참고문헌 (43)

1. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science H Andersen 69 2 485 2018 10.1093/bjps/axw023 Andersen, H. (2018). Complements, not competitors: Causal and mathematical explanations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(2), 485-508. 

   상세보기

2. Erkenntnis Z Ashton 83 3 595 2018 10.1007/s10670-017-9904-4 Ashton, Z., & Mizrahi, M. (2018a). Intuition talk is not methodologically cheap: Empirically testing the “received wisdom” about armchair philosophy. Erkenntnis, 83(3), 595-612. 

   상세보기

3. Metaphilosophy Z Ashton 49 1-2 58 2018 10.1111/meta.12279 Ashton, Z., & Mizrahi, M. (2018b). Show me the argument: Empirically testing the armchair philosophy picture. Metaphilosophy, 49(1-2), 58-70. 

   상세보기

4. S Baronett 2016 Logic 3 Baronett, S. (2016). Logic (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. 

5. American Journal of Mathematics MB Bestvina 135 6 1449 2013 10.1353/ajm.2013.0049 Bestvina, M. B., Bromberg, K., Fujiwara, K., & Souto, J. (2013). Shearing coordinates and convexity of length functions on teichmuller space. American Journal of Mathematics, 135(6), 1449-1476. 

   상세보기

6. Themes and Prospects. Philosophia Mathematica J Carter 27 1 1 2019 10.1093/philmat/nkz002 Carter, J. (2019). Philosophy of mathematical practice-motivations. Themes and Prospects. Philosophia Mathematica, 27(1), 1-32. 

   상세보기

7. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A C Cellucci 44 1 32 2013 10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.09.002 Cellucci, C. (2013). Philosophy of mathematics: Making a fresh start. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(1), 32-42. 

   상세보기

8. Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics G Cherlin 43 2 339 2016 10.1007/s10801-015-0636-8 Cherlin, G. (2016). On the relational complexity of a final permutation group. Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics, 43(2), 339-374. 

   상세보기

9. M Colyvan 231 2018 Explanation beyond causation: Philosophical perspectives on non-causal explanations Colyvan, M., Cusbert, J., & McQueen, K. (2018). Two flavours of mathematical explanation. In A. Reutlinger & J. Saatsi (Eds.), Explanation beyond causation: Philosophical perspectives on non-causal explanations (pp. 231-249). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

10. IM Copi 2011 Introduction to logic 14 Copi, I. M., Cohen, C., & McMahon, K. (2011). Introduction to logic (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 

11. MJ Cullinane 2013 A transition to mathematics with proofs Cullinane, M. J. (2013). A transition to mathematics with proofs. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. 

12. C Dutilh Novaes 63 2019 Advances in experimental philosophy of logic and mathematics Dutilh Novaes, C. (2019). The beauty (?) of mathematical proofs. In A. Aberdein & M. Inglis (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of logic and mathematics (pp. 63-93). London: Bloomsbury Press. 

13. W Fenton 1996 Introduction to discrete mathematics with ISETL 10.1007/978-1-4612-4052-5 Fenton, W., & Dubinsky, E. (1996). Introduction to discrete mathematics with ISETL. New York: Springer. 

    

14. RJ Fogelin 2005 Understanding arguments: An introduction to informal logic 7 Fogelin, R. J., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2005). Understanding arguments: An introduction to informal logic (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. 

15. The American Mathematical Monthly FJ Freniche 117 5 442 2010 10.4169/000298910x485969 Freniche, F. J. (2010). On Riemann’s rearrangement theorem for the alternating harmonic series. The American Mathematical Monthly, 117(5), 442-448. 

    상세보기

16. T Govier 2010 A practical study of argument 7 Govier, T. (2010). A practical study of argument (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. 

17. G Hanna 1 2010 Explanation and proof in mathematics: Philosophical and educational perspectives 10.1007/978-1-4419-0576-5 Hanna, G., Jahnke, H. N., & Pulte, H. (2010). Introduction. In G. Hanna, H. N. Jahnke, & H. Pulte (Eds.), Explanation and proof in mathematics: Philosophical and educational perspectives (pp. 1-13). Dordrecht: Springer. 

    

18. Synthese R Hersh 88 2 127 1991 10.1007/BF00567741 Hersh, R. (1991). Mathematics has a front and a back. Synthese, 88(2), 127-133. 

    상세보기

19. A Hinkis 2013 Proofs of the Cantor-Bernstein theorem: A mathematical excursion 10.1007/978-3-0348-0224-6 Hinkis, A. (2013). Proofs of the Cantor-Bernstein theorem: A mathematical excursion. Basel: Springer. 

    

20. Philosophia Mathematica M Inglis 23 1 87 2014 10.1093/philmat/nku014 Inglis, M., & Aberdein, A. (2014). Beauty is not simplicity: An analysis of mathematicians’ proof appraisals. Philosophia Mathematica, 23(1), 87-109. 

    상세보기

21. Synthese M Inglis 2019 10.1007/s11229-019-02234-5 Inglis, M., & Mejía-Ramos, J. P. (2019). Functional explanation in mathematics. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02234-5. 

    상세보기

22. American Journal of Mathematics Y Komori 135 4 1019 2013 10.1353/ajm.2013.0032 Komori, Y. (2013). Functional equations of Weng’s zeta functions for (G,P)/ℚ. American Journal of Mathematics, 135(4), 1019-1038. 

    상세보기

23. P Maddy 1997 Naturalism in mathematics Maddy, P. (1997). Naturalism in mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

24. P Mancosu 1 2008 The philosophy of mathematical practice 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296453.001.0001 Mancosu, P. (2008a). Introduction. In P. Mancosu (Ed.), The philosophy of mathematical practice (pp. 1-21). New York: Oxford University Press. 

    

25. P Mancosu 134 2008 The philosophy of mathematical practice 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296453.003.0006 Mancosu, P. (2008b). Mathematical explanation: Why it matters. In P. Mancosu (Ed.), The philosophy of mathematical practice (pp. 134-149). New York: Oxford University Press. 

    

26. Mancosu, P. (2018). Explanation in mathematics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2018 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/mathematics-explanation/. 

27. R Marcus 2018 Introduction to formal logic with philosophical applications Marcus, R. (2018). Introduction to formal logic with philosophical applications. New York: Oxford University Press. 

28. Annals of Mathematics Y Martel 174 2 757 2011 10.4007/annals.2011.174.2.2 Martel, Y., & Merle, F. (2011). Description of two soliton collision for the quartic gKdV equation. Annals of Mathematics, 174(2), 757-857. 

    상세보기

29. C McLarty 370 2008 The philosophy of mathematical practice 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296453.003.0015 McLarty, C. (2008). ‘There is no ontology here’: Visual and structural geometry in arithmetic. In P. Mancosu (Ed.), The philosophy of mathematical practice (pp. 370-406). New York: Oxford University Press. 

    

30. M Mizrahi 201 2019 Advances in experimental philosophy of logic and mathematics Mizrahi, M. (2019). What isn’t obvious about ‘obvious’: A data-driven approach to philosophy of logic. In A. Aberdein & M. Inglis (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of logic and mathematics (pp. 201-224). London: Bloomsbury Press. 

31. Perspectives on Science M Mizrahi 28 1 63 2020 10.1162/posc_a_00333 Mizrahi, M. (2020). The case study method in philosophy of science: An empirical study. Perspectives on Science, 28(1), 63-88. 

    상세보기

32. Y Nievergelt 2002 Foundations of logic and mathematics: Applications to computer science and cryptography 10.1007/978-1-4612-0125-0 Nievergelt, Y. (2002). Foundations of logic and mathematics: Applications to computer science and cryptography. Boston: Birkhauser. 

    

33. M Niss 51 2006 New mathematics education research and practice Niss, M. (2006). The structure of mathematics and its influence on the learning process. In J. Maasz & W. Schlöglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 51-62). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. 

34. Synthese JA Overton 190 8 1383 2013 10.1007/s11229-012-0109-8 Overton, J. A. (2013). “Explain” in scientific discourse. Synthese, 190(8), 1383-1405. 

    상세보기

35. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A A Pease 377 2140 20180159 2018 10.1098/rsta.2018.0159 Pease, A., Aberdein, A., & Martin, U. (2018). Explanation in mathematical conversations: An empirical investigation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 377(2140), 20180159. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0159. 

    상세보기

36. Foundations of Science A Pease 14 1-2 111 2009 10.1007/s10699-008-9150-y Pease, A., Smaill, A., Colton, S., & Lee, J. (2009). Bridging the gap between argumentation theory and the philosophy of mathematics. Foundations of Science, 14(1-2), 111-135. 

    상세보기

37. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science C Pincock 66 4 857 2015 10.1093/bjps/axu016 Pincock, C. (2015). Abstract explanations in science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(4), 857-882. 

    상세보기

38. Journal of Computational Mathematics Z Ren 30 5 533 2012 10.4208/jcm.1203-m3761 Ren, Z. (2012). Banded Toeplitz Preconditioners for Toeplitz Matrices from Sinc Methods. Journal of Computational Mathematics, 30(5), 533-543. 

    상세보기

39. Journal of Theoretical Probability A Rozkosz 26 4 1061 2013 10.1007/s10959-011-0395-y Rozkosz, A. (2013). Stochastic representation of weak solutions of viscous conservation laws: A BSDE approach. Journal of Theoretical Probability, 26(4), 1061-1083. 

    상세보기

40. American Journal of Mathematics J Sylvester 8 3 196 1886 10.2307/2369408 Sylvester, J. (1886). Lectures on the theory of reciprocants. American Journal of Mathematics, 8(3), 196-260. 

    상세보기

41. DN Walton 2002 Legal argumentation and evidence Walton, D. N. (2002). Legal argumentation and evidence. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University. 

42. SH Weintraub 1997 Differential forms: A complement to vector calculus Weintraub, S. H. (1997). Differential forms: A complement to vector calculus. New York: Academic Press. 

43. Journal for General Philosophy of Science M Zelcer 44 1 173 2013 10.1007/s10838-013-9216-6 Zelcer, M. (2013). Against mathematical explanation. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 44(1), 173-192. 

    상세보기