본 연구에서는 KBC2022의 풍직각방향 변동풍하중 스펙트럼을 이용하여 풍직각방향 풍하중을 생성하고 생성된 풍직각방향 풍하중이 작용하는 구조물의 비탄성 동적거동을 해석하는 프로그램을 개발하고자 한다. 풍응답은 일차 모드가 탁월하고 소성화에 의한 진동의 변화는 작고, 풍방향 진동과 풍직각방향 진동은 독립적이며, 비틀림 진동의 영향은 작다고 가정한다. 적용 구조물을 수평방향의 단자유도 모델로 가정하고, 구조물의 질량을 집중질량으로 치환하여 상부에 작용시킨다. 비탄성 해석을 위한 이력모델은 이선형 모델을 적용한다. 강성비(𝛼)와 항복점비(𝛽)를 변수로 비탄성 동적응답을 분석한 결과 강성비가 일정한 경우에 항복점비가 증가할수록 최대변위비는 감소하다가 최소값을 나타내고 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 강성비가 0.5이상인 경우 최대변위비가 1이하가 되는 항복점비가 존재하며, 이는 비탄성 내풍설계시 비탄성 거동을 허용하더라도 탄성설계된 건물보다 최대 변형이 감소함을 나타낸다.
본 연구에서는 KBC2022의 풍직각방향 변동풍하중 스펙트럼을 이용하여 풍직각방향 풍하중을 생성하고 생성된 풍직각방향 풍하중이 작용하는 구조물의 비탄성 동적거동을 해석하는 프로그램을 개발하고자 한다. 풍응답은 일차 모드가 탁월하고 소성화에 의한 진동의 변화는 작고, 풍방향 진동과 풍직각방향 진동은 독립적이며, 비틀림 진동의 영향은 작다고 가정한다. 적용 구조물을 수평방향의 단자유도 모델로 가정하고, 구조물의 질량을 집중질량으로 치환하여 상부에 작용시킨다. 비탄성 해석을 위한 이력모델은 이선형 모델을 적용한다. 강성비(𝛼)와 항복점비(𝛽)를 변수로 비탄성 동적응답을 분석한 결과 강성비가 일정한 경우에 항복점비가 증가할수록 최대변위비는 감소하다가 최소값을 나타내고 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 강성비가 0.5이상인 경우 최대변위비가 1이하가 되는 항복점비가 존재하며, 이는 비탄성 내풍설계시 비탄성 거동을 허용하더라도 탄성설계된 건물보다 최대 변형이 감소함을 나타낸다.
In this study, fluctuating wind velocity for time history analysis is simulated by a single variate, single-dimensional random process using the KBC2022 spectrum about across-wind direction. This study analyzed and obtained the inelastic dynamic response for structures modeled as a single-degree-of-...
In this study, fluctuating wind velocity for time history analysis is simulated by a single variate, single-dimensional random process using the KBC2022 spectrum about across-wind direction. This study analyzed and obtained the inelastic dynamic response for structures modeled as a single-degree-of-freedom system. It is assumed that the wind response is excellent in the primary mode, the change in vibration owing to plasticization is minor, along-wind vibration and across-wind vibration are independent, and the effect of torsional vibration is small. The numerical results, obtained by the Newmark-𝛽 method, shows the time-history responses and trends of maximum displacements. As a result of analyzing the inelastic dynamic response of the structure with the second stiffness ratio(𝛼) and yield displacement ratio (𝛽) as variables, it is identified that as the yield displacement ratio (𝛽) increases when the second stiffness ratio is constant, the maximum displacement ratio decreases, then reaches a minimum value, and then increases. When the stiffness ratio is greater than 0.5, there is a yield point ratio at which the maximum displacement ratio is less than 1, indicating that the maximum deformation is reduced compared to the elastically designed building even if the inelastic behavior is permitted in the inelastic wind design.
In this study, fluctuating wind velocity for time history analysis is simulated by a single variate, single-dimensional random process using the KBC2022 spectrum about across-wind direction. This study analyzed and obtained the inelastic dynamic response for structures modeled as a single-degree-of-freedom system. It is assumed that the wind response is excellent in the primary mode, the change in vibration owing to plasticization is minor, along-wind vibration and across-wind vibration are independent, and the effect of torsional vibration is small. The numerical results, obtained by the Newmark-𝛽 method, shows the time-history responses and trends of maximum displacements. As a result of analyzing the inelastic dynamic response of the structure with the second stiffness ratio(𝛼) and yield displacement ratio (𝛽) as variables, it is identified that as the yield displacement ratio (𝛽) increases when the second stiffness ratio is constant, the maximum displacement ratio decreases, then reaches a minimum value, and then increases. When the stiffness ratio is greater than 0.5, there is a yield point ratio at which the maximum displacement ratio is less than 1, indicating that the maximum deformation is reduced compared to the elastically designed building even if the inelastic behavior is permitted in the inelastic wind design.
Aswegan, K., Larsen, R., Klemencic, R., Hooper, J., Hasselbauer,？J. (2017) Performance-based Wind and Seismic Engineering:？Benefits of Considering Multiple Hazards, Structures？Congress 2017, Denver, USA, pp.473~484.
Chopra, A.K. (2001) Dynamics of Structures, Prentice Hall.
Chopra, A.K., Goel, R. (2001) A Modal Pu shover Analysis？Procedure to Estimate Seismic Demands for Buildings: Theory？and Preliminary Evaluation, Report No. PEER 2001/03,？Pacfic Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Elezaby, F ., El Damatty, A. (2020) Ductility-based Design？approach of Tall Buildings under Wind Loads, Wind &？Struct., 31(2), pp.143~152.
Feng, C., Chen, X. (2017) Crosswind Response of Tall Buildings？with Nonlinear Aerodynamic Damping and Hysteretic？Restoring Force Character, J. Wind Eng. & Ind. Aerodyn.,？167, pp.62~74.
Hwang, J.K. (1999) Analysis of Fluctuatinf Wind Force Considering？Aerodynamic Characteristics for the Change of Building？Plan, Doctor's Thesis, Seoul National University.
Hwang, J.K., Hong, S.K., Jeon, B.S. (2000) Analysis of Serviceability by Fluctuating Wind Force, Proc. Wind Eng. Inst.？Korea, 3, pp.42~47.
Jeong, S.Y., Kim, M.K., Kang, H.K. (2021) Case Study and？Research on Performance-Based Wind Design of RC Tall？Buildings, J. Wind Eng. Inst. Korea, 25(3), pp.119~128.
Kang, H.K., Jeong, S.Y., Alinejad, H. (2019) Understanding of？Wind Load Determination according to KBC 2016 and Its？Application to High-rise Buildings, J. Wind Eng. Inst. Korea,？23(2), pp.83~89.
Mohammadi, A., Azizinamini, A., Griffis, L., Irwind, P. (2019)？Performance Assessment of an Existing 47-Story High-Rise？Building under Extreme Wind Loads, J. Struct. Eng., 145(1),？pp.1~16.
Nigam, N.C., Narayanan, S. (1994) Applications of Random？Vibrations, Narosa Publishing House.
The Architectural Institute of Korea (2022) Korean Building？Code and Commentary.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.