Objectives: In order to reduce the burden on employers and increase the reliability of measurement results, improvements to the provisions related to the work environment measurement reporting system, such as the current Occupational Safety and Health Act and its Enforcement Rules, are planned. This...
Objectives: In order to reduce the burden on employers and increase the reliability of measurement results, improvements to the provisions related to the work environment measurement reporting system, such as the current Occupational Safety and Health Act and its Enforcement Rules, are planned. This study aimed to suggest improvements for the work environment measurement reporting system through a survey and Delphi investigation. Method: This survey included workplaces (health managers), national institutions (the Ministry of Employment and Labor) that use the results of the work environment measurement reporting system for policy and supervision purposes, and work environment measurement institutions that enter the results were included. In addition to the survey, we tried to derive results through meetings with stakeholders and expert advisory meetings. Results: It is difficult to abolish or partially improve the reporting system under the Enforcement Regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act at this point because the opinions of workplaces, supervisory agencies, and measuring agencies differ in terms of its intended purpose and use. In the case of high-exposure harmful factors (over 50% on the basis of exposure) in the "comprehensive opinion" described in the work environment measurement results table, it is necessary to insert unit of work with exposed harmful factors, exposure factors, and current conditions in checklists or tables so that they can be reflected in government policies. In the case of workplaces that are feared to be highly exposed to substances subject to measurement, it seems desirable to improve them so that industrial health instructors registered with the Korea Safety and Health Agency or local labor offices can provide technical guidance. As an improvement plan to increase the reliability of data and the use of big data, it is necessary to improve the input method for processes and jobs. Conclusion: The laws and regulations of the work environment measurement reporting system are difficult to revise due to a lack of consensus among current stakeholders, but improvements can be achieved by improving the Ministry of Employment and Labor's notifications and other means. In addition, in order to effectively utilize the data from the K2B system, it is necessary to improve the input method for processes and jobs.
Objectives: In order to reduce the burden on employers and increase the reliability of measurement results, improvements to the provisions related to the work environment measurement reporting system, such as the current Occupational Safety and Health Act and its Enforcement Rules, are planned. This study aimed to suggest improvements for the work environment measurement reporting system through a survey and Delphi investigation. Method: This survey included workplaces (health managers), national institutions (the Ministry of Employment and Labor) that use the results of the work environment measurement reporting system for policy and supervision purposes, and work environment measurement institutions that enter the results were included. In addition to the survey, we tried to derive results through meetings with stakeholders and expert advisory meetings. Results: It is difficult to abolish or partially improve the reporting system under the Enforcement Regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act at this point because the opinions of workplaces, supervisory agencies, and measuring agencies differ in terms of its intended purpose and use. In the case of high-exposure harmful factors (over 50% on the basis of exposure) in the "comprehensive opinion" described in the work environment measurement results table, it is necessary to insert unit of work with exposed harmful factors, exposure factors, and current conditions in checklists or tables so that they can be reflected in government policies. In the case of workplaces that are feared to be highly exposed to substances subject to measurement, it seems desirable to improve them so that industrial health instructors registered with the Korea Safety and Health Agency or local labor offices can provide technical guidance. As an improvement plan to increase the reliability of data and the use of big data, it is necessary to improve the input method for processes and jobs. Conclusion: The laws and regulations of the work environment measurement reporting system are difficult to revise due to a lack of consensus among current stakeholders, but improvements can be achieved by improving the Ministry of Employment and Labor's notifications and other means. In addition, in order to effectively utilize the data from the K2B system, it is necessary to improve the input method for processes and jobs.
Byeon SH, Yi KH, Yu GM, Phee YG. Regulatory compliance for the working envrironment measurement system in korea, J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2009;19(3):233-239
Choi SJ, Kim W. Status of benzene exposure and suggested countermeasures for petrochemical workers in the yeosu industrial complex. J Korean Soc Occup Envrion Hyg 2007;17(4):310-321
Choi SJ. Assessment on work envrionment monitoring program in korea. J Korean Soc Occup Envrion Hyg 2008;18(4):282-292
Jang JK, Park HD, Ro JW. Statistical analysis of domestic work environment monitoring big data. Korea Institute for Industrial Safety and Health, 2016
Jeong JY, Kang TS, Lee SG, Park HD, Kim KY. An improvement plan for a workplace monitoring system through random selection of workplace and unnoticed measurement imspection. J Korean Soc Occup Envrion Hyg 2017;27(2):105-114 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2017.27.2.105
Jeong JY, Phee YK, Kim CY, Kim PG. A study of the standarization for working envrionmnet measurement method and working measurement instituttions assessment. Korea Institute for Industrial Safety and Health, 2008
Kim KY, Kang TS, Lee SG, Park HD, Jeong JY. A review of a system for improving the reliability of domestic measurement results regarding the work environment. J Korean Soc Occup Envrion Hyg 2017;27(2):87-96 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2017.27.2.87
Lee YG, Park JI, Lee JH, Jeong TG, Choi YE et al. A pilot project for the integrated assessment and monitoring for workplace environment. Korea Institute for Industrial Safety and Health, 2020
Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). Occupational safety and health act. Act No. 3532, 1981
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.