최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기Sensors, v.20 no.19, 2020년, pp.5712 -
Stecz, Wojciech (C4ISR Software Department, PIT-RADWAR, 04-051 Warsaw, Poland) , Gromada, Krzysztof (Krzysztof.Gromada@pitradwar.com)
The paper presents the concept of planning the optimal trajectory of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) of a short-range tactical class, whose task is to recognize a set of ground objects as a part of a reconnaissance mission. Tasks carried out by such systems are mainly associated with an aer...
1. Coutinhoa W.P. Battarrab M. Fliegea J. The unmanned aerial vehicle routing and trajectory optimisation problem, a taxonomic review Comput. Ind. Eng. 2018 120 116 128 10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.037
2. Yang L. Qi J. Song D. Xiao J. Han J. Xia Y. Survey of Robot 3D Path Planning Algorithms J. Control Sci. Eng. 2016 1 22 10.1155/2016/7426913
3. Stecz W. Gromada K. UAV Mission Planning with SAR Application Sensors 2020 20 1080 10.3390/s20041080 32079279
4. Zhao Y. Zheng Z. Liu Y. Survey on computational-intelligence-based UAV path planning Knowl.-Based Syst. 2018 158 54 64 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.05.033
5. Schellenberg B. Richardson T. Richards A. Clarke R. Watson M. On-Board Real-Time Trajectory Planning for Fixed Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Extreme Environments Sensors 2019 19 4085 10.3390/s19194085
6. Mufalli F. Batta R. Nagi R. Simultaneous sensor selection and routing of unmanned aerial vehicles for complex mission plans Comput. Oper. Res. 2012 39 2787 2799 10.1016/j.cor.2012.02.010
7. Li J. Chen J. Wang P. Li C. Sensor-Oriented Path Planning for Multiregion Surveillance with a Single Lightweight UAV SAR Sensors 2018 18 548 10.3390/s18020548
8. Vasquez-Gomez J.I. Marciano-Melchor M. Valentin L. Herrera-Lozada J.C. Coverage Path Planning for 2D Convex Regions J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2020 97 81 94 10.1007/s10846-019-01024-y
9. El-Sherbeny N.A. Vehicle routing with time windows: An overview of exact, heuristic and metaheuristic methods J. King Saud Univ. (Sci.) 2010 22 123 131 10.1016/j.jksus.2010.03.002
10. Schneider M. The vehicle-routing problem with time windows anddriver-specific times Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2016 250 101 119 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.015
11. Hu C. Lu J. Liu X. Zhang G. Robust vehicle routing problem with hard time windows under demand and travel time uncertainty Comput. Oper. Res. 2018 94 139 153 10.1016/j.cor.2018.02.006
12. Bai J. Su Y. Chen L. Feng Y. Liu J. EO Sensor Planning for UAV Engineering Reconnaissance Based on NIIRS and GIQE Math. Probl. Eng. 2018 1 9 10.1155/2018/6837014
13. National Collection of Aerial Photography Home Page―Feature: The National Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale Available online: https://ncap.org.uk/feature/national-imagery-interpretability-rating-scale-niirs (accessed on 10 August 2020)
14. Motion Imagery Standards Board Video-National Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale STANDARD The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Springfield, VA, USA 2014
16. Choset H. Nagatani K. Topological simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM): Toward exact localization without explicit localization IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 2001 17 125 137 10.1109/70.928558
17. Kim J. Workspace exploration and protection with multiple robots assisted by sensor networks Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2018 1 14 10.1177/1729881418792170
18. Xin L. Zhou C. Ding M. 3D multipath planning for UAV based on network graph J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 2011 22 640 646 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2011.04.013
19. Velenzuela A.Q. Reyes J.C.G. Comparative Study of the Different Versions of General Image Quality Equation ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019 IV-2/W5 10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-493-2019
20. Colomina I. Molina P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014 92 79 97 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013
21. Gromek D. Samczynski P. Misiurewicz J. Malanowski M. Kulpa K. Gados A. Jarzebska A. Smolarczyk M. Implementation and Results of New High Resolution SAR Modes for an Airborne Maritime Patrol Radar Int. J. Electron. Telecommun. 2013 59 213 218 10.2478/eletel-2013-0025
25. STANAG 4586 Ed.4, Standard Interfaces of UAV Control System (UCS) for NATO UAV Interoperability NATO Standardization Agency (NSA) Brussels, Belgium 2017
26. Chen X. Chen X. Xu G. The path planning algorithm studying about UAV attacks multiple moving targets based on Voronoi diagram Int. J. Control Autom. 2016 9 281 292 10.14257/ijca.2016.9.1.26
27. Zhang K. Liu P. Kong W. Zou J. Liu M. An Improved Heuristic Algorithm for UCAV Path Planning J. Optim. 2017 10.1155/2017/8936164
28. NATO NATO Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Interoperability Architecture (NIIA) Allied Engineering Documentation Publication Brussels, Belgium 2005
29. Miller C.E. Tucker A.W. Zemlin R.A. Integer programming formulation of traveling salesman problems J. ACM 1960 7 326 329 10.1145/321043.321046
31. Lin M.-H. Carlsson J.G. Ge D. Shi J. Tsai J.-F. A Review of Piecewise Linearization Methods Math. Probl. Eng. 2013 11 1 8 10.1155/2013/101376
32. Gonzalez V. Monje C.A. Moreno L. Balaguer C. Fast Marching Square Method for UAVs Mission Planning with consideration of Dubins Model Constraints IFAC-PapersOnLine 2016 49 164 169 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.09.029
33. Janjo? F. Reichart R. Niermeyer P. Smooth Path-Generation Around Obstacles Using Quartic Splines and RRTs IFAC-PapersOnLine 2017 50 9108 9113 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1708
34. Anderson E.P. Randal B. Tim M. Real-time dynamic trajectory smoothing for unmanned air vehicles IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2005 13 471 477 10.1109/TCST.2004.839555
35. Noonan A. Schinstock D. Lewis C. Spletzer B. Optimal Turning Path Generation for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM) Albuquerque, NM, USA 2007 21 26
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.