$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[해외논문] Classification of Industries by Level of Technology: an Appraisal and some Implications

Prometheus, v.18 no.4, 2000년, pp.417 - 436  

Carroll, Peter ,  Pol, Eduardo ,  Robertson, Paul L.

Abstract

Modern growth theory acknowledges that a country's economic prosperity depends in large part on its capacity for technological innovation. Empirical evidence, however, supports the view that not all sectors are equally innovative. As a result, it seems desirable from a public policy perspective to identify and promote sectors displaying both a high innovation rate and, in an increasingly competitive international economy, a high degree of international competitiveness. It is frequently argued that the high-tech industry sectors, in contrast to low-tech sectors, satisfy both conditions, with the clear implication that public policy should be directed to enhancing the performance of high-tech sectors. This approach raises at least two important issues. The first is whether such classifications can be meaningfully constructed given both the intractability of the concepts involved and the difficulties in data collection. A second issue is the basic assumption that policy emphasis should be placed on technology-intensive industries because they have a greater impact on growth. In this paper, we argue that while it may be possible to construct indices of technological intensity that are useful for some purposes, the ones that are currently proposed do not, in fact, address questions of economic growth and firm performance very well. In part, this is a reflection of the technicalities involved in formulating and operationalising the indices, but it also reflects problems in the underlying premise, namely technology-intensive sectors are more growth-inducing than low-tech sectors. We call, therefore, for the adoption of a more sophisticated and detailed approach that would provide a sensible classification of industries and new policy insights.

Keyword

#High-TECH Low-TECH Industries Intensity Innovation Economic Growth Policy Implications  

참고문헌 (21)

  1. T. Hatzichronoglou 216 4 1997 'Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification' 

  2. T. Hatzichronoglou 216 4 1997 'Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification' 

  3. T. Hatzichronoglou 216 4 1997 'Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification' 

  4. 30 1997 Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data 

  5. P. Patel 192 1998 'The wide (and increasing) spread of technological competences in the world's largest firms: a challenge to conventional wisdom' 

  6. California Management Review O. Granstrand 39 4 8 1997 10.2307/41165908 'Multi-technology corporations: why they have "distributed" rather than "distinctive core" competences' 

    상세보기 crossref

  7. Journal of Economic Perspectives Romer 8 1 3 1994 10.1257/jep.8.1.3 'The origins of endogenous growth' 

    상세보기 crossref

  8. 1984 High Technology, International Trade and Competition 

  9. 1988 The Measurement of High Technology 

  10. K. Bryant 1996 Australian Business Innovation. A Strategic Analysis, Science and Technology Policy Branch, Department of Industry, Science and Technology 

  11. Research Technology Management Medcof 1 1999 'Identifying super technology industries' 

  12. Research Technology Management Medcof 3 1999 'Identifying super technology industries' 

  13. Krugman 279 1996 International Economics Theory and Policy 

  14. 8116.0 1998 Innovation in Manufacturing 

  15. Harvard Business Review Shankling 166 1984 'Organizing for high-tech marketing' 

  16. Research Policy D. Felsenstein 18 239 1989 10.1016/0048-7333(89)90018-8 'Measuring the technological intensity of the industrial sector: a methodological and empirical approach' 

    상세보기 crossref

  17. Geography D. Keeble 361 1990 'High-technology industry' 

  18. Harvard Business Review Porter 85 1998 'Clusters and the new economics of competition' 

  19. David 1991 'Computer and dynamo: the modern productivity paradox in a not-too-distant mirror' 

  20. Administrative Science Quarterly M. Tushman 31 439 1986 10.2307/2392832 'Technological discontinuities and organizational environments' 

    상세보기 crossref

  21. Utterback 158 1994 Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change 

활용도 분석정보

상세보기
다운로드
내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로