[논문]FGI를 활용한 장기계속공사계약 분쟁 개선방안 기초연구

김재식; 이정원; 이민재

doi:10.6106/kjcem.2023.24.2.079

FGI를 활용한 장기계속공사계약 분쟁 개선방안 기초연구
A Study on the Improvement of Long-Term Continuing Construction Contracts Dispute Using FGI 원문보기

한국건설관리학회논문집 = Korean journal of construction engineering and management, v.24 no.2, 2023년, pp.79 - 87

김재식 (충남대학교 건축학과) , 이정원 (충남대학교 건축학과) , 이민재 (충남대학교 토목공학과)

초록
AI-Helper

장기계속공사계약은 예산 일년주의 원칙에 충실한 계약으로, 비교적 많은 예산이 수년에 걸쳐 투입되어야 목적물이 완성되는 특성을 가지고 있는 건설공사에서는 적절한 보완대책이 필요한 계약이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 FGI와 조달청의 공사발주 내역 분석을 통해 장기계속공사계약의 문제점과 개선방안을 도출하였다. 장기계속공사계약의 문제점으로는 법률과 대통령령의 정합성 문제, 예산편성의 효율성이라 보기 어려운 계약이 다수 발주되는 문제, 공기연장에 따른 간접비용 산정문제, 최종 차수계약에 예산이 과다하게 투입되는 문제 등이 존재하였다. 이를 해결하기 위해 총공사기간과 총공사금액의 효력을 인정하는 내용과 장기계속공사계약으로 할 수 있는 대상사업 범위를 한정하는 내용을 포함하는 관련법률 개정이 필요하다. 또한, 공사기간 연장시기에 발생되는 간접비용에 대한 산출기준과 적정 공사기간 산정기준을 명확히 할 필요가 있다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Given that most government contracts are based on a fiscal year, long-term continuing construction contracts require appropriate provisions as significant amounts of budget is supposed to be invested for several years. This study drew problems and improvements of the long-term continuing construction contracts by analyzing the contents of FGI and list of construction order. We found that a number of problems, such as the mismatch between laws and enforcement decrees, difference in calculating overheads due to the extension of construction period, many construction orders that are hard to see as budget efficiency and over investment in the final annual contract, were tangled up in the process. To solve the problems mentioned, we suggested several improvements as follows: (1) effect of total construction period and total amount should be guaranteed by a law, (2) it is suggested that the scope of long-term continuing construction contract is determined by a law, and (3) it should be clear about the calculation of overheads concerned with the extension of construction period as well as the estimation of construction period to prevent over investment in the final contract.

주제어

표/그림 (6)

표 Table 1. Types of public construction contract
표 Table 2. Background information of interviewee
그림 Fig. 1. Budget of Long-Term Continuing Construction Contracts (LTCCC) Oder (2018~2022)
그림 Fig. 2. Budget Ratio of LTCCC Order (2018~2022)
그림 Fig. 3. Number of LTCCC Order per Budget (2018~2022)
그림 Fig. 4. The number of contracts of which the budget of a fiscal year and total budget are same (2018~2022)

참고문헌 (19)

An, S.H. (2017). "Issues and activation plan of the？Construction dispute conciliation System." International？journal of negotiation, 20(2), pp. 83-117.
Chang, C.K. (2013). "Suggestions on Efficient Cost？Management for Public Construction Projects : Focused？on Total Project Cost Management System." Korean？Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,？KICEM, 14(3), pp. 12-21.
Cho, Y.J. (2019). "Systematic Improvement for Effective？Operation of Long-Term Continuous Construction？Contracts." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering？and Management, KICEM, 20(6), pp. 3-10.
Han, S.J., and Woo, S.K. (2021). "Causes and Directions for？Improvement of Additional Industrial Safety and Health？Management Expenses due to the Extension od Time."？KICEM Annual Conference 2021, pp. 119-120.
Jeong, K.C., and Lee, J.S. (2017). "Improvement of the？Calculation Standard for Prolongation cost of Long-term Continuing Contracts Construction Project."？Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and？Management, KICEM, 18(2), pp. 30-37.
Jung, Y.C. (2020). "Restructuring of the Legal Theory on？the Long-term Continuous Construction Contract？under the National Contract Law." Public Law, 48(3),？pp. 313-337.
Kim, S.B. et al.(2008). "An Empirical Study on the Effect？of Public Construction Industry by Expansion of？New Budget System." Korean Journal of Construction？Engineering and Management, KICEM, 9(3), pp. 153-163.
Kim, T.K. (2018). "Study on the right to claim for expenses？incurred upon extension of construction period in the？construction contract general conditions : Focusing？on comparison and examination with creditor delay."？DONG-A LAW REVIEW, (78), pp. 275-305.
Kim, T.K. (2021). "Research on the Legal Nature of So-called General Contracts in Long-term Continuous？Construction Contracts : Focusing on the Supreme？Court 2018. 10. 30. Judgment 2014 Da 235189 en banc？decision." Ilkam Law Review, 48(0), pp. 45-82.
Krueger, R.A., and Casey, M.A. (2008). Focus groups : A？Practical Guide for Applied Research (4th Edition),？Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lee, J.H., and Shin, M.J. (2021). "Legal Issues Concerning？the Extension of the Construction Period and the？Adjustment of the Contract Price in the Long-term？Construction Contract." Ilkam Real Estate Law Review,？23(0) pp. 303-341.
Lee, S.H. (1996). "Problems and Improvement of the Long-Term Continuing Construction Contracts." Construction？Economy Research Institute of Korea (CERIK) Issue？Focus, 7.
Lee, S.J., Cha, Y.W., Han, S.W., and Hyun, C.T. (2021). "A？Rating Method for the Estimation of the Additional？Overhead Expenses incurred by Schedule Extension？in Public Construction Projects." Korean Journal of？Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM,？22(3), pp. 79-90.
Park, S.H., Lee, J.K., Yang, C.H., Lee, J., and Kang, Y.K. (2021).？"Derivation of Design Elements for Connection through？Urban Underground using FGI Method." International？journal of highway engineering, 23(2), pp. 129-136.

상세보기
Park, S.W. (2018). "A Short Essay on Overhead Cost and？Time Extension Issues in Government Long-Term？Continuing Construction Contracts." Korea Law Review,？89, pp. 117-173.
Song, K. (2018). "A Study on the Purpose of Introducing？Long Term Construction Contract." The Graduate？School of Railroad Woosong University.
Stewart, D.W., and Shamdasani, P.N. (2014). Focus groups :？Theory and Practice (3th Edition), Newbury Park, CA:？Sage.
Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF) (2022). Notice？on Decision for Disclosure Information (Registration？Number : 10042415).
The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea (BAI) (2018).？Audit Reports, Seoul, Korea.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증