[논문]SPECT/CT 영상에서 에너지창 기반 산란보정과 CT 기반 산란보정 방법의 정량적 정확성 비교

김지현; 이주영

doi:10.17946/jrst.2022.45.2.135

SPECT/CT 영상에서 에너지창 기반 산란보정과 CT 기반 산란보정 방법의 정량적 정확성 비교
The Comparison of Quantitative Accuracy between Energy Window-Based and CT-Based Scatter Correction Method in SPECT/CT Images 원문보기

방사선기술과학 = Journal of radiological science and technology, v.45 no.2, 2022년, pp.135 - 143

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

In SPECT image, scatter count is the cause of quantitative count error and image quality degradation. This study is to evaluate the accuracy of CT based SC(CTSC) and energy window based SC(EWSC) as the comparison with existing Non SC. SPECT/CT images were obtained after filling air in order to acquire a reference image without the influence of scatter count inside the Triple line insert phantom setting hot rod(99mTc 74.0 MBq) in the middle and each SPECT/CT image was obtained each separately after filling water instead of air in order to derive the influence of scatter count under the same conditions. For EWSC, 9 sub-energy windows were set additionally in addition to main energy window(140 keV, 20%) and then, images were acquired at the same time and five types of EWSC including DPW(dual photo-peak window)10%, DEW(dual energy window)20%, TEW(triple energy window)10%, TEW5.0%, TEW2.5% were used. Under the condition without fluctuations in primary count, total count was measured by drawing volume of interest (VOI) in the images of the two conditions and then, the ratio of scatter count of total counts was calculated as percent scatter fraction(%SF) and the count error with image filled with water was evaluated with percent normalized mean-square error(%NMSE) based on the image filled with air. Based on the image filled with air, %SF of images filled with water to which each SC method was applied is non scatter correction(NSC) 37.44, DPW 27.41, DEW 21.84, TEW10% 19.60, TEW5% 17.02, TEW2.5% 14.68, CTSC 5.57 and the scatter counts were removed the most in CTSC and %NMSE is NSC 35.80, DPW 14.28, DEW 7.81, TEW10% 5.94, TEW5% 4.21, TEW2.5% 2.96, CTSC 0.35 and the error in CTSC was found to be the lowest. In SPECT/CT images, the application of each scatter correction method used in the experiment could improve the quantitative count error caused by the influence of scatter count. In particular, CTSC showed the lowest %NMSE(=0.35) compared to existing EWSC methods, enabling relatively accurate scatter correction.

주제어

참고문헌 (15)

Cherry S, Sorenson J, Phelps E. Physics in nuclear medicine. 4th ed. ELSEVIER; 2012:204-6.
Cherry S, Sorenson J, Phelps E. Physics in nuclear medicine. 4th ed. ELSEVIER; 2012:147-54.
Changizi V, Takavar A, Babakhani A, Sohrabi M. Scatter correction for heart SPECT images using TEW method. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008;9(3):2767.
Farid K, Habert MO, Martineau A, Caillat-Vigneron N, Sibon I. CT nonuniform attenuation and TEW scatter corrections in brain Tc-99m ECD SPECT. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36(8):665-8.

상세보기
Beauregard JM, Hofman MS, Pereira JM, Eu P, Hicks RJ. Quantitative (177)Lu SPECT (QSPECT) imaging using a commercially available SPECT/CT system. Cancer Imaging. 2011;11:56-66.

상세보기
Dewaraja YK, Ljungberg M, Fessler JA. 3-D Monte Carlo-Based Scatter Compensation in Quantitative I-131 SPECT Reconstruction. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2006;53(1):181.

상세보기
Xiao J, De Wit TC, Staelens SG, Beekman FJ. Evaluation of 3D Monte Carlo-based scatter correction for 99mTc cardiac perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(10):1662-9.

상세보기
Cervo M, Gerbaudo VH, Park MA, Moore SC. Quantitative simultaneous 111In/99mTc SPECT-CT of osteomyelitis. Med Phys. 2013;40(8):082501.

상세보기
De Nijs R, Lagerburg V, Klausen TL, Holm S. Improving quantitative dosimetry in (177)Lu-DOTATATE SPECT by energy window-based scatter corrections. Nucl Med Commun. 2014;35(5):522-33.

상세보기
Pretorius PH, Van Rensburg AJ, Van Aswegen A, LLtter MG, Serfontein DE, Herbst CP. The channel ratio method of scatter correction for radionuclide image quantitation. J Nucl Med. 1993;34(2):330-5.
Jaszczak RJ, Greer KL, Floyd CE, Harris CC, Coleman RE. Improved SPECT quantification for scattered photons. J Nucl Med. 1984;25:893-900.
Dewaraja YK, Li J, Koral KF. Quantitative I-131 SPECT with triple energy window Compton scatter correction. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1998;45:3109-14.

상세보기
Ichihara T, Ogawa K, Motomura N, Kubo A, Hashimoto S. Compton scatter compensation using the triple-energy window method for single- and dual-isotope SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1993;34(12):2216-21.

상세보기
Konik A. Evaluation of attenuation and scatter correction requirements in small animal PET and SPECT imaging [dissertation]. University of Iowa; 2010:32-43.
Ljungberg M, King MA, Hademenos GJ, Strand SE. Comparison of four scatter correction methods using Monte Carlo simulated source distributions. J Nucl Med. 1994;35(1):143-51.

상세보기

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

SPECT/CT 영상에서 에너지창 기반 산란보정과 CT 기반 산란보정 방법의 정량적 정확성 비교
The Comparison of Quantitative Accuracy between Energy Window-Based and CT-Based Scatter Correction Method in SPECT/CT Images 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (15)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

연관된 기능

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

SPECT/CT 영상에서 에너지창 기반 산란보정과 CT 기반 산란보정 방법의 정량적 정확성 비교 The Comparison of Quantitative Accuracy between Energy Window-Based and CT-Based Scatter Correction Method in SPECT/CT Images 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (15)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

김지현 (13)

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

연관된 기능

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

SPECT/CT 영상에서 에너지창 기반 산란보정과 CT 기반 산란보정 방법의 정량적 정확성 비교
The Comparison of Quantitative Accuracy between Energy Window-Based and CT-Based Scatter Correction Method in SPECT/CT Images 원문보기