$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 고무풍선 중 니트로스아민류의 효과적 위해성 소통 전략에 관한 연구
Effective Risk Communication Strategies for N-Nitrosamines in Rubber Balloons 원문보기

韓國環境保健學會誌 = Journal of environmental health sciences, v.49 no.4, 2023년, pp.228 - 235  

김현경 (한국건설생활환경시험연구원) ,  이기영 (서울대학교 보건대학원 환경보건학과)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Background: As the public interest in chemical substances found in daily life has increased, environmental health education content has been developed and related studies have been conducted. However, there is still insufficient research on methodologies for environmental health education. Objective...

Keyword

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Korea Environment Institute. Comprehensive environmental value study for integrated environmental and economic analysis: impact assessment and value estimation by sector. Available: https://www.kei.re.kr/elibList.es?mida10101000000&elibNameresearchreport&actview&c_id721735 [accessed 12 June 2023].? 

  2. Sah JY. Consumer-friendly strategy for food risk communication: focused on communication approach and appeal [dissertation]. [Seoul]: Seoul National University; 2016.? 

  3. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Analysis of chemical substances in balloons. Available: https://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publications/2007/978-87-7052-662-3/pdf/978-87-7052-664-7.pdf [accessed 12 June 2023].? 

  4. Scientific Committee on Consumer Products. Opinion on the presence and release of nitrosamines and nitrosatable compounds from rubber balloons. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_o_121.pdf [accessed 12 June 2023].? 

  5. Li P, Bai H, Li H, Chen M, Lu Q, Zhang Q. [Determination of migration of 15 N-nitrosamines and N-nitrosatable substances from children's latex articles by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using solid phase extraction]. Chin J Chromatogr. 2014; 32(1): 81-88. Chinese.? 

  6. Korea Consumer Agency. A report on the safety of rubber balloons. Available: https://www.kca.go.kr/smartconsumer/sub.do?menukey7301&modeview&no1002606614&page29 [accessed 12 June 2023].? 

  7. Kwon YR. A study on changes of sense of place and environmental consciousness in place-based environmental education: a case study on participants of eco-guide program of 'Shihwa lake savers'. [dissertation]. [Seoul]: Seoul National University; 2005.? 

  8. Kim BS, Lee SJ. The study of attitude of Korean parents on environmental education for their elementary children. Korean J Environ Educ. 2009; 22(4): 1-13.? 

  9. Kim HK, Yoon SJ. A qualitative case study on the life and the significance of 'EcoMom'. J Anthropol Educ. 2011; 14(2): 91-127.? 

  10. Korea Ministry of Environment. A study on strategies for promoting risk communication in environmental health. Available: https://repository.kei.re.kr/handle/2017.oak/19880?modesimple [accessed 12 June 2023].? 

  11. Lee JS, O EG, Lee HK, Kim SH. Message strategy to promote colorectal cancer screening behavior. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2017; 17(12): 357-367.? 

  12. Kim HI, Kim YW. The effects of controlling language and message orientation on pro-environmental behavioral intentions in environmental communication: focusing on the moderation effects of issue involvement and the mediation effects of psychological reactance. Advert Res. 2018; (116): 138-179.? 

  13. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981; 211(4481): 453-458.? 

  14. Gallagher KM, Updegraff JA. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med. 2012; 43(1): 101-116.? 

  15. Goodall C, Appiah O. Adolescents' perceptions of Canadian cigarette package warning labels: investigating the effects of message framing. Health Commun. 2008; 23(2): 117-127.? 

  16. Toll BA, Salovey P, O'Malley SS, Mazure CM, Latimer A, McKee SA. Message framing for smoking cessation: the interaction of risk perceptions and gender. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008; 10(1): 195-200.? 

  17. Latimer AE, Salovey P, Rothman AJ. The effectiveness of gain-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behavior: is all hope lost? J Health Commun. 2007; 12(7): 645-649.? 

  18. O'Keefe DJ, Jensen JD. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: a meta-analytic review. J Health Commun. 2007; 12(7): 623-644.? 

  19. White K, MacDonnell R, Dahl DW. It's the mind-set that matters: the role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. J Mark Res. 2011; 48(3): 472-485.? 

  20. Chang H, Zhang L, Xie GX. Message framing in green advertising: the effect of construal level and consumer environmental concern. Int J Advert. 2015; 34(1): 158-176.? 

  21. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.? 

  22. Rosenstock IM. Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966; 44(3 Pt 2): 94-127.? 

  23. Yoon IK, Kim JH, Jang MH, Seo JY, Kim KT, Park DH, et al. Development and application of health belief model based milk education program for elementary, middle, and high school students. J Home Econ Educ Res. 2007; 19(4): 17-36.? 

  24. Lee SH. Health education program development and evaluation of its effectiveness in promoting the safe use of cleaning agents for infants and toddlers parent: health belief model application [dissertation]. [Seoul]: Ewha Womans University; 2018.? 

  25. Abood DA, Black DR, Feral D. Nutrition education worksite intervention for university staff: application of the health belief model. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2003; 35(5): 260-267.? 

  26. Jo HS, Lee HW, Kim CB, Jeong HJ. A meta -analysis of health related behavior study based on health belief model in Korean. Korean J Health Psychol. 2004; 9(1): 69-84.? 

  27. Carpenter CJ. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Commun. 2010; 25(8): 661-669.? 

  28. Harrison JA, Mullen PD, Green LW. A meta-analysis of studies of the health belief model with adults. Health Educ Res. 1992; 7(1): 107-116.? 

  29. Chung DH. Determinants of preventive behavior intention to the particulate matter: an application of the expansion of health belief model. J Digit Converg. 2019; 17(8): 471-479.? 

  30. Kim JH, Cho JH. Investigation of effects of individuals' social viewing of fine dust information obtained through social media on behavioral intentions of disease prevention: application of health beliefs model. Korean J Broadcast Telecommun Studies. 2019; 33(4): 37-65.? 

  31. Jo SE, Shin HC, Yoo SW, Roh HS. The study of factors affecting tuberculosis preventive behavior intentions: an extension of HBM with mediating effects of self-efficacy and fear. J Public Relations. 2012; 16(1), 148-177.? 

  32. Witte K. Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: using the extended parallel process model to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In: Andersen PA, Guerrero LK. editors. Handbook of communication and emotion: research, theory, applications, and contexts. Cambridge: Academic Press; 1996. p.423-450.? 

  33. Kang MJ. The impact of emotion in communication on environmentally responsible behavior [dissertation]. [Seoul]: Seoul National University; 2014.? 

  34. Roh JC. Specialization of risk-communication in environmental news. Korean J Sociol. 2004; 38(1): 77-105.? 

  35. Kim HI, Lee EK. Analysis of media reports on the safety of herbal medicines from the viewpoint of risk communication. J Health Technol Assess. 2014; 2(2): 99-104.? 

  36. Park KS, Park BS. The social construction of environmental risk communication: the changing media coverage of asbestos risk in Korea. ECO. 2015; 19(1): 7-47. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로