This study was intended to evaluate the shielding rate of radiation shields manufactured using 3D printers that have recently been used in various fields by comparing them with existing shields made of lead, and to find out their applicability through experiments. A 3D printer shield made of tungste...
This study was intended to evaluate the shielding rate of radiation shields manufactured using 3D printers that have recently been used in various fields by comparing them with existing shields made of lead, and to find out their applicability through experiments. A 3D printer shield made of tungsten filament 1 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm shield, RNS-TX (nanotungsten) 1.1 mm, lead 0.2 mmPb, and 1mmPb were exposed to 99mTc, 18F, and 201TI for 15, 30, 45 minutes, and 60 minutes after measuring cumulative dose three times. Based on this, the shielding rate of each shield was calculated based on the dose in the absence of the shield. In addition, 99mTc, 18F, and 201TI were located 100 cm away from the phantom in which the OSLD nano Dot device was inserted, and if there was no shield for 60 minutes, the dose of thyroid was measured using 1.0 mm of lead shield, 1.1 mm of RNS-TX shield, and 2 mm of tungsten shield made by 3D printer. The use of shields during radiation shielding emitted from open radiation sources all resulted in a reduction in dose. The radiation dose emitted from the radionuclides under the experiment was all reduced when the shield was used. This study has been confirmed that tungsten is a material that can replace lead due to its excellent performance and efficiency as shield, and that it even shows the possibility of manufacturing a customized shield using 3D printer.
This study was intended to evaluate the shielding rate of radiation shields manufactured using 3D printers that have recently been used in various fields by comparing them with existing shields made of lead, and to find out their applicability through experiments. A 3D printer shield made of tungsten filament 1 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm shield, RNS-TX (nanotungsten) 1.1 mm, lead 0.2 mmPb, and 1mmPb were exposed to 99mTc, 18F, and 201TI for 15, 30, 45 minutes, and 60 minutes after measuring cumulative dose three times. Based on this, the shielding rate of each shield was calculated based on the dose in the absence of the shield. In addition, 99mTc, 18F, and 201TI were located 100 cm away from the phantom in which the OSLD nano Dot device was inserted, and if there was no shield for 60 minutes, the dose of thyroid was measured using 1.0 mm of lead shield, 1.1 mm of RNS-TX shield, and 2 mm of tungsten shield made by 3D printer. The use of shields during radiation shielding emitted from open radiation sources all resulted in a reduction in dose. The radiation dose emitted from the radionuclides under the experiment was all reduced when the shield was used. This study has been confirmed that tungsten is a material that can replace lead due to its excellent performance and efficiency as shield, and that it even shows the possibility of manufacturing a customized shield using 3D printer.
Han SH, Koo BY. Transmission dose measurement？of gamma-ray using tungsten shield. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society.？2018;19(9):124-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.9.124？
Han SH. Performance evaluation of gamma-ray？shielding to produce a nuclear medicine exclusive？apron. Chungbuk National University Graduate？School; 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2017.40.1.07
Finnerty M, Brennan PC. Protective aprons in imaging departments: Manufacturer stated lead equivalence values require validation. European Radiology.？2005;15(7):1477-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2571-2？
Lee WH, Ahn SM. Evaluation of reductive effect of？exposure dose by using air gap apron in nuclear？medicine related work environment. The Journal of？the Korea Contents Association. 2014;14(12):845-53.？DOI: 10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.12.845？
Mori H, Koshida K, Ishigamori O, Matsubara K.？Evaluation of the effectiveness of X-ray protective？aprons in experimental and practical fields. Radiological？Physics and Technology. 2014;7:158-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-013-0246-x？
Choi TJ, Oh TK, Kim JH, Kim OB. Development of？lead free shielding material for diagnostic radiation？beams. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology.？2010;21(2):232-7. Retrieved from https://www.progmedphys.org/journal/view.html?pnsearch&uid530&vmdFull&all_kDevelopment%20of%20Lead%20Free%20Shielding%20Material%20for%20Diagnostic%20Radiation%20Beams&？
Lee LS. The effect of a radio-protective apron and？working posture on EMG activities of muscles of？neck extender, trapezius and lumbar erector spine.？Yonsei University Medical Library; 2004. Retrieved？from https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/128869
Oh WK. Development of 3D printing system for human？bone model manufacturing using medical images.？Journal of Radiological Science and Technology.？2017;40(3):433-41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2017.40.3.11
Park HH, Lee JY, Kim JH, Nam KS, Lyu KY, Lee？TS. The usability evaluation according to the application of bismuth shields in PET/CT examination.？Journal of Radiological Science and Technology.？2014;37(1):49-56. Retrieved from https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201328635215601.page？
Lee HY. Department of radiological science. College？of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan,？J. Korean Soc. Radiology. 2018;12(7):22-45. DOI:？https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2018.12.7.909？
Dong KR, Kim CB, Park YS, Ji YS, Kim CN, Won？JU, et al. A study of individual dose for radiological？technologists working with easiest. Journal of Korean？Society for Indoor Environment. 2009;6(1):38-47.？Retrieved from https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/105045？
Han SH, Koo BY. Transmission dose measurement？of gamma-ray using tungsten shield. Journal of the？Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society.？2018;19(9):124-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.9.124？
Wu Y, Cao Y, Wu Y, Li D. Mechanical properties？and ga㎜a-ray shielding performance of 3D-printed？poly-ether-ether-ketone / tungsten composites.？Materials. 2020;13(20):4475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204475？
Yoon MS, Yoon J. Evaluation of tungsten blended？filament shields made by 3D printer in radiography.？Journal of Radiological Science and Technology.？2021;44(6):615-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2021.44.6.615？
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.