[논문]국내외 소비자 제품 노출평가모델을 이용한 노출량 비교

강소현; 임미영; 이기영

doi:10.5668/jehs.2024.50.1.43

국내외 소비자 제품 노출평가모델을 이용한 노출량 비교
Comparison of Exposure Estimates Using Consumer Exposure Assessment Models and the Korean Exposure Algorithm 원문보기

韓國環境保健學會誌 = Journal of environmental health sciences, v.50 no.1, 2024년, pp.43 - 53

강소현 (서울대학교 보건대학원 환경보건학과) , 임미영 (서울대학교 보건환경연구소) , 이기영 (서울대학교 보건대학원 환경보건학과)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Background: Exposure assessment is an important part of risk assessment for consumer products. Exposure models are used when estimating consumer exposures by considering exposure routes, subjects, and circumstances. These models differ based on their tiers, types, and target populations. Consequently, exposure estimates may vary between models. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the results of different exposure models using identical exposure factors. Methods: Chemical exposure from consumer products was calculated using four consumer exposure assessment models: Targeted Risk Assessment 3.1, Consumer Exposure Model 2.1 (CEM), ConsExpo web 1.1.1, and the Korean Exposure Algorithm (primary and detailed) issued by the Ministry of Environment, No. 972 (MOE). The same exposure factors were used in each model to calculate inhalation and dermal exposures to acetaldehyde, d-limonene, and naphthalene in all-purpose cleaners, leather coating sprays, and sealants. Results: In the results, TRA provided the highest estimate. Generally, MOE (detailed), CEM and ConsExpo showed lower exposures. The inhalation exposure for leather coating spray showed the largest differences between models, with differences reaching up to 1.2×107 times. Since identical inputs were used for the calculations, it is likely that the models significantly influenced the estimated results. Conclusions: Despite using the same exposure factors to calculate dermal and inhalation exposures, the results varied substantially based on the model's exposure algorithm. Therefore, selecting an exposure model for assessing consumer products should be done with careful consideration.

주제어

참고문헌 (16)

Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of？Chemicals (IPCS). IPCS risk assessment terminology. Part 1: IPCS/OECD key generic terms used in chemical hazard/risk assessment.？Part 2: IPCS glossary of key exposure assessment terminology. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Guidelines for exposure assessment. Washington, D.C.: EPA; 1992 May. Report No.:？EPA/600/Z-92/001.
National Institute of Environmental Research. Exposure calculation formula (related to Article 9-3). Regulations on the subject and？method of risk assessment of consumer chemical products. Available: https://dlib.nier.go.kr/NIER/cop/bbs/selectNoLoginBoardArticle.do?menuNo13001&bbsIdBBSMSTR_000000000031&nttId30410&CommandREAD [Accessed 23 February 2024].
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Predictive models？and tools for screening chemicals under TSCA: consumer exposure？models 1.5. Washington, D.C.: EPA; 2017.
Dam-Deisz WDC, Schuur AG. ConsExpo Web. Consumer exposure models - model documentation: update for ConsExpo Web 1.0.2. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM); 2017. Report No.: RIVM Report 2017-0197.
European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals？(ECETOC). Addendum to TR114: technical basis for the TRA v3.1.？Brussels: ECETOC; 2014 Jun. Technical Report No. 124.
Park J, Yoon C, Lee K. Comparison of modeled estimates of inhalation exposure to aerosols during use of consumer spray products. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018; 221(6): 941-950.
Delmaar C, Meesters J. Modeling consumer exposure to spray？products: an evaluation of the ConsExpo Web and ConsExpo nano？models with experimental data. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol.？2020; 30(5): 878-887.

상세보기
Lee S, Lee K, Kim H. Comparison of quantitative exposure models？for occupational exposure to organic solvents in Korea. Ann Work？Expo Health. 2019; 63(2): 197-217.
Lee K. COnsumer products exposure and risk assessment. Seoul:？Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute; 2016 Jun.？Report No.: 20130011370001.
Kim S, Chen J, Cheng T, Gindulyte A, He J, He S, et al. PubChem？2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023; 51(D1): D1373-D1380.
National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER). Korean exposure factors handbook. Incheon: NIER; 2019.
National Institute of Environmental Research. General exposure？factors (related to Article 9-5). Regulations on the subject and method of risk assessment of consumer chemical products. Available:？https://dlib.nier.go.kr/NIER/cop/bbs/selectNoLoginBoardArticle.do?menuNo13001&bbsIdBBSMSTR_000000000031&nttId30410&CommandREAD [Accessed 23 February 2024].
Bremmer HJ, Blom WM, van Hoeven-Arentzen PH, Prud'homme？de Lodder LCH, van Raaij MTM, Straetmans EHFM, et al. Pest？control products fact sheet - to assess the risks for the consumer:？updated version for ConsExpo 4. Bilthoven: National Institute for？Public Health and the Environment (RIVM); 2016. Report No.:？RIVM Report 320005002.
Meesters JAJ, Nijkamp MM, Schuur AG, Te-Biesebeek JD. Cleaning？products fact sheet - default parameters for estimating consumer？exposure: updated version 2018. Bilthoven: National Institute for？Public Health and the Environment (RIVM); 2018. Report No.:？RIVM Report 2016-0179.
Park J, Yoon C. Model algorithms for estimates of inhalation exposure and comparison between exposure estimates from each？model. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg. 2019: 29(3): 358-367.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

국내외 소비자 제품 노출평가모델을 이용한 노출량 비교
Comparison of Exposure Estimates Using Consumer Exposure Assessment Models and the Korean Exposure Algorithm 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (16)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

국내외 소비자 제품 노출평가모델을 이용한 노출량 비교 Comparison of Exposure Estimates Using Consumer Exposure Assessment Models and the Korean Exposure Algorithm 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (16)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

임미영 (3) 이기영 (57)

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

국내외 소비자 제품 노출평가모델을 이용한 노출량 비교
Comparison of Exposure Estimates Using Consumer Exposure Assessment Models and the Korean Exposure Algorithm 원문보기