$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[해외논문] Development of digital breast tomosynthesis and diffuse optical tomography fusion imaging for breast cancer detection 원문보기

Scientific reports, v.10 no.1, 2020년, pp.13127 -   

Chae, Eun Young (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505 South Korea) ,  Kim, Hak Hee (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505 South Korea) ,  Sabir, Sohail (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34141 South Korea) ,  Kim, Yejin (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34141 South Korea) ,  Kim, Hyeongseok (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34141 South Korea) ,  Yoon, Sungho (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 3414) ,  Ye, Jong Chul ,  Cho, Seungryong ,  Heo, Duchang ,  Kim, Kee Hyun ,  Bae, Young Min ,  Choi, Young-Wook

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Diffuse optical tomography (DOT) non-invasively measures the functional characteristics of breast lesions using near infrared light to probe tissue optical properties. This study aimed to evaluate a new digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)/DOT fusion imaging technique and obtain preliminary data for b...

참고문헌 (49)

  1. 1. Jin J JAMA patient page. Breast cancer screening: Benefits and harms JAMA 2014 312 2585 25514316 

  2. 2. Tabar L Beyond randomized controlled trials: Organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality Cancer 2001 91 1724 1731 11335897 

  3. 3. Boyd NF Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer N. Engl. J. Med. 2007 356 227 236 17229950 

  4. 4. Kolb TM Lichy J Newhouse JH Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations Radiology 2002 225 165 175 12355001 

  5. 5. Vachon CM Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction Breast Cancer Res. 2007 9 217 18190724 

  6. 6. Rafferty EA Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: Results of an enriched reader study AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014 202 273 281 24450665 

  7. 7. Friedewald SM Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography JAMA 2014 311 2499 2507 25058084 

  8. 8. Conant EF Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: A cohort study within the PROSPR consortium Breast Cancer Res. Treat 2016 156 109 116 26931450 

  9. 9. Ciatto S Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): A prospective comparison study Lancet Oncol. 2013 14 583 589 23623721 

  10. 10. Skaane P Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program Radiology 2013 267 47 56 23297332 

  11. 11. Zackrisson S One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): A prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study Lancet Oncol. 2018 19 1493 1503 30322817 

  12. 12. Rafferty EA Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis and digital mammography in dense and nondense breasts JAMA 2016 315 1784 1786 27115381 

  13. 13. Arridge SR Optical tomography in medical imaging Inverse Probl. 1999 15 R41 R93 

  14. 14. Gibson AP Hebden JC Arridge SR Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging Phys. Med. Biol. 2005 50 R1 43 15773619 

  15. 15. Zimmermann BB Multimodal breast cancer imaging using coregistered dynamic diffuse optical tomography and digital breast tomosynthesis J. Biomed. Opt. 2017 22 46008 28447102 

  16. 16. Vedantham S Digital breast tomosynthesis guided near infrared spectroscopy: volumetric estimates of fibroglandular fraction and breast density from tomosynthesis reconstructions Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express 2015 1 4 045202 10.1088/2057-1976/1/4/045202 26941961 

  17. 17. Deng B Brooks DH Boas DA Lundqvist M Fang Q Characterization of structural-prior guided optical tomography using realistic breast models derived from dual-energy X-ray mammography Biomed. Opt. Express 2015 6 2366 2379 26203367 

  18. 18. Sabir S Convolutional neural network-based approach to estimate bulk optical properties in diffuse optical tomography Appl. Opt. 2020 59 1461 1470 32225405 

  19. 19. Yoo J Deep learning diffuse optical tomography IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2020 39 877 887 31442973 

  20. 20. Michaelsen KE Calibration and optimization of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis guided near infrared spectral tomography Biomed. Opt. Express 2015 6 4981 4991 26713210 

  21. 21. Xu C Ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography for predicting and monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancers: Recent progress Ultrason. Imaging 2016 38 5 18 25887527 

  22. 22. Cochran JM Hybrid time-domain and continuous-wave diffuse optical tomography instrument with concurrent, clinical magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer imaging J. Biomed. Opt. 2019 24 1 11 30680976 

  23. 23. Zhao Y Optimization of image reconstruction for magnetic resonance imaging-guided near-infrared diffuse optical spectroscopy in breast J. Biomed. Opt. 2015 20 56009 26000795 

  24. 24. El-Ghussein F Mastanduno MA Jiang S Pogue BW Paulsen KD Hybrid photomultiplier tube and photodiode parallel detection array for wideband optical spectroscopy of the breast guided by magnetic resonance imaging J. Biomed. Opt. 2014 19 011010 23979460 

  25. 25. Heo, D. et al. Combination digital breast tomosynthesis and diffuse optical tomography. In Frontiers in Optics/Laser Science . paper JW3A.113 (2018). 10.1364/FIO.2018.JW3A.113. 

  26. 26. Sabir S Sampling scheme optimization for diffuse optical tomography based on data and image space rankings J. Biomed. Opt. 2016 21 106004 27775749 

  27. 27. Dehghani H Near infrared optical tomography using NIRFAST: Algorithm for numerical model and image reconstruction Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 2008 25 711 732 20182646 

  28. 28. Krishnaswamy V A digital X-ray tomosynthesis coupled near infrared spectral tomography system for dual-modality breast imaging Opt. Express 2012 20 19125 19136 23038553 

  29. 29. McBride TO Spectroscopic Reconstructed Near Infrared Tomographic Imaging for Breast Cancer Diagnosis 2001 Hanover Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College 

  30. 30. Dehghani H Srinivasan S Pogue BW Gibson A Numerical modelling and image reconstruction in diffuse optical tomography Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2009 367 3073 3093 19581256 

  31. 31. Lourakis M A brief description of the Levenberg?Marquardt algorithm implemented by levmar Comput. Sci. 2005 4 1 6 

  32. 32. Schweiger M Arridge S The Toast++ software suite for forward and inverse modeling in optical tomography J. Biomed. Opt. 2014 19 040801 24781586 

  33. 33. Rao, S. The Finite Element Method in Engineering , 6th edn. (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017). 

  34. 34. D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendenson EB, Morris EA et al. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology; 2013. 

  35. 35. Landis JR Koch GG The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 1977 33 159 174 843571 

  36. 36. Grosenick D Rinneberg H Cubeddu R Taroni P Review of optical breast imaging and spectroscopy J. Biomed. Opt. 2016 21 091311 27403837 

  37. 37. Di Leo G Trimboli RM Sella T Sardanelli F Optical imaging of the breast: Basic principles and clinical applications AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2017 209 230 238 28379746 

  38. 38. Choe R Differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors by in-vivo three-dimensional parallel-plate diffuse optical tomography J. Biomed. Opt. 2009 14 024020 19405750 

  39. 39. Poplack SP Electromagnetic breast imaging: Results of a pilot study in women with abnormal mammograms Radiology 2007 243 350 359 17400760 

  40. 40. Xu Y Zhu Q Estimation and imaging of breast lesions using a two-layer tissue structure by ultrasound-guided optical tomography J. Biomed. Opt. 2015 20 066002 26046722 

  41. 41. Zhu Q Ultrasound-guided optical tomographic imaging of malignant and benign breast lesions: Initial clinical results of 19 cases Neoplasia 2003 5 379 388 14670175 

  42. 42. Zhu Q Utilizing optical tomography with ultrasound localization to image heterogeneous hemoglobin distribution in large breast cancers Neoplasia 2005 7 263 270 15799826 

  43. 43. Baikejiang R Zhang W Li C Diffuse optical tomography for breast cancer imaging guided by computed tomography: A feasibility study J. X-ray Sci. Technol. 2017 25 341 355 

  44. 44. Brooksby B Imaging breast adipose and fibroglandular tissue molecular signatures by using hybrid MRI-guided near-infrared spectral tomography Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006 103 8828 8833 16731633 

  45. 45. Fang Q Combined optical imaging and mammography of the healthy breast: Optical contrast derived from breast structure and compression IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2009 28 30 42 19116186 

  46. 46. Fang Q Combined optical and X-ray tomosynthesis breast imaging Radiology 2011 258 89 97 21062924 

  47. 47. Elmore JG Wells CK Lee CH Howard DH Feinstein AR Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms N. Engl. J. Med. 1994 331 1493 1499 7969300 

  48. 48. Adibelli ZH Observer variability of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon for mammography Breast Care (Basel) 2010 5 11 16 22619635 

  49. 49. Schoder H Gonen M Screening for cancer with PET and PET/CT: Potential and limitations J. Nucl. Med. 2007 48 Suppl 1 4S 18S 17204716 

LOADING...

활용도 분석정보

상세보기
다운로드
내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

유발과제정보 저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로