$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

학습에서 디지털기술 사용의도에 영향을 주는 요인에 대한 분석
Factors Influencing the Intention to Use Digital Technology in Education 원문보기

벤처창업연구= Asia-Pacific journal of business and venturing, v.17 no.2, 2022년, pp.153 - 165  

장문경 (가천대학교 경영학부)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

코로나19 팬더믹 사태로 인해 교육 및 학습 활동이 온라인으로 이동할 수밖에 없게 되면서, 교육 및 학습에 정보통신기술을 사용하는 것은 더이상 선택이 아닌 필수 요소가 되었으며, 에듀테크(Edutech) 스타트업에 대해 벤처캐피탈은 역대 최대 투자액을 투자하고 있다. 이러한 상황에서 본 연구는 디지털 시대에 필수능력인 된 디지털 리터러시와 함께 통합기술수용이론(UTAUT: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology)을 같이 고려하여, 학습에서 디지털기술을 사용하려는 의도에 영향을 미치는 요인들에 대해 연구하였다. 또한 디지털 리터러시에 많은 영향을 끼친다고 알려져 있는 요소인 연령에 따라 달라지는 요인들의 영향력 차이를 분석하였다. 구조 방정식 모형 분석 결과, 성과기대, 노력기대, 사회적 영향이 학습에서 디지털기술을 사용하려는 의도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 디지털 리터러시는 성과기대, 노력기대, 사회적 영향에 긍정적인 영향을 끼치는 것으로 드러났으나 학습에서 디지털기술을 사용하려는 의도에 직접적으로 끼치는 영향은 유의하지 않게 나타났다. 그리고 연령의 조절효과를 보기 위해 실시한 다중집단분석 결과, 사회적 영향이 학습에서 디지털기술을 사용하고자 하는 의도에 미치는 경로에 대해 10대와 60대, 20대와 60대, 30대와 60대간의 차이가 유의하게 줄어드는 것을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 이론적 측면에서 디지털 리터러시와 통합기술수용이론을 함께 고려하여 학습이라는 특정상황에서 디지털기술을 사용하고자 하는 의도에 미치는 요인에 대한 연구의 외연을 확대하는데 기여했으며, 실무적 측면에서 학습 참여자들이 보다 적극적으로 디지털기술을 사용하게 만들 때에 연령별로 주요하게 고려해야할 요인에 대한 지침으로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The COVID-19 Pandemic incident forced all educational and learning activities to move online, so it is no longer an option to use information and communication technology for education and learning. Venture capital has made the largest investment ever in Edu-tech startups. This study investigates th...

주제어

#비대면 교육   #에듀테크   #디지털 리터러시   #통합기술수용이론  

참고문헌 (54)

  1. Association of College & Research Libraries(2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Chicago, Illinois; U.S.A. In The association of college and research libraries. 

  2. Akcayir, M., Dundar, H., & Akcayir, G.(2016). What makes you a digital native? Is it enough to be born after 1980?. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 435-440. 

    상세보기

  3. Barclay, D. Higgins C., & Thompson R.(1995). The partial least squares(PLS) approach to causal modelling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, Special Issue on Research Methodology, 2(2), 285-309. 

  4. Baek, B. C., Park, S. Y., & Cha, S. B.(2014). Agricultural high school teachers'e-learning literacy and intention to use e-learning and relationships with their e-learning efficacy, social organizational support and hindrance fact. Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, 46(3), 29-51. 

  5. Bervell, B., & Umar, I. N.(2017). Validation of the UTAUT model: re-considering non-linear relationships of exogeneous variables in higher education technology acceptance research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6471-6490. 

  6. Chan, B. S., Churchill, D., & Chiu, T. K.(2017). Digital literacy learning in higher education through digital story telling approach. Journal of International Education Research, 13(1), 1-16. 

    상세보기

  7. Cho, H. K., & Choi, D. H.(2020).[Corona new normal]Phone english in the morning, Python and hobby class in the evening. news1. Retrieved(2021.07.30.) from https://www.news1.kr/articles/?3905675. 

  8. Choi, I. H., & Jeong, S. H.(2019). Effect of Age, Income, and Digital Literacy on Online Personal Information Exposure and Protection Behaviors. Korean Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, 63(5), 233-266. 

  9. Chin, W.(1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16. 

  10. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F.(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. 

    상세보기

  11. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W.(2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(5), 91-109. 

  12. Go, H. N., & Lee, Y. J.(2019). A study on the usage of digital device based on digital Literacy. In Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference. Korean Society of Computer Information, 27(2), 219-222. 

  13. Gong, Y. I.(2020). SPRi Report-Trends and implications of the Edutech industry. SPRi, Retrieved(2021.07.30.) from https://www.spri.kr/post/22938 

  14. Hague, C., & Payton, S.(2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum. Future Lab. Retrieved from http://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/FUTL06/FUTL06.pdf 

  15. Helsper, E.(2016). Inequalities in digital literacy: Definitions, measurements, explanations and policy implications. In Survey on the use Hyder, N.(2016). Evaluation of TTS. Digital To inspire digital creativity in young people. Glasgow. Retrieved from https://www.creativescotland.com/resources/professional-resources/research/creative-scotlandresearch/evaluation-of-tts-digita. 

  16. Helsper, E. J., & Smahel, D.(2020). Excessive internet use by young Europeans: Psychological vulnerability and digital literacy?. Information, Communication & Society, 23(9), 1255-1273. 

    상세보기

  17. Heo, K. A., & Chung, C. H.(2011). The development and validation of a digital literacy scale for kindergarten teachers. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 31(5), 225-252. 

  18. HolonIQ(2020). $16.1B of global edtech venture capital in 2020. Retrieved(2021.07.30.) from https://www.holoniq.com/notes/16.1b-of-global-edtech-venture-capital-in-2020/. 

  19. Hu, S., Laxman, K., & Lee, K.(2020). Exploring factors affecting academics' adoption of emerging mobile technologies-an extended UTAUT perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4615-4635. 

    상세보기

  20. Jang, M., Aavakare, M., Nikou, S., & Kim, S.(2021). The impact of literacy on intention to use digital technology for learning: A comparative study of Korea and Finland. Telecommunications Policy, 45(7), 102154. 

    상세보기

  21. Kang, J. M., Song, H. J., & Kim, H. S.(2014). Development and application of the diagnostic instruments for measuring digital literacy in the smart society. Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 17(3), 143-173. 

  22. Kdata(2020). Data industry white paper. Retrieved(2021.07.30.) from https://dataonair.or.kr/2020-%EB%8D%B0%EC%9D%B4%ED%84%B0-%EC%82%B0%EC%97%85-%EB%B0%B1%EC%84%9C. 

  23. Kim, B. H., & Lee, H. J.(2019). The effects of digital literacy and teaching efficacy on smart education adoption. Journal of Future Early Childhood Education, 26(2), 97-119. 

  24. Kim, E. W.(2018). Edutech, Edtech, and Educational technology. Chosun Edu, Retrieved(2022.03.02.) from http://edu.chosun.com/m/view.html?contid2018041000811. 

  25. Kim, J. H.(2021). Online classes are better. COVID-19 university landscape changed after a year. The Herald Business, Retrieved(2021.07.30.) from http://news.heraldcorp.com/view.php?ud20210524000183. 

  26. Kim, S. S., & Song, S. H.(2016). Structural Relationship of Supply Chain Partnership: Focused on the Role and Contract Period. Asia Pacific Journal of Samall Business, 38(3), 49-71. 

  27. Kim, Y. Y., Joo, Y. W., & Park, H. J.(2021). The role of digital literacy and IS success factors influencing on distance learners' satisfaction and continuance. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(11), 53-62. 

  28. Kwon, S. H., & Hyun, S. H.(2014). A study of the factors influencing the digital literacy capabilities of middle-aged people in online learning. The Korean Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(1), 120-140. 

  29. Lee, G. E.(2020). Weekly KDB Report-Changes in non-face-to-face education trends after COVID-19, KDB Future Strategy Research Institute. Retrieved (2021.07.30.) from https://rd.kdb.co.kr/fileView?groupId9835F18F-9447-77FF-EFD2-73D173242857&fileIdA7B1561F-8131-B274-112D-DE1BC9728C44. 

  30. Lee, Y. M.(2020). Elementary, middle, and high schools "Online School Opening"..."Untact" education spread through COVID-19, Business watch. Retrieved(2021.07.30.) from http://news.bizwatch.co.kr/article/mobile/2020/04/01/0021. 

  31. Marchewka, J. T., & Kostiwa, K.(2007). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions usingcourse management software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 91-104. 

  32. Martin, A.(2005). DigEuLit-a European framework for digital literacy: a progress report. Journal of eLiteracy, 2(2), 130-136. 

  33. Martinez & Cervantes(2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling(PLS-SEM) applications in Economics and Finance. Basel: Switzerland, MDPI AG. 

  34. Ministry of SMEs and Startups(2022). Venture investment reached 7.7 trillion won last year, up 3.4 trillion won from 2020. Retrieved(2022.03.02.) from https://www.korea.kr/news/pressReleaseView.do?newsId156493622. 

  35. Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H.(2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 11-25. 

    상세보기

  36. Moric, I., Pekovic, S., & Jovanovic, J.(2020). Digital health literacy and sport-physical activities: The moderating role of age. Health Policy, 1-24. 

  37. Munger, K., Luca, M., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J.(2019). Age matters: Sampling strategies for studying digital media effects. Retrieved(2021.07.30.) from https://csdp.princeton.edu/sites/csdp/files/media/munger_mturk_digital_literacy_note_0.pdf. 

  38. Ng, W.(2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. 

    상세보기

  39. Nikou, S., Cavalheiro, S., & Widen, G.(2020). Digital natives and digital immigrants in the creative economy. Cham: Springer, In Proceedings of the international conference on information. 

  40. Ok, H. J., Cho, B. Y., Kim, J. Y., Kim, J. Y., Kim, H. D., Koh, J. A., Oh, E. H., & Seo, S. H.(2016). A study of developing and validating an assessment of digital literacy attitudes. Korean Language Education, 152, 251-283. 

  41. Thomas, T., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K.(2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoptionin higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 9(3), 71-85. 

  42. Park, J. H.(2018). A study on the development of conceptualization model for reading, information, ICT, and digital literacy. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(2), 267-300. 

  43. Park, K. R., & Heo, C. M.(2019). Effect of service factors in Distance Education on Customer satisfaction and customer loyalty Impacts: Focusing on Employment Opportunities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(4), 101-111. 

  44. Prensky, M.(2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently?. On the horizon, 9(6), 2-6. 

  45. Ribble, M., & Bailey, G.(2007). Digital citizenship in schools. Washington, D. C.: International Society for Technology in Education. 

  46. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A.(2005). Smart PLS 2.0 M3. Hamburg: University of Hamburg. www.smartpls.de. 

  47. Sobel, M. E.(1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312. 

    상세보기

  48. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N.(2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. 

    상세보기

  49. Wang, Q. E., Myers, M. D., & Sundaram, D.(2013). Digital natives and digital immigrants. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5(6), 409-419. 

  50. Wold, H.(1975). Path models with latent variables: The NIPALS approach. In Quantitative sociology. New York: Academic Press. 

  51. Yi, H. S., Kim, H. S., Kim, S. H., & Lee, W. J.(2020). A comparison of digital literacy level of elementary and middle school students based on the 2018-2019 National Assessment of Digital Literacy. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 26(2), 337-366. 

  52. Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R.(2016). Development and validation of the internet skills scale(ISS). Information, Communication & Society, 19(6), 804-823. 

    상세보기

  53. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D.(2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. 

  54. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X.(2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. 

    상세보기

관련 콘텐츠

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로