[논문]Determining UAV Flight Trajectory for Target Recognition Using EO/IR and SAR

Stecz, Wojciech; Gromada, Krzysztof

doi:10.3390/s20195712

Determining UAV Flight Trajectory for Target Recognition Using EO/IR and SAR 원문보기

Sensors, v.20 no.19, 2020년, pp.5712 -

Stecz, Wojciech (C4ISR Software Department, PIT-RADWAR, 04-051 Warsaw, Poland) , Gromada, Krzysztof (Krzysztof.Gromada@pitradwar.com)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The paper presents the concept of planning the optimal trajectory of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) of a short-range tactical class, whose task is to recognize a set of ground objects as a part of a reconnaissance mission. Tasks carried out by such systems are mainly associated with an aerial reconnaissance using Electro-Optical/Infrared (EO/IR) systems and Synthetic Aperture Radars (SARs) to support military operations. Execution of a professional reconnaissance of the indicated objects requires determining the UAV flight trajectory in the close neighborhood of the target, in order to collect as much interesting information as possible. The paper describes the algorithm for determining UAV flight trajectories, which is tasked with identifying the indicated objectives using the sensors specified in the order. The presence of UAV threatening objects is taken into account. The task of determining the UAV flight trajectory for recognition of the target is a component of the planning process of the tactical class UAV mission, which is also presented in the article. The problem of determining the optimal UAV trajectory has been decomposed into several subproblems: determining the reconnaissance flight method in the vicinity of the currently recognized target depending on the sensor used and the required parameters of the recognition product (photo, film, or SAR scan), determining the initial possible flight trajectory that takes into account potential UAV threats, and planning detailed flight trajectory considering the parameters of the air platform based on the maneuver planning algorithm designed for tactical class platforms. UAV route planning algorithms with time constraints imposed on the implementation of individual tasks were used to solve the task of determining UAV flight trajectories. The problem was formulated in the form of a Mixed Integer Linear Problem (MILP) model. For determining the flight path in the neighborhood of the target, the optimal control algorithm was also presented in the form of a MILP model. The determined trajectory is then corrected based on the construction algorithm for determining real UAV flight segments based on Dubin curves.

주제어

참고문헌 (35)

1. Coutinhoa W.P. Battarrab M. Fliegea J. The unmanned aerial vehicle routing and trajectory optimisation problem, a taxonomic review Comput. Ind. Eng. 2018 120 116 128 10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.037

상세보기
2. Yang L. Qi J. Song D. Xiao J. Han J. Xia Y. Survey of Robot 3D Path Planning Algorithms J. Control Sci. Eng. 2016 1 22 10.1155/2016/7426913

상세보기
3. Stecz W. Gromada K. UAV Mission Planning with SAR Application Sensors 2020 20 1080 10.3390/s20041080 32079279

상세보기
4. Zhao Y. Zheng Z. Liu Y. Survey on computational-intelligence-based UAV path planning Knowl.-Based Syst. 2018 158 54 64 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.05.033

상세보기
5. Schellenberg B. Richardson T. Richards A. Clarke R. Watson M. On-Board Real-Time Trajectory Planning for Fixed Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Extreme Environments Sensors 2019 19 4085 10.3390/s19194085

상세보기
6. Mufalli F. Batta R. Nagi R. Simultaneous sensor selection and routing of unmanned aerial vehicles for complex mission plans Comput. Oper. Res. 2012 39 2787 2799 10.1016/j.cor.2012.02.010

상세보기
7. Li J. Chen J. Wang P. Li C. Sensor-Oriented Path Planning for Multiregion Surveillance with a Single Lightweight UAV SAR Sensors 2018 18 548 10.3390/s18020548

상세보기
8. Vasquez-Gomez J.I. Marciano-Melchor M. Valentin L. Herrera-Lozada J.C. Coverage Path Planning for 2D Convex Regions J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2020 97 81 94 10.1007/s10846-019-01024-y

상세보기
9. El-Sherbeny N.A. Vehicle routing with time windows: An overview of exact, heuristic and metaheuristic methods J. King Saud Univ. (Sci.) 2010 22 123 131 10.1016/j.jksus.2010.03.002

상세보기
10. Schneider M. The vehicle-routing problem with time windows anddriver-specific times Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2016 250 101 119 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.015

상세보기
11. Hu C. Lu J. Liu X. Zhang G. Robust vehicle routing problem with hard time windows under demand and travel time uncertainty Comput. Oper. Res. 2018 94 139 153 10.1016/j.cor.2018.02.006

상세보기
12. Bai J. Su Y. Chen L. Feng Y. Liu J. EO Sensor Planning for UAV Engineering Reconnaissance Based on NIIRS and GIQE Math. Probl. Eng. 2018 1 9 10.1155/2018/6837014

상세보기
13. National Collection of Aerial Photography Home Page―Feature: The National Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale Available online: https://ncap.org.uk/feature/national-imagery-interpretability-rating-scale-niirs (accessed on 10 August 2020)
14. Motion Imagery Standards Board Video-National Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale STANDARD The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Springfield, VA, USA 2014
15. Pytlak R. Numerical Methods for Optimal Control Problems with State Constraints Lecture Notes in Mathematics Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 1999 10.1007/BFb0097244
16. Choset H. Nagatani K. Topological simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM): Toward exact localization without explicit localization IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 2001 17 125 137 10.1109/70.928558

상세보기
17. Kim J. Workspace exploration and protection with multiple robots assisted by sensor networks Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2018 1 14 10.1177/1729881418792170

상세보기
18. Xin L. Zhou C. Ding M. 3D multipath planning for UAV based on network graph J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 2011 22 640 646 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2011.04.013

상세보기
19. Velenzuela A.Q. Reyes J.C.G. Comparative Study of the Different Versions of General Image Quality Equation ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019 IV-2/W5 10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-493-2019

상세보기
20. Colomina I. Molina P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014 92 79 97 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013

상세보기
21. Gromek D. Samczynski P. Misiurewicz J. Malanowski M. Kulpa K. Gados A. Jarzebska A. Smolarczyk M. Implementation and Results of New High Resolution SAR Modes for an Airborne Maritime Patrol Radar Int. J. Electron. Telecommun. 2013 59 213 218 10.2478/eletel-2013-0025

상세보기
22. Gutchess D. Irvine J.M. Young M. Snorrason M. Predicting the effectiveness of SAR imagery for target detection Proc. SPIE 2011 8051 805110 10.1117/12.882712
23. Nolan A. Goley S. Bakich M. Performance Estimation of SAR imagery using NIIRS techniques Proc. SPIE 2012 23 10.1117/12.920849
24. Soumekh M. Himed B. SAR-MTI processing of multi-channel airborne radar measurement (MCARM) data Proceedings of the IEEE National Radar Conference Long Beach, CA, USA 25 April 2002 24 28 10.1109/NRC.2002.999687
25. STANAG 4586 Ed.4, Standard Interfaces of UAV Control System (UCS) for NATO UAV Interoperability NATO Standardization Agency (NSA) Brussels, Belgium 2017
26. Chen X. Chen X. Xu G. The path planning algorithm studying about UAV attacks multiple moving targets based on Voronoi diagram Int. J. Control Autom. 2016 9 281 292 10.14257/ijca.2016.9.1.26

상세보기
27. Zhang K. Liu P. Kong W. Zou J. Liu M. An Improved Heuristic Algorithm for UCAV Path Planning J. Optim. 2017 10.1155/2017/8936164

상세보기
28. NATO NATO Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Interoperability Architecture (NIIA) Allied Engineering Documentation Publication Brussels, Belgium 2005
29. Miller C.E. Tucker A.W. Zemlin R.A. Integer programming formulation of traveling salesman problems J. ACM 1960 7 326 329 10.1145/321043.321046

상세보기
30. Pareek P. Verma A. Linear OPF with linearization of quadratic branch flow limits Proceedings of the IEEMA Engineer Infinite Conference (eTechNxT) New Delhi, India 13？14 March 2018 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2865181
31. Lin M.-H. Carlsson J.G. Ge D. Shi J. Tsai J.-F. A Review of Piecewise Linearization Methods Math. Probl. Eng. 2013 11 1 8 10.1155/2013/101376

상세보기
32. Gonzalez V. Monje C.A. Moreno L. Balaguer C. Fast Marching Square Method for UAVs Mission Planning with consideration of Dubins Model Constraints IFAC-PapersOnLine 2016 49 164 169 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.09.029

상세보기
33. Janjo？ F. Reichart R. Niermeyer P. Smooth Path-Generation Around Obstacles Using Quartic Splines and RRTs IFAC-PapersOnLine 2017 50 9108 9113 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1708

상세보기
34. Anderson E.P. Randal B. Tim M. Real-time dynamic trajectory smoothing for unmanned air vehicles IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2005 13 471 477 10.1109/TCST.2004.839555

상세보기
35. Noonan A. Schinstock D. Lewis C. Spletzer B. Optimal Turning Path Generation for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM) Albuquerque, NM, USA 2007 21 26

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

Determining UAV Flight Trajectory for Target Recognition Using EO/IR and SAR 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (35)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트