최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.42 no.2, 2022년, pp.201 - 214
김관영 (서울대학교) , 이종혁 (서울대학교) , 최진현 (서울대학교) , 전상학 (서울대학교) , 이선경 (서울대학교)
The purpose of this study is to examine the characteristics of model of the experiment in students' open inquiry. The research is a reinterpretation of the data collected from the performance of a three-year research project under the theme of 'school science inquiry' the perspective of model of the...
Bailer-Jones, D. M. (2009). Scientific models in philosophy of science. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Bud, R., & Warner, D. (1998). Instruments of science. An historical encyclopedia. London and New York: Smithsonian Institution.
Chae, D. H. (2004). The changes of preservice and inservice elementary school teacher' concepts of the solar system based upon their exposure to the earth motion centric solar system model. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(5), 886-901.
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218.
Cho, H. S., & Nam, J. (2017). Analysis of trends of model and modeling-related research in science education in Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 539-552.
Cho, J. I. (1995). The use of models and their effect on scientific understanding of diffusion and osmosis, and on scientific attitude. Biology Education, 23(1), 1-8.
Clement, J. J. (2008). Student/teacher co-construction of visualizable models in large group discussion. In J. J. Clement & M. A. Rea-Ramirez (Eds.), Model based learning and instruction in science (pp. 11-22). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Fujimura, J. (1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and "translation." In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp.168-211). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giere, R. N. (2018). Models of experiments. In I. F. Peschard & B. C. van Fraassen (Eds.), The experimental side of modeling (pp. 59-70). MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert, & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp 3-17). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Gobert, J. D., O'Dwyer, L., Horwitz, P., Buckley, B., Levy, S., & Wilensky, U. (2011). Examining the relationship between students' understanding of the nature of models and conceptual learning in biology, physics, and chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 653-684.
Halloun, I. (2007). Modeling theory in science education (Vol. 24). Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.
Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16, 448-473.
Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55(5), 440-454.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2014). Determinism and underdetermination in genetics: Implication for students' engagement in argumentation and epistemic practice. Science & Education, 23(2), 465-484.
Jo, Y. H. (1999). Qualitative description, analysis, interpretation. The Korean Society For The Study of Anthropology of Education, 27-63.
Johnson, S. D. (1987). Teaching problem solving. The Technology Teacher, 46(5), 15-17.
Kang, E., Kim, C., Choe, S., Yoo, J., Park, H., Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2012). Small group interaction and norms in the process of constructing a model for blood flow in the heart. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 32(2), 372-387.
Kang, M. (2014). Abduction and forced choice: Empirical justification for logic of the subliminal. Semiotic Inquiry, 41, 9-30.
Kim, C.-J., & Lee, S.-K. (2005). The characteristics of socio-scientific norms and discourses in the science classrooms: Case studies of beginning teachers. The Korean Society for the Study of Teacher Education, 22(3), 359-386.
Kim, J. Y., Choe, S. U., & Kim, C. J. (2016). The effects of cogenerative dialogues on scientific model understanding and modeling of middle school students. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 37(4), 243-268.
Kimbell, R., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wosniak, A., & Kelly, V. (1991). The assessment of performance in design and technology: The final report of the APU design and technology project 1985-1991. School Examinations and Assessment Council, SEAC.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lee, C. E., & Kim, H. B. (2016). Understanding the role of wonderment questions related to activation of conceptual resources in scientific model construction: Focusing on students' epistemological framing and positional framing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 471-483.
Lee, D. S. (2009). Sign, object And being. Journal of East-West Communication Council, 12, 91-118.
Lee, J., Noh, T, & Lee, S.-K. (2017). The characteristics of instrumental genesis appearing in the processes of high school students' school scientific inquiries. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 37(6), 971-980.
Lee, K.-J., Lee, K.-H., Lee, J.-C., & Kim, J.-H. (1989). A study on the improvement of science education with experimental model and it's programming(I). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 9(2), 13-27.
Lee, S. (2000). The nature and structure of experimentation: Epistemic approach founded on theory-network. (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul.
Lee, S. (2004). Philosophical understanding of doing experience. Korea: Seokwangsa.
Lee, S. (2009). Phenomena and instruments. Korea: Hanul academy.
Lee, S. (2015). Materiality of science technologized. Journal of the Society of Philosophical Studies, 111, 123-148.
Lee, S., Kim, C. J., Choe, S. U., Yoo, J., Park, H., Kang, E., & Kim, H. B. (2012). Exploring the patterns of group model development about blood flow in the heart and reasoning process by small group interaction. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(5), 805-822.
Lee, S.-K. (2006). The patterns and the characteristics of students' Interactive argumentation in the small-group discussions. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 50(1), 79-88.
Lee, S.-K., Yu, E.-J., Choi, J.-R., Kim, C.-J., Han, H.-J., & Shin, M.-K. (2010). Exploring science teacher' epistemological understanding of science and science teaching and learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(2), 218-233.
Lopes, J. B., & Costa, N. (2007). The evaluation of modelling competences: Difficulties and potentials for the learning of the sciences. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 811-851.
Mendonca, P. C. C., & Justi, R. (2011). Contributions of the model of modelling diagram to the learning of ionic bonding: Analysis of a case study. Research in Science Education, 41(4), 479-503.
MOE (Ministry of Education) (2015). 2015 Revised science national curriculum. Ministry of Education.
Morris, C. (1946). Signs, language and behavior. N.Y.: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Nagel, E. (1960). Logic without metaphysics. Philosophy, 35(132).
NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
No, J. H. (1996). The effects of the engineering model and science model on the children's science achievement and the science-related attitude. (Unpublished master's theses). Korea National University of Education.
Park, H., Choi, J., Kim, C., Kim, H. Yoo, J., Jang S., & Choe, S. (2016). The change in modeling ability of science-gifted students through the co-construction of scientific model. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 15-28.
Park, M Y. (2014). The division of calculation and experiment in the mathematical proof - with priority given to Wittgensteins LFM and RFM -. Philosophical Investigation, 36, 121-146.
Passmore, C., & Svoboda, J. (2012). Exploring opportunities for argumentation in modelling classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1535-1554.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pruitt, S. L. (2014). The next generation science standards: The features and challenges. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 145-156.
Rea-Ramirez, M. A., Clement, J., & Nunez-Oviedo, M. C. (2008). An instructional model derived from model construction and criticism theory. In J. J. Clement & M. A. Rea-Ramirez (Eds.), Model based learning and instruction in science (pp. 23-43). Netherlands: Springer.
Roth, W. M., & Bowen, G. M. (1994). Mathematization of experience in a grade 8 open-inquiry environment: An introduction to the representational practices of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(3), 293-318.
Roth, W. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998), Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35-59.
Schwarz, C. V. (2009). Developing preservice elementary teachers' knowledge and practices through modeling-centered scientific inquiry. Science Education, 93(4), 720-744.
Song, J., Kang, S.-J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Na, J., Do, J.-H.,Park, S. C., Son, Y.-A., Son, J. W., Oh, P. S., Lee, J.-K., Lee, H. J., Ihm, H., Jeong, D. H., Joung, Y. J., & Kim, J. (2019). Developing performance expectations, school implementation strategies, evaluation indicators of the Korean Science Education Standards (KSES) for the next generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
Suppes, P. (1962). Models of data. In E. Nagel, P. Suppes, & A. Tarski (Eds.), Logic, methodology and philosophy of science: Proceedings of the 1960 international conference (pp. 252-261). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Thagard, P. (2012). The cognitive science of science. The MIT Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. London: Sage.
Yang, C. H., Kim, S. Y., Jo, M. J., & Noh, T. H. (2016). The characteristics of group and classroom discussions in the scientific modeling of the particulate model of matter. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 361-369.
Yeu, H. (2016). Natures and principles of meaning interpretation in qualitative research: Based on the hermeneutics of Heidegger and Gadamer. Anthropology of Education, 19(4), 1-40.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.