[논문]내린천 상류 유역 열목어(Brachymystax lenok tslingensis) 서식지 자연성 평가

김정은; 이황구

doi:10.17820/eri.2023.10.3.073

내린천 상류 유역 열목어(Brachymystax lenok tslingensis) 서식지 자연성 평가
Evaluation on Watershed Natural Habitat Assessment for Conservation of Brachymystax lenok tsinlingensis in Naerin Upstream 원문보기

Ecology and resilient infrastructure, v.10 no.3, 2023년, pp.73 - 84

김정은 (국립공원공단 국립공원연구원) , 이황구 (상지대학교 생명과학과)

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구는 수생태계 생물다양성과 자연 서식지 환경을 유역 수준에서 평가하기 위해 수질과 수생태 분야를 중심으로 통합 지표를 개발하였으며, 지표별 결과 특성을 분석하여 적용성을 검토하였다. 자연성 평가체계는 인간 활동에 의한 교란, 서식지 다양성, 생물다양성, 생태계 구조의 4가지 평가분야와 7개 세부 평가지표로 구성하였다. 하천 생태계의 서식지 보전을 위해 평가 대상 생물군으로 어류를 활용하였으며, 멸종위기야생생물 II급 열목어와 최대 서식지인 계방천과 내린천을 평가대상으로 선정하였다. 조사 수역은 대부분 하천차수가 낮은 산간계류 형태로 열목어의 공서어종은 금강모치와 참갈겨니로 분석되었다. 자연성 평가 결과, 교란 현황 분야에서 본류보다 지류에서 제방 식생이 안정적인 환경을 보였으며, 외부 교란이 적은 것으로 분석되었다. 서식지 다양성 분야에서는 서식지 평가 지수가 평균 200 이상의 높은 점수를 나타내어 최적의 생물서식 환경을 보이는 것으로 분석되었다. 생물다양성 분야에서는 민감종의 비율이 높고, 용존산소가 많은 편이며 오염물질이 거의 없는 청정상태로 분석되었다. 생태계 구조 분야에서는 생태지표특성 메트릭과 멸종위기야생생물의 출현에 따른 점수 편차가 큰 특성을 보였으나, 대체로 하천생태계 건강성이 우수한 것으로 분석되었다. 열목어의 출현 유무에 따라 서식지 환경에 차이를 보이면서 자연성 평가 결과에 다소 차이를 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 생태계 변화 관찰 목적에 따라 자연환경 변화를 신속하게 탐지하고 하천생태계보전을 위한 평가체계로 활용하기 위해서는 다양한 유역을 대상으로 조사 분석이 이루어져야 할 것으로 판단된다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The objective of this study was to evaluate biodiversity and natural habitat environment of freshwater ecosystem. Our aim was therefore to produce a set of biodiversity and habitat indicators based on multi-parameters of water quality and biodiversity by analyzing the characteristics of the results by indicators. We selected four indicators a) anthropogenic disturbance, b) habitat diversity, c) biodiversity, d) ecosystem structure. The fishes cohabiting with Brachymystax lenok tsinlingensis were Rhynchocypris kumgangensis and Zacco koreanus. As a result of the anthropogenic disturbance evaluation, it was analyzed that vegetation embankment showed a more stable environment in the tributary than the main stream, and other disturbance was not confirmed As a result of the habitat diversity evaluation, it was analyzed that habitat evaluation index showed a high score of 200 more on average, showing an optimal habitat condition. As a result of the biodiversity evaluation, it was analyzed as a clean habitat condition with a high proportion of sensitive species, abundant dissolved oxygen, and little pollutants. As a results of the ecosystem structure, the ecological health condition metrics and appearance of endangered species showed large score deviation, but it was analyzed that the stream ecosystem health was generally excellent. There was a slight correlation between the habitat environment and the results of the nature habitat evaluation according to the appearance of the B. lenok tsinlingensis.

주제어

표/그림 (6)

그림 Fig. 1. The map showing the sampling sites in Gyebang Stream and Naerin Stream.
표 Table 1. Metrics employed for stream ecological health and diversity
표 Table 2. Individual number of fish species collected at each site in the Gyebang stream and Naerin Stream
표 Table 3. Ecological health and diversity assessment based on the 7 metrics in Gyebang Stream and Naerin Stream
그림 Fig. 2. Comparison with scoring for evaluation category.
그림 Fig. 3. Total score of evaluation as appearance of Brachy-mystax lenok tslingensis.

참고문헌 (35)

AI-Chokhachy, R., Roper, B.B., and Archer, E.K. 2010.？Evaluating the status and trends of physical stream？habitat in headwater streams within the interior Columbia？River and upper Missouri River basins using an index？approach. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139: 1041-1059.

상세보기
An, K.G., Jung, S.H., and Choi, S.S. 2001. An evaluation？on health conditions of Pyong-Chang River using the？Index of Biolog ical Integrity ( IBI) and Qualitative Habitat？Evaluation Index (QHEI). Korea Journal of Limnology 34: 153-165. (in
Bae, Y.J., Lee, W.J., and Seung, H.W. 2003. Development？of environmental technique and biodiversity management？system and their application to stream ecosystems？in Korea. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 21: 223-233. (in
Byeon, H.G. 2011. The characteristics of fish fauna and？Brachimystax lenok tsinlingensis individuals in the？Bonghwa-gun, Korea. Korean Journal of Environmental？Ecology 25: 878-886. (in
Cho, Y.C., Choi, H.M., Ryu I.G., Kim, S.H., Shin, D.S.,？and Yu, S.J. 2021. Assessment of water quality in lower？reaches Namhan River by using statistical analysis water？quality index (WQI). Journal of Korean Society on？Water Environment 37: 114-127. (in
Choi, J.S. and Choi, J.K. 2005. Fish fauna and disturbance？in Odaesan National Park, Korea. Korean Journal of？Environmental Ecology 19: 177-187. (in
Grinstead, S., Kelly, B., Siepker, M., and Weber, M.J.？2022. Evaluation of two fish-based indices of biotic？integrity for assessing coldwater stream health and？habitat condition in lowa's Driftless Area, USA. Aquatic？Ecology 56: 983-1000.
Jackson, D.A., Pere-Neto, P.R., and Olden, J.D. 2001.？What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities？the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors.？Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 157-170.

상세보기
Jung, H.R. and Kim, K.H. 2018. A development of an？assessment system for stream physical environments in？Korea. Korea Water Resources Association 51: 713-727. (in
Jung, S.H., Choi, S.S., and An, K.G. 2001. An evaluation？on health conditions of Pyeong-Chang River using the？Index of biological Integrity (IBI) and qualitative habitat？evaluation index (QHEI). Korean Journal of Limnology 34: 153-165. (in
Kang, H.S. and Hur, J.W. 2012. Aquatic ecosystem assessment？and habitat improvement alternative in Hongcheon？River using fish community. Korean Society of Civil？Engineering 32: 331-343. (in
Kim, H.J., Lee, S.H. and An, K.G. 2010. Comparative？analysis of ecological health conditions before and after？ecological restoration in Changwon Stream and Nam？Stream. Korean Journal of Limnology 43: 307-318. (in
Kim, I.S. and Park, J.Y. 2002. Freshwater fish of Korea.？Kyohak Publishing Co., Ltd. Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
Kim, I.S., Choi, Y., Lee, C.L., Lee, Y.J., Kim, B.J. and？Kim, J.H. 2005. Illustrated book of Korean fishes.？Kyohak Publishing Co., Ltd. Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
Kim, J.I., Choi, J.W., and An, K.G. 2014. Spatial and？temporal variations of water quality in an urban Miho？Stream and some influences of the tributaries on the？water quality. Journal of Environmental Science International 23: 433-445. (in Korean)
Korea Environment Institute (KEI). 2017. A study on the？basic principles and policy roadmap of integrated water？management. pp. 1-116. (in Korean)
Lee, J.E., Choi, J.W., and An, K.H. 2012. Influence of？land use pattern and seasonal precipitation on the？long-term physico-chemical water quality in Namhan？River watershed. Journal of Environmental Sciences 21: 1115-1129. (in Korean)
Lee, J.W., Woo, S.Y., Kim, Y.W., Park, J.W., and Kim,？S.J. 2021. Evaluation of InVEST habitat quality model？using aquatic ecosystem health data. Journal of Korea？Water Resources Association 54: 657-666. (in Korean)
Lee, S.H. and Yang, D.C. 2010. A study on the disturbance？and the rehabilitation of stream by using evaluation？of ichthyofauna to disturbed ecosystem. Korean Journal？of Limnology 43: 242-254. (in Korean)
Lee, S.H., Lee, H.G., Park, S.J., Lee, S.H. and Choi, J.K.？2014. Distribution characteristics of fish community to？stream order in Namhan River watershed. Korean Journal？of Ecology and Environment 47: 100-115. (in Korean)
Ministry of Construction and Traffics (MCT). 2004. Development？to close-to nature river improvement techniques. pp. 1-1460. (in Korean)
Murray, S. and Innes, J.L. 2009. Effects of environment？on fish species distributions in the Mackenzie River？drainage basin of northeastern British Columbia, Canada.？Ecology of Freshwater Fish 18: 183-196.

상세보기
Nam, M.M. 1996. Present status of Korean freshwater？fish. In 1996 Symposium of Korean Journal of Limnology.？Proc. pp. 31-45. (in Korean)
National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR). 2022.？National list of Korea. https://kbr.go.kr/. Accessed 13 Sep 2022. (in Korean)
National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER).？2016. Biomonitoring survey and assessment manual.？pp. 1-313. (in Korean)
Nelson, J.S. 2006. Fishes of the world (3rd ed.). John？Wiley & Sons. New York. U.S.A. p. 550
Noss, R.F. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a？hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4: 355-364.

상세보기
Taylor, C.M., Holder, T.L., Fiorillo, R.A., Williams, L.R.,？Thomas, R.B., and Warren, Jr. M.L. 2006. Distribution,？abundance, and diversity of stream fishes under variable？environmental conditions. Canadian Journal of Fisheries？and Aquatic Sciences 63: 43-54.

상세보기
Tracy, E.E., Infante, D.M., Cooper, A.R., and Taylor,？W.W. 2022. An ecological resilience index to improve？conservation action for stream fish habitat. Aquatic？Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 32: 951-996.
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) 2001.？Indicators and environmental impact assessment: designing？national-level monitoring and indicator programs.？UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/7/12. Montreal. Subsidiary Body？on Scientific. Technical and Technological Advice.
Xiang, W.N. 1996. GIS-based riparian buffer analysis:？injecting geographic information into landscape planning.？Landscape and Urban Planning 34: 1-10.

상세보기
Yang, H.E., Lee, J.B., and Kim, I.H. 2017. Assessment？of the vulnerability of groundwater level management？in Nakdong river basin. Journal of Korea Water Resources？Association 50: 815-825. (in Korean)
Yoon, H.N., Kim, K.D., Jeon, Y.L., Lee, J.H., and Park,？Y.J. 2013. Stomach contents of the Manchurian Trout？(Brachymystax lenok tsinlingensis) and River Salmon？(Oncorhynchus masou masou) in the Odae mountain,？Gangwondo. Korean Journal of Ichthyology 25: 90-105. (in Korean)
Yoon, J.D. and Jang, M.H. 2009. Migration patterns of？Brachymystax lenok tsinlingensis using radio tags in the？upper part of the Nakdong river. Korean Journal of？Ecology and Environment 42: 58-66. (in Korean)
Yun, S.W. and Park, J.Y. 2021. Fish fauna and community？structure in the Deogyusan National Park, Korea.？Korean Journal of Ichthyology 33: 126-141. (in Korean)

원문보기 상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증