[논문]AHP를 활용한 안전밸브(PSV) 고장모드의 Cause Factors 우선순위 분석

김명철; 이미정; 이동건; 백종배

doi:10.9713/kcer.2022.60.3.347

AHP를 활용한 안전밸브(PSV) 고장모드의 Cause Factors 우선순위 분석
Priority Analysis of Cause Factors of Safety Valve Failure Mode Using Analytical Hierarchy Process 원문보기

Korean chemical engineering research = 화학공학, v.60 no.3, 2022년, pp.347 - 355

김명철 (한국교통대학교 안전공학과) , 이미정 (한국교통대학교 안전공학과) , 이동건 (한국교통대학교 안전공학과) , 백종배 (한국교통대학교 안전공학과)

초록
AI-Helper

안전밸브(PSV)는 다양한 원인으로 발생하는 압력이 설정 압력에 도달하면 자동적으로 스프링이 작동하면서 분출되고 일정 압력 이하가 되면 정상상태로 복원되는 안전장치이다. 안전밸브는 압력상승 등 비정상 상태에서 정상 작동할 수 있도록 주기적인 검사와 모니터링 이행이 필수적이다. 그러나 현행 안전검사는 정해진 주기에만 수행되고 있어 정상작동 여부의 안전성을 확보하는 데 어려움이 있다. 따라서 안전관리에 필요한 안전밸브의 고장모드와 원인요소를 찾아 평가항목을 개발하였다. 그리고 항목의 우선순위를 도출하여 안전성 확보를 위한 의사결정 정보를 제공하고자 한다. 이를 위해 15명의 전문가를 대상으로 안전밸브(PSV)의 Failure Mode Cause Factor(FMCFs)와 관련하여 중요하다고 판단되는 평가요인을 도출하기 위해 3차례에 걸친 델파이(Delphi) 조사를 수행하였다. 그 결과 안전밸브의 6개 고장모드와 그 하위요인 22개의 평가요인을 선정하였다. 이와 같이 선정된 평가요인들의 우선순위를 분석하기 위해 계층구조를 도식화하였고 우선순위 계산에는 계층적 의사결정 방법(AHP)을 적용하였다. 분석결과 FMCFs의 고장모드 우선순위는 'Leakage'(0.226), 'Fail to open'(0.201), 'Fail to relieve req'd capacity'(0.152), 'Open above set pressure'(0.149), 'Spuriously open'(0.146), 'Stuck open'(0.127) 순으로 확인하였다. FMCFs의 하위 우선순위는 'PSV component rupture'(0.109), 'Fail to PSV size calculation'(0.068), 'PSV Spring aging'(0.065), 'Erratic opening'(0.059), 'Damage caused by improper installation and handling'(0.058), 'Fail to spring'(0.053) 등의순으로확인하였다. 우선순위가 결정된 FMCFs 효율적인 관리를 통해 안전밸브의 취약점을 파악하고 안전성을 향상하는데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The safety valve (PSV) is a safety device that automatically releases a spring when the pressure generated by various causes reaches the set pressure, and is restored to a normal state when the pressure falls below a certain level. Periodic inspection and monitoring of safety valves are essential so that they can operate normally in abnormal conditions such as pressure rise. However, as the current safety inspection is performed only at a set period, it is difficult to ensure the safety of normal operation. Therefore, evaluation items were developed by finding failure modes and causative factors of safety valves required for safety management. In addition, it is intended to provide decision-making information for securing safety by deriving the priority of items. To this end, a Delphi survey was conducted three times to derive evaluation factors that were judged to be important in relation to the Failure Mode Cause Factor (FMCFs) of the safety valve (PSV) targeting 15 experts. As a result, 6 failure modes of the safety valve and 22 evaluation factors of its sub-factors were selected. In order to analyze the priorities of the evaluation factors selected in this way, the hierarchical structure was schematized, and the hierarchical decision-making method (AHP) was applied to the priority calculation. As a result of the analysis, the failure mode priorities of FMCFs were 'Leakage' (0.226), 'Fail to open' (0.201), 'Fail to relieve req'd capacity' (0.152), 'Open above set pressure' (0.149), 'Spuriously' 'open' (0.146) and 'Stuck open' (0.127) were confirmed in the order. The lower priority of FMCFs is 'PSV component rupture' (0.109), 'Fail to PSV size calculation' (0.068), 'PSV Spring aging' (0.065), 'Erratic opening' (0.059), 'Damage caused by improper installation and handling' (0.058), 'Fail to spring' (0.053), etc. were checked in the order. It is expected that through efficient management of FMCFs that have been prioritized, it will be possible to identify vulnerabilities of safety valves and contribute to improving safety.

주제어

표/그림 (11)

그림 Fig. 1. Schematic presentation of risk-based inspection planning procedure (API 580/581) [7-8].
표 Table 1. Safety valve performance summary
표 Table 2. Country standardization status of pressure safety valve[9-10]
표 Table 3. General Characteristics of Expert Group for Delphi Analysis
표 Table 4. The AHP process and applied formulas
표 Table 5. Pairwise comparison scale for AHP preferences
그림 Fig. 2. Hierarchical structure of failure mode cause factors.
표 Table 6. Final Delphi Analysis Results
그림 Fig. 3. Priority ranking of main cause factors.
그림 Fig. 4. Priority ranks of sub-cause factors in main cause factor.
표 Table 7. Overall importance and priority (before and after correction)

참고문헌 (30)

Flowstar company, "Technical Data," UK, https://www.flowstarvalveshop.com/pages/safety-relief-valves(2021).
Korea Ministry of Government Legislation, "Occupational Safety and Health Act and Enforcement Regulations of the Act," (2021).
Korea Ministry of Government Legislation, "Regulations for Occupational Safety and Health," (2021).
Korea Ministry of Government Legislation, "High Pressure Gas Safety Control and Enforcement Rules of the Act," (2021).
Daniel A. Crowl, Joseph F. Louvar, "Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, 4th Edition," 379-406(2019).
Jang, Y. R., Kim, J. H., Kim, S. H. and Kwak, Y. H., "The Necessity of Introducing the In-service Test based on Analysis of Performance Test Result of Pressure Safety Valve," KIGAS, 21(6), 15-22(2017).
API 580 American Petroleum Institute, "Risk-based Inspection," Washington, D.C.: API Publishing Services(2002).
API 581 American Petroleum Institute, "Risk-based Inspection Technology," Washington, D.C.: API Publishing Services(2008).
American Petroleum Institute, "API-520 Sizing, Selection, and Installation of Pressure-Relieving Devices in Refineries Part I - Sizing and Selection," (2000).
European Committee for Standardization, "Safety Devices for Protection Against Excessive Pressure - Part1: Safety Valves (ISO 4126-1:2013)," (2013).
Saliha Unver, Ibrahim Ergenc, "Safety Risk Identification and Prioritize of Forest Logging Activities Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Alexandria Engineering Journal 60, 1591-1599(2021).

상세보기
CHoi, S. H., "Modeling Partially Dependent Double Failure States of Pressure Safety Valves," KIGAS 22(6), 40-43(2018).
Kim, Y.-J. and Shim, J.-S., "A Comparison of Weight Elicitation Techniques:Focusing on AHP, JA, and SW," Institute of Public Policy and Administration, 21(1), 5-34(2007).
Vaidya, O., Kumar, S., "Analytic Hierarchy Process: an Overview of Applications," Eur. J. Oper. Res., 169(1), 1-29(2006).

상세보기
Subramanian, N. and Ramanathan, R., "A Review of Applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in Operations Management," Int. J. Prod. Econ., 138(3), 215-241(2012).

상세보기
Ishizaka, A. and Labib, A., "Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and Limitations," OR Insight, 22(4), 201-220(2009).

상세보기
Chemweno, P., Pintelon, L., Van Horenbeek, A., Muchiri, P., "Development of a Risk Assessment Selection Methodology for Asset Maintenance Decision Making: An Analytic Network Process (ANP) Approach," Int. J. Prod. Econ., 170, 663-676(2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.03.017.

상세보기
Zavadskas, E. K. and Podvezko, V., "Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM," Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decis. Making, 15, 267-283(2016), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016500036.

상세보기
Jovcic, S., Prusa, P. and Nikolicic, S., "Evaluation Criteria of the Belt Conveyor Using the AHP Method and Selection of the Right Conveyor by Hurwitz Method," Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J., 12(2), 137-143(2018), https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/92092.

상세보기
Seong, J. H. and Byun, Y. S., "A Study on the Weights of the Condition Evaluation of Rock Slope used in Entropy and AHP Method," KOSOS, 31(5), 61-66(2016).
Kim, J. M., Lee, J. B. and Chang, S. R., "Risk Level Analysis of Architectural Work Using AHP," KOSOS, 32(5), 96-102(2017).
Davoodi, A., "On Inconsistency of a Pairwise Comparison Matrix," Int. J. Industr. Math., 1(4), 343-350(2009).
Cabala, P., "Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Evaluating Decision Alternatives," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Technology, Institute of Organization and Management 1, 1-23(2010).
Han, Y., Wang, Z., Lu, X., Hu, B., "Application of AHP to Road Selection," Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9(86), 1-21(2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020086.

상세보기
Saaty, T. L., "How to Make a Decision: the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Eur J. Oper. Res., 48, 9-26(1990).

상세보기
Eskander, R. F. A., "Risk Assessment Influencing Factors for Arabian Construction Projects Using Analytic Hierarchy Process," Alexandria Eng. J., 57(4), 4207-4218(2018).

상세보기
Kang, E. J., Jang, S. M. and Kil, T. S., "A Study on the Priorities in the Roles of Community Pharmacists in Aged Society Using AHP," JKCA 19(6), 402-411(2019).
An, J. S., "Developing Evaluation Criteria for Historic Gardens Preservation Condition by Applying Delphi Technique and Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sungkyunkwan University, 38-60(2011).
John Reynolds, Hal Thomas, Mike Moosemiller, "Predicting Relief Valve Reliability-Results of the API Risk-Based Inspection and AIChE/CCPS Equipment Reliability Database Groups," Process Plant Safety Symposium, Pressure Relief Systems (Session T5a12), 1-6(2001).
Lawshe, C. H., "A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity," Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575(1975).

상세보기

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증