[논문]Effects of Environmental Uncertainty on Interfirm Governance Mechanisms: The Moderating Role of Structural Holes

KIM, Minjung; KIM, Taewan

doi:10.13106/jidb.2022.vol13.no9.11

Effects of Environmental Uncertainty on Interfirm Governance Mechanisms: The Moderating Role of Structural Holes 원문보기

Journal of industrial distribution & business = 산경연구논집, v.13 no.9, 2022년, pp.11 - 26

KIM, Minjung (Department of Global Culture and Industry Management, Calvin University) , KIM, Taewan (Department of Business Administration, Konkuk University)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Purpose: Manufacturers rely on interfirm governance mechanisms to reduce the risks inherent in uncertain environments; however, it is unclear which governance mechanisms are developed to manage relationships with suppliers. This study sought to enhance knowledge of how environmental uncertainty affects interfirm governance mechanisms under conditions reflecting varying levels of structural holes. To this end, the study investigated the relationships between manufacturers and major first-tier and sub-suppliers. In particular, the moderating effect of structural holes is examined. Research design, data and methodology: A questionnaire survey was conducted with a major first-tier supplier of a Korean engineering firm. Proposed hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling. Results: The results show that while the relationship between environmental uncertainty and unilateral governance is positive but statistically insignificant, with bilateral governance is negative and statistically significant. The study also demonstrates that when structural holes are considered, the effects between environmental uncertainty and governance mechanisms are attenuated. Conclusions: This study suggests some theoretical and managerial contributions between exchange partners, especially, the results suggest that structural holes have a critical competitive advantage in uncertain environments. Therefore, manufacturers should carefully consider how they deal with environmental uncertainty when they make a business decision under structural holes situations.

주제어

표/그림 (7)

그림 Figure 1: Conceptual Framework
그림 Figure 2: Structural Hole (Burt, 1992,1997)
표 Table 1: Construct Measurement Summary
표 Table 2: Correlations, Means, and Standard Deviations
그림 Figure 3 Results of the Main Effects
표 Table 3: Main Effects on Unilateral Governance and Bilateral Governance
표 Table 4: Moderating Effect of Structural Holes

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper

가설 설정

H1: The higher the environmental uncertainty, the greater the manufacturer’s reliance on a unilateral governance mechanism.
H2: The higher the environmental uncertainty, the lower the manufacturer’s reliance on a bilateral governance mechanism.
H3: The positive relationship between environmental uncertainty and the manufacturer’s reliance on a unilateral governance mechanism is moderated by structural holes.
H4: The negative relationship between environmental uncertainty and the manufacturer’s reliance on a bilateral governance mechanism is moderated by structural holes.
Examining structural holes contributes to a better understanding of how governance mechanisms develop in uncertain environments. This study hypothesized that manufacturers rely on unilateral governance under environmental uncertainty when they lack structural holes with their suppliers. On one hand, when structural holes are considered, the relationship between environmental uncertainty and unilateral governance is mitigated.

제안 방법

The study surveys the procurement managers of the first-tier suppliers who are qualified to respond to items about their firms and exchange partners because they have relationships with second-tier suppliers and are strongly engaged in interactions with the manufacturer. Surveying first-tier suppliers that have intense relationships with their exchange partners (i.e., manufacturer, second-tier suppliers) allows the study to examine the influence of environmental uncertainty on governance mechanisms amid structural holes.
, structural holes, environmental uncertainty, unilateral governance, bilateral governance). The study conducts an item-total-correlation test in order to eliminate ill-fitting items. The study employs exploratory factor analysis (EFA) for the variable screening.
This study explores the relationships between the manufacturer, its major first-tier suppliers, and the sub-suppliers to test the hypotheses regarding the effects of environmental uncertainty on governance mechanisms (unilateral and bilateral). The manufacturer and its suppliers engage in substantial interactions to increase information exchange and cooperation.
Unlike any previous empirical study, this study examines the moderating role of structural holes on the relationship between environmental uncertainty and interfirm governance mechanisms. This study thus has academic contributions to network studies in two ways.

이론/모형

The study conducts an item-total-correlation test in order to eliminate ill-fitting items. The study employs exploratory factor analysis (EFA) for the variable screening.

성능/효과

By contrast, the manufacturer’s adoption of bilateral governance is explained as hypothesized both when environmental uncertainty is employed as a sole exogenous variable and when it is considered as an exogenous variable while structural holes is considered as a catalyst.
The suppliers were forced to comply with Chrysler's demand, but they were reluctant to respond to Chrysler’s urgent demands for additional parts. Chrysler also wanted to unilaterally control supplier decisions on supplier part prices and on-time delivery, leaving little room for the supplier to make efficient decisions. The absence of flexibility, which is the result of unilateral governance, may lead to hidden costs.
Finally, the study measures construct reliability, finding that each factor shows a satisfactory level. Overall, these results indicate appropriate measure reliability and validity.
First, it discusses structural holes as part of the network structure in business relationships and demonstrates that they can influence a manufacturer’s tendency toward a specific kind of interfirm governance mechanism
First, it irons out the conflicts between the TCA (unilateral governance mechanism) and relational contract theory (bilateral governance mechanism) under conditions reflecting structural holes. Research has shown that in an uncertain environment, the choice of governance mechanism (unilateral or bilateral) of an exchange partner can vary depending on the level of structural holes.
Finally, the study measures construct reliability, finding that each factor shows a satisfactory level. Overall, these results indicate appropriate measure reliability and validity. Table 1 describes each construct’s CR, presents the factor loadings, reliability measures, goodness-of-fit indices, and AVE values for each construct.
First, it irons out the conflicts between the TCA (unilateral governance mechanism) and relational contract theory (bilateral governance mechanism) under conditions reflecting structural holes. Research has shown that in an uncertain environment, the choice of governance mechanism (unilateral or bilateral) of an exchange partner can vary depending on the level of structural holes. Second, this study uses structural holes—a network structure—to explain governance mechanisms under environmental uncertainty.
Second, the results of this study extend the TCA and relational contracting theory (RCT) to explain manufacturer– supplier relationships
Figure 1 presents the study’s conceptual framework. The empirical test of this study was conducted with a Samsung Engineering firm in the context of internal entities, manufacturer-supplier-subsupplier relationships.
The manufacturer and its suppliers engage in substantial interactions to increase information exchange and cooperation. The study assumes that major first-tier suppliers display the highest level of dependence and the most intensive interaction with the manufacturer. The study selects the major first-tier suppliers through systematic random sampling from a mailing list of a major manufacturing firm.
Thus, only when structural holes are considered as a moderator is the manufacturer’s decision regarding unilateral governance clarified in a statistically significant manner

후속연구

Second, this study uses structural holes—a network structure—to explain governance mechanisms under environmental uncertainty
The main objective of the research is to provide a better understanding of the effects of environmental uncertainty on governance mechanisms under conditions reflecting varying levels of structural holes. No empirical study has been examined to determine which governance choices are effective for manufacturers in their relationships with partners in an uncertain environment.
Thus, they could be a critical variable in the choice of mechanism in uncertain environments. The study proposes that the party with structural holes in their exchange partners will tend to choose a bilateral governance mechanism. On the other hand, the party without structural holes is more likely to rely on unilateral governance mechanisms.

참고문헌 (104)

Abdi, M., & Aulakh, P. S. (2017). Locus of uncertainty and the relationship between contractual and relational governance in cross-border interfirm relationships. Journal of Management, 43(3), 771-803.

상세보기
Achrol, R. S., & Stern, L. W. (1988). Environmental determinants of decision-making uncertainty in marketing channels. Journal of marketing research, 25(1), 36-50.

상세보기
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative science quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.

상세보기
Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. Sage.
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of marketing research, 14(3), 396-402.

상세보기
Arya, B., & Lin, Z. (2007). Understanding collaboration outcomes from an extended resource-based view perspective: The roles of organizational characteristics, partner attributes, and network structures. Journal of management, 33(5), 697-723.
Andaleeb, S. S. (1995). Dependence relations and the moderating role of trust implications for behavioral intentions in marketing channels. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 157-172.

상세보기
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.

상세보기
Anderson, J. C., Hakansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1994). Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of marketing, 58(4), 1-15.

상세보기
Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of marketing, 54(1), 42-58.

상세보기
Argote, L. (1982). Input volatility and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Administrative Science Quality, 27(September), 420-434.

상세보기
Artz, K. W. (1999). Buyer-supplier performance: the role of asset specificity, reciprocal investments and relational exchange. British Journal of Management, 10(2), 113-126.

상세보기
Aulakh, P. S., Kotabe, M., & Sahay, A. (1996). Trust and performance in cross-border marketing partnerships: A behavioral approach. Journal of international business studies, 27(5), 1005-1032.

상세보기
Balakrishnan, S., & Koza, M. P. (1993). Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint-ventures: Theory and evidence. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 20(1), 99-117.

상세보기
Baum, J. A., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic management journal, 21(3), 267-294.

상세보기
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.

상세보기
Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., & Phillips, D. J. (2004). Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization science, 15(3), 259-275.

상세보기
Bello, D. C., & Gilliland, D. I. (1997). The effect of output controls, process controls, and flexibility on export channel performance. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 22-38.

상세보기
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of management review, 20(2), 343-378.

상세보기
Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. (1997). A note on social capital and network content. Social networks, 19(4), 355-373.

상세보기
Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in organizational behavior, 22, 345-423.

상세보기
Burt, R. S. (2002). The social capital of structural holes. The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field, 148(90), 122.
Burt, R. S. (2007). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. OUP Oxford.
Burt, R. S. (2008). Information and structural holes: comment on Reagans and Zuckerman. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(5), 953-969.

상세보기
Burt, R. S., & Knez, M. (1995). Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality and society, 7(3), 255-292.

상세보기
Cannon, J. P., Achrol, R. S., & Gundlach, G. T. (2000). Contracts, norms, and plural form governance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 180-194.

상세보기
Carson, S. J., Madhok, A., & Wu, T. (2006). Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: The effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1058-1077.

상세보기
Celly, K. S., & Frazier, G. L. (1996). Outcome-based and behavior-based coordination efforts in channel relationships. Journal of marketing research, 33(2), 200-210.

상세보기
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.

상세보기
Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative science quarterly, 29, 52-73.

상세보기
Dong, M. C., Tse, D. K., & Hung, K. (2010). Effective distributor governance in emerging markets: the salience of distributor role, relationship stages, and market uncertainty. Journal of International Marketing, 18(3), 1-17.

상세보기
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization science, 12(4), 450-467.

상세보기
Flap, H. D., & DeGraaf, N. D. (1986). Social capital and attained occupational-status. Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, 22(2), 145-161.
Ford, D., & McDowell, R. (1999). Managing business relationships by analyzing the effects and value of different actions. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5), 429-442.

상세보기
Fornell, C., & Larker, D. (1981). Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Frazier, G. L., & Antia, K. D. (1995). Exchange relationships and interfirm power in channels of distribution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 321-326.

상세보기
Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization science, 11(2), 183-196.

상세보기
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.

상세보기
Granovetter, M. (2018). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. University of Chicago press.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.

상세보기
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology, 91(3), 481-510.

상세보기
Griffith, D. A., & Myers, M. B. (2005). The performance implications of strategic fit of relational norm governance strategies in global supply chain relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 254-269.

상세보기
Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative science quarterly, 40, 619-652.

상세보기
Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic management journal, 21(3), 203-215.

상세보기
Gummesson, E., & Mele, C. (2010). Marketing as value co-creation through network interaction and resource integration. Journal of business market management, 4(4), 181-198.

상세보기
Gundlach, G. T., & Achrol, R. S. (1993). Governance in exchange: contract law and its alternatives. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12(2), 141-155.

상세보기
Hagen, J. M., & Choe, S. (1998). Trust in Japanese interfirm relations: Institutional sanctions matter. Academy of management Review, 23(3), 589-600.

상세보기
Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative science quarterly, 42(4),716-749.

상세보기
Heide, J. B. (1994). Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of marketing, 58(1), 71-85.

상세보기
Heide, J. B. (2003). Plural governance in industrial purchasing. Journal of marketing, 67(4), 18-29.

상세보기
Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1992). Do norms matter in marketing relationships? Journal of marketing, 56(2), 32-44.

상세보기
Hill, C. W. (1990). Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Academy of management review, 15(3), 500-513.

상세보기
Hutt, M., & Speh, T. (2000). Business marketing management: a strategic approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Jaccard, J., Wan, C. K., & Jaccard, J. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression (No. 114). Sage.
Jackson, M. O. (2009). Networks and economic behavior. Annu. Rev. Econ., 1(1), 489-511.

상세보기
Jaworski, B. J. (1988). Toward a theory of marketing control: environmental context, control types, and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 23-39.

상세보기
John, G., & Weitz, B. (1989). Salesforce compensation: An empirical investigation of factors related to use of salary versus incentive compensation. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(1), 1-14.

상세보기
Kline, R. B. (1998). Software review: Software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. Journal of psychoeducational assessment, 16(4), 343-364.

상세보기
Klein, S., Frazier, G. L., & Roth, V. J. (1990). A transaction cost analysis model of channel integration in international markets. Journal of Marketing research, 27(2), 196-208.

상세보기
Knight, F. H. (1921). Cost of production and price over long and short periods. Journal of Political Economy, 29(4), 304-335.

상세보기
Krishnan, R., Geyskens, I., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2016). The effectiveness of contractual and trust-based governance in strategic alliances under behavioral and environmental uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 37(12), 2521-2542.

상세보기
Lal, R. (1990). Improving channel coordination through franchising. Marketing Science, 9(4), 299-318.

상세보기
Lee, D. R. (1992). Managing Business Transactions: Controlling the Cost of Coordinating, Communicating, and Decision Making. Southern Economic Journal, 59(1), 131-133.

상세보기
Lin, N., Ensel, W. M., & Vaughn, J. C. (1981). Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American sociological review, 46(4), 393-405.

상세보기
Lusch, R. F., & Brown, J. R. (1996). Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. Journal of marketing, 60(4), 19-38.

상세보기
Macneil, I. R. (1980). Power, contract, and the economic model. Journal of Economic Issues, 14(4), 909-923.

상세보기
McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic management journal, 20(12), 1133-1156.

상세보기
Mendenhall, W., Sincich, T., & Boudreau, N. S. (2003). A second course in statistics: regression analysis (Vol. 6). New York: Prentice Hall.
Mishra, A. A., & Shah, R. (2009). In union lies strength: Collaborative competence in new product development and its performance effects. Journal of Operations Management, 27(4), 324-338.

상세보기
Mishra, D. P., Heide, J. B., & Cort, S. G. (1998). Information asymmetry and levels of agency relationships. Journal of marketing Research, 35(3), 277-295.

상세보기
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of marketing research, 29(3), 314-328.

상세보기
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.

상세보기
Noordewier, T. G., John, G., & Nevin, J. R. (1990). Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships. Journal of marketing, 54(4), 80-93.

상세보기
Nooteboom, B. (1996). Trust, opportunism and governance: A process and control model. Organization studies, 17(6), 985-1010.

상세보기
Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management science, 25(9), 833-848.

상세보기
Park, M., Kim, M., & Ryu, S. (2020). The relationship between network governance and unilateral governance in dynamic consumer demand. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 194-201.

상세보기
Wang, L., Sheng, S., Wu, S., & Zhou, K. Z. (2017). Government role, governance mechanisms, and foreign partner opportunism in IJVs. Journal of Business Research, 76, 98-107.

상세보기
Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American sociological review, 62(5), 673-693.

상세보기
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual review of sociology, 24(1), 1-24.

상세보기
Prell, C. (2012). Social network analysis: History, theory and methodology. Sage.
Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V. (1997). Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association, 14(3), 190-202.
Raub, W., & Weesie, J. (1990). Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 626-654.

상세보기
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization science, 12(4), 502-517.

상세보기
Rodan, S. (2010). Structural holes and managerial performance: Identifying the underlying mechanisms. Social Networks, 32(3), 168-179.

상세보기
Ryu, S., Cho, H., & Kim, K. (2013). Effects of network embeddedness on the relationship between environmental volatility and interfirm contracts. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 20(3), 139-153.

상세보기
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative science quarterly, 23, 224-253.

상세보기
Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2015). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural and open systems perspectives. Routledge.
Simmel, G. (1919). Philosophische kultur: gesammelte essais(Vol. 27). A. Kroner
Shipilov, A. V., & Li, S. X. (2008). Can you have your cake and eat it too? Structural holes' influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(1), 73-108.

상세보기
Song, X. M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (1998). Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products. Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication Of The Product Development & Management Association, 15(2), 124-135.
Stump, R. L., & Heide, J. B. (1996). Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(4), 431-441.

상세보기
Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (1998). Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: A structurationist perspective on network processes and effectiveness. Organization science, 9(3), 265-284.

상세보기
Thomas, G. P., & Grashof, J. F. (1982). Impact of internal and external environmental stability on the existence of determinant buying rules. Journal of Business Research, 10(2), 159-168.

상세보기
Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of "coopetition" within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization science, 13(2), 179-190.

상세보기
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American sociological review, 61(4), 674-698.

상세보기
Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization science, 8(2), 109-125.

상세보기
Wathne, K. H., & Heide, J. B. (2000). Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. Journal of marketing, 64(4), 36-51.

상세보기
Weitz, B. A., & Jap, S. D. (1995). Relationship marketing and distribution channels. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 305-320.

상세보기
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1993). Transaction cost economics and organization theory. Industrial and corporate change, 2(2), 107-156.
Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. (2007). When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 1-31.

상세보기
Young, G., Sapienza, H., & Baumer, D. (2003). The influence of flexibility in buyer-seller relationships on the productivity of knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 443-451.

상세보기
Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic management journal, 26(9), 809-825.

상세보기

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증