AbstractZatsiorsky et al. (in Contemporary Problems of Biomechanics, pp. 272–291, CRC Press, Massachusetts, 1990a) obtained, by means of a gamma-ray scanning technique, the relative body segment masses, center of mass (CM) positions, and radii of gyration for samples of college-aged Caucasian...
AbstractZatsiorsky et al. (in Contemporary Problems of Biomechanics, pp. 272–291, CRC Press, Massachusetts, 1990a) obtained, by means of a gamma-ray scanning technique, the relative body segment masses, center of mass (CM) positions, and radii of gyration for samples of college-aged Caucasian males and females. Although these data are the only available and comprehensive set of inertial parameters regarding young adult Caucasians, they have been rarely utilized for biomechanical analyses of subjects belonging to the same or a similar population. The main reason is probably that Zatsiorsky et al. used bony landmarks as reference points for locating segment CMs and defining segment lengths. Some of these landmarks were markedly distant from the joint centers currently used by most researchers as reference points. The purpose of this study was to adjust the mean relative CM positions and radii of gyration reported by Zatsiorsky et al., in order to reference them to the joint centers or other commonly used landmarks, rather than the original landmarks. The adjustments were based on a number of carefully selected sources of anthropometric data.
AbstractZatsiorsky et al. (in Contemporary Problems of Biomechanics, pp. 272–291, CRC Press, Massachusetts, 1990a) obtained, by means of a gamma-ray scanning technique, the relative body segment masses, center of mass (CM) positions, and radii of gyration for samples of college-aged Caucasian males and females. Although these data are the only available and comprehensive set of inertial parameters regarding young adult Caucasians, they have been rarely utilized for biomechanical analyses of subjects belonging to the same or a similar population. The main reason is probably that Zatsiorsky et al. used bony landmarks as reference points for locating segment CMs and defining segment lengths. Some of these landmarks were markedly distant from the joint centers currently used by most researchers as reference points. The purpose of this study was to adjust the mean relative CM positions and radii of gyration reported by Zatsiorsky et al., in order to reference them to the joint centers or other commonly used landmarks, rather than the original landmarks. The adjustments were based on a number of carefully selected sources of anthropometric data.
de Leva 318 1993 International Society of Biomechanics XIVth Congress-Abstracts Validity and accuracy of four methods for locating the center of mass of young male and female athletes
Gordon 1989 1988 anthropometric survey of U.S. Army personnel: summary statistics interim report (NATICK/TR-89/027)
J. Biomechanics Hinrichs 23 949 1990 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90361-6 Adjustments to the segment center of mass proportions of Clauser et al.
Zatsiorsky 71 1993 Biomechanics and Performance in Sport Biomechanical characteristics of the human body
Zatsiorsky 1152 1983 Biomechanics VIII-B The mass and inertia characteristics of the main segments of the human body
Zatsiorsky 272 1990 Contemporary Problems of Biomechanics Methods of determining mass-inertial characteristics of human body segments
Zatsiorsky 186 1990 Biomechanics of Human Movement: Applications in Rehabilitation, Sports and Ergonomics In vivo body segment inertial parameters determination using a gamma-scanner method
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.