[논문]GMStool: GWAS-based marker selection tool for genomic prediction from genomic data

Jeong, Seongmun; Kim, Jae-Yoon; Kim, Namshin

doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76759-y

[해외논문] GMStool: GWAS-based marker selection tool for genomic prediction from genomic data 원문보기

Scientific reports, v.10 no.1, 2020년, pp.19653 -

Jeong, Seongmun (Genome Editing Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon, 34141 Republic of Korea) , Kim, Jae-Yoon (Genome Editing Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon, 34141 Republic of Korea) , Kim, Namshin (Genome Editing Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon, 34141 Republic of Korea)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The increased accessibility to genomic data in recent years has laid the foundation for studies to predict various phenotypes of organisms based on the genome. Genomic prediction collectively refers to these studies, and it estimates an individual’s phenotypes mainly using single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Typically, the accuracy of these genomic prediction studies is highly dependent on the markers used; however, in practice, choosing optimal markers with high accuracy for the phenotype to be used is a challenging task. Therefore, we present a new tool called GMStool for selecting optimal marker sets and predicting quantitative phenotypes. The GMStool is based on a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and heuristically searches for optimal markers using statistical and machine-learning methods. The GMStool performs the genomic prediction using statistical and machine/deep-learning models and presents the best prediction model with the optimal marker-set. For the evaluation, the GMStool was tested on real datasets with four phenotypes. The prediction results showed higher performance than using the entire markers or the GWAS-top markers, which have been used frequently in prediction studies. Although the GMStool has several limitations, it is expected to contribute to various studies for predicting quantitative phenotypes. The GMStool written in R is available at www.github.com/JaeYoonKim72/GMStool.

참고문헌 (37)

1. Bian Y Holland J Enhancing genomic prediction with genome-wide association studies in multiparental maize populations Heredity (Edinb) 2017 118 6 585 593 10.1038/hdy.2017.4 28198815

상세보기
2. Perez-Enciso M Zingaretti LM A guide on deep learning for complex trait genomic prediction Genes (Basel) 2019 10 7 E553 10.3390/genes10070553 31330861

상세보기
3. Druet T Macleod IM Hayes BJ Toward genomic prediction from whole-genome sequence data: Impact of sequencing design on genotype imputation and accuracy of predictions Heredity (Edinb) 2014 112 1 39 47 10.1038/hdy.2013.13 23549338

상세보기
4. Ober U Using whole-genome sequence data to predict quantitative trait phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster PLoS Genet. 2012 8 5 e1002685 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002685 22570636

상세보기
5. Veerkamp RF Bouwman AC Schrooten C Calus MP Genomic prediction using preselected DNA variants from a GWAS with whole-genome sequence data in Holstein？Friesian cattle Genet. Sel. Evol. 2016 48 1 95 10.1186/s12711-016-0274-1 27905878

상세보기
6. Al K Using imputed whole-genome sequence data to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for parasite resistance in Australian sheep Genet. Sel. Evol. 2019 51 1 32 10.1186/s12711-019-0476-4 31242855

상세보기
7. Ni G Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture Genet. Sel. Evol. 2017 49 1 8 10.1186/s12711-016-0277-y 28093063

상세보기
8. Brøndum RF Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction J. Dairy Sci. 2015 98 6 4107 4116 10.3168/jds.2014-9005 25892697

상세보기
9. van den Berg I Boichard D Guldbrandtsen B Lund MS Using sequence variants in linkage disequilibrium with causative mutations to improve across-breed prediction in dairy cattle: A simulation study G3 (Bethesda) 2016 6 8 2553 2561 10.1534/g3.116.027730 27317779

상세보기
10. Mihaescu R Meigs J Sijbrands E Janssens AC Genetic risk profiling for prediction of type 2 diabetes PLoS Curr. 2011 10.1371/currents.RRN1208 21278902

상세보기
11. Manolio TA Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases Nature 2009 461 7265 747 753 10.1038/nature08494 19812666

상세보기
12. Balding DJ A tutorial on statistical methods for population association studies Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006 7 10 781 791 10.1038/nrg1916 16983374

상세보기
13. Bermingham ML Application of high-dimensional feature selection: Evaluation for genomic prediction in man Sci. Rep. 2015 5 10312 10.1038/srep10312 25988841

상세보기
14. Filho DF Tournaments between markers as a strategy to enhance genomic predictions PLoS ONE 2019 14 6 e0217283 10.1371/journal.pone.0217283 31233512

상세보기
15. Yilmaz S Tastan O Cicek E Spadis: An algorithm for selecting predictive and diverse snps in gwas IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2019 10.1109/TCBB.2019.2935437

상세보기
16. Wray NR Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013 14 7 507 515 10.1038/nrg3457 23774735

상세보기
17. Endelman JB Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP Plant Genome 2011 4 3 250 255 10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024

상세보기
18. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org (2018).
19. Meuwissen THE Hayes BJ Goddard ME Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps Genetics 2001 157 4 1819 1829 11290733

상세보기
20. McKinney BA Reif DM Ritchie MD Moore JH Machine learning for detecting gene？gene interactions Appl. Bioinform. 2006 5 2 77 88 10.2165/00822942-200605020-00002

상세보기
21. Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R news 2 (3), 18？22. https://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/Rnews_2002-3.pdf (2002). Accessed 21 August 2020.
22. Abadi, M. et al. Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04467 (2016). Accesed 5 September 2020.
23. Chollet, F. Keras: Deep Learning for humans. https://github.com/fchollet/keras (2015). Accessed 5 September 2020.
24. Ma W A deep convolutional neural network approach for predicting phenotypes from genotypes Planta 2018 248 5 1307 1318 10.1007/s00425-018-2976-9 30101399

상세보기
25. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980 (2014).
26. Zhao K Genome-wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic architecture of complex traits in Oryza sativa Nat. Commun. 2011 2 1 467 10.1038/ncomms1467 21915109

상세보기
27. Jeong S-C Genetic diversity patterns and domestication origin of soybean Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018 132 4 1179 1193 10.1007/s00122-018-3271-7 30588539

상세보기
28. Jeong N Korean soybean core collection: Genotypic and phenotypic diversity population structure and genome-wide association study PLoS ONE 2019 14 10 e0224074 10.1371/journal.pone.0224074 31639154

상세보기
29. Browning BL Zhou Y Browning SR A one-penny imputed genome from next-generation reference panels Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2018 103 3 338 348 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.015 30100085

상세보기
30. Wang, J. & Zhang, Z. GAPIT version 3: An interactive analytical tool for genomic association and prediction. Preprint at https://github.com/jiabowang/GAPIT3 (2018). Accessed 11 July 2020.
31. Yin L KAML: Improving genomic prediction accuracy of complex traits using machine learning determined parameters Genome Biol. 2020 21 1 1 22 10.1186/s13059-020-02052-w

상세보기
32. Moser G Simultaneous discovery, estimation and prediction analysis of complex traits using a Bayesian mixture model PLoS Genet. 2015 11 4 e1004969 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004969 25849665

상세보기
33. Lloyd-Jones LR Improved polygenic prediction by Bayesian multiple regression on summary statistics Nat. Commun. 2019 10 1 1 11 10.1038/s41467-019-12653-0 30602773

상세보기
34. Ghojogh, B. & Crowley, M. The theory behind overfitting, cross validation, regularization, bagging, and boosting: tutorial.？Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.12787 (2019). Accessed 11 July 2020.
35. Azodi CB Benchmarking parametric and machine learning models for genomic prediction of complex traits G3 (Bethesda) 2019 9 11 3691 3702 10.1534/g3.119.400498 31533955

상세보기
36. Mouresan EF Selle M Ronnegard L Genomic prediction including SNP-specific variance predictors G3 (Bethesda) 2019 9 10 3333 3343 10.1534/g3.119.400381 31467030

상세보기
37. Waldmann P Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees Genet. Sel. Evol. 2016 48 1 42 10.1186/s12711-016-0219-8 27286957

상세보기

LOADING...

활용도 분석정보

상세보기

다운로드

내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

원문 보기

AccessON 원문보기

원문 URL 링크

DOI : 10.1038/s41598-020-76759-y [무료]
Nature Publishing : 저널
AccessON : 저널

*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

[보고서] 질병위험도예측 마커선발 및 의료영상정보 통합분석 기술개발

저작권 관리 안내

내보내기 메뉴

내보내기 구분

파일저장
인쇄
메일전송

구성항목

기본정보
상세정보

관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관

저장형식

Text(ASCII format)
Excel format
RefWorks Direct Export
RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley

메일정보

받는사람 (필수): @
보내는사람 (선택): @
제목
내용: KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스

안내

총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다.

다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000)

검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다.

데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요)

다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다.
파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오.

Text(ASCII format)
Excel format

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper

안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

연합인증