[논문]2D 혈관조영술에서 직접 측정한 혈관 직경과 MR 영상에서 단면적 기반 환산 직경의 비교 분석

이기백; 김미현

doi:10.17946/jrst.2023.46.5.427

2D 혈관조영술에서 직접 측정한 혈관 직경과 MR 영상에서 단면적 기반 환산 직경의 비교 분석
Comparative Analysis between Directly Measured Diameter in 2D Angiography and Cross-Sectional Area-Converted Diameter in MR Image 원문보기

방사선기술과학 = Journal of radiological science and technology, v.46 no.5, 2023년, pp.427 - 433

이기백 (충북보건과학대학교 방사선과) , 김미현 (서울아산병원 영상의학과)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

This study aimed to quantitatively compare the diameters measured directly from the coronal plane or sagittal plane of 2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and the cross-sectional area-converted diameters calculated from contrast-enhanced MR (CE-MR) imaging. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 20 patients who underwent both 2D DSA and CE-MR imaging. Firstly, the venous diameters of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) and transverse sinus (TS) were directly measured from 2D DSA. Subsequently, the axial planes for SSS diameter and the sagittal plane for TS in CE-MR imaging were utilized to calculate cross-sectional area-based converted diameters. The numerical values obtained from 2D DSA and CE-MR imaging were compared pairwise at each location. For SSS, the diameter measured by 2D DSA was 27% larger than the conversion-based diameter from CE-MR imaging (9.8±1.4 mm vs. 7.1±1.3 mm, P<0.05). Similarly, for the right TS, the difference was 16% (8.8±3.2 mm vs. 7.4±2.0 mm, P<0.05), and for the left TS, the difference was 22% (8.4±2.8 mm vs. 6.6±1.3 mm, P<0.05). In conclusion, the diameter measured directly in conventional 2D DSA may be larger than the diameter converted based on the cross-sectional area. Therefore, when selecting the size of the stent, it is crucial to make precise determinations while keeping this fact in mind.

주제어

참고문헌 (26)

Li K, Ren M, Meng R, Ding Y, Rajah GB, Wang F,？et al. Efficacy of stenting in patients with cerebral？venous sinus thrombosis-related cerebral venous sinus stenosis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(3):307-12.？DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014328

상세보기
Levitt MR, Albuquerque FC, Gross BA, Moon K, Jadhav？AP, Ducruet AF, et al. Venous sinus stenting in patients？without idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J？Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(5):512-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012405

상세보기
Fargen KM, Liu K, Garner RM, Greeneway GP, Wolfe？SQ, Crowley RW. Recommendations for the selection？and treatment of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension for venous sinus stenting. J？Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(12):1203-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014042

상세보기
Nicholson P, Brinjikji W, Radovanovic I, Hilditch？CA, Tsang ACO, Krings T, et al. Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv？Surg. 2019;11(4):380-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014172

상세보기
Giridharan N, Patel SK, Ojugbeli A, Nouri A, Shirani？P, Grossman AW, et al. Understanding the complex？pathophysiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension and the evolving role of venous sinus stenting: A comprehensive review of the literature.？Neurosurg Focus. 2018;45(1):E10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2018.4.FOCUS18100

상세보기
Peterson KA, Kittel C, Lee KE, Garner R, Nechtman？CM, Brown P, et al. Angiographic cerebral venous？sinus calibers and drainage patterns in patients with？normal intracranial pressure and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;？13(10):958-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg2020-016976
Saber H, Lewis W, Sadeghi M, Rajah G, Narayanan？S. Stent survival and stent-adjacent stenosis rates？following venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A systematic review and？meta-analysis. Interv Neurol. 2018;7(6):490-500.？DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000490578

상세보기
Lee NJ, Chung MS, Jung SC, Kim HS, Choi CG, Kim？SJ, et al. Comparison of high-resolution mr imaging？and digital subtraction angiography for the characterization and diagnosis of intracranial artery disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(12):？2245-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4950

상세보기
Loiudice P, Pellegrini M, Marino M, Mazzi B, Ionni？I, Covello G, et al. Choroidal vascularity index in？thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: A cross-sectional study. Eye Vis (Lond). 2021;30;8(1):18. DOI:？http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00242-6

상세보기
Kim DO, Kim HJ, Jung HJ, Son HK, Hong JO, Jeong？HK, et al. Clinical usefulness of 3-D image rendering？using DICOM images in cardiovascular system.？Journal of the Korean Society of Picture Archiving？and Communications System. 2001;7:41-7. Retrieved？from https://www.ksiim.org/site/journal/search/archives
Yoon JT, Lee KB. Radiation dose reduction of lens？by adjusting table height and magnification ratio？in 3D cerebral angiography. Journal of Radiological？Science and Technology. 2022;45(4):313-20. DOI:？https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2022.45.4.313

원문보기 상세보기
Kim SG, Kim SH. Usefulness of 3D rotational angiography for cerebral vascular diameter measurement.？Journal of Radiological Science and Technology.？2023;46(1):9-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17946/？JRST.2023.46.1.9

원문보기 상세보기
Schneiders JJ, Marquering HA, Antiga L, Van den？Berg R, VanBavel E, Majoie CB. Intracranial？aneurysm neck size overestimation with 3D rotational angiography: The impact on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics simulated with computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.？2013;34(1):121-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3179

상세보기
Brinjikji W, Cloft C, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF.？Comparison of 2D digital subtraction angiography？and 3D rotational angiography in the evaluation？of dome-to-neck ratio. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.？2009;30(4):831-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1444

상세보기
Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Valentine RJ, Modrall JG,？Smith S, Clagett GP. Accuracy and utility of？three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic？resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.？J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(2):257-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.03.051

상세보기
Lee J, Chung TS, Lee KY, Suh SH. Comparison of？non-invasive imaging studies in the evaluation of？carotid artery stenosis and occlusion: CT angiography,？time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enh？anced MR angiography. J Korean Soc Magn Reson？Med. 2011;15:234-41. Retrieved from https://synapse.koreamed.org/upload/synapsedata/pdfdata/0040jksmrm/jksmrm-15-234.pdf
Bharatha A, Yeung R, Durant D, Fox AJ, Aviv RI,？Howard P, et al. Comparison of computed tomography angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of clipped intracranial？aneurysms. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34(3):？440-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e318 1d27393

상세보기
Dinkin MJ, Patsalides A. Venous sinus stenting in？idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Results of a？prospective trial. J Neuroophthalmol. 2017;37(2):？113-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000426

상세보기
Leishangthem L, SirDeshpande P, Dua D, Satti SR.？Dural venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: An updated review. J？Neuroradiol. 2019;46(2):148-54. DOI: https://doi.？org/10.1016/j.neurad.2018.09.001

상세보기
Boyter E. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension.？JAAPA. 2019;32(5):30-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000554732.85914.91

상세보기
Garner RM, Aldridge JB, Wolfe SQ, Fargen KM.？Quality of life, need for retreatment, and the？re-equilibration phenomenon after venous sinus？stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension.？J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13(1):79-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016124

상세보기
Lee KB, Nam KC, Jang JS, Kim HC. Feasibility？of the quantitative assessment method for CT？quality control in phantom image evaluation. Appl.？Sci. 2021;11:3570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083570

상세보기
Lee KB, Cho YB, Jeong HK, Nam KC, Kim HC. The？study on automatized quantitative assessment？method of CT image in quality control: Focusing？on spatial and low contrast resolution. Journal of The Institute of Electronics and Information？Engineers. 2017;54(12):186-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5573/ieie.2017.54.12.186

상세보기
Lee JM, Park JH, Kim JS, Lim CH, Lee KB.？Comparison of sizes of anatomical structures according to scan position changes in patients with？interstitial lung disease using high-resolution？thoracic CT. Journal of Radiological Science and？Technology. 2021;44(2):91-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2021.44.2.91

원문보기 상세보기
Svoboda N, Bradac O, Mandys V, Netuka D, Benes？V. Diagnostic accuracy of DSA in carotid artery？stenosis: A comparison between stenosis measured？on carotid endarterectomy specimens and DSA in？644 cases. Acta Neurochir(Wien). 2022;164(12):？3197-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05332-5

상세보기
Kim HG. Normal corpus callosum dimensions？measured by MRI. Journal of Radiological Science？and Technology. 2008;31(3):277-85. Retrieved from？https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO200804748557363.page

원문 URL 링크

DOI : 10.17946/JRST.2023.46.5.427 [무료]
Korea Open Access Journals : 저널
AccessON : 저널

*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내

내보내기 메뉴

내보내기 구분

파일저장
인쇄
메일전송

구성항목

기본정보
상세정보

관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관

저장형식

Text(ASCII format)
Excel format
RefWorks Direct Export
RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley

메일정보

받는사람 (필수): @
보내는사람 (선택): @
제목
내용: KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스

안내

총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다.

다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000)

검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다.

데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요)

다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다.
파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오.

Text(ASCII format)
Excel format

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper

안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

연합인증