다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
Annales françaises d'anesthésie et de réanimation, v.17 no.6, 1998년, pp.555 - 572
Benhamou, D
AI-Helper
AbstractPain is a subjective feeling; its assessment is therefore difficult, and no “gold standard” method exists for humans. Major improvements have, however, been made in the last decade by widespread acceptation of the concept of pain evaluation and widespread use on surgical ward...
RésuméBien que la mesure de la douleur, phénomène subjectif, soit difficile et qu'il n'existe pas de méthode clinique de référence, des progrès majeurs ont été réalisés au cours des dernières années par l'acceptation, dans de nombreux établissements de soins, du concept de mesure en routine de la douleur postopératoire. L'auto-évaluation par le patient lui-même est la règle chaque fois que possible, car l'hétéro-évaluation par le personnel soignant conduit à une sous-estimation. Cette sous-estimation existe également lorsque l'hétéro-évaluation utilise une échelle systématisée, telle que l'échelle comportementale développée par Boureau. Il est théoriquement souhaitable d'évaluer non seulement l'intensité de la douleur, mais également les autres composantes telles que la localisation, le retentissement affectif et émotionnel, le type de douleur. En pratique, les échelles permettant d'évaluer ces différentes composantes sont trop complexes pour une mise en ˦uvre chez tous les opérés et plusieurs fois par jour. Ainsi, le Mac Gill Pain Questionnaire ne peut-il être utilisé dans le contexte postopératoire en dehors de la recherche clinique. Par ailleurs, sa validation scientifique, bien que considérée comme obtenue par de nombreux auteurs, est en réalité soutenue par peu de preuves méthodologiques. Ainsi, seules les méthodes décrivant uniquement l'intensité de la douleur sont-elles utilisées en pratique clinique. L'échelle verbale simple (EVS), l'échelle numérique simple (ENS) et l'échelle visuelle analogique (EVA) sont préférées par un nombre croissant d'auteurs. Malgré la difficulté de la validation scientifique, il semble que l'EVA soit la plus sensible et la plus reproductible. La mesure de l'intensité de la douleur postopératoire doit être réalisée plusieurs fois par jour, au repos et en conditions dynamiques (toux, mouvement) et doit concerner plutôt la douleur du moment présent que celle des heures précédentes.
Pain Chapman 22 1 1985 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90145-9 Pain Measurement: an overview
Anesthesiology Melzack 34 50 1971 10.1097/00000542-197101000-00017 On the language of pain
J Psychosom Res Reading 24 119 1980 10.1016/0022-3999(80)90032-X A comparison of pain rating scales
Pain Kremer 10 241 1981 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90199-8 Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement
Pain Reading 13 185 1982 10.1016/0304-3959(82)90028-8 A comparison of the McGill pain questionnaire in chronic and acute pain
Lancet Huskisson 2 1127 1974 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)90884-8 Measurement of pain
Lancet Keele 3 6 1948 10.1016/S0140-6736(48)91787-5 The pain chart
J Adv Nurs Allcock 24 1144 1996 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb01019.x Factors affecting the assessment of postoperative pain: a literature review
Pain Teske 16 289 1983 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90117-3 Relationships between nur-ses'observations and patients'self-reports of pain
Pain Hodgkins 23 273 1985 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90105-8 Comparing patients'and their physicians' assessment of pain
Am J Nurs Burge 86 1263 1986 10.1097/00000446-198611000-00014 Why were these cardiac surgical patients more satisfied with their pain management than their nurses expected? Primary nur-sing may have made the difference
J Burn Care Rehabil Iafrati 7 413 1986 10.1097/00004630-198609000-00008 Pain on the burn unit: patient vs nurse perceptions
Meth Find Exp Clin Pharmacol Baños 11 123 1989 Acceptability of visual analogue scales in the clinical setting: a comparison with verbal rating scales in postoperative pain
Pain Zalon 54 329 1993 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90033-L Nurses'assessment of postoperative patients'pain
Pain Choinière 40 143 1990 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90065-L Comparisons between patients and nurses assessment of pain and medication efficacy in severe burn injuries
J Adv Nurs Camp 12 593 1987 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1987.tb03049.x Comparison of medical, surgical and oncology patients description of pain and nurses documentation of pain assessments
Pain Cohen 9 265 1980 10.1016/0304-3959(80)90013-5 Postsurgical pain relief: patients'status and nur-ses'medication choices
J Burn Care Reha-bil Walkenstein 3 233 1982 10.1097/00004630-198207000-00010 Comparison of burned patients perception of pain with nurses perception of patients pain
Pain Van der Does 39 95 1989 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90179-6 Patients and nurses ratings of pain and anxiety during burn wound care
Pain Price 17 45 1983 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4 The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chro-nic and experimental pain
Pain Fordyce 18 53 1984 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90126-X Pain measurement and pain behavior
Pain Richards 14 393 1982 10.1016/0304-3959(82)90147-6 Assessing pain behavior: the UAB pain behavior scale
Pain Bonnel 22 81 1985 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90150-2 Labor pain assessment: validity of a behavioral index
Réan Urg Blettery 5 691 1996 10.1016/S1164-6756(05)80594-8 Les échelles de mesure de la douleur dans un service d'accueil des urgences
Nurs Outlook Fagerhaugh 22 645 1974 Pain expression and control on a burn care unit
Pain Gracely 11 109 1981 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90144-5 Pain assessment in humans -a reply to Hall
Pain Jensen 27 117 1986 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9 The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods
Pain Ohnhaus 1 379 1975 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90075-5 Methodological problems in the measu-rement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale
Pain Scott 2 175 1976 10.1016/0304-3959(76)90113-5 Graphic representation of pain
Pain Carlsson 16 87 1983 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90088-X Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale
Pain Heft 19 153 1984 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90835-2 An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain
Ann NY Acad Sci Lasagna 86 28 1964 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb42788.x The clinical measurement of pain
Pain Seymour 21 177 1985 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90287-8 An evaluation of length and end-phrase of visual analogue scales in dental pain
Baillière's Clin Anaesthesiol Stubhaug 9 555 1995 10.1016/S0950-3501(95)80022-0 Post-operative analgesic trials: some important issues
Pain Linton 17 57 1983 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90127-6 A clinical comparison of two pain scales: correlation, remembering chronic pain, and a measure of compliance
Pain Gracely 5 5 1978 10.1016/0304-3959(78)90020-9 Ratio scales of sensory and affective verbal pain descriptors
Pain Heft 9 363 1980 10.1016/0304-3959(80)90050-0 A validation model for verbal descriptor scaling of human clinical pain
Pain Melzack 1 277 1975 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5 The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods
Br J Clin Pharmacol Wallenstein 10 319S 1980 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01816.x Clinical evaluation of mild analgesics: the measurement of clinical pain
Thérapie Boureau 39 119 1984 Élaboration d'un ques-tionnaire d'auto-évaluation de la douleur par liste de qualifica-tifs. Comparaison avec le Mc Gill Pain Questionnaire de Melzack
Pain Gaston-Johansson 20 69 1984 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90812-1 Pain assessment: differences in quality and intensity of the words pain, ache and hurt
Exp Neurol Dubuisson 51 480 1976 10.1016/0014-4886(76)90271-5 Classification of clinical pain des-criptions by multiple group discriminant analysis
J Oral Maxillofac Surg Seymour 41 643 1983 10.1016/0278-2391(83)90017-4 An evaluation of den-tal pain using visual analogue scales and the McGill Pain Ques-tionnaire
Pain Van Buren 6 23 1979 10.1016/0304-3959(79)90137-4 An evaluation of the McGill Pain Questionnaire for use in dental pain assessment
Pain Lowe 46 53 1991 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90033-T Confirming the theore-tical structure of the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Pain Schwartz 19 383 1984 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90084-8 Global appropriateness of pain dra-wings: blind ratings predict patterns of psychological distress and litigation status
Pain Margolis 24 57 1986 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90026-6 A rating system for use with patient pain drawings
Clin J Pain Murphy 3 197 1988 10.1097/00002508-198712000-00003 Measurement of pain: a comparison of the visual analogue with a non visual analogue scale
Pain Price 56 217 1994 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3 A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales
Aitken 62 989 1969 A growing edge of measurement of feelings [abridged]
Br J Psychol Soc Clarke 17 55 1964 Reliability and sensitivity in the self-assessment of well-being [abstract]
Clin Pharmacol Ther Sriwatanakul 34 234 1983 10.1038/clpt.1983.159 Studies with different types of visual analog scales for measurement of pain
Anaesthesia Revill 31 1191 1976 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain
Ann Rheum Dis Downie 37 378 1978 10.1136/ard.37.4.378 Studies with pain rating scales
Ann Rheum Dis Scott 38 560 1979 10.1136/ard.38.6.560 Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales
Ann Rheum Dis Dixon 40 87 1981 10.1136/ard.40.1.87 Reproductibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale
Ann Rheum Dis Scott 38 558 1979 10.1136/ard.38.6.558 Accuracy of subjective measurements made with or without previous scores: an important source of error in serial measurement of subjective states
Reg Anesth Freedman 22 Suppl 2 83 1997 The optimal method to administer the visual analogue scale (VAS) [abstract]
Br J Clin Pharmacol Nicholson 6 3 1978 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1978.tb01673.x Visual analogue scales and drug effects in man
Anesthesiology Watanabe 71 481 1989 10.1097/00000542-198909000-00053 Visual Analogue Pain Scale with convenient digitizer [letter]
J Psychosom Res Woodforde 16 173 1972 10.1016/0022-3999(72)90041-4 Some relationships between sub-jective measures of pain
Clin Pharmacol Ther Littman 38 16 1985 10.1038/clpt.1985.127 Reassessment of verbal and visual analog ratings in analgesic studies
Eur J Clin Pharmacol Joyce 8 415 1975 10.1007/BF00562315 Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain
Eur J Clin Pharmacol Seymour 23 441 1982 10.1007/BF00605995 The use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain
J Psychosom Res Ahles 28 121 1984 10.1016/0022-3999(84)90004-7 Cancer-related pain-II. Assessment with visual analogue scales
Rheum Rheabil Frank 21 211 1982 10.1093/rheumatology/21.4.211 A comparison of three ways of measuring pain
Pain Chudler 16 221 1983 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90111-2 The assessment of pain by cerebral evoked potentials
Anesthesiology Willer 63 675 1985 10.1097/00000542-198512000-00019 Epidural morphine strongly depresses nociceptive flexion reflexes in patients with postope-rative pain
Lancet Richmond 342 73 1993 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91284-S Preoperative morphine pre-empts postoperative pain
Anesthe-siology Zahn 86 1066 1997 10.1097/00000542-199705000-00010 Effect of systemic and intra-thecal morphine in a rat model of postoperative pain
Hargreaves vol 18 579 1991 Evaluating endogenous mediators of pain and analgesia in clinical studies
Carr vol 18 599 1991 Commentary. Caveats in the evaluation of stress hormone responses in analgesic trials
Lehmann vol 18 481 1991 Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for postoperative pain relief
Anaesthesia McCoy 48 256 1993 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb06914.x Forum: patient-controlled analgesia with without background infusion. Analgesia assessed using the demand: delivery ratio
Anaesthesia Oates 49 755 1994 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb04444.x Failure of pain relief after surgery. Attitudes of ward staff and patients to postoperative analgesia
Br J Anaesth Liu 67 768 1991 10.1093/bja/67.6.768 Comparison of contemporaneous and retrospective assessment of postoperative pain using the visual analogue scale
Anesth Analg Dahl 74 362 1992 10.1213/00000539-199203000-00008 Differential analgesic effects of low-dose epidural morphine and morphine-bupivacaine at rest and during mobilization after major abdominal surgery
해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.