최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기대한지구과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean society of earth science education, v.15 no.1, 2022년, pp.16 - 26
This study was to investigate what pre-service teachers pay attention to when designing science lessons. As a result of analyzing the responses of pre-service teachers, it is analyzed that pre-service teachers are designing science lessons with emphasis on science inquiry, considering students' inte...
곽한영(2006). 실용지능의 개념이 예비교사 교육과정 개선에 갖는 함의에 대한 연구. 시인교육연구, 38(1), 1-18.
교육부(2015). 과학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책 9].
서혜애(2010). 과학.수학교사 생애주기 연수체제 구축을 위한 연구. 한국과학창의재단.
양희선, 김현섭(2017). 중학교 과학 수업에서 피드백 기반 실험수업 모형의 적용 효과. 현장과학교육, 11(2), 246-259.
엄미리, 엄준용(2009). 교육실습 전후 예비교사의 역량 변화 연구. 한국교원교육연구, 26(3), 491-508.
이선경, 오필석, 김혜리, 이경호, 김찬종, 김희백(2009). 과학 교사의 교수내용지식과 실천적 지식에 관한 연구 관점 고찰. 한국교원교육연구, 26(1), 27-57.
전경문(2015). 과학 탐구 지도에 대한 초등학교 교사들의 인식 조사. 과학교육연구지, 39(2), 267-277.
Allan, E., Shane, J., Brownstein, E. M., Ezrailson, C., Hagevik, R., & Veal, W. (2009). Using performance-based assessments to prepare safe science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 495-500.
Bhattacharyya, S., Volk, T., & Lumpe, A. (2009). The influence of an extensive inquiry-based field experience on pre-service elementary student teachers' science teaching beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 199-218.
Brophy, J. E. (1999). Perspectives of classroom management: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In H. Freiberg (Ed.), Beyond behaviorism: Changing the classroom management paradigm (pp. 43-56). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Colaizzi, P. E. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist view it existential phenomenology. New york: Oxford University Press.
Gagne', M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.
Galison, P. (1997). Three laboratories. Social Research, 64(3), 1127-1155.
Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In S. Magnusson, J. Krajcik, & H. Borko (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: PCK and science education (pp. 95-132). Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Gowin, D. B. (1981). Educating. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Hurd, P. D. (1983). Science education: The search for new vision. Educational Leadership, 41, 20-22.
Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings, & G. F. Madsus (Eds.), Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Leonard, J., Barnes-Johnson, J., Dantley, S. J., & Kimber, C. (2011). Teaching science inquiry in urban contexts: The role of elementary preservice teachers' beliefs. The Urban Review, 43, 124-150.
Manz, E. (2015). Resistance and the development of scientific practice: Designing the mangle into science instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 33(2), 89-124.
Martin-Dunlop, C. S. (2012). Prospective elementary teachers' understanding of the nature of science and perceptions of the classroom learning environment. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 873-893.
National Research Council(NRC). (2000). Inquiry and national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Teachers Association(NSTA). (2007). NSTA position statement. The Integral Role of Laboratory Investigations in Science Instruction. Retrieved May 15, 2015 from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/laboratory.aspx
Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS). (2013). Retrieved May 15, 2015 from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
Sardo-Brown, D. (1990). Experienced teachers' planning practices: A US survey. Journal of Educational for Teaching, 16(1), 57-71.
Silber, K. H. (2007). A principle-based model of instructional design: A new way of thinking about and teaching ID. Educational Technology, 5-19.
Steele, A., Brew, C., Rees, C., & Ibrahim-Khan, S. (2013). Our practice, their readiness: Teacher educators collaborate to explore and improve preservice teacher readiness for science and math instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 111-131.
Stoffels, N. T. (2005). "There is a worksheet to be followed": A case study of a science teacher's use of learning support texts for practical work. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9, 147-157.
Taylor, A. R., Jones, M. G., Broadwell, B., & Oppewal, T. (2008). Creativity, inquiry, or accountability? Scientists' and teachers' perceptions of science education. Science Education, 92(6), 1058-1075.
Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695.
Yager, R. E. (1986). To Sts an sets course in K-12 settings. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 6, 276-281.
Young, A. C., Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1998). Dosuperior teachers employ systematic instructional planning procedures? A descriptive study. ETR&D, 46, 65-78.
Young, M. J., Brett, B., Squires, S., & Lemire, N. (1995). Symposium: A new observation tool for looking at inquiry-based teaching and learning. American Educational Research Association, Annual Meeting in San Francisco, April 1995.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.