[논문]The effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE in 2-month-old infants.

Kei, J; Flynn, C; McPherson, B; Smyth, V; Latham, S; Loscher, J

[해외논문] The effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE in 2-month-old infants.

British journal of audiology, v.35 no.1, 2001년, pp.67 - 75

Kei, J , Flynn, C , McPherson, B , Smyth, V , Latham, S , Loscher, J

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE obtained from 2-month-old infants as a function of filter cut-off frequency, activity states and pass/fail status of infants. Two experiments were performed. In Experiment 1, 100 2-month-old infants (200 ears) in five activity states (asleep, awake but peaceful, sucking a pacifier, feeding, restless) were tested by use of TEOAE technology. Five different filter conditions were applied to the TEOAE responses post hoc. The filter conditions were set at 781 Hz (default setting), 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 and 1.6 kHz. Results from this experiment showed that TEOAE parameters such as whole-wave reproducibility (WR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 0.8 kHz and 1.6 kHz, changed as a function of the cut-off frequency. The findings suggest that the 1.6 kHz and 1.2 kHz filter conditions are optimal for WR and SNR pass/fail criteria, respectively. Although all infant recordings appeared to benefit from the filtering, infants in the noisy states seemed to benefit the most. In Experiment 2, the high-pass filtering technique was applied to 23 infants (35 ears) who apparently failed the TEOAE tests on initial screening but were subsequently awarded a pass status based on the results from a follow-up auditory brainstem response (ABR) assessment. The findings showed a significant decrease in noise contamination of the TEOAE with a corresponding significant increase in WR. With high-pass filtering at 1.6 kHz, 21/35 ears could be reclassified into the pass category.

참고문헌 (23)

10.1001/archotol.1988.01860200071021 Bonfils P, Uziel A, Pujol R. Screening for auditory dysfunction in infants by evoked otoacoustic emissions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114:887-90.
10.1097/00003446-199410000-00004 Brass DN, Kemp DT. The objective assessment of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. Ear Hear 1994; 15:371 -7.
10.1097/00003446-199412000-00008 Brass DN, Watkins P, Kemp DT. Assessment of an implementation of a narrow band neonatal otoacoustic emission screening method. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 467-75.
10.3109/00206099909073021 Driscoll C, Kei J, Murdoch B, McPherson B, Smyth V, Latham S et al. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in two-month-old infants: a normative study. Audiology 1999; 38: 181-6.
10.1016/0165-5876(94)90170-8 Jacobson JT, Jacobson CA. The effects of noise in transient EOAE newborn hearing screening. Int J Ped Otorhinolarygol 1994; 29:235-48.

상세보기
10.3109/00206099709071961 Kei J, McPherson B, Smyth V, Latham S, Loscher J. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in infants: effects of gender, ear asymmetry and activity status. Audiology 1997;36: 61-71.
Kemp DT, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown AM. Acoustic emission cochleography. practical aspects. Scand Audiol 1986; 2 (Suppl. 25), 71-95.
10.3109/00206099409071876 Kok MR, van Zanten GA, Brocaar MP, Jongejan HTM. Click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in very-low-birth-weight infants: a cross-sectional data analysis. Audiology 1994; 33; 152-64.
Lutman ME. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in adults: implications for screening. Audiol in Practice 1989;6:6-8.
10.3109/03005369309077899 Lutman ME. Reliable identification of clickevoked otoacoustic emissions using signal-processing techniques. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 103-8.
10.1097/00003446-199708000-00001 Lutman ME, Davis AC, Fortnum MM, Wood S. Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening by transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1997; 18:265-76.
10.1016/S0033-3506(98)00219-4 McPherson B, Kei J, Smyth V, Latham S, Loscher J. Feasibility of community-based hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Public Health 1998; 112:147-52.
10.3109/01050399409047506 Meredith R, Stephens D, Hogan S, Cartilidge PHT, Drayton M. Screening for hearing loss in an at-risk neonatal population using evoked otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1994; 23: 187-93.
10.1097/00003446-199812000-00006 Rhoades K, McPherson B, Smyth V, Kei J, Baglioni A. Effects of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1998;19:450-62.
10.1097/00003446-199302000-00009 Norton SJ. Application of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions to pediatric populations. Ear Hear 1993; 14:64-73.
10.3109/00206099909073005 Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Cirandori F. Optimal band pass filtering of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. Audiology 1999; 38:69-74.
10.1097/00003446-199602000-00005 Salamy A, Eldredge L, Sweetow R. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: feasiblity in the nursery. Ear Hear 1996; 17:42-8.
10.3109/00206099209072903 Schoonhaven R. Dependence of auditory brainstem response on click polarity and high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1992;31:72-86.
10.1016/S0165-5876(99)00005-1 Smyth V, McPherson B, Kei J, Young J, Tudehope D. Maurer M, Rankin G. Otoacoustic emission criteria for neonatal hearing screening. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol 1999,48:9-15.

상세보기
10.1097/00003446-199004000-00007 Stevens JC, Webb HD, Hutchinson J, Connell J. Smith MF, Buffin JT. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal screening. Ear Hear 1991; 11: 128-33.
10.3109/03005369509086592 Tognola G, Ravazzani F, Grandori F. An optimal filtering technique to reduce the influence of low-frequency noise on click-evoked oloacoustic emissions. Br J Audiol 1995; 29:153-60.
10.1055/s-0028-1085105 Vohr BR, White KR, Maxon AB, Johnson MJ. Factors affecting the interpretation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission results in neonatal hearing screening. Sem Hear 1993; 14:57-72.

상세보기
White KR, Vohr BR, Behrens TR. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: results of the Rhode Island hearing assessment project. Sem Hear 1993; 14:18-29.

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper

안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

[해외논문] The effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE in 2-month-old infants.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

참고문헌 (23)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트