참고문헌 (54)

1. Park, J., Ko, Y., & Kim, H., (2019). A study on evaluation model for usability of research data service. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 36(4), 129-159. 

2. Lee, H., Li, J., & Shin, S. (2017). Development tendency of altmetrics research: using social network analysis and co-word analysis. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 21(11), 2089-2094. 

   원문보기 상세보기

3. Cho, J. (2015). A study about scholarly impact measurement through Altmetrics. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(1), 65-81. 

4. Choi, H., Lee, Y., & Lee, H. (2019). Impact analysis of government subsidy fluctuations on basic research outputs: focused on the IT field. Journal of Social Science, 45(3), 321-344 

5. Hur, W. (2013). How researchers estimate indirect effect using bootstrapping: the case of simple, multiple, and double mediation. Korea Business Review, 6(3), 43-59. 

6. Hong, S. & Jung, S. (2014). Testing the interaction effects in regression and structural equation models: theories and procedures. The Korean Journal of the Human Development, 21(4), 1-24. 

7. Adie, E. (2014). Attention! A study of open access vs non-open access articles. figshare. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1213690. 

   

8. Alhoori, H., Ray Choudhury, S., Kanan, T., Fox, E., Furuta, R., & Giles, C. (2015). On the Relationship between Open Access and Altmetrics. iConference 2015 Proceedings. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/73451 

9. Altmetric (2021). Altmetric database in CSV format. Unpublished raw data. 

10. Archambault, E., Cote, G., Struck, B., & Voorons, M. (2016). Research Impact of Paywalled Versus Open Access Papers. Available: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article1028&contextscholcom 

11. Bornmann, L. & Haunschild, R. (2018). Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000 Prime data. PLoS ONE, 13(5), e0197133. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197133 

    상세보기

12. Bornmann, L. (2014). Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: a study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime, Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 935-950. 

    상세보기

13. Bornmann, L. (2015). Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics, 103, 1123-1144 Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1565-y 

    상세보기

14. Cho, J. (2021). Altmetrics of highly cited research papers in social science. Serials Review, 47(1), 17-27. 

    상세보기

15. Clements, J. (2017) Open access articles receive more citations in hybrid marine ecology journals. FACETS 2, 1-14. 

    상세보기

16. Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015). The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media Large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 260-288 

    상세보기

17. Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015) Do "altmetrics" correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. asis&t, 66(10), 2003-2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309 

    상세보기

18. DORA (2012) The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Available: https://sfdora.org/read/ 

19. Ebrahimy, S., Mehrad, J., Setareh, F., & Hosseinchari, M. (2016). Path analysis of the relationship between visibility and citation: the mediating roles of save, discussion, and recommendation metrics. Scientometrics, 109, 1497-1510. 

    상세보기

20. Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., & Schlogl, C. (2014). Usage versus citation behaviours in four subject areas. Scientometrics, 101, 1077-95. 

    상세보기

21. Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2005). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4), 39-47. 

22. Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Lariviere, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLOS ONE, 10(3). 

    상세보기

23. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. 

24. Holmberg, K., Hedman, J., & Bowman, T. D. et al. (2020). Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetric activity than articles in subscription-based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish universities. Scientometrics, 122, 645-659. 

    상세보기

25. Kousha, K. & Abdoli, M. (2010). The citation impact of Open Access agricultural research: A comparison between OA and non-OA publications. Online Information Review, 34(5), 772-785. 

    상세보기

26. Lewis, C. (2018). The Open Access Citation Advantage: Does It Exist and What Does It Mean for Libraries?. Information Technology and Libraries, 37(3), 50-65. Available: https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i3.10604 

    상세보기

27. Li, X. & Thelwall, M. (2012). F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Montreal: 541-551. 

28. Liu, X., Wei, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2020). How researchers view altmetrics: an investigation of ISSI participants, Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(3), 361-378. 

    상세보기

29. McGillivray, B. (2019). The relationship between usage and citations in an open access mega-journal, Scientometrics, Springer; Akademiai Kiado, 121(2), 817-838. 

    상세보기

30. Mohammadi, E. & Thelwall, M. (2014). Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. JASIST, 65(8), 1627-1638. 

31. Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., & Lariviere, V. (2015). Who reads research articles? an altmetrics analysis of mendeley user categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 66(9), 1832-1846. 

32. NISO (2016). Output of the NISO Alternative Assessment Metrics Project. Available: https://groups.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/17091/ 

33. Ortega J. L. (2018). Disciplinary differences of the impact of altmetric. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 365(7):10.1093/femsle/fny049. 

    상세보기

34. Ouchi, A., Saberi, M. K., Ansari, N., Hashempour, L., & Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A. (2019). Do altmetrics correlate with citations? A study based on the 1,000 most-cited articles, Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(4), 192-202. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-07-2019-0050 

    상세보기

35. Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Lariviere, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of oa: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ 6, e4375. 

    상세보기

36. Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: a manifesto, Available: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto 

37. Science (2020). Will Trump White House tear down journal paywalls? Many anxiously await a decision. Available: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/05/will-trump-white-house-tear-down-journal-paywalls-many-anxiously-await-decision 

38. Singh, V. K., Singh, P., & Karmakar, M. et al. (2021) The journal coverage of web of science, scopus and dimensions: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126, 5113-5142 

    상세보기

39. SPARC Europe (2015). The Open Access Citation Advantage Service (OACA) Available: https://sparceurope.org/what-we-do/open-access/sparc-europe-open-access-resources/open-access-citation-advantage-service-oaca/ 

40. Subbaraman, N. (2019). Rumours fly about changes to US government open-access policy, Nature News, 20 DECEMBER 2019. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03926-1 

41. Sutton, S., Miles, R., & Konkiel, S. (2018) Awareness of altmetrics among LIS scholars and faculty. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 59(1-2), 33-47. 

42. Tang, M., Bever, J., & Yu, F. (2017). Open access increases citations of papers in ecology. Ecosphere, 8(7), e01887. Available: https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ecs2.1887 

    상세보기

43. Teplitskiy, M., Lu, G., & Duede, E. (2017). Amplifying the impact of open access: wikipedia and the diffusion of science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 2116-2127. 

    상세보기

44. Thelwall, M. (2017) Are Mendeley reader counts useful impact indicators in all fields? Scientometrics, 113(1), 1721-1731. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2557-x. 

    상세보기

45. Thelwall, M. & Nevill, T. (2018). Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts? Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 237-248. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.008 

    상세보기

46. Thelwall, M. (2020). Mendeley reader counts for us computer science conference papers and journal articles. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 347-359. 

    상세보기

47. Thelwall, M. & Wilson, P. (2016). Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: an analysis of 45 fields, JASIST, 67(8), 1962-1972 Available: https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23501 

48. Tint, T. H. H. & Na, J. (2017). Disciplinary differences in altmetrics for social sciences, Online Information Review, 41(2), 235-251. 

    상세보기

49. Wang Z., Chen, Y., & Glanzel, W. (2020). Preprints as accelerator of scholarly communication: an empirical analysis in mathematics. Journal of Informetrics, 14(4), 101097. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101097 

    상세보기

50. Wellcome (2020). Sharing research data and findings relevant to the novel coronavirus (nCoV) outbreak (2020.131) Available: https://wellcome.ac.uk/press-release/sharing-research-data-and-findings-relevant-novel-coronavirus-ncov-outbreak 

51. Winter, J. C. F. (2015). The relationship between tweets, citations, and article views for PLOS ONE articles. Scientometrics, 102, 1773-1779 

    상세보기

52. Xu, L., Liu, J., & Fang, Q. (2011). Analysis on open access citation advantage: an empirical study based on Oxford open journals, iConference February 2011, 426-432. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1940761.1940819 

    

53. Zahedi, Z. & Haustein, S. (2018). On the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and Mendeley readership counts: a large-scale analysis of Web of Science publications. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 191-202. 

    상세보기

54. Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? a cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of 'alternative metrics' in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1491-1513. 

    상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

조재인 (42)