[논문]Influence of product market competition and managerial competency on corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from the US

Tsendsuren, Chuluunbat; Yadav, Prayag L.; Han, Seung Hun; Kim, Hohyun

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127065

[해외논문] Influence of product market competition and managerial competency on corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from the US

Journal of cleaner production, v.304, 2021년, pp.127065 -

Tsendsuren, Chuluunbat (School of Business and Technology Management, College of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) , Yadav, Prayag L. (School of Business and Technology Management, College of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) , Han, Seung Hun (School of Business and Technology Management, College of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) , Kim, Hohyun (Department of Business Administration, A Seoul School of Integrated Sciences and Technologies)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Abstract Previous findings on the relationship between corporate environmental responsibility and firm performance have not been conclusive or consistent; therefore, scholars have increasingly paid attention to the role of external factors that shape corporate environmental behavior. Among various potential factors, this study focused on product market competition and managerial competency. Specifically, we investigated the influence of product market competition on corporate environmental responsibility and firm performance, and further examined whether managerial competency moderated this influence. Using 2015–16 Newsweek’s green rankings covering 500 of the largest publicly traded US firms, the regression results showed that product market competition tends to discourage firms from addressing environmental challenges. Importantly, however, managerial competency played a positive moderating role in enhancing corporate environmental practices under market competition. Moreover, while product market competition lowered profitability in general, firms with greater environmental efforts retained their profitability under strong competition, although this effect was only found for firms with competent managers. The findings exhibited robustness in several alternative methods, including lagged variables and instrumental variable approaches. This study identifies external factors that influence corporate environmental responsibility and extends the body of knowledge by capturing the moderating role of managerial competency. It also provides insights for policymakers and practitioners regarding environmental management. Strategic integration of corporate environmental responsibility in corporate functioning will pave the way for executing stakeholder sagacity in a competitive environment. Graphical abstract [DISPLAY OMISSION]

Keyword

참고문헌 (64)

J. Corp. Finance Adhikari 37 229 2016 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.12.017 Religion, gambling attitudes and corporate innovation

상세보기
Aghion 2020 Environmental Preferences and Technological Choices: Is Market Competition Clean or Dirty?
Am. Econ. Rev. Avinash 67 297 1977 Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity

상세보기
J. Econ. Manag. Strat. Bagnoli 12 419 2003 10.1111/j.1430-9134.2003.00419.x Selling to socially responsible consumers: competition and the private provision of public goods

상세보기
J. Manag. Barney 17 99 1991 Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Q. J. Econ. Bertrand 118 1169 2003 10.1162/003355303322552775 Managing with style: the effect of managers on firm policies

상세보기
Calif. Manag. Rev. Bhattacharya 47 9 2004 10.2307/41166284 Doing better at doing good: when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives

상세보기
J. Mark. Brown 61 68 1997 The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses

상세보기
Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. Busch 583 2018 10.1002/csr.1480 The robustness of the corporate social and financial performance relation: a second-order meta-analysis

상세보기
Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. Callan 16 61 2009 10.1002/csr.182 Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: an update and reinvestigation

상세보기
J. Manag. Carpenter 30 749 2004 Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition
J. Bus. Ethics Chang 125 211 2014 10.1007/s10551-013-1895-8 The heterogeneous impact of corporate social responsibility activities that target different stakeholders

상세보기
J. Oper. Manag. Chen 65 333 2019 10.1002/joom.1018 Who pays you to be green? How customers’ environmental practices affect the sales benefits of suppliers’ environmental practices

상세보기
Q. Rev. Econ. Finance Chen 68 171 2018 10.1016/j.qref.2017.09.004 Managerial ability and acquirer returns

상세보기
J. Bus. Ethics Cho 158 467 2019 10.1007/s10551-017-3760-7 Managerial efficiency, corporate social performance, and corporate financial performance

상세보기
Acad. Manag. J. Crossland 57 652 2014 10.5465/amj.2012.0469 CEO career variety: effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty

상세보기
Manag. Sci. Demerjian 58 7 1229 2012 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1487 Quantifying managerial ability: a new measure and validity tests

상세보기
Strat. Manag. J. Duanmu 39 3006 2018 10.1002/smj.2948 Does market competition dampen environmental performance? Evidence from China

상세보기
J. Clean. Prod. Feng 113 781 2016 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.038 Environmental management systems and financial performance: the joint effect of switching cost and competitive intensity

상세보기
J. Econ. Manag. Strat. Fernández-kranz 19 453 2010 Managerial talent and corporate social responsibility (CSR): how do talented managers view corporate social responsibility
J. Econ. Manag. Strat. Fernández-Kranz 19 453 2010 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00258.x When necessity becomes a virtue: the effect of product market competition on corporate social responsibility

상세보기
Economist Fisman 1 2006 A model of corporate philanthropy
Strat. Manag. J. Flammer 36 1469 2015 10.1002/smj.2307 Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization

상세보기
J. Clean. Prod. García-Sánchez 215 1288 2019 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.130 An empirical analysis of the complementarities and substitutions between effects of ceo ability and corporate governance on socially responsible performance

상세보기
Bus. Strat. Environ. García-Sánchez 28 542 2018 10.1002/bse.2263 Chief executive officer ability, corporate social responsibility, and financial performance: the moderating role of the environment

상세보기
J. Finance Giroud 66 563 2011 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01642.x Corporate governance, product market competition, and equity prices

상세보기
J. Bus. Ethics Goll 49 41 2004 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000013862.14941.4e The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance

상세보기
J. Bus. Finance Account. Gray 28 327 2001 10.1111/1468-5957.00376 Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: a research note and extension

상세보기
Res. Int. Bus. Finance Habib 42 262 2017 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.048 Managerial ability, investment efficiency and stock price crash risk

상세보기
Acad. Manag. Rev. Hambrick 9 193 1984 10.2307/258434 Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers

상세보기
Bell J. Econ. Hart 14 366 1983 10.2307/3003639 The market mechanism as an incentive scheme

상세보기
J. Finance Hoberg 69 293 2014 10.1111/jofi.12050 Product market threats, payouts, and financial flexibility

상세보기
J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money Jacoby 58 269 2019 10.1016/j.intfin.2018.11.015 Corporate governance, external control, and environmental information transparency: evidence from emerging markets

상세보기
J. Bank. Finance Jha 60 252 2015 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.08.003 Corporate social responsibility and social capital

상세보기
J. Financ. Econ. Jung 125 48 2017 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.04.005 CEO talent, CEO compensation, and product market competition

상세보기
Inf. Syst. Res. Kim 27 259 2016 10.1287/isre.2016.0620 Does product market competition drive CVC investment? Evidence from the US IT industry

상세보기
Pac. Basin Finance J. Lee 49 60 2018 10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.04.001 Product market competition and corporate social responsibility activities: perspectives from an emerging economy

상세보기
J. Risk Insur. Leverty 79 751 2012 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01443.x Dupes or incompetents? An examination of management’s impact on firm distress

상세보기
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. Link 53 508 2006 10.1109/TEM.2006.883704 Standardization and discretion: does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits?

상세보기
J. Finance Lins 72 1785 2017 10.1111/jofi.12505 Social capital, trust, and firm performance: the value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis

상세보기
J. Corp. Finance Liu 52 118 2018 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.004 Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations

상세보기
J. Mark. Luo 70 1 2006 Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value

상세보기
Soc. Responsib. J. Luth 13 339 2017 10.1108/SRJ-03-2016-0038 Antecedents of corporate social performance: the effects of task environment managerial discretion

상세보기
Acad. Manag. Rev. Mackey 2007 10.5465/amr.2007.25275676 Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies

상세보기
J. Sustain. Account. Manag. Martin 2 15 2018 Corporate social responsibility disclosure and company financial performance: do high and low profile industry moderate the result? Indones
McWilliams 2001 Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective
Asia Pac. J. Manag. Meng 33 267 2016 10.1007/s10490-015-9450-z The impact of product market competition on corporate environmental responsibility

상세보기
J. Corp. Finance Mishra 29 390 2014 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.003 The dark side of CEO ability: CEO general managerial skills and cost of equity capital

상세보기
Organ. Stud. Orlitzky 24 403 2003 10.1177/0170840603024003910 Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis

상세보기
Porter 1985 Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
Bus. Rev. Porter 89 2011 Creating shared value. Harv
J. Econ. Perspect. Porter 9 97 1995 10.1257/jep.9.4.97 Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship

상세보기
J. Manag. Dev. Puopolo 34 729 2015 Does the market reward for going green?
Soc. Bus. Rev. Quairel-Lanoizelee 11 130 2016 10.1108/SBR-04-2016-0026 Are competition and corporate social responsibility compatible? The myth of sustainable competitive advantage

상세보기
Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. Reed 77 897 2015 10.1111/obes.12088 On the practice of lagging variables to avoid simultaneity

상세보기
J. Bus. Ethics Ruf 32 143 2001 10.1023/A:1010786912118 An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: a stakeholder theory perspective
Res. Int. Bus. Finance Sheikh 46 373 2018 10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.04.009 CEO power, product market competition and firm value

상세보기
J. Econ. Bus. Sheikh 98 40 2018 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.07.001 Corporate social responsibility, product market competition, and firm value

상세보기
Ecol. Econ. Vastola 134 267 2017 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.006 Dealing with cultural differences in environmental management: exploring the CEP-CFP relationship

상세보기
Strat. Manag. J. Waddock 18 303 1997 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G The corporate social performance-financial performance link

상세보기
Bus. Strat. Environ. Yadav 25 402 2016 10.1002/bse.1883 Impact of environmental performance on firm value for sustainable investment: evidence from large US firms

상세보기
J. Clean. Prod. Yu 211 628 2019 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.198 The impact of environmental orientation on supplier green management and financial performance: the moderating role of relational capital

상세보기
J. Bus. Ethics Yuan 157 391 2019 10.1007/s10551-017-3622-3 CEO ability and corporate social responsibility

상세보기
J. Bank. Finance Zolotoy 100 218 2019 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.01.015 Local religious norms, corporate social responsibility, and firm value

상세보기

LOADING...

활용도 분석정보

상세보기

다운로드

내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증