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes & M. L. Niess (Eds.), Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches (pp. 295-322). IGI Global. 

  71. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006a). Designing learning from day one: A first day activity to foster design thinking about educational technology. Teachers College Record. 

  72. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006b). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. 

  73. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1-16. 

  74. Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23, 40-42. 

  75. Moersch, C. (2011). Digital Age Best Practices: Teaching and Learning Refocused. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi10.1.1.800.5887&reprep1&typepdf 

  76. Niess, M. L. (2008). Knowledge needed for teaching with technologies-Call it TPACK. AMTE Connections, 17(2), 9-10. 

  77. Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge Growth in Teaching with Technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 299-317. 

  78. Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper, S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Ozgun-Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 9(1). https://citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/mathematics/mathematics-teacher-tpack-standards-and-development-model. 

  79. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321-1335. 

  80. Ozgun-Koca, S. A., Meagher, M., & Edwards, M. T. (2010). Preservice teachers' emerging TPACK in a technology-rich methods class. The Mathematics Educator, 19(2), 10-20. 

  81. Palak, D., & Walls, R. T. (2009). Teachers' Beliefs and Technology Practices: A Mixed-methods Approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 417-441. 

  82. Papanastasiou, E. C., Zembylas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can Computer Use Hurt Science Achievement? The USA Results from PISA. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 325-332. 

  83. Papanikolaou, K. (2017). Learning design as a vehicle for developing TPACK in blended teacher training on technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 34. 

  84. Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology, 1(2007), 224-239. 

  85. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Doubleday. 

  86. Polly, D. (2011). Examining teachers' enactment of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in their mathematics teaching after technology integration professional development. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(1), 37-59. 

  87. Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Examining how learner-centered professional development influences teachers' espoused and enacted practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(2), 120-130. 

  88. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15. 

  89. Ravitz, J. L., Becker, H. J., & Wong, Y. (2000). Constructivist-Compatible Beliefs and Practices among U.S. Teachers. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey Report #4. (NSF-REC-9600614). Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. 

  90. Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2020). Social Isolation and Acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Expansion of the UTAUT Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183-208. 

  91. Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 883-907. 

  92. Sang, G., Valcke, M., Van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103-112. 

  93. Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2018). The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers' technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modeling approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 67-80. 

  94. Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2021). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106586. 

  95. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. 

  96. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. 

  97. Speer, N. M. (2008). Connecting beliefs and practices: A fine-grained analysis of a college mathematics teacher's collections of beliefs and their relationship to his instructional practices. Cognition and Instruction, 26(2), 218-267. 

  98. Stoilescu, D. (2015). A Critical Examination of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework: Secondary School Mathematics Teachers Integrating Technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(4), 514-547. 

  99. Suharwoto, G. (2006). Developing and Implementing a Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Teaching Mathematics with Technology. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2006-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3824-3828). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 

  100. Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2006). Preparing preservice elementary teachers to teach science through computer models. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 87-98. 

  101. Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2008a). Learning and teaching about scientific models with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 220-233. 

  102. Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2008b). Professional development for computer-enhanced learning: A case study with science teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 3-12. 

  103. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge - a review of the literature: Technological pedagogical content. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121. 

  104. Walen, S. B., Williams, S. R., & Garner, B. E. (2003). Pre-service teachers learning mathematics using calculators: A failure to connect current and future practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(4), 445-462. 

  105. Welsh, J., Harmes, J. C., & Winkelman, R. (2011). Florida's Technology Integration Matrix. Principal Leadership, 12(2), 69-71. 

  106. Willermark, S. (2018). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A Review of Empirical Studies Published From 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315-343. 

  107. Yoder, A. J. (2000). The Relationship between Graphing Calculator Use and Teachers' Beliefs about Learning Algebra. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, 25-28. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로