다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
Open astronomy, v.29 no.1, 2020년, pp.94 - 106
Hou, Chongyuan (School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China) , Yang, Yuan (School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China) , Yang, Yikang (School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China) , Yang, Kaizhong (National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Vessel Integrated Power System, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan, China) , Zhang, Xiao (School of Automation Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China) , Lu, Junyong
AbstractThe increase in space debris orbiting Earth is a critical problem for future space missions. Space debris removal has thus become an area of interest, and significant research progress is being made in this field. However, the exorbitant cost of space debris removal missions is a major concern for commercial space companies. We therefore propose the debris removal using electromagnetic launcher (DREL) system, a ground-based electromagnetic launch system (railgun), for space debris removal missions. The DREL system has three components: a ground-based electromagnetic launcher (GEML), suborbital vehicle (SOV), and mass of micrometer-scale dust (MSD) particles. The average cost of removing a piece of low-earth orbit space debris using DREL was found to be approximately USD 160,000. The DREL method is thus shown to be economical; the total cost to remove more than 2,000 pieces of debris in a cluster was only approximately USD 400 million, compared to the millions of dollars required to remove just one or two pieces of debris using a conventional space debris removal mission. By using DREL, the cost of entering space is negligible, thereby enabling countries to remove their space debris in an affordable manner.
10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.09.001 Aglietti GS, Taylor B, Fellowes S, Salmon T, Retat I, Hall A, Chabot T, et al. 2020. The active space debris removal mission RemoveDebris. Part 2: in orbit operations. Acta Astronaut. 168:310-322.
10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.06.056 Alpatov A, Khoroshylov S, Bombardelli C. 2018. Relative control of an ion beam shepherd satellite using the impulse compensation thruster. Acta Astronaut. 151:543-554.10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.06.056
10.1016/j.asr.2018.07.021 Bennett T, Schaub H. 2018. Contactless electrostatic detumbling of axi-symmetric GEO objects with nominal pushing or pulling. Adv Space Res. 62(11):2977-2987.10.1016/j.asr.2018.07.021
10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.07.009 Calabro M, Perrot L. 2019. XXI century tower: laser orbital debris removal and collision avoidance. Acta Astronaut. 158:220-230.10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.07.009
10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.002 Choi J, Jung J, Lee D, Kim B. 2019. Articulated linkage arms based reliable capture device for janitor satellites. Acta Astronaut. 163:91-99.10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.002
10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.09.010 Fang Y, Pan J, Luo Y, Li C. 2019. Effects of deorbit evolution on space-based pulse laser irradiating centimeter-scale space debris in LEO. Acta Astronaut. 165:184-190.10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.09.010
FENGYUN 1C. http://celestrak.com/NORAD/elements/1999-025.txt. Accessed 30 Aug 2016 and 30 Aug 2017.
10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.09.002 Forshaw JL, Aglietti GS, Fellowes S, Salmon T, Retat I, Hall A, et al. 2020. The active space debris removal mission RemoveDebris. Part 1: from concept to launch. Acta Astronaut. 168:293-309.
10.1016/j.asr.2018.02.021 Hakima H, Bazzocchi MC, Emami MR. 2018. A deorbiter CubeSat for active orbital debris removal. Adv Space Res. 61(9):2377-2392.10.1016/j.asr.2018.02.021
Hypervelocity projectile datasheet. https://www.baesystems.com/en/download-en/20190320154752/1434555443512.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2020.
10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.12.014 Jarry A, Bonnal C, Dupont C, Missonnier S, Lequette L, Masson F. 2019. SRM plume: A candidate as space debris braking system for Just-In-Time Collision avoidance maneuver. Acta Astronaut. 158:185-197.10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.12.014
10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.05.055 Kelly P, Bevilacqua R. 2019. An optimized analytical solution for geostationary debris removal using solar sails. Acta Astronaut. 162:72-86.10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.05.055
10.1029/JA083iA06p02637 Kessler DJ, Cour-Palais BG. 1978. Collision frequency of artificial satellites: the creation of a debris belt. J Geophys Res Space Phys. 83(A6):2637-2646.10.1029/JA083iA06p02637
10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.08.016 Khoroshylov S. 2019. Out-of-plane relative control of an ion beam shepherd satellite using yaw attitude deviations. Acta Astronaut. 164:254-261.10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.08.016
Launch of space-debris-removal experiment delayed amid safety reviews. https://spacenews.com/launch-of-space-debris-removal-experiment-delayed-due-to-safety-reviews/. Accessed 24 Feb 2020.
10.1016/j.asr.2017.10.008 Li H, Li J, Jiang F. 2018. Dynamics and control for contactless interaction between spacecraft and tumbling debris. Adv Space Res. 61(1):154-166.10.1016/j.asr.2017.10.008
10.1016/j.asr.2018.01.033 Liu X, Lu Y, Zhou Y, Yin Y. 2018. Prospects of using a permanent magnetic end effector to despin and detumble an uncooperative target. Adv Space Res. 61(8):2147-2158.10.1016/j.asr.2018.01.033
10.1016/j.asr.2018.11.017 Liu YQ, Yu ZW, Liu XF, Chen JB, Cai GP. 2019. Active detumbling technology for noncooperative space target with energy dissipation. Adv Space Res. 63(5):1813-1823.10.1016/j.asr.2018.11.017
10.1016/j.asr.2019.05.029 Lu Y, Huang P, Meng Z. 2019. Adaptive anti-windup control of post-capture combination via tethered space robot. Adv Space Res. 64(4):847-860.10.1016/j.asr.2019.05.029
Navy lasers, railgun, and gun-launched guided projectile: Background and issues for congress. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/R44175.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2020.
Navy railgun ramps up in test shots. https://breakingdefense.com/2017/05/navy-railgun-ramps-up-in-test-shots/. Accessed 5 Jan 2020.
Navy’s new railgun can hurl a shell over 5,000 Mph. https://www.wired.com/2014/04/electromagnetic-railgun-launcher/. Accessed 5 Jan 2020.
10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.048 Olivieri L, Francesconi A. 2020. Large constellations assessment and optimization in LEO space debris environment. Adv Space Res. 65(1):351-363.10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.048
10.1016/j.asr.2019.03.024 Razzaghi P, Al Khatib E, Bakhtiari S. 2019. Sliding mode and SDRE control laws on a tethered satellite system to de-orbit space debris. Adv Space Res. 64(1):18-27.10.1016/j.asr.2019.03.024
10.1016/j.asr.2019.10.041 Shan M, Guo J, Gill E. 2020. An analysis of the flexibility modeling of a net for space debris removal. Adv Space Res. 65(3):1083-1094.10.1016/j.asr.2019.10.041
10.1016/j.asr.2017.12.026 St-Onge D, Sharf I, Sagnieres L, Gosselin C. 2018. A deployable mechanism concept for the collection of small-to-medium-size space debris. Adv Space Res. 61(5):1286-1297.10.1016/j.asr.2017.12.026
Space debris laser ranging at Yunnan observatories. https://cddis.nasa.gov/lw19/docs/2014/Papers/3049_Li_paper.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2020.
Swiss startup ClearSpace wins ESA contract to deorbit Vega rocket debris. https://spacenews.com/swiss-startup-clearspace-wins-esa-contract-to-deorbit-vega-rocket-debris/. Accessed 24 Feb 2020.
10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.05.054 Underwood C, Viquerat A, Schenk M, Taylor B, Massimiani C, Duke R, et al. 2019. InflateSail de-orbit flight demonstration results and follow-on drag-sail applications. Acta Astronaut. 162:344-358.10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.05.054
U.S. navy demonstrates world’s most powerful EMRG at 10 MJ. https://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=34718. Accessed 5 Jan 2020.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.